[00:27] <Eickmeyer[m]> OvenWerks: Ok, that makes sense. So, removing that code would remove Carla's jackd1 compatibility? Seems worth it to me.
[02:25] <OvenWerks> Well no, not quite that easy, J2 is supposed to be API compatable. It would seem that jackd2 has a bug.
[02:26] <OvenWerks> I expect that falktx will remove a few lines of code from carla/catia untill jackd2 is fixed
[02:28] <OvenWerks> The idea was to make j1 and j2 as close to feature compatable as possible... or at least make j2 have everything j1 has exactly as it is and working before depricating j1
[02:30] <OvenWerks> zita-ajbridge will not change and if it works with j1 specific features then this bug effectively means j2 is not yet done in this feature.
[02:33] <OvenWerks> BTW, catia is not quite the same as Carla's patchbay yet.
[02:36] <OvenWerks> despite what falktx said in #lad there is at least one more bug in it... there are "ghost" client boxes for some items. That is, for zita-ajbridge there is a box with port and another one with just the name... but just zita-ajbridge (well maybe other zita things too) this is probably also a J2 difference.
[03:19] <Eickmeyer[m]> Ok, so it's basically a bug in J2.
[03:45] <OvenWerks> Eickmeyer[m]: FYI, I have had someone send me (email) a controls 2.0.5 log file. It says we are using a variable before it is set... two of them but it looks like similar code. I guess there will be a bug fix 2.0.6 tomorrow or Thursday.
[03:45] <Eickmeyer[m]> Sounds good.
[19:50] <OvenWerks> Eickmeyer[kde]: I think 2.0.6 is ready... have a look I guess
[19:51] <Eickmeyer[m]> OvenWerks: Ack
[19:53] <Eickmeyer[m]> OvenWerks: LGTM. Do you want to tag it or should I?
[19:53] <OvenWerks> you can do that if it all looks ok.
[19:54] <Eickmeyer[m]> Ok.
[20:49] <Eickmeyer[m]> OvenWerks: studio-controls in groovy, backports, Fedora Rawhide. Should be in Fedora 33 in 3 days, Fedora 32 & 31 in a week.