| === pieq_ is now known as pieq | ||
| LocutusOfBorg | <LocutusOfBorg> can anybody please hint petsc4py/ppc64el regressed in relase and Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969715 ? | 06:37 |
|---|---|---|
| LocutusOfBorg | <ubot5> Debian bug 969715 in src:petsc4py "petsc4py: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el" [Serious,Open] | 06:37 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 969715 in src:petsc4py "petsc4py: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el" [Serious,Open] | 06:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, hello, I see python-blinker has no rdeps now... https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blinker/1.4+dfsg1-0.3ubuntu1 time to revert it? this means we can NBS cleanup python-nose and let it finally migrate | 06:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logwatch (bionic-proposed/main) [7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1.1 => 7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1.2] (ubuntu-server) | 06:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logwatch (focal-proposed/main) [7.5.2-1ubuntu1 => 7.5.2-1ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server) | 06:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logwatch (xenial-proposed/main) [7.4.2-1ubuntu1 => 7.4.2-1ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server) | 06:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1] (kernel) | 09:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1] (kernel) | 09:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (focal-proposed/main) [2.13.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.13.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-server) | 09:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 09:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 09:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 09:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 09:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (focal-proposed/main) [1.2.2-1ubuntu0.2 => 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.3] (no packageset) | 09:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 09:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 09:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 09:58 | |
| doko | Laney, vorlon, rbalint: the new glibc makes some packages uninstallable (upper dependency), like libnss-db. However I don't see these mentioned in update_excuses or update_output. why not? | 09:59 |
| doko | rbalint, maybe don't update yet, so we can investigate | 09:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 09:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 09:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1] | 10:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1] | 10:00 | |
| doko | update_output_notst doesn't show these either | 10:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 10:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 10:07 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, did you see my message wrt python above? | 10:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 10:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1096.106] (no packageset) | 10:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1084.95~16.04.1] (kernel) | 10:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] | 11:38 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | hello seb128, question: do you think openexr is worth an FFe? | 11:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I already did the work on bileto, might be ready to publish | 11:39 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, hey, sorry but I don't know enough about the package to say | 11:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ack | 11:42 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openexr/+bug/1895134 | 12:01 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1895134 in openexr (Ubuntu) "[Ffe] openexr" [Undecided,New] | 12:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | if anybody wants to have a look... | 12:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel [source] (focal-proposed) [38-2~ubuntu20.04.1] | 12:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1084.95~16.04.1] | 12:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1096.106] | 13:07 | |
| rbalint | doko, i've uploaded the no change rebuilds for the packages made uninstallable by glibc | 13:52 |
| rbalint | doko, nvidia-cuda-toolkit is pending | 13:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1054.58~16.04.1] (kernel) | 14:33 | |
| === popey8 is now known as popey | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: finalrd (bionic-proposed/main) [3~ubuntu18.04.0 => 6~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: finalrd (xenial-proposed/primary) [6~ubuntu16.04.1] | 14:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: finalrd (focal-proposed/main) [5 => 6~ubuntu20.04.1] (core) | 14:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1054.58~16.04.1] | 15:08 | |
| vorlon | rbalint: a lot of new autopkgtests reported as regressions on i386 for glibc, do you know why given that we just had a glibc autopkgtest run? | 15:58 |
| vorlon | rbalint: (and it looks like these are actual i386 whitelisted packages, not false positives) | 15:59 |
| vorlon | Broken libc6-dev:i386 Breaks on libc6-dev-i386-cross:amd64 < none -> 2.31-0ubunt | 15:59 |
| vorlon | u9cross1 @un puN > (< 2.32~) | 15:59 |
| vorlon | are we missing an upload of the cross-toolchain? | 15:59 |
| seb128 | vorlon, https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/09/10/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t12:03 | 16:00 |
| vorlon | k | 16:00 |
| vorlon | doko: ^^ is a cross-toolchain upload something you would help handle? | 16:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, please is it ok to hint petsc4py on ppc64el, given that is regressed in release please? (there is an RC bug open in Debian, see above) | 16:04 |
| rbalint | vorlon, i'm testing a fix | 16:06 |
