mwhudsonLocutusOfBorg, xnox: did either of you managed to figure out why the ghc/armhf build took so very long?00:55
mwhudsonwhat https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils64/1+c301:38
RAOFI agree. Wat?04:01
mwhudsonit doesn't list any architecures ubuntu builds for04:17
mwhudsonwhich is fairly special04:17
=== paride|off is now known as paride
LocutusOfBorgmwhudson, yes, sure08:16
LocutusOfBorgI did https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa08:17
LocutusOfBorgupload 8.8.4 to groovy, and 8.6.5 (no change rebuild) to focal08:17
LocutusOfBorgthe groovy build is still ongoing, while the no-change rebuild to focal of the focal version took ~1 day08:17
LocutusOfBorgnow, I backported 8.8.4 to focal, and I'm trying to see if it makes any difference08:17
LocutusOfBorgbuilding 8.8.4 to groovy with gcc-9 didn't help in speeding it up08:17
ubottuddstreet, rafaeldtinoco, rbasak, sil2100, slashd, teward, tsimonq2: DMB ping08:29
LaneyIf someone has time, can you please make the "canonical-oem-metapackage-uploaders" team, add it to the ACL for the "canonical-oem-metapackages" packageset, and then transfer ownership of that set to ~ubuntu-archive?08:30
Laneyall per https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/devel-permissions/2020-August/001555.html08:30
LaneyI'm just mentoring FourDollars through writing the required script08:30
LaneyAh, the team will also need a PPA, can that be created, something like "oem-metapackage-staging"08:32
LocutusOfBorgmwhudson, unfortunately looks like armhf still sucks at remaining up and running for some days... so retry button is being hit hard08:34
sem2peiehello, may I ask again about my WiFi problem? maybe someone can see if I filled out the ticket correctly, I wasn't sure which packages are relevant09:03
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1895333 in linux-hwe-5.4 (Ubuntu) " cannot change the regulatory domain ath10k, QCA9984 (QNAP QWA-AC2600)" [Undecided,New]09:04
mwhudsonLocutusOfBorg: hmmm09:37
rbasakLaney: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-oem-metapackage-uploaders09:42
rbasakSorry I thought I reported back to the thread that I'd done that, but it looks like I didn't09:42
Laneyrbasak: ah, cheers, that's step 1 and 2 already done then09:43
rbasakLaney: I have no objection in principle to hand the packageset over to ~ubuntu-archive to maintain. However the DMB hasn't moved to do that yet. I'd personally like to see some reference documentation on that first, and for ~ubuntu-archive and the DMB to then agree to whatever gets documented.09:46
rbasakLaney: separately I think the DMB need uploader applicants for the new team?09:46
LaneyIs the script reference documentation enough for you, or something else?09:49
LaneyI was just looking at code, that's why I asked, because if we run it currently then it won't have permissions of course09:50
Laneybut I guess not a real issue until we're signed off09:50
Laney(I'm going to poke FourDollars to apply once we're done with the script)09:55
rbasakI don't mind where the documentation lives09:55
rbasakI'd like the social bits documented - what the DMB and ~ubuntu-archive respectively agree to do, what limitations to their actions apply, etc.09:57
LaneyI think the emails contain most of that already, and we can turn that into a wiki page09:58
rbasakFor the DMB I documented the existence of the packageset at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/KnowledgeBase#Canonical_OEM_metapackage_packageset but that's DMB-specific. The script would be a good place to document the detail of the AA/DMB relationship I guess - then both teams can link there09:58
rbasakOr the wiki, sure :)09:58
Laneyslyon: hey, for your info, I just noticed that netplan.io's ppc64el test runs are failing to complete - have just deployed a fix that will make this soon report as a regression instead of endlessly retrying10:25
Laneylooks like it never comes back after the "cloud_init_generate" reboot10:25
slyonThanks Laney! I already talked with Steve and Balint about this problem and I'm currently trying to properly fix this "cloud_init_generate" reboot test... Could you point me to the fix you deployed?10:28
Laneyyou might not be very impressed by it :-)10:30
slyonthank you!10:42
=== Wryhder is now known as Lucas_Gray
xnoxslyon:  somehow i feel instead of reboot test, it should start lxd container and do things to it.12:22
xnoxor something like that.12:23
xnoxslyon:  cause it looks like we are destroying the VM's networking, and it never comes back.12:23
slyonxnox: yes... maybe that would be more robust. The broken network/SSH is fixed already in -0ubuntu3 (from my PPA): https://launchpad.net/~slyon/+archive/ubuntu/netplan – But now it fails with "tar: This does not look like a tar archive; autopkgtest-virt-ssh [23:27:12]: copyup destination failed, status 2". I am not yet able to reproduce this locally..12:26
slyon(see https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy-slyon-netplan/groovy/amd64/n/netplan.io/20200911_232730_31b98@/log.gz)12:26
slyonxnox: For an LXD test I would need to modify the base test-class, tho, as the netplan testsuite is playing with several kernel modules, which is not possible inside containers.12:27
ahasenackdidrocks: hi, I updated realmd last week in groovy, with many patches from fedora/upstream13:32
ahasenackdidrocks: adcli is waiting on an FFe13:32
didrocks999ahasenack: nice! I’ll do some checks on them. thanks for letting me know13:40
bdmurraywaveform: Is there a good spot for bug 1895550?17:01
ubottubug 1895550 in Ubuntu "Ubuntu 18.04.5 release for Raspberry Pi 4 does not boot" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189555017:01
waveformbdmurray, I can take a look at replicating that17:02
bdmurraywaveform: I'm more concerned about what bucket to put raspberry pi bugs in17:05
waveformbdmurray, hmmm - it might be related to either the kernel (which'd be linux-raspi2 for bionic) or firmware (linux-firmware-raspi2 for all releases)17:08
bdmurraywaveform: I thought I'd heard of a forthcoming raspi meta package. Am I remembering correctly?17:09
waveformbdmurray, yes, although as far as I know that's only for groovy; there'll be a raspi-common seed, and others depending on that but I forget what meta-package gets generated from that17:12
mwhudsoncan anyone explain to me why golang-goprotobuf is still in main?23:58
mwhudsonnothing else in main depends on it afaics and it's not seeded23:58
mwhudsonoh it's on component-mismatches :)23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!