rbasak | vorlon: on your git-ubuntu question, do you mean for staging prior to upload, or to adopt developers' commits into the "official" git-ubuntu record? | 00:08 |
---|---|---|
rbasak | vorlon: on your git-ubuntu question, do you mean for staging prior to upload, or to adopt developers' commits into the "official" git-ubuntu record _after upload_? | 00:09 |
vorlon | rbasak: either? :) | 00:16 |
rbasak | vorlon: the latter I'm hoping to do next. I have a hook in the right place now, so it's just a case of specifying and implementing the getting of a commit to the importer at the time the upload is seen and imported. | 00:24 |
rbasak | vorlon: the former still needs to be specced out etc | 00:24 |
rbasak | For the latter I'm hoping to be able to find an appropriate MP if it exists and matches | 00:25 |
=== pieq_ is now known as pieq | ||
mwhudson | can we just mass remove all software that builds with -Werror pls | 01:47 |
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
mwhudson | ehh what https://launchpadlibrarian.net/499271572/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-armhf.achilles_2-10_BUILDING.txt.gz | 02:38 |
mwhudson | doko, cjwatson: does one of you have the power to restart https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20200925-groovy/+build/19970489 ? | 02:38 |
cjwatson | mwhudson: done | 07:46 |
xnox | rbalint: imho, yes, systemd & udev should have tight depedency. | 09:30 |
rbalint | xnox, https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/-/merge_requests/103 https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/391515 | 10:51 |
xnox | rbalint: slightly surprised that udev doesn't link against libsystemd0, do we duplicate code in Ubuntu? | 10:56 |
rbalint | xnox, udev does not link against libsystemd0, yes, but what do you mean by code duplication? | 11:24 |
rbalint | xnox, linking statically? | 11:27 |
ItzSwirlz | o/ Can you guys confirm that things from Debian are ONLY BEING SYNCED from UNSTABLE and things in Experimental and Testing won't be, correct? | 12:15 |
rbasak | autosync runs from unstable, but Ubuntu developers can manually sync anything | 12:16 |
ItzSwirlz | Ok | 12:16 |
rbasak | (though the version number can't go backwards) | 12:16 |
ItzSwirlz | I want to avoid Cinnamon/CJS being synced because we essentially threw in mozjs78 and it's a mega-patch, I don't want to risk or throw anything in a month pre-release | 12:17 |
rbasak | Oh and autosync is off this cycle of course because of the freeze | 12:17 |
ItzSwirlz | Ok | 12:17 |
ItzSwirlz | It seemed it was still with post-Feature Freeze | 12:17 |
ItzSwirlz | That things were still syncing but alr | 12:18 |
rbasak | I would hope that nobody would do that but it's more of a social thing | 12:18 |
rbasak | It won't happen automatically | 12:18 |
ItzSwirlz | I don't really think people are interested in Cinnamon DE who are capable of doing that | 12:20 |
seb128 | rbasak, mozjs is a depends of GNOME and we got 78 synced as part of 3.38 | 12:31 |
rbasak | Thanks, but I don't know about any of the specifics here. | 12:32 |
rbasak | ItzSwirlz: ^ | 12:32 |
ItzSwirlz | Don't worry about it | 12:33 |
ItzSwirlz | Cinnamon DE is crazy | 12:33 |
ItzSwirlz | It's Linux Mint's and they have essentialy no regard for any Debian/Ubuntu base, so thats why mozjs52i s still in the repos and thats what we're using | 12:33 |
slyon | RAOF: Hey! If you're working on SRUs today, I'd be glad if you could have a look at netplan.io 0.100 (stuck in Focal unapproved queue), as Brian is out today and Lukasz can't do it as he already sponsored it for me. LP: #1894197 | 13:03 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1894197 in netplan.io (Ubuntu) "[SRU][FFe] Update to netplan.io 0.100" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894197 | 13:03 |
ItzSwirlz | I could also use some SRU help today aswell if anyones available | 13:05 |
seb128 | ItzSwirlz, SRU help for? do you have questions or do you need a sponsor for some changes? | 13:25 |
ItzSwirlz | SRU for cinnamon-session | 13:25 |
ItzSwirlz | Bug #1887312 | 13:25 |
