| vorlon | rbalint: burp/armhf is smelling like a real regression introduced by new glibc :/ | 00:25 |
|---|---|---|
| jeremysu | rbasak hi, could you please help to review https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-conf/+bug/1895669 | 02:46 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1895669 in HWE Next "Add more support to Lenovo ThinkStation P620" [Undecided,New] | 02:46 |
| tjaalton | jeremysu: are you asking for a sponsor to upload it? | 04:02 |
| jeremysu | tjaalton yes | 04:02 |
| tjaalton | there's another sru now in focal-proposed... | 04:03 |
| tjaalton | acceptdd on tuesday | 04:04 |
| jeremysu | tjaalton yes, I'm negotiating with the owner of Dell dock project to see whether possible to respin for P620 | 04:04 |
| tjaalton | so it was sponsored already yesterday | 06:22 |
| tjaalton | jeremysu: I've released the current one, explanation in the bug if someone is curious | 06:35 |
| jeremysu | thank you very much. Is it possible to have your attention on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-conf/+bug/1895669 to land it in -proposed? | 06:59 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1895669 in HWE Next "Add more support to Lenovo ThinkStation P620" [Undecided,New] | 06:59 |
| tjaalton | yes | 06:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-ucm-conf [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-1ubuntu0.4] | 07:00 | |
| tjaalton | jeremysu: ^ | 07:00 |
| jeremysu | many thanks! | 07:01 |
| Laney | rbalint: any thought on | 09:42 |
| Laney | TEMPORARY_TEST_FAIL_STRINGS = ['Temporary failure resolving', | 09:42 |
| Laney | 'Temporary failure in name resolution', | 09:42 |
| Laney | + 'Unable to connect to ftpmaster.internal:http:', | 09:42 |
| Laney | ? | 09:42 |
| Laney | re https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/armhf/f/fpylll/20200917_024927_2aab3@/log.gz and https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/armhf/k/kcompletion/20200917_061002_60056@/log.gz | 09:43 |
| Laney | also https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/armhf/g/glibc/20200917_035400_0d794@/log.gz: gcc ICE | 09:44 |
| juliank | Laney: +1 | 09:44 |
| juliank | I wasn't asked, but still voice my opinion :) | 09:44 |
| Laney | LA LA LA WAS THAT THE WIND? | 09:46 |
| Laney | thanks juliank :P | 09:46 |
| Laney | although I notice one of the strings in https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/armhf/g/gcc-7/20200917_034016_83a73@/log.gz | 09:46 |
| Laney | did it really fail 3x in a row? | 09:47 |
| juliank | Laney: Eventually things will be better once apt gets sensible automatic retries with backoff | 09:47 |
| Laney | mmm | 09:48 |
| Laney | I dunno what happens, we never managed to catch it interactively | 09:48 |
| Laney | I guess lxd's network blips out for a few seconds? | 09:48 |
| juliank | maybe | 09:49 |
| Laney | well, not sure if it does or if the instance's network just dies | 09:49 |
| Laney | in which case no amount of retrying will help | 09:49 |
| juliank | Laney: Right, maybe it's worth adding a 20s sleep and retry and see if that helps | 09:50 |
| juliank | like, if it does not recover within 20s, it's probably dead | 09:50 |
| Laney | that'd be an improvement | 09:52 |
| Laney | hmm | 09:52 |
| Laney | rbalint: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/BsXx8wBKF5/ | 09:52 |
| Laney | I'd have expected to see a retry there from your code | 09:53 |
| Laney | AH | 09:54 |
| Laney | you didn't include 20 in the codes to look for | 09:54 |
| juliank | that reminds me of something but I'm not sure what | 09:54 |
| juliank | and it's surprisingly unrelated | 09:55 |
| Laney | ¬_¬ | 10:17 |
| Laney | rbalint: (fixed) | 10:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, if you plan to bump llvm-defaults to 11, please get the package from debian/experimental (uploaded one hour ago) | 10:33 |
| * enyc meows | 10:58 | |
| enyc | LocutusOfBorg: the linux-guest-resizing guest-additions-prblem in vbox linux guests (maybe 32bit-only affected!) looks like officially fixeh in addons 6.1.16 ... but using your .deb virtualbox-guest- packges from 6.1.14 works too, interestingly... | 10:59 |
| enyc | LocutusOfBorg: in short, my preference would be to hold off any virtualbox focal SRU's for a bit unless there is some other urgent problem | 11:00 |
| seb128 | hey there, is anyone feeling giving a review to https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/ubuntu-archive-scripts/display-broken-binaries/+merge/390362 ? | 11:39 |
| seb128 | it would make some of the items on the team report have a reason rather than being empty | 11:39 |
| Laney | I'll have a look | 11:43 |
| Laney | +1 ftw | 11:43 |
| seb128 | Laney, thanks! | 11:46 |
| ginggs | turn llvm up to eleven! | 12:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gkeop-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.4.0-1001.1] (no packageset) | 12:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdb (focal-proposed/main) [9.1-0ubuntu1 => 9.2-0ubuntu1~20.04] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) | 12:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: cvise (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.6.0-2~18.04] | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: cvise (focal-proposed/primary) [1.6.0-2~20.04] | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-pebble (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.5.3-1~18.04] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-pebble (focal-proposed/primary) [4.5.3-1~20.04] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python2.7 (focal-proposed/universe) [2.7.18~rc1-2 => 2.7.18-1~20.04] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync) | 12:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python3.9 (focal-proposed/primary) [3.9.0~rc1-1~20.04] | 12:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3-stdlib-extensions (focal-proposed/main) [3.8.2-1ubuntu1 => 3.8.5-1~20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) | 12:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.8 (focal-proposed/main) [3.8.2-1ubuntu1.2 => 3.8.5-1~20.04] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 12:51 | |
