=== pieq_ is now known as pieq [06:37] can anybody please hint petsc4py/ppc64el regressed in relase and Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969715 ? [06:37] Debian bug 969715 in src:petsc4py "petsc4py: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el" [Serious,Open] [06:37] Debian bug 969715 in src:petsc4py "petsc4py: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el" [Serious,Open] [06:40] doko, hello, I see python-blinker has no rdeps now... https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blinker/1.4+dfsg1-0.3ubuntu1 time to revert it? this means we can NBS cleanup python-nose and let it finally migrate [06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logwatch (bionic-proposed/main) [7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1.1 => 7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1.2] (ubuntu-server) [06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logwatch (focal-proposed/main) [7.5.2-1ubuntu1 => 7.5.2-1ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server) [06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logwatch (xenial-proposed/main) [7.4.2-1ubuntu1 => 7.4.2-1ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server) [09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1] (kernel) [09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1] (kernel) [09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (focal-proposed/main) [2.13.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.13.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-server) [09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (focal-proposed/main) [1.2.2-1ubuntu0.2 => 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.3] (no packageset) [09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [09:59] Laney, vorlon, rbalint: the new glibc makes some packages uninstallable (upper dependency), like libnss-db. However I don't see these mentioned in update_excuses or update_output. why not? [09:59] rbalint, maybe don't update yet, so we can investigate [09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1] [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1] [10:01] update_output_notst doesn't show these either [10:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [10:38] doko, did you see my message wrt python above? [10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1096.106] (no packageset) [10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1084.95~16.04.1] (kernel) [11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] [11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] [11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] [11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] [11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] [11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] [11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] [11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] [11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] [11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [i386] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu1] [11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] [11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [20.09.0-2ubuntu2] [11:39] hello seb128, question: do you think openexr is worth an FFe? [11:39] I already did the work on bileto, might be ready to publish [11:41] LocutusOfBorg, hey, sorry but I don't know enough about the package to say [11:42] ack [12:01] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openexr/+bug/1895134 [12:01] Ubuntu bug 1895134 in openexr (Ubuntu) "[Ffe] openexr" [Undecided,New] [12:01] if anybody wants to have a look... [12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel [source] (focal-proposed) [38-2~ubuntu20.04.1] [12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1084.95~16.04.1] [13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1096.106] [13:52] doko, i've uploaded the no change rebuilds for the packages made uninstallable by glibc [13:53] doko, nvidia-cuda-toolkit is pending [14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1054.58~16.04.1] (kernel) === popey8 is now known as popey [14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: finalrd (bionic-proposed/main) [3~ubuntu18.04.0 => 6~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset) [14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: finalrd (xenial-proposed/primary) [6~ubuntu16.04.1] [14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: finalrd (focal-proposed/main) [5 => 6~ubuntu20.04.1] (core) [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1054.58~16.04.1] [15:58] rbalint: a lot of new autopkgtests reported as regressions on i386 for glibc, do you know why given that we just had a glibc autopkgtest run? [15:59] rbalint: (and it looks like these are actual i386 whitelisted packages, not false positives) [15:59] Broken libc6-dev:i386 Breaks on libc6-dev-i386-cross:amd64 < none -> 2.31-0ubunt [15:59] u9cross1 @un puN > (< 2.32~) [15:59] are we missing an upload of the cross-toolchain? [16:00] vorlon, https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/09/10/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t12:03 [16:00] k [16:00] doko: ^^ is a cross-toolchain upload something you would help handle? [16:04] vorlon, please is it ok to hint petsc4py on ppc64el, given that is regressed in release please? (there is an RC bug open in Debian, see above) [16:06] vorlon, i'm testing a fix [16:06] rbalint: ok [16:07] LocutusOfBorg: where do you see that it's regressed in release? all the recent tests against the release version seem to have passed [16:13] vorlon, actually the release -4 is adding two new tests, run-tests-64, and run-demos-64, and the first is failing [16:13] so, its broken in release, meaning that we never ran such tests there [16:14] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969715 [16:14] Debian bug 969715 in src:petsc4py "petsc4py: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el" [Serious,Open] [16:14] LocutusOfBorg: so what about neutering the test on ppc64el instead, so we still get good test coverage from the others? [16:15] mmm mark as flaky maybe? or you mean a return 0? [16:15] LocutusOfBorg: either way [16:15] I was wondering about a force-reset [16:15] to avoid delta [16:15] but I can do it, sure [16:19] uploaded [16:20] vorlon, FYI I'm about to upload a python-blinker in sync with Debian (so, dropping python2 package), this way python-nose can be NBS-cleanup and migrate, I hope it is ok... [16:21] I don't see any reverse dependency left now [16:27] LocutusOfBorg: no FFe required for dropping the python2 package, certainly [16:31] vorlon, i'll leave it for doko tomorrow, it builds for 4 hours anyway so i would not be around to test if my fix is correct [16:32] vorlon, so, please NBS cleanup them both :D [16:32] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blinker/1.4+dfsg1-0.3ubuntu2 [16:37] /usr/include/libdap/xdr-datatypes.h:16:10: fatal error: rpc/types.h: No such file or directory [16:37] yay glibc! [16:38] how to break gdal via bad include headers... [16:48] rbalint, ^^ this looks like a serious glibc bug? [16:48] LocutusOfBorg, port to tirpc [16:48] what is that? [16:48] LocutusOfBorg, transport-independent RPC library [16:49] LocutusOfBorg, brand new thing from Sun :-) [16:49] ok, but this breaks lots of software... [16:49] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=rpc%2Ftypes.h&literal=1 [16:50] LocutusOfBorg, just rebuilds, not built ones [16:50] LocutusOfBorg, see LP: #1894434 [16:50] Launchpad bug 1894434 in glibc (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please accept glibc 2.32-0ubuntu1 to Groovy" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894434 [16:53] mmm rbalint libdap is shown as good on that bileto, but every reverse-dependency of it is broken [16:57] meh I give up, I don't know how and what to fix... [16:59] no change rebuild libdap shows "checking for TIRPC... yes" so maybe it just works === paride is now known as paride|off [19:00] LocutusOfBorg: it's not NBS until it migrates [19:30] LocutusOfBorg, there is a minimal proting guide at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SunRPCRemoval#Scope , but i'd like to get glibc migrated if it has no regressions instead of adding new entangled packages to the (non-)transition [19:30] porting [19:58] 9base/s390x is weird, why does an upgrade of glibc provoke a stack smash with a garbage backtrace [19:59] well, fixed by a no-change rebuild of 9base [20:04] but only if I rebuild against the new libc6-dev [20:04] rbalint: ^^ [20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel) [20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel) [20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel) [20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52] (core, kernel) [21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52] [21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52] [21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52] [21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52] [21:14] I can see disco test results for apport and autopkgtest but I can't actually access the log files. Is that expected? [21:15] http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/apport/disco/amd64 [21:28] bdmurray: I believe the log files should have been deleted as part of EOL cleanup [21:29] the most recent success for apport in disco should've been copied forward to the eoan page [21:29] rbalint: LP: #1851263 looks like it should have a better test case description; perhaps documenting what was done in terms of archive-wide testing for the new glibc [21:29] Launchpad bug 1851263 in glibc (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS bump Glibc 2.27 to the latest stable" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1851263 [21:29] Okay, the error message is "Unauthorized" which is confusing. [21:33] huh not sure why it gives that message vs a 404 [21:34] I've put off cleaning up the database for EOL releases because it didn't seem critical in terms of resource utilization [21:34] and there might be some stats we want to preserve [21:35] hi release team, gentle ping about an openldap FFe: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1894838 [21:35] Ubuntu bug 1894838 in openldap (Ubuntu) "FFe: update to 2.4.53, fixing crash bugs" [High,New] [21:42] LocutusOfBorg: the petsc4py failure is different in Ubuntu and Debian. In Debian, I suspect it's due to ucx support in openmpi. In Ubuntu it looks like OOM to me [21:43] any chance we could try petsc4py autopkgtests on the yuge instances? [22:44] ginggs: Do you mean the ones with more memory? [23:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glibc [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.27-3ubuntu1.3] [23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.26] [23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1026.26~18.04.1] (no packageset) [23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset) [23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset) [23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1026.26] (core, kernel) [23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset) [23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1] (no packageset)