[11:12] <rbasak> cjwatson: o/ I can't delete lp:~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird I think because there are build (deb) and snap recipes pointing to it. Any suggestions please?
[11:13] <rbasak> Is this something you would permit to be forced as a one-off?
[11:13] <rbasak> The reason I'd like to delete thunderbird is that we aren't maintaining it for now due to size, and I want do declare that everything we are importing meets some level of quality.
[11:13] <rbasak> Alternatively would I be able to change its owner maybe?
[11:14]  * rbasak wonders if he could delete all branches and tags instead
[11:15] <cjwatson> rbasak: Neither of those recipes have ever worked, so I've deleted them
[11:16] <rbasak> Thanks!
[11:16] <rbasak> I've deleted the thunderbird repository now
[11:17] <rbasak> I believe that's all repositories done, and everything left is stable and should be fast forwarding now. I will double check everything and release a 1.0. Thank you for all your help!
[11:19] <cjwatson> Awesome
[11:19] <cjwatson> Nice work
[11:28] <rbasak> openjdk-8 looks like it might benefit from a repack BTW.
[11:29] <rbasak> Do you have any strategy for routine repacks? I get the impression that after a while git-ubuntu repos get pretty bad for this
[11:30] <cjwatson> rbasak: We're hoping to get that on our roadmap for next cycle
[11:31] <cjwatson> rbasak: In the meantime we can do it by hand (https://wiki.canonical.com/Launchpad/PolicyandProcess/GitRepack is our internal doc for this)
[11:32] <rbasak> Sounds good, thanks.
[11:32] <rbasak> I don't think I need openjdk-8 BTW - it just finished and I probably won't need to fetch it again for now.
[11:34] <cjwatson> I've requested it anyway
[11:35] <rbasak> np. It might help with performance elsewhere