-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fonts-ibm-plex (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [5.0.0-1 => 5.1.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)00:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-ibm-plex [sync] (groovy-proposed) [5.1.3-1]00:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grcompiler (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.2-2 => 5.2-2.1] (no packageset) (sync)00:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grcompiler [sync] (groovy-proposed) [5.2-2.1]00:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: malcontent (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-2 => 0.9.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)03:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted malcontent [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.0-1]03:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: android-platform-build (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:8.1.0+r23-3ubuntu2 => 1:8.1.0+r23-4.1] (no packageset) (sync)03:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted android-platform-build [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:8.1.0+r23-4.1]03:49
Mirvlots of non-amd64 errors last night, like https://launchpadlibrarian.net/499880916/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-arm64.file-roller_3.36.3-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz - rebuild seems to help05:32
Mirvriscv64 still gives Could not connect to ftpmaster.internal:80 (, connection timed out06:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: matlab-support (groovy-proposed/universe) [ => 0.0.22] (no packageset) (sync)06:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted matlab-support [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.0.22]06:20
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, cvc4, why3, coq, sslreflect06:58
LocutusOfBorgand probably also llvm-* when it builds06:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaru-theme [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.5]07:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-artwork [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.12.7]07:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted curtin [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.2-0ubuntu1]07:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)07:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)07:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)07:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)08:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)08:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)08:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)08:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)08:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)08:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)08:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)08:15
apwMirv, yes there was a loss of connectivity to ftpmaster which affected a lot of builds; do you have an example of the failure on riscv6408:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)08:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)08:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)08:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)08:27
=== ebarretto_ is now known as ebarretto
cjwatsonMirv: oh, interesting, I expected all those to show up as a different type of error08:35
cjwatsontempting to retry all failures since yesterday afternoon08:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-192.222] (core, kernel)08:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)08:41
LocutusOfBorgcjwatson, for some reasons, riscv64 is still sad09:06
LocutusOfBorgat least llvm-toolchain-11 is BD-uninst due to -ECONNECT09:07
cjwatsonLocutusOfBorg: timestamp?09:08
cjwatsonThat should have been fixed as of about half an hour ago09:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtmultimedia-opensource-src (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.14.2-2 => 5.14.2-3] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5) (sync)09:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-192.222]09:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected torbrowser-launcher [source] (focal-proposed) [0.3.2-9ubuntu1]09:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930.1)09:48
LocutusOfBorgcjwatson, confirmed, works now :D10:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cvise (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2 => 1.6.0-3] (no packageset) (sync)10:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cvise [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.6.0-3]10:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsejda-java [source] (focal-proposed) [3.2.84-2~20.04]10:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pdfsam [source] (focal-proposed) [4.0.4-1ubuntu2~20.04]10:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pkg-js-tools (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.9.40 => 0.9.41] (no packageset) (sync)10:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pkg-js-tools [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.41]10:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-10 (groovy-proposed/main) [10.2.0-11ubuntu1 => 10.2.0-13ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)10:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.100-0ubuntu4~20.04.1]10:53