ubottu | bug 1887312 in cinnamon-session (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Cinnamon session doesn't shutdown until all apps close regardless if they act to Cinnamon's logout request" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1887312 | 13:25 |
seb128 | k | 13:27 |
ItzSwirlz | thanks | 13:32 |
xnox | rbasak: yeah, static linking. Cause i thought udev by now uses libsystemd0. | 13:41 |
=== hellswor1 is now known as hellsworth | ||
=== cjwatson changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Primary archive uploads down for hardware migration | Archive: Beta Freeze, Feature Freeze, Debian Import Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Trusty-Focal | If you can't send messages here, authenticate to NickServ first | Patch Pilots: | ||
bdmurray | seb128: I think I made the change to the rls-gg-incoming report that you wanted. Does it match your excpecations? | 14:37 |
bdmurray | seb128: I am a bit concerned about bugs slipping through the cracks (going straight to rls-gg-tracking) given the number of people who can target a bug to a release. | 14:38 |
Laney | bdmurray: it's already very common for people to just target bugs without going through -incoming | 14:39 |
Laney | when we go through the bugs we do both incoming and -tracking & unsassigned | 14:39 |
seb128 | bdmurray, did you get a refresh done using that change yet? http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html still lists the item that should go away ... and what L_aney said | 14:40 |
seb128 | also we do review the tracking page for unassigned items, unsure if you do the same? | 14:40 |
bdmurray | seb128: I said rls-gg, I haven't changes rls-ff | 14:40 |
seb128 | bdmurray, ah, I didn't know the code / queries were different by serie, I mentioned ff because we have a buggy item and not on the g one, I will create a fake one for testing | 14:42 |
=== diddledan5 is now known as diddledan | ||
=== rs20099 is now known as rs2009 | ||
pitti | hey hey! FYI, we just found out why latest groovy totally craps out libparted -- so if you start seeing installer failures, that's likely due to that kernel regression; https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gparted/-/issues/111 has more info | 16:04 |
pitti | i.e. groovy needs a kernel update to fix that (already fixed upstream) | 16:04 |
pitti | but I see there's a kernel in -proposed, I'll test that one first before reporting a new bug | 16:13 |
bdmurray | pitti: thanks! | 16:19 |
bdmurray | sil2100: ^^ | 16:19 |
=== dannf` is now known as dannf | ||
sil2100 | pitti: yes please! Since I know the current linux in release was not supposed to be released | 16:35 |
sil2100 | pitti: it migrated by accident, only the -proposed one is the right one (hopefully migrating soon) | 16:36 |
sil2100 | We were waiting with beta images until that lands | 16:36 |
pitti | sil2100: ah, good to know, thanks! | 16:40 |
jchittum | bdmurray: hello! if you have time, could you review livecd-rootfs in the focal-proposed unapproved queue? The version is 2664.7 | 18:34 |
bdmurray | jchittum: Why does this look familiar to me? | 18:56 |
jchittum | bdmurray: that I don't know? maybe from the chatter at various points regarding console=ttyS0 for kernel stuff? the ticket on the change is related to the discussions around that | 19:01 |
bdmurray | jchittum: ah well, its been accepted | 19:02 |
jchittum | thanks! | 19:02 |
=== fabiomirmar_ is now known as fabiomirmar | ||
blahdeblah | ganso: Hi. Now a good time to look at this NTP issue & NTPmon bug? | 19:19 |
ganso | blahdeblah: hey! yes! =) | 19:19 |
sigv | No patch pilots in the title.. so an open ended question - is there a reasonable way for me to try and push a merge (looking for sponsor) ticket forward in any way? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debmirror/+bug/1892110 | 20:16 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1892110 in debmirror (Ubuntu) "Please merge debmirror 2.33 (universe) from Debian testing (main)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] | 20:16 |
mwhudson | cjwatson: thanks | 20:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!