[00:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glibc [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [2.27-3ubuntu1.3] (core)
[04:54] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, negative Run 64-bit tests (single processor) with python3 for complex build
[04:54] <LocutusOfBorg> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/ppc64el/p/petsc4py/6928244/log.gz
[04:55] <LocutusOfBorg> to me, looks like debian has the same test failure as ubuntu + one more new failure
[05:02] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, nose cleanup now please?
[05:02] <LocutusOfBorg> rbalint, gdal is entangled with poppler, so we have to fix it now...
[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1026.26]
[05:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1026.26~18.04.1]
[05:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1]
[05:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1]
[05:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1]
[05:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-48.52~18.04.1]
[07:17] <rbalint> doko, glibc needs a gcc-9 rebuild, but i did not trigger it in case you would like to add more changes
[08:45] <doko> rbalint: is this because of s390x symbols?
[08:50] <rbalint> doko, yes
[08:53] <doko> ok, I'll prepare one, just minor upstream updates
[08:58] <rbalint> doko, thanks!
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glibc [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.27-3ubuntu1.3]
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1024.24] (no packageset)
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1096.106~16.04.1] (kernel)
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1096.106~16.04.1]
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1024.24]
[11:22] <ginggs> bdmurray: yes, I meant adding petsc4py to big_packages, but locutus is trying something else
[11:28] <rbalint> ubuntu-archive please drop libxml-commons-external-java-doc from groovy-proposed, it is not built anymore
[11:29] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, how is debian compared to memory on ppc64el w.r.t ubuntu?
[11:30] <apw> rbalint, looking
[11:31] <apw> rbalint, gone
[11:34] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: I don't know about debian, but iirc ubuntu has 1.5GB
[11:35]  * ginggs asks
[11:37] <LocutusOfBorg> it would be nice, because it seems failing on the same way in Debian, so this way we can exclude a memory issue maybe
[11:41] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: I still don't get why you think the failure is the same
[11:51] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: most autopkgtest workers in Debian have 8GB
[12:30] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, I see on the link above the same segfault...
[12:30] <LocutusOfBorg> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/ppc64el/p/petsc4py/6928244/log.gz
[12:30] <LocutusOfBorg> debian has the same ubuntu failure + another
[12:30] <LocutusOfBorg> unless I did a mistake in parsing the log
[12:36] <kanashiro> LocutusOfBorg: re rails 6: I talked to the Debian maintainer and there is a known issue with webpack in non-amd64, for instance 'rails new app-name' would not work properly in non-amd64. So I'd suggest to wait for a fix before we move on with the transition, likely leave it for the next cycle
[12:37] <LocutusOfBorg> kanashiro, isn't the issue already in release? or is it a new issue with rails 6?
[12:40] <kanashiro> LocutusOfBorg: it is an issue with rails 6, they tried to work around some JS issues they had but turns out they have this webpack issue now
[12:40] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[12:47] <kanashiro> yw
[13:30] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, are you available for an NBS-proposed cleanup please? old binaries left on amd64: python-nose (from 1.3.7-6)
[13:32] <LocutusOfBorg> also, if we remove barrier on riscv64, we can have it migrate...
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.6.0-1028.28] (no packageset)
[13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1028.28]
[13:40] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, python-nose gone
[13:45] <coreycb> hello, could I get input from someone on the release team on a discussion we're having in #ubuntu-devel about incompatibility of dnspython 2.0.0 with eventlet in groovy?
[13:45] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[13:46] <coreycb> I'm thinking we need to do cut a dnspython 2.0.0.really.1.16.0-0ubuntu1 version due to the incompatibilities with eventlet
[14:19] <coreycb> hello release team, just fyi - I'm uploading a new stable point release for pyroute2 to groovy to align with openstack victoria dependencies as it contains needed bug fixes. bumping from 0.5.9->0.5.13. it is mostly an openstack dependency but there are a few other packages that depend on it.
[14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (bionic-proposed/main) [2:12.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 2:12.1.1-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[14:57] <xnox> coreycb:  hm, can we not upgrade eventlet?
[14:57] <xnox> coreycb:  is incompatiblity large?
[14:58] <coreycb> xnox: eventlet isn't patched yet
[14:59] <xnox> coreycb:  yeah, and it looks like a big pile of sadness.
[15:00] <coreycb> xnox: eventlet without bugs is a big pile of sadness :)
[15:05] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: nose cleanup> done
[15:06] <vorlon> rbalint: libxml-commons-external-java-doc done
[15:08] <LocutusOfBorg> <3
[15:09] <coreycb> xnox: unless something lands soon for eventlet, I don't see us patching it ourselves.