| slashd | Hi SRU vanguard, (iirc sil2100 is out atm). Could you please promote 'sosreport' from focal-proposed to focal-updates when time permits? Thanks in advance ! | 13:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gkeop-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1001.1] | 13:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sane-backends (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.29-0ubuntu5.1 => 1.0.29-0ubuntu5.2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 13:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sane-backends (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.27-1~experimental3ubuntu2.3 => 1.0.27-1~experimental3ubuntu2.4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 14:00 | |
| xnox | ubuntu-archive please reject https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=zfcpdump-kernel-signed it is wrong | 15:12 |
| seb128 | xnox, rejected | 15:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected zfcpdump-kernel-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [5.4-0ubuntu1] | 15:14 | |
| apw | interesting, my queue screen says i rejected it | 15:14 |
| Laney | check the queue page and see who won ;-) | 15:14 |
| seb128 | apw, I clicked the button and got an error so you probably beat me to it? | 15:14 |
| apw | heh, when do we ever have so much cover we get a human race-condition | 15:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tracker (focal-proposed/main) [2.3.4-1 => 2.3.6-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, ubuntugnome) | 15:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfcpdump-kernel (focal-proposed/universe) [4.13-0ubuntu1 => 5.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:40 | |
| vorlon | bdmurray: should the test case for LP: #1894919 cover comparing the installed packages at end of upgrade with and without -proposed, to verify that only the autoremoved packages are different? | 15:40 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1894919 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Focal) "gnome-software-plugin-snap consider an unwanted removal for 20.04 ubuntu-desktop" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894919 | 15:40 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: sure that sounds fine | 15:42 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: will you update the test case? | 15:43 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: I put it in the regression potential section | 15:48 |
| bdmurray | Additionally, we should ensure that nothing extra is autoremoved... | 15:48 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: I'm worried that if it's only listed in regression potential rather than test case that it might be missed on verification | 15:54 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: I'm sure I'm the one doing the verification but I can move it. | 15:55 |
| bdmurray | I've moved it anyway | 16:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.27] | 16:02 | |
| vorlon | seb128: dbus/i386 passed | 16:48 |
| Laney | retrying those glibc/unknown failures, looks like they just slipped in before the fixes earlier today | 16:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted finalrd [source] (xenial-proposed) [6~ubuntu16.04.1] | 17:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: finalrd [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [6~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) | 17:08 | |
| vorlon | Laney: ah I think I already hit retry on those | 17:20 |
| === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch | ||
| === ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson | ||
| rbalint | vorlon, burp/armhf passed locally and also suprisingly with new glibc - not that i would be unhappy about it :-) | 18:42 |
| vorlon | rbalint: hmm ok | 19:01 |
| vorlon | rbalint: I'd appreciate your input on LP: #1894195 since the stated rationale is fixes to the nftables backend | 19:02 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1894195 in iptables (Ubuntu) "FFe: Merge iptables 1.8.5-3 (main) from Debian sid (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894195 | 19:02 |
| rbalint | vorlon, left a comment, i could do it after glibcs, guest packages and systemd are done | 19:32 |
| vorlon | rbalint: not asking you to do it, just asking if you think it's sane :) | 19:33 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: one thing I wonder, is whether the email we send when stopping phasing should say that the SRUs are subject to reverting if not fixed | 20:08 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: I guess we can say that without having a revert plan because it'll still be subect to reverting | 20:14 |
| * vorlon nods | 20:15 | |
| bdmurray | vorlon, Laney: who is sending the UI freeze email? | 21:09 |
| bdmurray | or rather should I send it? | 21:10 |
| bdmurray | Laney, vorlon: I could use an autopkgtest-cloud update for a big package | 21:40 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: if you were to send the mail that'd be keen | 22:28 |
| vorlon | looking at autopkgtest-cloud now | 22:29 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: done | 22:30 |
| bdmurray | thanks | 22:30 |
| rbasak | RAOF: I was going to post to Discourse about the GNOME MRE. Am I right in thinking you're still planning to generate the list of packages within scope? Or if not, how will that come about? | 23:08 |
| RAOF | [rbasak](https://matrix.to/#/@freenode_rbasak:matrix.org): I am planning to generate a list of packages that are in-scope. | 23:09 |
| rbasak | Thanks! I'll comment in Discourse on the vala and gnome-shell end. | 23:14 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!