vorlonrbalint: burp/armhf is smelling like a real regression introduced by new glibc :/00:25
jeremysurbasak hi, could you please help to review https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-conf/+bug/189566902:46
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1895669 in HWE Next "Add more support to Lenovo ThinkStation P620" [Undecided,New]02:46
tjaaltonjeremysu: are you asking for a sponsor to upload it?04:02
jeremysu tjaalton yes04:02
tjaaltonthere's another sru now in focal-proposed...04:03
tjaaltonacceptdd on tuesday04:04
jeremysutjaalton yes, I'm negotiating with the owner of Dell dock project to see whether possible to respin for P62004:04
tjaaltonso it was sponsored already yesterday06:22
tjaaltonjeremysu: I've released the current one, explanation in the bug if someone is curious06:35
jeremysuthank you very much. Is it possible to have your attention on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-conf/+bug/1895669 to land it in -proposed?06:59
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1895669 in HWE Next "Add more support to Lenovo ThinkStation P620" [Undecided,New]06:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-ucm-conf [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-1ubuntu0.4]07:00
tjaaltonjeremysu: ^07:00
jeremysumany thanks!07:01
Laneyrbalint: any thought on09:42
Laney TEMPORARY_TEST_FAIL_STRINGS = ['Temporary failure resolving',09:42
Laney                                'Temporary failure in name resolution',09:42
Laney+                               'Unable to connect to ftpmaster.internal:http:',09:42
Laneyre https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/armhf/f/fpylll/20200917_024927_2aab3@/log.gz and https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/armhf/k/kcompletion/20200917_061002_60056@/log.gz09:43
Laneyalso https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/armhf/g/glibc/20200917_035400_0d794@/log.gz: gcc ICE09:44
juliankLaney: +109:44
juliankI wasn't asked, but still voice my opinion :)09:44
Laneythanks juliank :P09:46
Laneyalthough I notice one of the strings in https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/armhf/g/gcc-7/20200917_034016_83a73@/log.gz09:46
Laneydid it really fail 3x in a row?09:47
juliankLaney: Eventually things will be better once apt gets sensible automatic retries with backoff09:47
LaneyI dunno what happens, we never managed to catch it interactively09:48
LaneyI guess lxd's network blips out for a few seconds?09:48
Laneywell, not sure if it does or if the instance's network just dies09:49
Laneyin which case no amount of retrying will help09:49
juliankLaney: Right, maybe it's worth adding a 20s sleep and retry and see if that helps09:50
julianklike, if it does not recover within 20s, it's probably dead09:50
Laneythat'd be an improvement09:52
Laneyrbalint: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/BsXx8wBKF5/09:52
LaneyI'd have expected to see a retry there from your code09:53
Laneyyou didn't include 20 in the codes to look for09:54
juliankthat reminds me of something but I'm not sure what09:54
juliankand it's surprisingly unrelated09:55
Laneyrbalint: (fixed)10:18
LocutusOfBorgdoko, if you plan to bump llvm-defaults to 11, please get the package from debian/experimental (uploaded one hour ago)10:33
* enyc meows10:58
enycLocutusOfBorg: the linux-guest-resizing guest-additions-prblem  in vbox linux guests (maybe 32bit-only affected!)  looks like officially fixeh in  addons 6.1.16  ... but using your .deb virtualbox-guest- packges from 6.1.14 works too, interestingly...10:59
enycLocutusOfBorg: in short, my preference would be to hold off any virtualbox focal SRU's for a bit unless there is some other urgent problem11:00
seb128hey there, is anyone feeling giving a review to https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/ubuntu-archive-scripts/display-broken-binaries/+merge/390362 ?11:39
seb128it would make some of the items on the team report have a reason rather than being empty11:39
LaneyI'll have a look11:43
Laney+1 ftw11:43
seb128Laney, thanks!11:46
ginggsturn llvm up to eleven!12:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gkeop-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.4.0-1001.1] (no packageset)12:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdb (focal-proposed/main) [9.1-0ubuntu1 => 9.2-0ubuntu1~20.04] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)12:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: cvise (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.6.0-2~18.04]12:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: cvise (focal-proposed/primary) [1.6.0-2~20.04]12:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-pebble (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.5.3-1~18.04]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-pebble (focal-proposed/primary) [4.5.3-1~20.04]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python2.7 (focal-proposed/universe) [2.7.18~rc1-2 => 2.7.18-1~20.04] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync)12:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python3.9 (focal-proposed/primary) [3.9.0~rc1-1~20.04]12:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3-stdlib-extensions (focal-proposed/main) [3.8.2-1ubuntu1 => 3.8.5-1~20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)12:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.8 (focal-proposed/main) [3.8.2-1ubuntu1.2 => 3.8.5-1~20.04] (i386-whitelist) (sync)12:51
