[00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fonts-ibm-plex (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [5.0.0-1 => 5.1.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-ibm-plex [sync] (groovy-proposed) [5.1.3-1]
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grcompiler (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.2-2 => 5.2-2.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grcompiler [sync] (groovy-proposed) [5.2-2.1]
[03:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: malcontent (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-2 => 0.9.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[03:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted malcontent [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.0-1]
[03:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: android-platform-build (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:8.1.0+r23-3ubuntu2 => 1:8.1.0+r23-4.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[03:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted android-platform-build [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:8.1.0+r23-4.1]
[05:32] <Mirv> lots of non-amd64 errors last night, like https://launchpadlibrarian.net/499880916/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-arm64.file-roller_3.36.3-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz - rebuild seems to help
[06:01] <Mirv> riscv64 still gives Could not connect to ftpmaster.internal:80 (91.189.89.100), connection timed out
[06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: matlab-support (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0.21.1 => 0.0.22] (no packageset) (sync)
[06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted matlab-support [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.0.22]
[06:58] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, cvc4, why3, coq, sslreflect
[06:58] <LocutusOfBorg> and probably also llvm-* when it builds
[07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaru-theme [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.5]
[07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-artwork [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.12.7]
[07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted curtin [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[07:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[08:18] <apw> Mirv, yes there was a loss of connectivity to ftpmaster which affected a lot of builds; do you have an example of the failure on riscv64
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[08:35] <cjwatson> Mirv: oh, interesting, I expected all those to show up as a different type of error
[08:35] <cjwatson> tempting to retry all failures since yesterday afternoon
[08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-192.222] (core, kernel)
[08:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930)
[09:06] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, for some reasons, riscv64 is still sad
[09:07] <LocutusOfBorg> at least llvm-toolchain-11 is BD-uninst due to -ECONNECT
[09:08] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: timestamp?
[09:08] <cjwatson> That should have been fixed as of about half an hour ago
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtmultimedia-opensource-src (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.14.2-2 => 5.14.2-3] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5) (sync)
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-192.222]
[09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected torbrowser-launcher [source] (focal-proposed) [0.3.2-9ubuntu1]
[09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930.1)
[10:09] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, confirmed, works now :D
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cvise (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2 => 1.6.0-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cvise [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.6.0-3]
[10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsejda-java [source] (focal-proposed) [3.2.84-2~20.04]
[10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pdfsam [source] (focal-proposed) [4.0.4-1ubuntu2~20.04]
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pkg-js-tools (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.9.40 => 0.9.41] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pkg-js-tools [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.41]
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-10 (groovy-proposed/main) [10.2.0-11ubuntu1 => 10.2.0-13ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.100-0ubuntu4~20.04.1]
[11:09] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: hrrm I saw your name mentioned on sane-backends source ;p  I'm interested to know if there can be  focal20.04 backport of sane-backends 1.0.31  to fix (at least)  escl  driver bugs,  or (if appropriate) later an SRU
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-apt (groovy-proposed/main) [2.1.3 => 2.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cvise (focal-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2~20.04 => 1.6.0-3~20.04] (no packageset)
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: cvise (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.6.0-3~18.04]
[11:31] <xnox> note the rpi-eeprom has never made it to release pocket in any series, thus it's ok to get a better one in at least -proposed. The current one in -proposed is quite bad.
[11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware-raspi2 (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [1.20200601+arm64-0ubuntu3 => 1.20200902-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rpi-eeprom (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [7.8-0ubuntu2 => 9.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:01] <xnox> so above two are hwe basically
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rpi-eeprom [source] (groovy-proposed) [9.0-1ubuntu1]
[12:12] <xnox> flash-kernel is matching for linux-firmware-raspi2 upload
[12:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flash-kernel (groovy-proposed/main) [3.100ubuntu2 => 3.100ubuntu3] (core)
[12:15] <sil2100> Sure! Will get to queue reviews soonish, sorry o/
[12:22] <xnox> i also uploaded a bunch of ftbfs fixes (or syncs)
[12:22] <xnox> if there are any questions about things i uploaded, just ping me.
