[01:24] blackboxsw: Oh! Is bug #1889555 fixed in groovy yet? [01:24] bug 1889555 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Groovy) "cc_grub_dpkg was fixed to support nvme drives, but didn't clear the state of cc_grub_dpkg and didn't rerun it on upgrades" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1889555 [02:06] crud RAOF [02:07] nope, I'll queue the upload now :/ missed that series [02:08] Once that's done, it's good for release. :) [02:21] RAOF: thanks for the thorough review there. forgot to check all the boxes [02:21] building now [02:23] RAOF: [ubuntu/groovy-proposed] cloud-init 20.3-15-g6d332e5c-0ubuntu1 (Accepted) [02:24] should have the fix for https://launchpad.net/bugs/1889555 in it (as well as our upstream snapshot of all commits in our master branch) [02:24] Ubuntu bug 1889555 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Groovy) "cc_grub_dpkg was fixed to support nvme drives, but didn't clear the state of cc_grub_dpkg and didn't rerun it on upgrades" [Undecided,In progress] === doko_ is now known as doko [09:18] hi, is a release team member around to merge https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-groovy-systemd-s390x-fails/+merge/390809 ? [11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.5] (core) [11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.142.6 => 1.142.7] (core) [11:10] asking again - is a release team member around to merge https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-groovy-systemd-s390x-fails/+merge/390809 ? [13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (focal-proposed/main) [1.2.2-1ubuntu0.3 => 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.4] (no packageset) [13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel [source] (focal-proposed) [31-1ubuntu20.04.1] [13:53] hello release team, I need someone to go through "https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cluster-glue/+bug/1895355" [13:53] Ubuntu bug 1895355 in cluster-glue (Ubuntu) "[FFe] cluster-glue: groovy post-release fixes + AWS stonith agent" [High,New] [13:54] im depending on it to backport the feature as enablement for aws cloud [14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (bionic-proposed/main) [2:17.0.12-0ubuntu1 => 2:17.0.13-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [14:38] hi release team, when someone is able, could you please review this adcli FFe? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/1893784 [14:38] Ubuntu bug 1893784 in adcli (Ubuntu) "[FFe]: apply some useful upstream changes" [Undecided,New] [14:40] and this one too (note the adcli task in this bug is "broken"): https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/1868703 [14:40] Ubuntu bug 1868703 in sssd (Ubuntu Focal) "Support new AD requirements (ADV190023)" [Undecided,Triaged] [15:15] rbasak: if there is time today we have an upload queued for xenial only with cherry-picks to support overlayfs (which fixed Xenial cloudimage builds for CPC team) https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=cloud-utils [15:17] if there happens to be time after that https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=ubuntu-release-upgrader (bionic, focal) as well [15:17] which adds Ubuntu Advantage service PPA urls to mirrors.cfg [15:35] could someone review the ffe on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wslu/+bug/1895525 ? [15:35] Ubuntu bug 1895525 in wslu (Ubuntu) "[FreezeExpcetionRequest] wslu 2.3.6 to 3.2.1" [High,New] [15:36] is gfs2-utils/amd64 on bionic looping or something, that we aren't getting test results? [15:41] looks like it might be [15:41] I asked for the journal for it [15:41] ...2 minutes ago... [15:42] still scrolling [15:46] bah [15:47] https://git.launchpad.net/autopkgtest-cloud/commit/worker/worker?id=71a6b443d9b58dfcd782b7101c8c068bd7e478bf [15:47] should fail out in a few hours [16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1.22.10-1ubuntu2.1 => 1.22.10-1ubuntu2.2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) [16:28] vorlon: I deleted your test requests, they were duplicating re-queues which are currently in progress / some already done. Suggest looking again once the non-huge queue has drained & excuses has refreshed. [16:28] Would be good if bos02 could stay up overnight ... [17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted haproxy [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.13-2ubuntu0.1] [17:18] blackboxsw: shouldn't the cloud-utils upload also include a bug reference to bug 1630274? [17:18] bug 1630274 in cloud-utils (Ubuntu) "mount-image-callback may not mount overlay when it could" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1630274 [17:19] I'm EOD now, but hopefully resolving that will help move things along. [17:19] thanks rbasak === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch === mitya57_ is now known as mitya57 [18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-utils (xenial-proposed/main) [0.27-0ubuntu25.1 => 0.27-0ubuntu25.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) === ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson [19:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted finalrd [source] (focal-proposed) [6~ubuntu20.04.1] [19:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted finalrd [source] (bionic-proposed) [6~ubuntu18.04.1] [20:11] blackboxsw: Is that conversation why there are 2 uplods of cloud-utils? [20:13] tdaitx: re bug 1870813 "no regressions expected" isn't what the SRU team wants to see. We want to see info on how a regression might manifest itself / appear. [20:13] bug 1870813 in scilab (Ubuntu Focal) "Scilab does not start on bionic and focal" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1870813 [20:15] bdmurray: that conversation was because I actually performed two cherry-picks that applied to two separate bugs (even though it really fixes just the first bug properly) [20:15] This helps with making sure that we have a good test plan. [20:16] blackboxsw: I'm asking which one I can reject from the xenial queue. [20:16] bdmurray: but, I agreed withj smoser that I'd write up the SRU template on the 2nd bug and he just uploaded the changelog updates which calls out that other bug specifically [20:17] please reject the prior one from 2020-09-14 [20:17] the one within the last hour just has the explicit debian/changelog for both bugs [20:17] ack [20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-utils [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.27-0ubuntu25.2] [20:21] tdaitx: Additionally, while I understand we are fixing an application that doesn't start and so the thought may be "nothing can regress" by uploading an SRU of the package we are committing to make sure it really works. So with that I think it'd be fair for you to subscribe to the package to watch for any issues with the new version of scilab on focal. [20:24] bdmurray: ack, I will work on the regression part, thanks for the heads up [20:24] I am already subscribed through the openjdk transition team, I do plan to keep an eye on scilab bug reports - specially for the 6.0.2 upgrade on bionic [20:26] tdaitx: okay, great [20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.59 => 2.408.60] (desktop-core) [22:01] bdmurray: I updated the 2nd related cloud-utils bug with the SRU template that we'll have to use for verification. [22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (xenial-proposed/main) [1.361.5 => 1.361.6] (core) [22:02] so I think that queued upload might be ready for review (if you happen to be pruning/reviewing unapproved uploads) [22:02] if not, we'll plan on picking that up tomorrow [22:02] as well as the ubuntu-release-upgrader uploads