[08:13] morning all [08:14] Morning Chipaca [08:45] i wonder at '[...] events raised' [08:45] surely it's events fired, or triggered? [08:47] Either sounds good to me take your pick. Is it because "raised" makes it sound like exception raised. [11:30] ¡Muy buenos días a todos! [11:35] Morning [11:35] hola bthomas [11:37] facubatista: 👋 🙂 [11:37] facubatista: #413 is ready for a re-review (plz) [11:37] PR #413: bail out of main() if use_juju_for_storage=True and unsupported [11:42] * facubatista begs for reviews https://github.com/canonical/charmcraft/pull/153 [11:42] PR charmcraft#153: Adjust help messages in all cases to UX indications [12:01] * bthomas -> lunch [12:21] Issue operator#344 closed: Cleaner error message when use_juju_for_storage is True wrt Juju 2.6 [12:21] PR operator#413 closed: bail out of main() if use_juju_for_storage=True and unsupported [17:04] Issue operator#332 closed: Model.config is mutable [17:04] PR operator#411 closed: make model.config immutable [18:10] Issue operator#410 closed: Framework does not log re-emission of events [18:10] PR operator#415 closed: Log event deferral and reëmission [21:05] grah, #408 hates me (again) [21:05] PR #408: These changes make it so that the test suite passes on Windows [21:05] i'm going to EOD in defeat === ChanServ changed the topic of #smooth-operator to: general discussion of the operator framework || github.com/canonical/operator || ops 0.9.0 || charmcraft 0.5.0 [22:06] super simple review, please! thanks :) https://github.com/canonical/charmcraft/pull/168 [22:06] PR charmcraft#168: Release 0.5.0 [22:06] and with that, /me eods