| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjfx (focal-proposed/universe) [11.0.7+0-2ubuntu1 => 11.0.7+0-5ubuntu1~20.04] (no packageset) | 00:03 | |
| RAOF | hellsworth: For the libreoffice focal SRU, there's special code in sru-release warning refusing to release libreoffice without also releasing libreoffice-l10n. | 02:36 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | hellsworth: My investigation suggests that this is an outdated check, and that libreoffice-l10n is now no longer a separate source package, and so we should be good to release, but I'd like to check first :) | 02:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sshuttle [source] (focal-proposed) [0.78.5-1ubuntu1.1] | 03:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsejda-java (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.84-1 => 3.2.84-2~20.04] (no packageset) | 04:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pdfsam (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0.4-1 => 4.0.4-1ubuntu2~20.04] (no packageset) | 04:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sshuttle [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.78.3-1ubuntu1.1] | 04:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sshuttle [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.76-1ubuntu1.1] | 04:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sshuttle [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.78.3-1ubuntu1.1] | 04:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sshuttle [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.76-1ubuntu1.1] | 04:37 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, I don't really know, it was strange to me too... | 06:52 |
| dosaboy | rbasak: ive hit an odd build failure for focal-proposed - https://launchpadlibrarian.net/498597149/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-amd64.neutron_2%3A16.1.0-0ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz | 10:17 |
| dosaboy | it looks like it just timed out | 10:17 |
| dosaboy | is there a way to retrigger the build? | 10:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | dosaboy, yes (done) | 10:19 |
| dosaboy | LocutusOfBorg: thanks | 10:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks to you | 10:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | usually better directly ping the uploader for the package or the sponsor, coreycb in this case :) | 10:20 |
| dosaboy | LocutusOfBorg: ack will do | 10:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | lets see if this time the build passes | 10:22 |
| icey | LocutusOfBorg: he won't be online for a couple of hours yet ;-) | 10:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | not a big deal, I just want him to be aware of the fact that somebody retried his build :) btw, there is an open Debian bug against "flaky tests" so I presume its a known problem already | 10:40 |
| doko | sil2100, rbalint: please can we ignore the glibc/armhf test failure to let binutils migrate? afaiu there is a glibc upload pending to ignore that test failure | 11:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | dosaboy, it built, happy testing | 11:24 |
| doko | djview4 (4.11-2build1 to 4.11-3) | 11:35 |
| doko | Migration status for djview4 (4.11-2build1 to 4.11-3): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression | 11:35 |
| doko | Issues preventing migration: | 11:35 |
| doko | old binaries left on ppc64el: djview-plugin (from 4.11-2build1) | 11:35 |
| doko | old binaries left on s390x: djview-plugin (from 4.11-2build1) | 11:35 |
| doko | vorlon, Laney: trying to remove those binaries shows that they don't exist ... | 11:35 |
| xnox | doko: hm, i do see djview-plugin in groovy-release on 5 arches, and such package doesn't exist in groovy-prosed at all (so dropped) | 11:57 |
| xnox | also djvulibre-plugin | 11:57 |
| === acheronuk is now known as RikMills | ||
| Laney | seems wrong, I'll take a look | 12:05 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pulseaudio [source] (focal-proposed) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.8] | 12:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1004.6] (no packageset) | 13:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1026.26~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 13:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1085.96~16.04.1] (kernel) | 13:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1026.26~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 13:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1055.59] (kernel) | 13:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gkeop-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.4.0-1002.2] (no packageset) | 13:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1026.26~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 13:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1004.6] | 14:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1026.26~18.04.1] | 14:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1026.26~18.04.1] | 14:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1085.96~16.04.1] | 14:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1026.26~18.04.1] | 14:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1055.59] | 14:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gkeop-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1002.2] | 14:18 | |
