[00:51] <vorlon> cross-toolchain-base built; retrying all the glibc-triggered i386 autopkgtest failures now
[02:01] <blackboxsw> RAOF: I think we missed sil2100 today on SRU review but wanted to give you a heads up that we'll probably be pinging tomorrow about Xenial, Bionic and Focal review for cloud-init version 20.3.-2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1893064
[02:02] <RAOF> blackboxsw: Ok. Is this something you'd prefer me to look at today?
[02:02]  * RAOF is not guaranteeing anything at this point.
[02:03] <blackboxsw> we'd ♥a review whenever time permits :). But yes figured I'd ping early as cloud-init reviews tend to be meaty
[02:03] <blackboxsw> and didn't want to go through until Wednesday US if we could avoid it
[02:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (xenial-proposed/main) [1:16.04.30 => 1:16.04.31] (core)
[02:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scilab (bionic-proposed/universe) [6.0.1-7ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 6.0.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[03:35] <tjaalton> RAOF: hey, could you check bionic:xorg-server and focal:alsa-ucm-conf from the respective queues if possible, thanks!
[03:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1003.3]
[04:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scilab (focal-proposed/universe) [6.1.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu3 => 6.1.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)
[05:26] <RAOF> tjaalton: Huh. xorg-server appears to have been superceded by a security upload, sorry.
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xorg-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.6]
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-ucm-conf [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-1ubuntu0.3]
[05:48] <tjaalton> RAOF: huh indeed
[05:49] <tjaalton> I'll fix that in a bit
[06:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.6 => 2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.7] (desktop-core, xorg)
[06:42] <tjaalton> RAOF: thanks for the reviews so far, and if you're still around, the new xorg-server is now on the queue
[07:18] <cpaelzer> vorlon: thanks for your check of the bionic portion of the systemd test hints
[07:18] <cpaelzer> vorlon: I have replied on the bug but agree for now (also there is less blocked on it atm)
[07:19] <cpaelzer> but I have rechecked focal and it hasn't improved at all
[07:19] <cpaelzer> also rbalint gave his +1 on the MP (thanks!)
[07:19] <cpaelzer> and merging it will give ddstreet soem time to prep an upload
[07:19] <cpaelzer> I ahve updated https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-focal-disable-systemd/+merge/390005 summing that up
[07:19] <cpaelzer> and look for an SRU team member to consider merging this one now
[07:19] <cpaelzer> anyone around?
[07:20] <cpaelzer> at this time maybe rbasak RAOF tjaalton ^^ ?
[07:21] <cpaelzer> rbalint: and for 1895576 I'll do some retries if we can reproduce the result you've seen for glibc/cryptsetup or if it was a one off
[07:21] <cpaelzer> hopefulyl we know a bit more when you are back on
[07:25] <vorlon> doko: hmm so, Broken libc6-dev-i386-cross:amd64 Depends on rpcsvc-proto-i386-cross:amd64
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted peony-extensions [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.0.0-2]
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted peony-extensions [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [3.0.0-2]
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted peony-extensions [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [3.0.0-2]
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted peony-extensions [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [3.0.0-2]
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted peony-extensions [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [3.0.0-2]
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted peony-extensions [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [3.0.0-2]
[07:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.7]
[08:10] <cpaelzer> vorlon: doko: there are more such dependency issues
[08:10] <cpaelzer> I was just about to file a bug, did you already open one vorlon?
