-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gst-plugins-bad1.0 [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.18.0-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)00:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gst-plugins-bad1.0 [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.18.0-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)01:05
=== pieq__ is now known as pieq
vorlonxnox: how do I vacation01:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-191.221] (core, kernel)01:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-191.221]02:46
cpaelzerhiho release-team would be someone around to take a look at this FFe before it is even later? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/189378406:46
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1893784 in adcli (Ubuntu) "[FFe]: apply some useful upstream changes" [Undecided,New]06:46
cpaelzerLaney: I have seen you recently checked and acked a few, if you wouldn't mind ^^06:46
LocutusOfBorgplease accept gst-plugins-bad1.0 so we can finally finish the gst migration :D06:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gcc-10-cross-mipsen [sync] (focal-proposed) [2+c1ubuntu2]07:37
=== _hc[m] is now known as _hc
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (focal-proposed/main) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.6 => 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.8] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)08:21
=== ebarretto_ is now known as ebarretto
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gst-plugins-bad1.0 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.18.0-2ubuntu1]08:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gst-plugins-bad1.0 [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.18.0-2ubuntu1]08:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gst-plugins-bad1.0 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.18.0-2ubuntu1]08:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gst-plugins-bad1.0 [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.18.0-2ubuntu1]08:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gst-plugins-bad1.0 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.18.0-2ubuntu1]08:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gst-plugins-bad1.0 [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.18.0-2ubuntu1]08:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gst-plugins-bad1.0 [i386] (groovy-proposed) [1.18.0-2ubuntu1]08:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted finalrd [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [6~ubuntu16.04.1]08:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python2.7 [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.7.18-1~20.04]08:55
sil2100juliank: hey!09:03
sil2100juliank: I'm reviewing your grub2 SRU for focal right now and I need clafirication regarding something in the patch09:03
sil2100juliank: so in ubuntu-linuxefi-arm64.patch I see some uh, two lines that don't seem to do anything:09:04
sil2100+  (void) addr;09:05
sil2100+  (void) size;09:05
sil2100juliank: is this a leftover of some debugging attempt or something?09:05
sil2100waveform, xnox: looking now at the NEW pibootctl - "Initial release. (Closes: #XXXXXX)" in the changelog is quite unfortunate, I guess it would be best if we had the needs-packaging bug mentioned there (so LP: #1870100)09:30
ubot5Launchpad bug 1870100 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] pibootctl" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187010009:30
waveformsil2100, I can upload another one to the PPA with a cleaned-up history if you want?09:31
sil2100I always like when NEW packages have those in the changelog, as then I don't have to look for it manually09:31
sil2100waveform: let me take a look at the whole package, since if it's just this I guess I can tweak it before accepting too!09:31
Riot1Hey everyone09:36
Riot1ubuntu-archive: does the archive for bionic only reflect 18.04 lts release but not the changes up to 18.04.5 ?09:40
apwRiot1, the release pocket (suite bionic) reflects things as they were on release, the updates pocket on top of that represents everything since09:41
Riot1also updates reflect the diff between release and now09:41
Riot1thank you good sir :) helped me a lot :)09:46
julianksil2100: No, they mark the parameters as unused so it builds09:50
julianksil2100: Because I did not want to pull in the entire refactoring that dropped those arguments09:50
juliankcasting an argument to void is kind of the standard trick to get around unused parameter errors09:51
sil2100juliank: ah, sneaky!09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gstreamer-editing-services1.0 [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.18.0-2] (no packageset)09:53
Laney__attribute__ ((unused))!09:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.5]09:56
dosaboyrbasak: ive updated groovy/victoria status for 189167310:02