[12:53] <LocutusOfBorg> enyc, do you have a bug?
[13:06] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg:   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962539  is general issue experienced  and debian 968949 related.
[13:07] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: have asked the reporter-to-me to try ppa  https://launchpad.net/~sane-project/+archive/ubuntu/sane-git  on their focal20.04
[13:12] <Mirv> apw: sorry, yes I had riscv64 example, seems like it's all fixed now finally
[13:15] <LocutusOfBorg> enyc, I don't see any ubuntu bug...
[13:15] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: maybe not, its been imported into ubuntu by default i think
[13:15] <LocutusOfBorg> I mean, if nobody complains, SRUing is no-go
[13:15] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: rigth yes, well i'l getthem to confirm that helps
[13:16] <LocutusOfBorg> we need an Ubuntu bug with somebody checking/testing the fix
[13:16] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: the question is, if to backport escl only  or try to suggest SRU of all such bugs
[13:16] <enyc> indeed
[13:16] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: that makes sense ,thankyou for helpful answer =)
[13:16] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't know which path to take to be honest
[13:17] <LocutusOfBorg> is the patch available somewhere?
[13:17] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: not sure separate-patch,  sane-backends update to 1.0.31 fixeh escl  amnogst all the other changes!
[13:17] <LocutusOfBorg> if we have a one-line patch, better SRU just that, because changing version is not trivial
[13:17] <LocutusOfBorg> yes but jumping from .29 to .31 is... meh
[13:18] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: what would be involved in putting .31 into focal-backports ?
[13:18] <LocutusOfBorg> testing the world for no regressions...
[13:19] <enyc> i don't mean focal-updates, just -backports
[13:19] <LocutusOfBorg> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#New_upstream_microreleases
[13:19] <LocutusOfBorg> oh... probably it need backporters team....
[13:19] <LocutusOfBorg> it would be ok for backports, if we could reach somebody accepting it
[13:19] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: okay, well i'll see what fedeback get first ;p
[13:20] <enyc> thankyou
[13:24] <LocutusOfBorg> yw!
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (groovy-proposed/universe) [20200617.00-0ubuntu3 => 20200617.00-0ubuntu4] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-guest-agent [sync] (groovy-proposed) [20200617.00-0ubuntu4]
[13:36] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: aaah acutalyl I have a report that  the ppa does fix it for thei escl scanner... so will try to ask them to create appropriate bug.  Not sure if there is a good guide!
[13:51] <LocutusOfBorg> nice
[13:56] <ricotz> hello, please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vala/+bug/1897901
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (focal-proposed/main) [2:21.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.3 => 2:21.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.4] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (groovy-proposed/main) [2:22.0.0~b3~git2020091410.76b2fbd90e-0ubuntu2 => 2:22.0.0~b3~git2020091410.76b2fbd90e-0ubuntu3] (openstack)
[14:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plymouth (focal-proposed/main) [0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu6 => 0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu6.1] (core)
[14:14] <xnox> aha, it's here now. good.
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (groovy-proposed/restricted) [450.66-0ubuntu1 => 450.80.02-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: epiphany-browser (focal-proposed/universe) [3.36.3-0ubuntu1 => 3.36.4-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra)
[14:39] <tseliot> hi sil2100 , can you have a look at nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 when you have the time, please?
[14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-settings (groovy-proposed/main) [20.04.5 => 20.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:51] <icey> rbasak: any chance you could take a look at a minor SRU that's been in the focal unapproved queue for a few weeks? openvswitch was uploaded on the 10th related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/1887177
[15:03] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ok, looks like it's migrated then
[15:24] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cvc4 (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.6-2build2 => 1.8-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[15:26] <LocutusOfBorg> sadly I forgot cvc4 in the ocaml migration
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cvc4 [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.8-2]
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ardour (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:6.2.0+ds1-1 => 1:6.3.0+ds0-1] (ubuntustudio) (sync)
[15:32] <bdmurray> sil2100: bug 1897173 would have been fixed by the new kernel correct?