[08:11] <cpaelzer> essentially all libc6-*-cross fail for libnss-nis-*-cross and libnss-nisplus-*-cross
[08:13] <cpaelzer> vorlon: and for your finding with rpcsvc for example we also have libc6.1-dev-alpha-cross->rpcsvc-proto-alpha-cross
[08:28] <cpaelzer> vorlon: doko: filed at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cross-toolchain-base-ports/+bug/1895632
[08:28] <cpaelzer> since it is tightly coupled to glibc also rbalint ^^ FYI
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ublock-origin [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.29.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[08:31] <LocutusOfBorg> ^^ this one fixes firefox 80 incompatibility
[08:32] <LocutusOfBorg> and splits the package in two, one for firefox and one for chromium
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1025.25~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1025.25~18.04.1]
[14:10] <falcojr> RAOF: Not sure if you saw the message yesterday, but we have an SRU queued for cloud-init for focal, bionic, and xenial that needs review per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1893064
[14:22] <icey> hey coreycb - regarding getting something that would have failed dnspython into autopkgtests, designate hard-failed on building the package with the new one
[14:24] <coreycb> icey: unit tests hard failed right?
[14:24] <rbalint> ubuntu-archive dazzdb is buggy and with glibc 2.32 it becomes broken, but its reverse dependency, hinge is not LP: #1895685
[14:25] <icey> coreycb: yeah - https://git.launchpad.net/~chris.macnaughton/ubuntu/+source/designate/commit/?id=9c18a35de46329a45426888528965bd590140d29 has a good example of the bits that failed - I think there were 7 unit test failures
[14:26] <rbalint> ubuntu-archive i'd like to ask demoting dazzdb and reverse deps to groovy-proposed to let glibc in, dazzdb can also be dropped fully
[14:26] <coreycb> icey: ok probably a good candidate to start with then with autopkgtest unit tests
[14:27] <icey> coreycb: but those don't actually hit the eventlet failures :-/ just the designate ones
[14:27] <coreycb> icey: right.. I'm sure we'd catch the eventlet failures if we enable unit tests elsewhere, maybe nova
[14:28] <coreycb> icey: it doesn't all have to get done now but if we can get a couple done that would be great
[15:06] <blackboxsw> hello SRU vanguards: we have an unapproved upload for cloud-utils queued for xenial with a couple of upstream cherry-picks to better support overlayfs for to unblock cloud image builds https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=cloud-utils
[15:50] <rbalint> RAOF, bdmurray, could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-focal-disable-systemd/+merge/390005 for glibc and other packages?
[15:52] <bdmurray> rbalint: its in my queue to look at shortly
[15:52] <rbalint> bdmurray, thanks!
[16:19] <bdmurray> Could some archive admin remove xfce4-weather-plugin from xenial-proposed? The bug its supposed to fix hasn't been verified in forevah.
[16:37] <bdmurray> rbalint, cpaelzer: force-reset-test feels like a big hammer - couldn't we just ust force-badtest with the intent of fixing the tests in the next systemd upload?
[16:43] <rbalint> bdmurray, cpaelzer i'm ok either way
[16:43] <bdmurray> okay, I'll just do that then
[17:30] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: I'm ok either way as well, it is just that we had quite a history of failing tests - so "waiting until one works" felt better
[17:30] <cpaelzer> but either way works
[17:41] <bdmurray> By using force-badtest we will be forced to deal with it again with the next systemd SRU rather than punting the ball very far down the line (or some other sports analogy)
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted freeipmi [source] (focal-proposed) [1.6.4-3ubuntu1.1]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-arista [source] (focal-proposed) [2019.2.3-0ubuntu1]
[18:36] <bdmurray> bryce: bug 1890751 is missing SRU information
[18:42] <bryce> bdmurray, ok.  Any others from that MP I missed?
[18:42] <bdmurray> bryce: No, and I'm gonna let it through because I'm sure its like all the rest but please fix it up.
[18:43] <bdmurray> And what happened to patch 0016? why is it hiding?
[18:43] <bryce> bdmurray, thanks, and yeah doing so presently.  And yes, it's the same as the others, just different log message
[18:43] <bdmurray> I could understand skipping 13...
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted logwatch [source] (focal-proposed) [7.5.2-1ubuntu1.1]
[18:44] <bryce> bdmurray, when we upstreamed that one, upstream raised some questions that will need further investigation so we dropped it for now
[18:45] <bdmurray> Oh, heh there's a legitmate reason!