dosaboyassuming its correct to leave as Fix Committed since the release isnt actually out yet10:03
rbasakdosaboy: could you explain in a comment where the fix is up to please, if it's not actually in Groovy? That's a basic SRU requirement.10:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.5 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.5] (core)10:08
dokorbasak: do you want to have a look at https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/glibc/groovy/armhf before I give it back?10:08
dokorbalint: ^^^10:08
rbalintdoko, thanks, saved10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.5]10:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142.7]10:17
dosaboyrbasak: i think it is in groovy since that has the same package build as the victoria-staging uca ppa which does contain the fix10:20
dosaboybut since neither is released yet i dont think it makes sense to mark them as fix released10:20
dosaboyif the policy is something different then please let me know and i can change it10:20
dosaboyi.e. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neutron/2:17.0.0~git2020091014.215a541bd4-0ubuntu110:21
dosaboywhich matches https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cloud-archive/+archive/ubuntu/victoria-staging/+build/1993269110:22
dosaboyrbasak: ^10:22
dosaboyi can put that in the LP if you want10:22
dosaboyrbasak: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1891673/comments/1610:25
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1891673 in neutron (Ubuntu Focal) "qrouter ns ip rules not deleted when fip removed from vm" [High,Triaged]10:25
LocutusOfBorgplease accept gstreamer-editing-services1.0 thanks10:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.5 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.5] (core)10:35
rbasakdosaboy: I agree to leave the LP status itself as it is. Since "Fix Released" is usually an SRU expectation though, please do put the explanation in the bug, and then the SRU team can make a documented exception if appropriate.10:35
rbasakdosaboy: also that means whoever's on rota today will have the full information10:35
rbalintdoko, will be fixed fully in next upload LP: #189568710:36
ubot5Launchpad bug 1895687 in glibc (Ubuntu) "tst-cpuclock1 test is sometimes failing in on armhf testbefs " [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189568710:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gstreamer-editing-services1.0 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.18.0-2]10:40
Laneyjust made an autopkgtest-cloud change that should fix ubuntu-release-upgrader/update-manager10:45
LaneyIS shuffled it around a bit and the proxy setup needed changing10:45
* Laney retries those10:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-49.53~18.04.1] (no packageset)11:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-49.53~18.04.1] (no packageset)11:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1026.26] (core, kernel)11:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-49.53~18.04.1] (no packageset)11:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1026.26] (core, kernel)11:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1027.27] (core, kernel)11:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1025.25] (no packageset)11:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1085.96] (no packageset)11:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1071.74] (no packageset)11:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-49.53~18.04.1] (no packageset)11:08
dokoapw, sforshee: did something change with the riscv64 kernel? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/498529278/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-riscv64.oprofile_1.3.0-0ubuntu17_BUILDING.txt.gz11:12
dokoahh, wait, that didn't build before either11:36
xnoxrbalint:  ooooh glibc upload? i want something in too11:39
rbalintxnox, ok, please add it to the repo11:41
rbalintRAOF, bdmurray: please release glibc to focal11:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python3.9 [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.9.0~rc1-1~20.04]11:58
sforsheedoko: since when exactly? Our kernels are constantly changing, we did move to 5.8 fairly recently12:24
dokosforshee: see my second message12:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1027.27]12:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1025.25]12:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1026.26]12:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1026.26]12:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gcc-9-cross-mipsen [sync] (focal-proposed) [4+c2ubuntu3]12:38
sforsheedoko: I only got one message, seems the second never made it to me for some reason12:40
julianksil2100: can you approve the grub2:amd64 binaries too?12:52
juliankheh I just realized I only need the arm64 one to verify the bug12:52
juliankAlso new qemu just broke my arm64 boot12:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.5]12:57
LocutusOfBorgsforshee, it never built there according to the second message13:08