enycLocutusOfBorg: hrrm I saw your name mentioned on sane-backends source ;p  I'm interested to know if there can be  focal20.04 backport of sane-backends 1.0.31  to fix (at least)  escl  driver bugs,  or (if appropriate) later an SRU11:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-apt (groovy-proposed/main) [2.1.3 => 2.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)11:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cvise (focal-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2~20.04 => 1.6.0-3~20.04] (no packageset)11:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: cvise (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.6.0-3~18.04]11:23
xnoxnote the rpi-eeprom has never made it to release pocket in any series, thus it's ok to get a better one in at least -proposed. The current one in -proposed is quite bad.11:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware-raspi2 (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [1.20200601+arm64-0ubuntu3 => 1.20200902-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rpi-eeprom (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [7.8-0ubuntu2 => 9.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)12:01
xnoxso above two are hwe basically12:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rpi-eeprom [source] (groovy-proposed) [9.0-1ubuntu1]12:01
xnoxflash-kernel is matching for linux-firmware-raspi2 upload12:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flash-kernel (groovy-proposed/main) [3.100ubuntu2 => 3.100ubuntu3] (core)12:12
sil2100Sure! Will get to queue reviews soonish, sorry o/12:15
xnoxi also uploaded a bunch of ftbfs fixes (or syncs)12:22
xnoxif there are any questions about things i uploaded, just ping me.12:22
LocutusOfBorgenyc, do you have a bug?12:53
enycLocutusOfBorg:   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962539  is general issue experienced  and debian 968949 related.13:06
ubot5Debian bug 962539 in src:sane-backends "sane-backends: the escl backend is obselete, in its packaged version, it contains many malfunctions" [Wishlist,Fixed]13:06
ubot5Debian bug 968949 in src:sane-backends "src:sane-backends: SANE Backends 1.0.31 released. Please upgrade" [Wishlist,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/96894913:06
enycLocutusOfBorg: have asked the reporter-to-me to try ppa  https://launchpad.net/~sane-project/+archive/ubuntu/sane-git  on their focal20.0413:07
Mirvapw: sorry, yes I had riscv64 example, seems like it's all fixed now finally13:12
LocutusOfBorgenyc, I don't see any ubuntu bug...13:15
enycLocutusOfBorg: maybe not, its been imported into ubuntu by default i think13:15
LocutusOfBorgI mean, if nobody complains, SRUing is no-go13:15
enycLocutusOfBorg: rigth yes, well i'l getthem to confirm that helps13:15
LocutusOfBorgwe need an Ubuntu bug with somebody checking/testing the fix13:16
enycLocutusOfBorg: the question is, if to backport escl only  or try to suggest SRU of all such bugs13:16
enycLocutusOfBorg: that makes sense ,thankyou for helpful answer =)13:16
LocutusOfBorgI don't know which path to take to be honest13:16
LocutusOfBorgis the patch available somewhere?13:17
enycLocutusOfBorg: not sure separate-patch,  sane-backends update to 1.0.31 fixeh escl  amnogst all the other changes!13:17
LocutusOfBorgif we have a one-line patch, better SRU just that, because changing version is not trivial13:17
LocutusOfBorgyes but jumping from .29 to .31 is... meh13:17
enycLocutusOfBorg: what would be involved in putting .31 into focal-backports ?13:18
LocutusOfBorgtesting the world for no regressions...13:18
enyci don't mean focal-updates, just -backports13:19
LocutusOfBorgoh... probably it need backporters team....13:19
LocutusOfBorgit would be ok for backports, if we could reach somebody accepting it13:19
enycLocutusOfBorg: okay, well i'll see what fedeback get first ;p13:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (groovy-proposed/universe) [20200617.00-0ubuntu3 => 20200617.00-0ubuntu4] (no packageset) (sync)13:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-guest-agent [sync] (groovy-proposed) [20200617.00-0ubuntu4]13:29
enycLocutusOfBorg: aaah acutalyl I have a report that  the ppa does fix it for thei escl scanner... so will try to ask them to create appropriate bug.  Not sure if there is a good guide!13:36
ricotzhello, please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vala/+bug/189790113:56
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1897901 in vala (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync vala 0.48.11-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New]13:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (focal-proposed/main) [2:21.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.3 => 2:21.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.4] (openstack, ubuntu-server)14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (groovy-proposed/main) [2:22.0.0~b3~git2020091410.76b2fbd90e-0ubuntu2 => 2:22.0.0~b3~git2020091410.76b2fbd90e-0ubuntu3] (openstack)14:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plymouth (focal-proposed/main) [0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu6 => 0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu6.1] (core)14:13
xnoxaha, it's here now. good.14:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (groovy-proposed/restricted) [450.66-0ubuntu1 => 450.80.02-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)14:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: epiphany-browser (focal-proposed/universe) [3.36.3-0ubuntu1 => 3.36.4-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra)14:24
tseliothi sil2100 , can you have a look at nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 when you have the time, please?14:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-settings (groovy-proposed/main) [20.04.5 => 20.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop)14:41