| tdaitx | bdmurray: could you please remove scilab from focal and bionic? bileto is getting confused on testing the stuff in the ppa while the packages are also in the unapproved queue | 14:18 |
| tdaitx | thanks! | 14:18 |
| tdaitx | s/from focal and bionic/from focal and bionic queues/ | 14:19 |
| hellsworth | RAOF: re libreoffice-l10n.. there is not a package called this but there are several packages for each language like libreoffice-l10n-af, libreoffice-l10n-am, etc | 14:21 |
| hellsworth | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice | 14:21 |
| hellsworth | so if the sru code is looking for a one off libreoffice-l10n package, it doesn't exist and is an antiquated idea | 14:22 |
| bdmurray | hellsworth: I'll finish off releasing libreoffice today | 14:33 |
| doko | Laney: are you working on that? the alternative solution would be to remove it in the release pocket to let it migrate | 14:40 |
| Laney | yeah | 14:40 |
| Laney | I went to eat some avocado on toast | 14:41 |
| Laney | but now I am looking at the code | 14:41 |
| Laney | and full of delicious green goo | 14:41 |
| doko | happy mashing | 14:43 |
| Laney | can sort of see the problem | 14:53 |
| Laney | but I don't exactly know how to fix it | 14:53 |
| Laney | believe it or not it's to do with partial i386 | 14:53 |
| bdmurray | tdaitx: Okay, keep in mind we can review it from the rejected queue so you don't necessarily need to reupload it. | 14:56 |
| tdaitx | bdmurray: ack, thanks for the info | 15:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected scilab [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.0.2-1ubuntu1] | 15:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected scilab [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu4] | 15:14 | |
| sil2100 | Laney, bdmurray, vorlon: I'd like to request some ubuntu-release eyes on a FFe for ubuntu-image 1.10: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-image/+bug/1896744 | 15:25 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1896744 in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu Focal) "[FFe] SRU 1.10 tracking bug" [Critical,New] | 15:25 |
| sil2100 | It's the usual thing, most changes are UC20 related | 15:25 |
| seb128 | vorlon, launchpad hints that you are the one who did a copy of libdrm / i386 earlier today which did lead to the arch all common binary to vanish as superseeded, I opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1896790 and Colin restored the binary but you might have details about what you did exactly to add to the report? | 15:25 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1896790 in Launchpad itself "libdrm-common binary incorrectly superseeded after an i386 copy" [Undecided,New] | 15:25 |
| cjwatson | I think it was an override change rather than a copy in fact | 15:57 |
| cjwatson | Though a slightly weird one, possibly inconsistent across architectures? | 15:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-shell [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.4-0ubuntu18.04.5] | 16:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~20.04.2 => 0.100-0ubuntu4~20.04.1] (core) | 16:21 | |
| Laney | doko: ok, should be fixed for the next round | 16:23 |
| Laney | hoepfully I didn't break anything else, don't think so | 16:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, I *think* libdc1394-22 on i386 can be dropped, and libdc1394 should be used instead (ffmpeg switched to it) | 16:25 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the library changed just name, and the new release has just two bugfixes | 16:26 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (I think we should for now build them both, waiting for gst-plugins-bad1.0 and vlc to do the switch, something I presume will come in the next few days) | 16:30 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the switch is a matter of switching a build-dependency, nothing difficult to do, but I don't want to introduce delta | 16:30 |
| bdmurray | RAOF: I don't think the check should be removed be libreoffice-l10n is still a think for bionic afaict | 16:44 |
| bdmurray | *because | 16:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator (focal-proposed/main) [33-1 => 33.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 16:50 | |
| hellsworth | bdmurray: thanks re libreoffice | 17:00 |
| bdmurray | hellsworth: no problem, I'm glad we worked through that stuff | 17:02 |
| hellsworth | definitely. and improved what future srus look like | 17:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.6.0-1029.29] (no packageset) | 18:03 | |
| ijohnson | bdmurray: hi, I seem to have lost permission to assign importance to bugs in the snapd source project on LP, can you help with that? I can still assign importance to the snapd project directly, just not the ubuntu project for snapd | 18:06 |
