 can anybody please hint petsc4py/ppc64el regressed in relase and Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969715 ?
 Debian bug 969715 in src:petsc4py "petsc4py: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el" [Serious,Open]
[06:40] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, hello, I see python-blinker has no rdeps now... https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blinker/1.4+dfsg1-0.3ubuntu1 time to revert it? this means we can NBS cleanup python-nose and let it finally migrate
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logwatch (bionic-proposed/main) [7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1.1 => 7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1.2] (ubuntu-server)
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logwatch (focal-proposed/main) [7.5.2-1ubuntu1 => 7.5.2-1ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server)
[06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logwatch (xenial-proposed/main) [7.4.2-1ubuntu1 => 7.4.2-1ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server)
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1] (kernel)
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1] (kernel)
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (focal-proposed/main) [2.13.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.13.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-server)
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (focal-proposed/main) [1.2.2-1ubuntu0.2 => 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.3] (no packageset)
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[09:59] <doko> Laney, vorlon, rbalint: the new glibc makes some packages uninstallable (upper dependency), like libnss-db. However I don't see these mentioned in update_excuses or update_output. why not?
[09:59] <doko> rbalint, maybe don't update yet, so we can investigate
[09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1]
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1]
[10:01] <doko> update_output_notst doesn't show these either
[10:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[10:38] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, did you see my message wrt python above?
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1096.106] (no packageset)
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1084.95~16.04.1] (kernel)
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2]
[11:39] <LocutusOfBorg> hello seb128, question: do you think openexr is worth an FFe?
[11:39] <LocutusOfBorg> I already did the work on bileto, might be ready to publish
[11:41] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, hey, sorry but I don't know enough about the package to say
[11:42] <LocutusOfBorg> ack
[12:01] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openexr/+bug/1895134
[12:01] <LocutusOfBorg> if anybody wants to have a look...
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel [source] (focal-proposed) [38-2~ubuntu20.04.1]
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1084.95~16.04.1]
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1096.106]
[13:52] <rbalint> doko, i've uploaded the no change rebuilds for the packages made uninstallable by glibc
[13:53] <rbalint> doko, nvidia-cuda-toolkit is pending
[14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1054.58~16.04.1] (kernel)
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: finalrd (bionic-proposed/main) [3~ubuntu18.04.0 => 6~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: finalrd (xenial-proposed/primary) [6~ubuntu16.04.1]
[14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: finalrd (focal-proposed/main) [5 => 6~ubuntu20.04.1] (core)
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1054.58~16.04.1]
[15:58] <vorlon> rbalint: a lot of new autopkgtests reported as regressions on i386 for glibc, do you know why given that we just had a glibc autopkgtest run?
[15:59] <vorlon> rbalint: (and it looks like these are actual i386 whitelisted packages, not false positives)
[15:59] <vorlon> Broken libc6-dev:i386 Breaks on libc6-dev-i386-cross:amd64 < none -> 2.31-0ubunt
[15:59] <vorlon> u9cross1 @un puN > (< 2.32~)
[15:59] <vorlon> are we missing an upload of the cross-toolchain?
[16:00] <seb128> vorlon, https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/09/10/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t12:03
[16:00] <vorlon> k
[16:00] <vorlon> doko: ^^ is a cross-toolchain upload something you would help handle?
[16:04] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, please is it ok to hint petsc4py on ppc64el, given that is regressed in release please? (there is an RC bug open in Debian, see above)
[16:06] <rbalint> vorlon, i'm testing a fix
[16:06] <vorlon> rbalint: ok
[16:07] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: where do you see that it's regressed in release? all the recent tests against the release version seem to have passed
[16:13] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, actually the release -4 is adding two new tests, run-tests-64, and run-demos-64, and the first is failing
[16:13] <LocutusOfBorg> so, its broken in release, meaning that we never ran such tests there
[16:14] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969715
[16:14] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: so what about neutering the test on ppc64el instead, so we still get good test coverage from the others?
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm mark as flaky maybe? or you mean a return 0?