iceyrbasak: any chance you could take a look at a minor SRU that's been in the focal unapproved queue for a few weeks? openvswitch was uploaded on the 10th related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/188717714:51
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1887177 in openvswitch (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] ovsdb-server.service needs a depedency on local-fs.target" [Undecided,New]14:51
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: ok, looks like it's migrated then15:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cvc4 (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.6-2build2 => 1.8-2] (no packageset) (sync)15:26
LocutusOfBorgsadly I forgot cvc4 in the ocaml migration15:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cvc4 [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.8-2]15:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ardour (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:6.2.0+ds1-1 => 1:6.3.0+ds0-1] (ubuntustudio) (sync)15:30
bdmurraysil2100: bug 1897173 would have been fixed by the new kernel correct?15:32
ubot5bug 1897173 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "20.10 Installer crashes with partitions being written but unable to inform kernel of the change" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189717315:32
LocutusOfBorgrbalint, looks like the new glibc regressed mozjs build15:33
LocutusOfBorgI can't really understand what is failing...15:33
LocutusOfBorgafter commenting the sys/sysctl.h include in memory/mozjemalloc/jemalloc.c and changing sysctl(mib, 2, &ret, &len, (void *) 0, 0) into syscall(RR__sysctl, mib, 2, &ret, &len, (void *) 0, 0) I go a little bit further15:34
Eickmeyer[m]Writing an FFe for that ardour sync ^15:35
sil2100tseliot: let me try getting to that, yes o/15:38
Eickmeyer[m]ubuntu-release: bug 1897922, package is sync'd, needs an ACK.15:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sudo (bionic-proposed/main) [1.8.21p2-3ubuntu1.2 => 1.8.21p2-3ubuntu1.3] (core)15:41
ubot5bug 1897922 in ardour (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Upgrade Ardour to 6.3" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189792215:41
LocutusOfBorgbut the build stops here https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+sourcepub/11637831/+listing-archive-extra15:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cvc4 [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.8-2] (no packageset)15:46
rbalintLocutusOfBorg, https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-announce/2020/000029.html https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Linux-5.5-Kills-SYSCTL-SYSCALL15:50
ubot5sourceware.org bug 2020 in translator "probe kernel audit hooks" [Normal,Resolved: wontfix]15:50
LocutusOfBorginteresting, the build works in ppa15:52
LocutusOfBorgrbalint, isn't my patch good then?15:52
LocutusOfBorgusing the new syscall...15:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cvc4 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.8-2] (no packageset)15:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvc4 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.8-2]15:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvc4 [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.8-2]15:57
LocutusOfBorgcan we please have when convenient accepted sane-backends? its the very same release, just some packaging fixes an one patch16:00
bdmurrayLocutusOfBorg: Is this important for the Beta?16:05
LocutusOfBorgbdmurray, no, the bugfix regards a bug that returns empty when you request local devices during the scan16:05
LocutusOfBorgI don't think anybody will search for scanners during live testing :p16:06
LocutusOfBorgthis is the fix https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/-/merge_requests/50616:06
bdmurrayLocutusOfBorg: Okay, we'll review all the packages in the queue after the Beta release is over so pinging seems kind of redundant.16:06
LocutusOfBorgok sure, I didn't remember it was seeded and the beta was not yet over :) sorry for the ping16:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: carla (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.2.0-0ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio)16:17
Eickmeyer[m]^ bug 189780816:17
ubot5bug 1897808 in carla (Ubuntu) "Carla 2.2 hangs when zita-ajbridge ends after device removal" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189780816:17
Eickmeyer[m]One-line patch, if that could get a quick ACK before beta that would be nice.16:17
Eickmeyer[m]If not, then we can live with it being outside the beta images.16:18
iceyrbasak thanks for the more detailed addition to regression potential on the OVS bug16:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (focal-proposed) [2.13.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]16:58
hellsworthis there a way I can see how many users have updated their libreoffice to 6.4.6 before phasing stopped?16:58
bdmurrayhellsworth: nope16:59
hellsworthok thanks :)16:59
bdmurraywhat's going on?16:59
hellsworthwell looks like there's a real problem detected by the phased rollout of 6.4.6. a huge increase of a specific error has caused the phasing to stop. i reported it upstream yesterday and the devs are actively looking into it but a question came up of what other new packages might have been installed on the users system that could cause the error17:03
hellsworththat somehow led me to wonder the percentage of folks that updated to 6.4.6 before phasing had stopped17:03
hellsworththere's 23k errors of this kubuntu stacktrace. was 17k yesterday.17:04
hellsworthwell upstream thinks there's a legit LO bug and they're trying to find it. i wanted to be ready with helpful info in case :)17:04
hellsworthand satisfy my own curiosities :)17:04
* enyc meows17:05