[15:10] <coreycb> and eventlet is broken in a few different ways with dnspython 2.0.0 as noted in https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/issues/619
[15:12] <icey> and eventlet isn't the only thing that's broken - designate explicitly depends on APIs that are different between the two different versions
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel (focal-proposed/universe) [31-1 => 31-1ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:16.1.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[15:47] <rbalint> vorlon, 9base's command14 autpkgtest crashes locally for me in release locally, submitting a retry with hello to test base
[15:48] <vorlon> rbalint: you have a local mainframe? :-)
[15:48] <vorlon> (the test failure was only s390x)
[15:48] <vorlon> when I tested it in canonistack it worked against release
[15:48] <rbalint> vorlon, local to canonical's internal network :-)
[15:49] <vorlon> right, virtually local
[15:49] <rbalint> vorlon, https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/c679prgqKy/
[15:50] <vorlon> right. hmm
[15:50] <vorlon> that definitely doesn't match my "local" test results
[15:50] <rbalint> vorlon, it is a fresh lxd test image, maybe you did not use -U ?
[15:51] <vorlon> rbalint: it was a fresh lxd for me also
[15:51] <rbalint> vorlon, ah, also Linux juju-d7a408-generic-21 5.4.0-14-generic #17-Ubuntu SMP Thu Feb 6 22:46:43 UTC 2020 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux
[15:51] <rbalint> vorlon, the vm is upgraded to focal
[15:51] <vorlon> ok
[15:51] <vorlon> mine is bionic
[16:00] <rbalint> vorlon, so a rebuild solved it for sure?
[16:01] <rbalint> vorlon, i'm giving the rebuild a try and just upload a rebuild if it passes
[16:03] <rbalint> vorlon, we don't have a systemd in place to test non-armhf arches in lxc running on older kernels, so there may be other similar failures undetected
[16:04] <rbalint> vorlon, s/systemd/test system/  :-)
[16:04] <vorlon> rbalint: yes a rebuild against new glibc solved it.  a rebuild against old glibc did not
[16:07] <rbalint> vorlon, hm, this is not crashing consistently, it passes once when rebuilding against glibc 2.31, i need to test more
[16:09] <rbalint> vorlon, with fortune being used this is not fully surprising :-)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu31 => 2.04-1ubuntu31] (core)
[16:28] <rbalint> vorlon, still failing with the new glibc LP: #1895321
[16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu31 => 2.04-1ubuntu31] (core)
[16:46] <blackboxsw> tjaalton: thanks for the review on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1893717 I've added the SRU template if that helps the PR requests
[16:47] <blackboxsw> s/PR/upload requests/
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haproxy (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.13-2 => 2.0.13-2ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu32 => 2.04-1ubuntu32] (core)
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu31]
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu31]
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu32]
[19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu32 => 2.04-1ubuntu32] (core)
[19:15] <juliank> vorlon: I see you're as excited as I am about working grub on arm64 :)
[19:16] <vorlon> juliank: :)
[19:32] <LocutusOfBorg> can anybody please bump the hint node-mqtt/4.1.0-1/armhf to 4.2.1-1/armhf? the same timeout...
[19:32] <LocutusOfBorg> (flaky)
[19:34] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: done
[19:34] <LocutusOfBorg> lovely!
[19:38] <LocutusOfBorg> oh... gdal might have a fix
[19:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: rust-im-rc (groovy-proposed/primary) [14.3.0-1]
[20:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-im-rc [sync] (groovy-proposed) [14.3.0-1]
[20:04] <vorlon> lol @ ruby-puppet-syntax, which patched away test failures in a way that makes it build in Debian and ftbfs in Ubuntu, whereas the previous version was the opposite
[20:23] <vorlon> kanashiro: do you want to revert d/p/fix-ruby27-warning.patch in puppet, since Debian fixed this differently and incompatibly in ruby-puppet-syntax?
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-im-rc [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [14.3.0-1] (i386-excludes)
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-im-rc [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [14.3.0-1] (i386-excludes)
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-im-rc [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [14.3.0-1] (i386-excludes)
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-im-rc [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [14.3.0-1]
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-im-rc [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [14.3.0-1]
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-im-rc [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [14.3.0-1]
[23:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1025.25] (core, kernel)
[23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: memcached (focal-proposed/main) [1.5.22-2ubuntu0.1 => 1.5.22-2ubuntu0.2] (ubuntu-server)
[23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1097.107] (kernel)