=== pieq_ is now known as pieq
LocutusOfBorg<LocutusOfBorg> can anybody please hint petsc4py/ppc64el regressed in relase and Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969715 ?06:37
LocutusOfBorg<ubot5> Debian bug 969715 in src:petsc4py "petsc4py: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el" [Serious,Open]06:37
ubot5Debian bug 969715 in src:petsc4py "petsc4py: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el" [Serious,Open]06:37
LocutusOfBorgdoko, hello, I see python-blinker has no rdeps now... https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blinker/1.4+dfsg1-0.3ubuntu1 time to revert it? this means we can NBS cleanup python-nose and let it finally migrate06:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logwatch (bionic-proposed/main) [7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1.1 => 7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1.2] (ubuntu-server)06:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logwatch (focal-proposed/main) [7.5.2-1ubuntu1 => 7.5.2-1ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server)06:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logwatch (xenial-proposed/main) [7.4.2-1ubuntu1 => 7.4.2-1ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server)06:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1] (kernel)09:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1] (kernel)09:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (focal-proposed/main) [2.13.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.13.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-server)09:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)09:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)09:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)09:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)09:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (focal-proposed/main) [1.2.2-1ubuntu0.2 => 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.3] (no packageset)09:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)09:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)09:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)09:58
dokoLaney, vorlon, rbalint: the new glibc makes some packages uninstallable (upper dependency), like libnss-db. However I don't see these mentioned in update_excuses or update_output. why not?09:59
dokorbalint, maybe don't update yet, so we can investigate09:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)09:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)09:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1]10:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1]10:00
dokoupdate_output_notst doesn't show these either10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)10:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)10:07
LocutusOfBorgdoko, did you see my message wrt python above?10:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)10:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1096.106] (no packageset)10:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1084.95~16.04.1] (kernel)10:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1]11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1]11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1]11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2]11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2]11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2]11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1]11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2]11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2]11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1]11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2]11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2]11:38
LocutusOfBorghello seb128, question: do you think openexr is worth an FFe?11:39
LocutusOfBorgI already did the work on bileto, might be ready to publish11:39
seb128LocutusOfBorg, hey, sorry but I don't know enough about the package to say11:41
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1895134 in openexr (Ubuntu) "[Ffe] openexr" [Undecided,New]12:01
LocutusOfBorgif anybody wants to have a look...12:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel [source] (focal-proposed) [38-2~ubuntu20.04.1]12:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1084.95~16.04.1]12:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1096.106]13:07
rbalintdoko, i've uploaded the no change rebuilds for the packages made uninstallable by glibc13:52
rbalintdoko, nvidia-cuda-toolkit is pending13:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1054.58~16.04.1] (kernel)14:33
=== popey8 is now known as popey
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: finalrd (bionic-proposed/main) [3~ubuntu18.04.0 => 6~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)14:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: finalrd (xenial-proposed/primary) [6~ubuntu16.04.1]14:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: finalrd (focal-proposed/main) [5 => 6~ubuntu20.04.1] (core)14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1054.58~16.04.1]15:08
vorlonrbalint: a lot of new autopkgtests reported as regressions on i386 for glibc, do you know why given that we just had a glibc autopkgtest run?15:58
vorlonrbalint: (and it looks like these are actual i386 whitelisted packages, not false positives)15:59
vorlonBroken libc6-dev:i386 Breaks on libc6-dev-i386-cross:amd64 < none -> 2.31-0ubunt15:59
vorlonu9cross1 @un puN > (< 2.32~)15:59
vorlonare we missing an upload of the cross-toolchain?15:59
seb128vorlon, https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/09/10/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t12:0316:00
vorlondoko: ^^ is a cross-toolchain upload something you would help handle?16:00
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, please is it ok to hint petsc4py on ppc64el, given that is regressed in release please? (there is an RC bug open in Debian, see above)16:04
rbalintvorlon, i'm testing a fix16:06