slashdHi SRU vanguard, (iirc sil2100 is out atm). Could you please promote 'sosreport' from focal-proposed to focal-updates when time permits? Thanks in advance !13:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gkeop-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1001.1]13:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sane-backends (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.29-0ubuntu5.1 => 1.0.29-0ubuntu5.2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)13:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sane-backends (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.27-1~experimental3ubuntu2.3 => 1.0.27-1~experimental3ubuntu2.4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)14:00
xnoxubuntu-archive please reject https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=zfcpdump-kernel-signed it is wrong15:12
seb128xnox, rejected15:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected zfcpdump-kernel-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [5.4-0ubuntu1]15:14
apwinteresting, my queue screen says i rejected it15:14
Laneycheck the queue page and see who won ;-)15:14
seb128apw, I clicked the button and got an error so you probably beat me to it?15:14
apwheh, when do we ever have so much cover we get a human race-condition15:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tracker (focal-proposed/main) [2.3.4-1 => 2.3.6-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, ubuntugnome)15:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfcpdump-kernel (focal-proposed/universe) [4.13-0ubuntu1 => 5.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)15:40
vorlonbdmurray: should the test case for LP: #1894919 cover comparing the installed packages at end of upgrade with and without -proposed, to verify that only the autoremoved packages are different?15:40
ubot5Launchpad bug 1894919 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Focal) "gnome-software-plugin-snap consider an unwanted removal for 20.04 ubuntu-desktop" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189491915:40
bdmurrayvorlon: sure that sounds fine15:42
vorlonbdmurray: will you update the test case?15:43
bdmurrayvorlon: I put it in the regression potential section15:48
bdmurrayAdditionally, we should ensure that nothing extra is autoremoved...15:48
vorlonbdmurray: I'm worried that if it's only listed in regression potential rather than test case that it might be missed on verification15:54
bdmurrayvorlon: I'm sure I'm the one doing the verification but I can move it.15:55
bdmurrayI've moved it anyway16:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.27]16:02
vorlonseb128: dbus/i386 passed16:48
Laneyretrying those glibc/unknown failures, looks like they just slipped in before the fixes earlier today16:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted finalrd [source] (xenial-proposed) [6~ubuntu16.04.1]17:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: finalrd [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [6~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset)17:08
vorlonLaney: ah I think I already hit retry on those17:20
=== ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch
=== ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson
rbalintvorlon, burp/armhf passed locally and also suprisingly with new glibc - not that i would be unhappy about it :-)18:42
vorlonrbalint: hmm ok19:01
vorlonrbalint: I'd appreciate your input on LP: #1894195 since the stated rationale is fixes to the nftables backend19:02
ubot5Launchpad bug 1894195 in iptables (Ubuntu) "FFe: Merge iptables 1.8.5-3 (main) from Debian sid (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189419519:02
rbalintvorlon, left a comment, i could do it after glibcs, guest packages and systemd are done19:32
vorlonrbalint: not asking you to do it, just asking if you think it's sane :)19:33
vorlonbdmurray: one thing I wonder, is whether the email we send when stopping phasing should say that the SRUs are subject to reverting if not fixed20:08
bdmurrayvorlon: I guess we can say that without having a revert plan because it'll still be subect to reverting20:14
* vorlon nods20:15
bdmurrayvorlon, Laney: who is sending the UI freeze email?21:09
bdmurrayor rather should I send it?21:10
bdmurrayLaney, vorlon: I could use an autopkgtest-cloud update for a big package21:40
vorlonbdmurray: if you were to send the mail that'd be keen22:28
vorlonlooking at autopkgtest-cloud now22:29
vorlonbdmurray: done22:30
rbasakRAOF: I was going to post to Discourse about the GNOME MRE. Am I right in thinking you're still planning to generate the list of packages within scope? Or if not, how will that come about?23:08
RAOF[rbasak](https://matrix.to/#/@freenode_rbasak:matrix.org): I am planning to generate a list of packages that are in-scope.23:09
rbasakThanks! I'll comment in Discourse on the vala and gnome-shell end.23:14

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!