bdmurrayI might have some code that queries individual crashes in a bucket but I haven't used it in a while.17:05
hellsworththat's alright. no need to dust it off yet. upstream seems on the right trail..17:06
bdmurraywell hooray for the Error Tracker either way17:07
hellsworthi'm hoping they can fix it before 6.4.7 is published in 2 weeks17:07
hellsworthi know! good job error tracker :)17:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (groovy-proposed/main) [1:20.10.11 => 1:20.10.12] (core)17:07
arnatiousubuntu-archive is it possible to get https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/1883175 back into proposed?17:46
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1883175 in python-flake8 (Ubuntu Focal) "missing support for python3.8 language features" [Low,Confirmed]17:46
vorlonarnatious: how does reviving the same version address the autopkgtest regressions mentioned in the removal?17:55
arnatiousvorlon those aren't actual regressions, the failing packages are due to linting tests in those packages that now fail correctly18:01
arnatiousi.e. they have style errors that weren't caught originally18:01
arnatiouselpy's failure was due to another package that's update was included in its test run, was not able to reproduce on a clean configuration18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (focal-proposed/main) [4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)18:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: torbrowser-launcher (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.2-9 => 0.3.2-9ubuntu1] (no packageset)18:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted torbrowser-launcher [source] (focal-proposed) [0.3.2-9ubuntu1]19:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cvise [source] (focal-proposed) [1.6.0-3~20.04]19:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected cvise [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-2~18.04]19:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pebble [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.5.3-1~18.04]19:52
enycLocutusOfBorg: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/189796219:58
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1897962 in sane-backends (Ubuntu) "Out of Memory Error with Brother DCP-J7720W " [Undecided,Confirmed]19:58
enycLocutusOfBorg: i could create a different backport request if needbe19:58
vorlonarnatious: where did you do the reproducing of the elpy failure? Since the package is no longer in -proposed and therefore no results are visible on autopkgtest.ubuntu.com20:39
vorlonarnatious: (which is argument enough IMHO to pull the package back in for testing)20:39
vorlonarnatious: and did you mean all three source packages? since you only mentioned python-flake8 by url20:41
rbalintubuntu-archive: please process LP: #189791220:43
ubot5Launchpad bug 1897912 in golang-goprotobuf (Ubuntu) "Please remove golang-google-genproto and golang-goprotobuf from groovy-proposed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189791220:43
arnatiousvorlon yes all three, I repro'd using autopkgtest in a clean schroot20:50
arnatiousi.e. built three debs, ran `autopkgtest ubuntu-release-upgrader pycodestyle/*.deb pyflakes/*.deb python-flake8/*.deb -- schroot aptests-amd64`, etc for each package20:52
arnatious(included that because I am a noob at packaging so if that's not the way to vet these things let me know)20:52
vorlonrbalint: done20:53
vorlonarnatious: ok, they're all copied back now20:53
arnatiousvorlon: cheers, when the tests fail again I'll comment that they should be ignored20:53
vorlonnot the elpy one; we should get a clean autopkgtest run (which I've queued)20:54
arnatiousAgreed since that one was a segfault20:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-scrypt (groovy-proposed/main) [0.8.0-0.3ubuntu1 => 0.8.0-0.3ubuntu2] (no packageset)21:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-scrypt [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.0-0.3ubuntu2]21:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pam [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.3]21:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (focal-proposed/main) [2:21.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.3 => 2:21.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)21:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-nibbles (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:3.36.0-1 => 1:3.38.0-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)22:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-chess (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:3.36.1-1 => 1:3.38.0-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)22:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Groovy Beta] (20200930) has been added22:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Groovy Beta] (20200930) has been added22:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (groovy-proposed/main) [2.688 => 2.689] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)22:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.20200820-1ubuntu1 => 1.0.20200827-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)22:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.20200827-1ubuntu1]23:00
vorlonarnatious: I retested elpy with only python-flake8 upgraded and it still failed; only packages pulled from proposed are python3-pycodestyle, python3-pyflakes, pypython3-flake8, flake8 https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/e/elpy/focal/amd6423:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (xenial-proposed/main) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.1 => 1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.3] (core)23:35

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!