[15:33] <LocutusOfBorg> rbalint, looks like the new glibc regressed mozjs build
[15:33] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozjs52/52.9.1-1.1
[15:33] <LocutusOfBorg> I can't really understand what is failing...
[15:34] <LocutusOfBorg> after commenting the sys/sysctl.h include in memory/mozjemalloc/jemalloc.c and changing sysctl(mib, 2, &ret, &len, (void *) 0, 0) into syscall(RR__sysctl, mib, 2, &ret, &len, (void *) 0, 0) I go a little bit further
[15:35] <Eickmeyer[m]> Writing an FFe for that ardour sync ^
[15:38] <sil2100> tseliot: let me try getting to that, yes o/
[15:41] <Eickmeyer[m]> ubuntu-release: bug 1897922, package is sync'd, needs an ACK.
[15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sudo (bionic-proposed/main) [1.8.21p2-3ubuntu1.2 => 1.8.21p2-3ubuntu1.3] (core)
[15:42] <LocutusOfBorg> but the build stops here https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+sourcepub/11637831/+listing-archive-extra
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cvc4 [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.8-2] (no packageset)
[15:50] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-announce/2020/000029.html https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Linux-5.5-Kills-SYSCTL-SYSCALL
[15:52] <LocutusOfBorg> interesting, the build works in ppa
[15:52] <LocutusOfBorg> rbalint, isn't my patch good then?
[15:53] <LocutusOfBorg> using the new syscall...
[15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cvc4 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.8-2] (no packageset)
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvc4 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.8-2]
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvc4 [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.8-2]
[16:00] <LocutusOfBorg> can we please have when convenient accepted sane-backends? its the very same release, just some packaging fixes an one patch
[16:05] <bdmurray> LocutusOfBorg: Is this important for the Beta?
[16:05] <LocutusOfBorg> bdmurray, no, the bugfix regards a bug that returns empty when you request local devices during the scan
[16:06] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't think anybody will search for scanners during live testing :p
[16:06] <LocutusOfBorg> this is the fix https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/-/merge_requests/506
[16:06] <bdmurray> LocutusOfBorg: Okay, we'll review all the packages in the queue after the Beta release is over so pinging seems kind of redundant.
[16:07] <LocutusOfBorg> ok sure, I didn't remember it was seeded and the beta was not yet over :) sorry for the ping
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: carla (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.2.0-0ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio)
[16:17] <Eickmeyer[m]> ^ bug 1897808
[16:17] <Eickmeyer[m]> One-line patch, if that could get a quick ACK before beta that would be nice.
[16:18] <Eickmeyer[m]> If not, then we can live with it being outside the beta images.
[16:57] <icey> rbasak thanks for the more detailed addition to regression potential on the OVS bug
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (focal-proposed) [2.13.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[16:58] <hellsworth> is there a way I can see how many users have updated their libreoffice to 6.4.6 before phasing stopped?
[16:59] <bdmurray> hellsworth: nope
[16:59] <hellsworth> darn
[16:59] <hellsworth> ok thanks :)
[16:59] <bdmurray> what's going on?
[17:03] <hellsworth> well looks like there's a real problem detected by the phased rollout of 6.4.6. a huge increase of a specific error has caused the phasing to stop. i reported it upstream yesterday and the devs are actively looking into it but a question came up of what other new packages might have been installed on the users system that could cause the error
[17:03] <hellsworth> that somehow led me to wonder the percentage of folks that updated to 6.4.6 before phasing had stopped
[17:04] <hellsworth> there's 23k errors of this kubuntu stacktrace. was 17k yesterday.