sforsheeLocutusOfBorg: thanks13:10
=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks
Trevinhobdmurray: hey, could you  have a look at the mutter focal SRU when you've time? There's also gnome-shell in queue, but that's less priority, but mutter fixes the quite popular bug #189244013:36
ubot5bug 1892440 in mutter (Ubuntu Focal) "Shell text with wrong size in mutter 3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 (mostly on Nvidia)" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189244013:36
LocutusOfBorgubuntu-archive, can you please do a dbg cleanup in proposed?13:44
LocutusOfBorgold binaries left on ppc64el: gstreamer1.0-rtsp-dbg, libgstrtspserver-1.0-0-dbg (from 1.16.2-3)13:44
LocutusOfBorgold binaries left on s390x: gstreamer1.0-rtsp-dbg, libgstrtspserver-1.0-0-dbg (from 1.16.2-3)13:44
LocutusOfBorgold binaries left on s390x: libges-1.0-0-dbg (from 1.16.2-2)13:45
cpaelzerjuliank: which "new qemu" do you refer to?14:16
cpaelzerjuliank: there wasn't a major update in -dev or focal that should affect arm much14:16
cpaelzergroovy had 5.0 since 8th August14:16
juliankcpaelzer:  qemu-system-common:amd64 (1:5.0-5ubuntu6, 1:5.0-5ubuntu8)14:17
cpaelzerjust in case I should know about that issue you mentioned ...14:17
juliankcpaelzer: Maybe it's unrelated14:17
juliankcpaelzer: But my kernel did not boot with ramfb, but it boots fine with virtio-gpu14:17
cpaelzerjuliank: between those two versions only s390x changes are applied14:17
juliankcpaelzer: arm64 is not super stable anyway14:17
julianki hate emulation14:18
cpaelzernot sure what you are doing, but canonistack has real arm64 for you14:18
juliankbut then I don't have nested kvm on my chromebook, so sanest arm64 I can get14:18
juliankcpaelzer: Bootloader testing14:18
juliankEFI secure boot14:19
juliankcpaelzer: I tried launching arm64 instances earlier this month of varying sizes to build a grub, but it complained about not having any hosts available14:19
cpaelzerIMHO you could ask dannf  and folks to get you maas access to a bare metal arm6414:19
juliankUsed my chromebook instead :)14:19
cpaelzerjuliank: I just used arm64 on canonistack two days ago, hosts were free at that time14:20
cpaelzer--flavor cpu8-ram16-disk20 is what I used14:21
* Laney uses the rpi, works nicely for most stuff14:21
juliankLaney: that works too, well, not for UEFI secure boot testing14:21
juliankLaney: my chromebook has twice as many cores, though14:22
cpaelzerLaney: mine lands in the drawer too quickly if being idle and then I openstack-cli is much easier than standing up to fetch it :-)14:22
julianklatency to canonistack isn't much fun though14:23
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g_
juliankchromebook has lxd and 8 cores, so it's quite decent14:24
juliankAnd I can SSH into it14:24
juliankcpaelzer: that cpu8-ram16-disk20 worked14:25
juliankI was trying m1.{medium,large} last time14:25
juliankand cpu8-ram2-disk1014:25
bdmurraysil2100: Did you see my comment / question about bug 1894919?14:51
ubot5bug 1894919 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Focal) "gnome-software-plugin-snap consider an unwanted removal for 20.04 ubuntu-desktop" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189491914:51
sil2100bdmurray: hey! Let me check15:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: pibootctl (groovy-proposed/primary) [0.5.2-0ubuntu1]15:00
sil2100bdmurray: hm, do you have an idea right now why these remaining packages were still not purged during the autoremoval phase?15:04
bdmurraysil2100: nope, with version 20.04.25 there are messages regarding "unwanted removal" in /var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log but with 20.04.27 there are no such messages in main.log. I guess I could try 'sudo apt-get dist-upgrade' and see if they are also left.15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected pibootctl [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.5.2-0ubuntu1]15:07
sil2100bdmurray: generally in such cases I don't mind releasing the update, even if it's not a complete fix - we can always re-open the bug or have a new one created for the remaining bits15:09
sil2100So maybe you could do that (new bug for clean context?), and then we'd just15:09
bdmurraysil2100: Okay, I'll add all my verification notes to the bug then.15:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pibootctl [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.5.2-0ubuntu1]15:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pibootctl [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.5.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)15:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1085.96]15:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-49.53~18.04.1]15:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-49.53~18.04.1]15:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1071.74]15:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-49.53~18.04.1]15:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-49.53~18.04.1]15:25