vorlonrbalint: ok16:06
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: where do you see that it's regressed in release? all the recent tests against the release version seem to have passed16:07
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, actually the release -4 is adding two new tests, run-tests-64, and run-demos-64, and the first is failing16:13
LocutusOfBorgso, its broken in release, meaning that we never ran such tests there16:13
ubot5Debian bug 969715 in src:petsc4py "petsc4py: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el" [Serious,Open]16:14
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: so what about neutering the test on ppc64el instead, so we still get good test coverage from the others?16:14
LocutusOfBorgmmm mark as flaky maybe? or you mean a return 0?16:15
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: either way16:15
LocutusOfBorgI was wondering about a force-reset16:15
LocutusOfBorgto avoid delta16:15
LocutusOfBorgbut I can do it, sure16:15
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, FYI I'm about to upload a python-blinker in sync with Debian (so, dropping python2 package), this way python-nose can be NBS-cleanup and migrate, I hope it is ok...16:20
LocutusOfBorgI don't see any reverse dependency left now16:21
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: no FFe required for dropping the python2 package, certainly16:27
rbalintvorlon, i'll leave it for doko tomorrow, it builds for 4 hours anyway so i would not be around to test if my fix is correct16:31
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, so, please NBS cleanup them both :D16:32
LocutusOfBorg /usr/include/libdap/xdr-datatypes.h:16:10: fatal error: rpc/types.h: No such file or directory16:37
LocutusOfBorgyay glibc!16:37
LocutusOfBorghow to break gdal via bad include headers...16:38
LocutusOfBorgrbalint, ^^ this looks like a serious glibc bug?16:48
rbalintLocutusOfBorg, port to tirpc16:48
LocutusOfBorgwhat is that?16:48
rbalintLocutusOfBorg, transport-independent RPC library16:48
rbalintLocutusOfBorg, brand new thing from Sun :-)16:49
LocutusOfBorgok, but this breaks lots of software...16:49
rbalintLocutusOfBorg, just rebuilds, not built ones16:50
rbalintLocutusOfBorg, see LP: #189443416:50
ubot5Launchpad bug 1894434 in glibc (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please accept glibc 2.32-0ubuntu1 to Groovy" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189443416:50
LocutusOfBorgmmm rbalint libdap is shown as good on that bileto, but every reverse-dependency of it is broken16:53
LocutusOfBorgmeh I give up, I don't know how and what to fix...16:57
LocutusOfBorgno change rebuild libdap shows "checking for TIRPC... yes" so maybe it just works16:59
=== paride is now known as paride|off
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: it's not NBS until it migrates19:00
rbalintLocutusOfBorg, there is a minimal proting guide at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SunRPCRemoval#Scope , but i'd like to get glibc migrated if it has no regressions instead of adding new entangled packages to the (non-)transition19:30
vorlon9base/s390x is weird, why does an upgrade of glibc provoke a stack smash with a garbage backtrace19:58
vorlonwell, fixed by a no-change rebuild of 9base19:59
vorlonbut only if I rebuild against the new libc6-dev20:04
vorlonrbalint: ^^20:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel)20:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel)20:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel)20:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel)20:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52]21:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52]21:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52]21:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52]21:02
bdmurrayI can see disco test results for apport and autopkgtest but I can't actually access the log files. Is that expected?21:14
vorlonbdmurray: I believe the log files should have been deleted as part of EOL cleanup21:28
vorlonthe most recent success for apport in disco should've been copied forward to the eoan page21:29
vorlonrbalint: LP: #1851263 looks like it should have a better test case description; perhaps documenting what was done in terms of archive-wide testing for the new glibc21:29
ubot5Launchpad bug 1851263 in glibc (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS bump Glibc 2.27 to the latest stable" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185126321:29
bdmurrayOkay, the error message is "Unauthorized" which is confusing.21:29
vorlonhuh not sure why it gives that message vs a 40421:33
vorlonI've put off cleaning up the database for EOL releases because it didn't seem critical in terms of resource utilization21:34
vorlonand there might be some stats we want to preserve21:34
ahasenackhi release team, gentle ping about an openldap FFe: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/189483821:35
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1894838 in openldap (Ubuntu) "FFe: update to 2.4.53, fixing crash bugs" [High,New]21:35
ginggsLocutusOfBorg: the petsc4py failure is different in Ubuntu and Debian.  In Debian, I suspect it's due to ucx support in openmpi.  In Ubuntu it looks like OOM to me21:42
ginggsany chance we could try petsc4py autopkgtests on the yuge instances?21:43
bdmurrayginggs: Do you mean the ones with more memory?22:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glibc [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.27-3ubuntu1.3]23:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.26]23:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1026.26~18.04.1] (no packageset)23:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset)23:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset)23:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1026.26] (core, kernel)23:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset)23:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset)23:53

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!