[18:45] <bryce> bdmurray, if you also do the bionic and xenial SRUs you'll note some patches are omitted, those are because the issue they address aren't present on those ubuntu releases.
[18:46] <bdmurray> I was kind of joking it just made checking debian/patches/series a bit weird.
[18:46] <bryce> bdmurray, yeah we got some good review feedback from the server team on the logwatch/apparmor stuff, so some patches changed a fair bit during review, and 0016 was part of that
[18:47] <bryce> er, s/server team/security team/
[18:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted logwatch [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1.2]
[18:58] <bryce> bdmurray, sru text filled in
[19:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted logwatch [source] (xenial-proposed) [7.4.2-1ubuntu1.1]
[20:00] <bdmurray> jamespage: Did you mean to remove .gitignore in your openvswitch upload for SRU to focal? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/497025192/openvswitch_2.13.0-0ubuntu1_2.13.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1.diff.gz
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (focal-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.4]
[20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php7.4 [source] (focal-proposed) [7.4.3-4ubuntu2.3]
[21:06] <vorlon> rbalint: curiously, dazzdb also lists a number of reverse-testsuite-triggers
[21:06] <vorlon> rbalint: I guess those tests are going to want hinting at some point
[21:09] <vorlon> doko_: are you going to be working on LP: #1895632? since it's critical path for glibc 2.32
[21:12] <doko_> vorlon: would you mind checking uploads before these pings?
[21:14] <vorlon> doko_: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html doesn't list any newer versions since yesterday and there were no comments on the bug or here
[21:14] <vorlon> so I guess I should've pinged 25 minutes earlier
[21:14] <doko_> "checking uploads"
[21:15] <doko_> and yes, it's way after EOD, so please go away
[21:40] <vorlon> mwhudson_: fwiw for things like acpica-unix, I consider the existence of a testing-blocking RC bug that is going to require sourceful changes to fix, as sufficient reason to remove the package from -proposed
[21:40] <mwhudson_> vorlon: ok
[21:41] <mwhudson_> that makes sense
[21:42] <vorlon> "but the test suite blows up because it
[21:42] <vorlon> has more color names to choose from"
[21:44] <mwhudson> is that the perl color stuff?
[21:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected rpi-eeprom [source] (focal-proposed) [7.8-0ubuntu0.20.04.2]
[21:45] <vorlon> mwhudson: yh
[21:45] <vorlon> a
[21:55] <vorlon> bdmurray: why does xfce4-weather-plugin not show up as a removal candidate on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html#cleanup ?
[21:57] <bdmurray> :-(
[21:57] <bdmurray> I don't know - systemtap is missing too
[22:02] <ahasenack> is there a blanket replacement of glibc's rpc to libtirpc going on, or just on a case by cases basis?
[22:02] <bdmurray> vorlon: oh its because there are messages after the "verification still needed" comment but looking at them tehy aren't helpful
[22:03] <vorlon> bdmurray: should we fix the script to not do that?
[22:03] <ahasenack> squid builds a NIS auth helper, which relies on rpc.h. Looks like it can build with tirpc just fine, just needs some autoconf hackery. Or I could take the opportunity and disable NIS
[22:03] <vorlon> ahasenack: I don't think a blanket replacement is in progress; I guess the number of cases should be small
[22:03] <bdmurray> vorlon: No, its possible somebody verified it after the final call for testing but didn't know how to edit the tags.
[22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cross-toolchain-base-mipsen (focal-proposed/universe) [7ubuntu2 => 11ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cross-toolchain-base-mipsen [source] (focal-proposed) [11ubuntu1]
[22:48] <blackboxsw> RAOF: Just a friendly neighborhood SRU review request if there is time today for cloud-init SRU into X, B and F https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1893064
[22:50] <RAOF> Yup! I'll get to it this morning.