bdmurrayrbalint: For what package is the crash report in comment #1 of bug 1889190 created? Did you do any duplicate searching?15:25
ubot5bug 1889190 in glibc (Ubuntu Focal) "ldconfig is still deferred in libc6.preinst " [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/188919015:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pibootctl [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.5.2-0ubuntu1]15:26
LocutusOfBorgubuntu-archive ping for NBS proposed cleanup (gstreamer1.0)15:30
LocutusOfBorgold binaries left on ppc64el: gstreamer1.0-rtsp-dbg, libgstrtspserver-1.0-0-dbg (from 1.16.2-3)15:30
rbalintbdmurray, i have not checked the crash report nor looked for duplicates. i've reproduced the issue in a clean lxc container and considered the crash itself to be enough of a proof15:47
rbalintbdmurray, now looking at errors.u.c there are not many glibc crashes and i don't see a duplicate15:48
bdmurrayrbalint: okay, I'll have a look around launchpad15:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-119.120~16.04.1] (kernel)17:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-119.120~16.04.1] (kernel)17:02
=== ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch
juliankcpaelzer: Now that I saw it again - What happens is that qemu aarch64 sometimes gets "Synchronous Exception at 0x0000000137EF9040" instead of booting. I haven't seen this before today, but it might not really be a regression17:38
ahasenackhi release team, just a ping about two adcli FFes I have, if someone could take a look at some point: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/189378417:45
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868703 in sssd (Ubuntu Focal) "Support new AD requirements (ADV190023)" [Undecided,Triaged]17:45
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1893784 in adcli (Ubuntu) "[FFe]: apply some useful upstream changes" [Undecided,New]17:45
=== ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson
bdmurrayTrevinho: The mutter upload will end up reopening some bugs like 1870867 because of it being based on 3.36.217:59
Trevinhobdmurray: how that? it's 3.36.6-1ubuntu0.20.04.118:00
bdmurrayTrevinho: maybe I misstated the reason but that bug is included in the changelog entry for 3.36.4-1 although it was already SRU'ed for ubuntu. Because its in Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed the sru tools will act on it and it will need verification18:03
Trevinhobdmurray: mhmh, which bug sorry?18:07
bdmurraybug 1870867, bug 1857947 at least18:07
ubot5bug 1870867 in mutter (Ubuntu Focal) "gnome-shell crashed with SIGABRT meta_x11_get_stage_window: assertion failed: (META_IS_STAGE_X11 (impl))" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187086718:07
ubot5bug 1857947 in mutter (Ubuntu Focal) "gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in get_top_visible_window_actor() from meta_compositor_sync_stack() from meta_stack_tracker_sync_stack() from stack_tracker_sync_stack_later() from call_later_func()" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185794718:07
Trevinhoah, i was trying the tool right now18:08
Trevinhobdmurray: ah, i seee... that's because those are in the changes files..18:09
Trevinhobdmurray: so, those bugs got fixed in ubuntu earlier, but this release merges with debian changelogs that includes them again18:09
Trevinhobut we had them already fixed indeed18:10
hellsworthbdmurray: could we please publish libreoffice 6.4.6 for focal? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/189278318:10
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1892783 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] libreoffice 6.4.6 for focal" [High,Fix committed]18:10
TrevinhoI might make a changes without such version, but... well wouldn't be correct18:10
bdmurrayhellsworth: I'm personally not comfortable releasing that https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2020-September/005089.html18:11
Trevinhobdmurray: I think we can just make the tool to reopen them, I will mark them as verified explaingin that... would be ok?18:11
bdmurrayTrevinho: okay18:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.6-1ubuntu0.20.04.1]18:26
hellsworthbdmurray: alright then i'll go draft a microrelease exception18:29
cpaelzerjuliank: we didn't have such a report recently, but they occur every now and then over the last few yeras - so far sometimes being kernel or bootloader bugs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319083 or (more often) flaky and non reproducible https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/167552218:29
ubot5bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1319083 in grub2 "boot fails with Synchronous Exception on aarch64 with grub2 built with gcc6" [Unspecified,Closed: currentrelease]18:29
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1675522 in qemu (Ubuntu) "arm64: Synchronous Exception at 0x00000000BBC129BC" [Undecided,Expired]18:29