[16:15] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: either way
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg> I was wondering about a force-reset
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg> to avoid delta
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg> but I can do it, sure
[16:19] <LocutusOfBorg> uploaded
[16:20] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, FYI I'm about to upload a python-blinker in sync with Debian (so, dropping python2 package), this way python-nose can be NBS-cleanup and migrate, I hope it is ok...
[16:21] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't see any reverse dependency left now
[16:27] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: no FFe required for dropping the python2 package, certainly
[16:31] <rbalint> vorlon, i'll leave it for doko tomorrow, it builds for 4 hours anyway so i would not be around to test if my fix is correct
[16:32] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, so, please NBS cleanup them both :D
[16:32] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blinker/1.4+dfsg1-0.3ubuntu2
[16:37] <LocutusOfBorg>  /usr/include/libdap/xdr-datatypes.h:16:10: fatal error: rpc/types.h: No such file or directory
[16:37] <LocutusOfBorg> yay glibc!
[16:38] <LocutusOfBorg> how to break gdal via bad include headers...
[16:48] <LocutusOfBorg> rbalint, ^^ this looks like a serious glibc bug?
[16:48] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, port to tirpc
[16:48] <LocutusOfBorg> what is that?
[16:48] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, transport-independent RPC library
[16:49] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, brand new thing from Sun :-)
[16:49] <LocutusOfBorg> ok, but this breaks lots of software...
[16:49] <LocutusOfBorg> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=rpc%2Ftypes.h&literal=1
[16:50] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, just rebuilds, not built ones
[16:50] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, see LP: #1894434
[16:53] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm rbalint libdap is shown as good on that bileto, but every reverse-dependency of it is broken
[16:57] <LocutusOfBorg> meh I give up, I don't know how and what to fix...
[16:59] <LocutusOfBorg> no change rebuild libdap shows "checking for TIRPC... yes" so maybe it just works
[19:00] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: it's not NBS until it migrates
[19:30] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, there is a minimal proting guide at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SunRPCRemoval#Scope , but i'd like to get glibc migrated if it has no regressions instead of adding new entangled packages to the (non-)transition
[19:30] <rbalint> porting
[19:58] <vorlon> 9base/s390x is weird, why does an upgrade of glibc provoke a stack smash with a garbage backtrace
[19:59] <vorlon> well, fixed by a no-change rebuild of 9base
[20:04] <vorlon> but only if I rebuild against the new libc6-dev
[20:04] <vorlon> rbalint: ^^
[20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel)
[20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel)
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel)
[20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel)
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52]
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52]
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52]
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52]
[21:14] <bdmurray> I can see disco test results for apport and autopkgtest but I can't actually access the log files. Is that expected?
[21:15] <bdmurray> http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/apport/disco/amd64
[21:28] <vorlon> bdmurray: I believe the log files should have been deleted as part of EOL cleanup
[21:29] <vorlon> the most recent success for apport in disco should've been copied forward to the eoan page
[21:29] <vorlon> rbalint: LP: #1851263 looks like it should have a better test case description; perhaps documenting what was done in terms of archive-wide testing for the new glibc
[21:29] <bdmurray> Okay, the error message is "Unauthorized" which is confusing.
[21:33] <vorlon> huh not sure why it gives that message vs a 404
[21:34] <vorlon> I've put off cleaning up the database for EOL releases because it didn't seem critical in terms of resource utilization
[21:34] <vorlon> and there might be some stats we want to preserve
[21:35] <ahasenack> hi release team, gentle ping about an openldap FFe: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1894838
[21:42] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: the petsc4py failure is different in Ubuntu and Debian.  In Debian, I suspect it's due to ucx support in openmpi.  In Ubuntu it looks like OOM to me
[21:43] <ginggs> any chance we could try petsc4py autopkgtests on the yuge instances?
[22:44] <bdmurray> ginggs: Do you mean the ones with more memory?
[23:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glibc [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.27-3ubuntu1.3]
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.26]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1026.26~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1026.26] (core, kernel)
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset)