[01:29] RikMills: might have told me you synced it already for Groovy [01:30] so I don't do work/stuff I don't have to in the process [01:30] :P [01:30] AsciiWolf: yep i'll be handling it tomorrow. Currently crashing hard since I got up extra early last night. [07:12] teward: I left a script to try it while I slept, so did not know [09:52] RikMills, thanks for the quick sync! :-) [10:20] teward, I have updated the torbrowser-launcher SRU ticket with a comment describing what should be included in the SRU and why ;-) [13:57] AsciiWolf: yep all's good. except now we need 4 SRUs [13:57] s/SRUs/SRU tickets/ [13:57] 4 separate issues [13:57] rbasak: RikMills: an extra set of eyes would be good btw since scope creep on the SRU [13:58] (it went from one patch to two now four) [13:59] i also require my morning coffee and breakfast so [13:59] BRB [13:59] teward: not sure if I can spend much time since 20.10 beta is looming [14:00] no worries [14:00] since we're now in SRU mode I assume that if we have to push this until post-beta we can despite it'd be nice to fix [14:00] (I have my own torbrowser-installer script I use anyways locally) [14:01] * RikMills nods [14:01] *goes to play his playlist of russian folk music because reasons) [14:05] teward, AsciiWolf: happy to look, and if teward and I both endorse it then it can just jump straight through the SRU queue. But at the rate I'm going today, I don't think it'll be earlier than Monday, sorry. [14:06] rbasak: i'm in no urgent rush. the main reason is that we have two new things, one which adds a new dependency on gnupg and requires gpg (NOT gpg2) binaries to exist. and the libstdc apparmor rule revisions. two things that weren't within the original scope [14:06] which is why i would *like* a second set of eyes before I push any upload :) [14:06] while I trust AsciiWolf to some extent to know what patches are needed, i still would like another set of eyes ;) [14:07] ... aaaand my keurig isn't brewing coffee today bleh. Guess i need to clean it again. [14:53] teward, two tickets are already filled (for the new key and the version comparison issue) [14:53] should I fill the remaining two ones? [15:46] teward, rbasak I have filled the remaining two tickets and added links to all the 4 tickets in the torbrowser-launcher SRU ticket [15:57] 👍 [15:57] i'll dig when i get a minute [15:57] i assume you provided justification in each of the bugs as to why each nitpicked bit is needed? [16:14] teward, I did :) at least I hope...