[11:06] <seb128> hey there
[11:07] <seb128> any idea why https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/groovy/amd64/libdrm-common/2.4.102-1ubuntu1 shows as superseeded?
[11:09] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, just to be clear, this happened in the last two hours to me
[11:09] <LocutusOfBorg> because this sync https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/2.30.1-1 uses that libdrm-common, and the build log is successful
[11:10] <LocutusOfBorg> Get:45 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu groovy/main amd64 libdrm-common all 2.4.102-1ubuntu1 [5480 B]
[11:10] <seb128> rmadison still lists it, it's weird...
[11:10] <LocutusOfBorg> yep, I also checked that
[11:10] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe we are in the middle of a britney sadness?
[11:12] <LocutusOfBorg> looks like britney is copying stuff right now
[11:12] <seb128> but that package didn't see a recent upload so it shouldn't be copied around?
[11:12] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, but gst-plugins is migrating, meh
[11:13] <LocutusOfBorg> still not installable, but the situation seems to be healing
[11:14] <seb128> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/groovy/amd64/libdrm-common
[11:14] <seb128>  Superseded 2 hours ago by amd64 build of libdrm 2.4.102-1ubuntu1 in ubuntu groovy PROPOSED
[11:15] <seb128> was it that this version was blocked in proposed since august and is migrating now?
[11:22] <LocutusOfBorg> 2020-08-27 16:28:42 CEST	Published	Groovy	release	main	x11	2.4.102-1ubuntu1
[11:22] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm
[11:23] <LocutusOfBorg> and britney logs show no libdrm references
[11:51] <cjwatson> I think it's related to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/groovy/i386/libdrm-common having been copied back in a few hours ago, but not sure exactly how
[11:52] <cjwatson> Seems to have incorrectly self-superseded the architecture-independent binary
[11:52] <cjwatson> A bug report would be welcome
[11:54] <cjwatson> seb128: ^ in the meantime I've restored it with a self-copy
=== acheronuk is now known as RikMills
[12:31] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, how can we be sure it is the only binary who got the issue? do we have a way to detect them?
[12:32] <cjwatson> Not very easily, I'm afraid.  It's possible there's a cross-architecture consistency check of some kind somewhere among the ubuntu-release scripts ...
[12:33] <cjwatson> Also hopefully some kind of proposed-migration run would pick up the missing binary in many cases
[12:38] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, just a nitpick:
[12:38] <LocutusOfBorg> 2020-09-23 10:48:11 CEST	Superseded	Ubuntu Groovy amd64	release	main	libs	Standard		2.4.102-1ubuntu1 "Removal requested in 20 hours."
[12:38] <LocutusOfBorg> lol looks like it is predicting a future removal? :o
[12:39] <cjwatson> Feel free to report a bug.  Nitpicking it to me on IRC will probably not achieve so much :)
[12:40] <LocutusOfBorg> I was just wondering that my english wasn't parsing the sentence correctly
[12:40] <LocutusOfBorg> there are more serious things to do
[12:42] <cjwatson> It's not ideal English
[12:43] <LocutusOfBorg> if you want a bug report, I can do it, however I don't even know if "launchpad itself" is a good candidate
[12:45] <cjwatson> "Launchpad itself" is the only possible target
[12:46] <LocutusOfBorg> I did clone the repo, let me try to offer a patch
[12:55] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, looks like something that has been committed wrongly by somebody in 2008... see d3c177076ad59dc9b1f1f6a8b8a5b5c865e6e091
[12:56] <LocutusOfBorg> at least I don't think it was fixing a test
[12:56]  * LocutusOfBorg opens a bug
[12:58] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: It is possible
[12:58] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1896768
[12:58] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1896768 in Launchpad itself ""Removal requested" in publishing history has a future date" [Undecided,New]
[12:59] <LocutusOfBorg> I hope I explained correctly the issue
[15:14] <mohclips69> Just joined channel, is lauchpad.net down.   seems to be down from UK.
[15:14] <tomwardill> mohclips69: we're working on it
[15:15] <mohclips69> ta buddy
[15:18] <tomwardill> mohclips69: we should be mostly back
[15:20] <mohclips69> looks good so far
[15:24] <mohclips69> yup getting downloads now, thanks
[15:24] <seb128> cjwatson, I opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1896790 for the superseeded binary problem
[15:24] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1896790 in Launchpad itself "libdrm-common binary incorrectly superseeded after an i386 copy" [Undecided,New]
=== cjwatson changed the topic of #launchpad to: Recipe builds broken | Help contact: cjwatson (08:00-17:00 UTC Mon-Fri) | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support and spam reporting: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[21:36] <cjwatson> Recipe builds are currently broken due to a bug in migrating launchpad-buildd to Python 3; apologies for the inconvenience.  We'll be reverting this update shortly.
[22:21] <cjwatson> Reverted.  I had to cancel some recipe builds, but they'll try again on the usual schedule
=== cjwatson changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: cjwatson (08:00-17:00 UTC Mon-Fri) | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support and spam reporting: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[22:21] <cjwatson> (Well, reverted on amd64, which is the only arch that does recipe builds)