juliankcpaelzer: yup flaky, saw it twice in 10 boots or so18:30
bdmurrayhellsworth: I also think if the bullet points here were true then that would work instead of an exception https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#New_upstream_microreleases18:32
hellsworthI think the four bullet points in "New upstream microreleases" is true18:35
bdmurrayhellsworth: then maybe making the bug more clearly match that wiki page would help. Not being familiar with libreoffice I'd like it if the results of the upstream version testing were pointed to and maybe a link to a description of what testing upstream does.18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.1.0-0ubuntu2]18:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:12.1.1-0ubuntu2]18:44
Trevinhobdmurray: thanks for the quick review :)18:51
hellsworthbdmurray: ok I've added links to the testing upstream does and the test results. In the future I can link to these things in the SRU description19:00
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1892783 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] libreoffice 6.4.6 for focal" [High,Fix committed]19:00
hellsworthbdmurray: future libreoffice SRUs will point to the upstream testing and results. but what else would you like to happen first, allowing 6.4.6 to be released?19:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted memcached [source] (focal-proposed) [1.5.22-2ubuntu0.2]19:03
bdmurrayhellsworth: looking19:06
bdmurrayhellsworth: which one of these gerrit results maps to what is in 6.4.6?19:07
hellsworthwell i'm trying to map it right now. it's not so straightforward19:15
bdmurrayokay, I think that would help a lot19:16
rafaeldtinocohello release team, sorry to bother, I have a FFe that is important for MSSQL support (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+bug/1896223) <- I have subscribed release team already. The merge request contains the feature patchset and PPA its build. thank you19:32
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1896223 in pacemaker (Ubuntu) "[FFe] this is the no-quorum-policy feature (specially for mssql sevrer)" [High,New]19:32
hellsworthbdmurray: perhaps it would be more relevant to link to the autopkgtests that were run on this package in lp before asking you all to upload it.19:37
bdmurrayhellsworth: I'm not following that statement19:38
hellsworthso we have a little bit of a perfect storm here.. that ppa is gone becuase i just cleaned up my ppas and didn't think I needed this one around. so the autopkgtests that were run on it are gone19:39
hellsworthwell upstream runs their tests. then debian pulls upstream. then we pull debian. so you might be able to see how it's hard to map the ubuntu exact commit to the commit tested upstream19:40
hellsworthi always run autopkgtests for all of the archs before asking marcus to upload them19:40
hellsworthunfortunately though, that ppa is gone that had the passing tests.19:40
hellsworthactually nevermind. my autopkgtest result url was wrong and the results are still there even though the ppa is gone19:42
hellsworthso i'll go ahead and add that info to the sru too19:43
hellsworth(another great thing to always add to the description)19:43
rbalintbdmurray, please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/390633 to unblock systemd, the next upload is almost ready19:43
bdmurrayYeah, I think autopkgtest results are only deleted for EOL releases19:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-119.120~16.04.1]19:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-119.120~16.04.1]19:58
bdmurrayrbalint: Why did you not bump the version instead of adding another version? I don't see any other hints with multiple package versions...20:06
hellsworthbdmurray: i found the libreoffice upstream ci job that did the testing for 6.4.6 as it's been submitted to your team and added it to the bug20:35
hellsworthwhat other information can I provide about 6.4.6?20:36
bdmurrayhellsworth: Do you know why "There is not enough time for a full regression test" with bug fix releases?20:51
hellsworthi don't.. where did you see that?20:55
bdmurrayIn the Basic Regression Test section20:56
hellsworthi see.. well after spending the last 1+ hour digging around in their jenkins instance, it's really busy. they could be limited on resources20:59
bdmurrayOkay. Linking to https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests doesn't seem too useful given that it is marked as inactive21:00
hellsworthgood point21:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thermald [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.1-1ubuntu0.3]21:55
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: any idea why britney is complaining about gstreamer1.0-rtsp-dbg, libgstrtspserver-1.0-0-dbg on ppc64el s390x riscv64 but not other archs?23:35
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: the whole output looks rather suspect, britney should handle these normally as NBS packages23:36

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!