| vorlon | rbalint: ok | 16:06 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: where do you see that it's regressed in release? all the recent tests against the release version seem to have passed | 16:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, actually the release -4 is adding two new tests, run-tests-64, and run-demos-64, and the first is failing | 16:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, its broken in release, meaning that we never ran such tests there | 16:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969715 | 16:14 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 969715 in src:petsc4py "petsc4py: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el" [Serious,Open] | 16:14 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: so what about neutering the test on ppc64el instead, so we still get good test coverage from the others? | 16:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mmm mark as flaky maybe? or you mean a return 0? | 16:15 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: either way | 16:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I was wondering about a force-reset | 16:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | to avoid delta | 16:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but I can do it, sure | 16:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | uploaded | 16:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, FYI I'm about to upload a python-blinker in sync with Debian (so, dropping python2 package), this way python-nose can be NBS-cleanup and migrate, I hope it is ok... | 16:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I don't see any reverse dependency left now | 16:21 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: no FFe required for dropping the python2 package, certainly | 16:27 |
| rbalint | vorlon, i'll leave it for doko tomorrow, it builds for 4 hours anyway so i would not be around to test if my fix is correct | 16:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, so, please NBS cleanup them both :D | 16:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blinker/1.4+dfsg1-0.3ubuntu2 | 16:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | /usr/include/libdap/xdr-datatypes.h:16:10: fatal error: rpc/types.h: No such file or directory | 16:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yay glibc! | 16:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | how to break gdal via bad include headers... | 16:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | rbalint, ^^ this looks like a serious glibc bug? | 16:48 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, port to tirpc | 16:48 |
| LocutusOfBorg | what is that? | 16:48 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, transport-independent RPC library | 16:48 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, brand new thing from Sun :-) | 16:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ok, but this breaks lots of software... | 16:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=rpc%2Ftypes.h&literal=1 | 16:49 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, just rebuilds, not built ones | 16:50 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, see LP: #1894434 | 16:50 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1894434 in glibc (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please accept glibc 2.32-0ubuntu1 to Groovy" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894434 | 16:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mmm rbalint libdap is shown as good on that bileto, but every reverse-dependency of it is broken | 16:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | meh I give up, I don't know how and what to fix... | 16:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | no change rebuild libdap shows "checking for TIRPC... yes" so maybe it just works | 16:59 |
| === paride is now known as paride|off | ||
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: it's not NBS until it migrates | 19:00 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, there is a minimal proting guide at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SunRPCRemoval#Scope , but i'd like to get glibc migrated if it has no regressions instead of adding new entangled packages to the (non-)transition | 19:30 |
| rbalint | porting | 19:30 |
| vorlon | 9base/s390x is weird, why does an upgrade of glibc provoke a stack smash with a garbage backtrace | 19:58 |
| vorlon | well, fixed by a no-change rebuild of 9base | 19:59 |
| vorlon | but only if I rebuild against the new libc6-dev | 20:04 |
| vorlon | rbalint: ^^ | 20:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel) | 20:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel) | 20:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel) | 20:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel) | 20:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52] | 21:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52] | 21:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52] | 21:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52] | 21:02 | |
| bdmurray | I can see disco test results for apport and autopkgtest but I can't actually access the log files. Is that expected? | 21:14 |
| bdmurray | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/apport/disco/amd64 | 21:15 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: I believe the log files should have been deleted as part of EOL cleanup | 21:28 |
| vorlon | the most recent success for apport in disco should've been copied forward to the eoan page | 21:29 |
| vorlon | rbalint: LP: #1851263 looks like it should have a better test case description; perhaps documenting what was done in terms of archive-wide testing for the new glibc | 21:29 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1851263 in glibc (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS bump Glibc 2.27 to the latest stable" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1851263 | 21:29 |
| bdmurray | Okay, the error message is "Unauthorized" which is confusing. | 21:29 |
| vorlon | huh not sure why it gives that message vs a 404 | 21:33 |
| vorlon | I've put off cleaning up the database for EOL releases because it didn't seem critical in terms of resource utilization | 21:34 |
| vorlon | and there might be some stats we want to preserve | 21:34 |
| ahasenack | hi release team, gentle ping about an openldap FFe: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1894838 | 21:35 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1894838 in openldap (Ubuntu) "FFe: update to 2.4.53, fixing crash bugs" [High,New] | 21:35 |
| ginggs | LocutusOfBorg: the petsc4py failure is different in Ubuntu and Debian. In Debian, I suspect it's due to ucx support in openmpi. In Ubuntu it looks like OOM to me | 21:42 |
| ginggs | any chance we could try petsc4py autopkgtests on the yuge instances? | 21:43 |
| bdmurray | ginggs: Do you mean the ones with more memory? | 22:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glibc [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.27-3ubuntu1.3] | 23:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.26] | 23:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1026.26~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1026.26] (core, kernel) | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 23:53 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!