| ijohnson | i.e. I can't assign this bug for snapd to anyone or set the importance: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1879290 | 18:07 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1879290 in linux (Ubuntu) "pc: no message on the screen for ~30s on fast HW" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 18:07 |
| bdmurray | ijohnson: That's the snapd source package | 18:08 |
| ijohnson | bdmurray: right | 18:09 |
| bdmurray | ijohnson: okay you'd said snpad source project previously and I just trying to make sure we are using the same terms | 18:10 |
| ijohnson | sorry yes I need access to set bug things on the snapd source package | 18:10 |
| bdmurray | I don't know how long ago this happened but the snappy-dev team expired from the ubuntu-bugcontrol and an admin or the owner of the snappy dev team needs to accept the invite to join ubuntu-bugcontrol | 18:11 |
| ijohnson | bdmurray: ah ok, I will ask mvo to look at that tomorrow thanks | 18:12 |
| bdmurray | let me know if it gets sorted and I'll make sure snappy-dev doesn't expire | 18:12 |
| ijohnson | ack, thanks for checking | 18:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1029.29] | 18:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.4-0ubuntu18.04.3 => 3.28.4-0ubuntu18.04.6] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) | 18:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.6 => 2.664.7] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 18:40 | |
| bdmurray | sil2100: I've added more SRU information to bug 1894919 if you could have a look. | 19:15 |
| ubot5 | bug 1894919 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Focal) "gnome-software-plugin-snap consider an unwanted removal for 20.04 ubuntu-desktop" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894919 | 19:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.4+git20200505-0ubuntu18.04.1 => 3.28.4+git20200505-0ubuntu18.04.2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) | 19:36 | |
| Trevinho | sil2100: hey, I've finally found the root cause of mutter not compiling anymore in bionic, so I've uploaded a new version ^^, can you maybe look at that (given it was already approved)? | 19:39 |
| tdaitx | bdmurray: I am satisfied with the builds for scilab and I have updated bug 1870813 last night, I would appreciate if you have any further feedback before we get it back from the rejected queue | 19:47 |
| ubot5 | bug 1870813 in scilab (Ubuntu Focal) "Scilab does not start on bionic and focal" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1870813 | 19:47 |
| tdaitx | sil2100: ^ fiy since you worked on the openjdk 11 transition in bionic (this is about fixing a regression from an later openjdk-11 security update) | 19:48 |
| tdaitx | bdmurray: it's not urgent, so peek at it when you have the time ;-) | 19:50 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cryptsetup (bionic-proposed/main) [2:2.0.2-1ubuntu1.1 => 2:2.0.2-1ubuntu1.2] (core) | 19:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cryptsetup (focal-proposed/main) [2:2.2.2-3ubuntu2.2 => 2:2.2.2-3ubuntu2.3] (core, i386-whitelist) | 19:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.6-1ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 3.36.6-1ubuntu0.20.04.2] (desktop-core, desktop-extra) | 20:08 | |
| Trevinho | bdmurray: we got a sru-regression due to some merge issue it seems in latest mutter, I've uploaded a fixup ^ | 20:19 |
| vorlon | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html shows some revdep cleanup is needed for the gst transition | 20:20 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: libdc1394> can you point me specifically to what is dependent on libdc1394 being available on i386? | 20:24 |
| vorlon | seb128, cjwatson: I was processing https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/priority-mismatches.html and thus demoting libdrm-common/libdrm2 to priority: optional; I guess this confuses launchpad due to having a different per-arch priority on an arch: all package (libdrm-common)? | 20:27 |
| vorlon | Laney: what did you have to change to fix the "out of date on {ppc64el,riscv64,s390x}" problem? | 20:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04.39] | 20:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:16.04.31] | 20:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zlib (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1 => 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 20:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.60] | 20:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [0.130ubuntu3.10 => 0.130ubuntu3.11] (core) | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [0.122ubuntu8.16 => 0.122ubuntu8.17] (core) | 21:01 | |
| tdaitx | per robie's comment, please remove openjfx 11.0.7+0-5ubuntu1~20.04 from the queue, I will rework it and do another upload | 21:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openjfx [source] (focal-proposed) [11.0.7+0-5ubuntu1~20.04] | 21:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mediathekview (bionic-proposed/universe) [13.0.6-1 => 13.0.6-3~18.04] (no packageset) (sync) | 21:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.6-1ubuntu0.20.04.2] | 22:13 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!