[00:31] hpidcock: tags create on juju/utils, also a request to delete obsolete packages for v2 [00:31] wallyworld: thanks [00:48] wallyworld: did you want a take a quick look at the final changes I made https://github.com/juju/utils/pull/313 ? [00:48] ok [00:50] hpidcock: awesome, good to see that old stuff gone, will make auto completion of imports much nicer [00:50] wallyworld: ok will make a PR for develop now [00:54] wallyworld: can you do a $$merge$$ on that project, looks like for some reason its not responding to me [00:55] wait [00:55] all good [00:56] merged! [01:02] wallyworld: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/12039 [01:02] please and thankyou [01:02] looking [01:12] hpidcock: lgtm, ty [01:13] wallyworld: thanks [01:20] wallyworld: sorry there is more https://github.com/juju/names/pull/106 [01:20] np looking [01:22] lgtm [01:22] thanks [01:29] wallyworld: hah wow, yes there is more, thank-you again https://github.com/juju/testing/pull/153 [01:31] sure [01:32] hpidcock: lgtm, i'm sure there will be more === niemeyer_ is now known as niemeyer [05:46] kelvinliu: we finally get to remove roacle classic provider https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/12043 [05:47] looking [05:48] tyvm [05:48] wallyworld: lgtm, huge and simple lol [06:12] wallyworld: today is a good day to delete code [06:12] it is, the more the better [15:09] hml, https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/12046 [15:10] stickupkid: looking [15:10] stickupkid: approved === _thumper_ is now known as thumper [16:42] hml, can you CR this https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/12044 === evhan` is now known as evhan [23:40] kelvinliu: can you recall why the restriction was add so that for a podspec, the primary service account for the pod can only have one role? "the prime service can only have one role or cluster role" [23:42] wallyworld: initially, it was a slice as i remembered, [23:42] it is, so why do we allow only 1 for the primary service account? [23:43] there was a reason but i can't recall [23:43] and there's this bug 1896076 [23:43] Bug #1896076: Pod_spec : cannot apply namespaced role and cluster role to a serviceaccount [23:43] wallyworld: u prefer we only have one :) [23:44] not sure what the thinking was there [23:44] can you see a reason not to have > 1? [23:44] i can do a quick PR to fix it for 2.8.4 [23:44] the idea was to make it simpler and cleaner [23:46] I don't see a reason not to have 1+ [23:46] ok, will do a quick PR [23:47] just need to ensure the names of the bindings [23:48] have to uniq and no conflicts [23:48] maybe that was it [23:48] nah, we had proper naming for that