[17:04] <hellsworth> well upstream thinks there's a legit LO bug and they're trying to find it. i wanted to be ready with helpful info in case :)
[17:04] <hellsworth> and satisfy my own curiosities :)
[17:05]  * enyc meows
[17:05] <hellsworth> 😸
[17:05] <bdmurray> I might have some code that queries individual crashes in a bucket but I haven't used it in a while.
[17:06] <hellsworth> that's alright. no need to dust it off yet. upstream seems on the right trail..
[17:07] <bdmurray> well hooray for the Error Tracker either way
[17:07] <hellsworth> i'm hoping they can fix it before 6.4.7 is published in 2 weeks
[17:07] <hellsworth> i know! good job error tracker :)
[17:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (groovy-proposed/main) [1:20.10.11 => 1:20.10.12] (core)
[17:46] <arnatious> ubuntu-archive is it possible to get https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/1883175 back into proposed?
[17:55] <vorlon> arnatious: how does reviving the same version address the autopkgtest regressions mentioned in the removal?
[18:01] <arnatious> vorlon those aren't actual regressions, the failing packages are due to linting tests in those packages that now fail correctly
[18:01] <arnatious> i.e. they have style errors that weren't caught originally
[18:03] <arnatious> elpy's failure was due to another package that's update was included in its test run, was not able to reproduce on a clean configuration
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (focal-proposed/main) [4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: torbrowser-launcher (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.2-9 => 0.3.2-9ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted torbrowser-launcher [source] (focal-proposed) [0.3.2-9ubuntu1]
[19:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cvise [source] (focal-proposed) [1.6.0-3~20.04]
[19:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected cvise [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-2~18.04]
[19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pebble [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.5.3-1~18.04]
[19:58] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1897962
[19:58] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: i could create a different backport request if needbe
[20:39] <vorlon> arnatious: where did you do the reproducing of the elpy failure? Since the package is no longer in -proposed and therefore no results are visible on autopkgtest.ubuntu.com
[20:39] <vorlon> arnatious: (which is argument enough IMHO to pull the package back in for testing)
[20:41] <vorlon> arnatious: and did you mean all three source packages? since you only mentioned python-flake8 by url
[20:43] <rbalint> ubuntu-archive: please process LP: #1897912
[20:50] <arnatious> vorlon yes all three, I repro'd using autopkgtest in a clean schroot
[20:52] <arnatious> i.e. built three debs, ran `autopkgtest ubuntu-release-upgrader pycodestyle/*.deb pyflakes/*.deb python-flake8/*.deb -- schroot aptests-amd64`, etc for each package
[20:52] <arnatious> (included that because I am a noob at packaging so if that's not the way to vet these things let me know)
[20:53] <vorlon> rbalint: done
[20:53] <vorlon> arnatious: ok, they're all copied back now
[20:53] <arnatious> vorlon: cheers, when the tests fail again I'll comment that they should be ignored
[20:54] <vorlon> not the elpy one; we should get a clean autopkgtest run (which I've queued)
[20:54] <arnatious> Agreed since that one was a segfault
[21:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-scrypt (groovy-proposed/main) [0.8.0-0.3ubuntu1 => 0.8.0-0.3ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-scrypt [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.0-0.3ubuntu2]
[21:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pam [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.3]
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (focal-proposed/main) [2:21.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.3 => 2:21.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-nibbles (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:3.36.0-1 => 1:3.38.0-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-chess (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:3.36.1-1 => 1:3.38.0-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Groovy Beta] (20200930) has been added
[22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Groovy Beta] (20200930) has been added
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (groovy-proposed/main) [2.688 => 2.689] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.20200820-1ubuntu1 => 1.0.20200827-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.20200827-1ubuntu1]
[23:06] <vorlon> arnatious: I retested elpy with only python-flake8 upgraded and it still failed; only packages pulled from proposed are python3-pycodestyle, python3-pyflakes, pypython3-flake8, flake8 https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/e/elpy/focal/amd64
[23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (xenial-proposed/main) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.1 => 1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.3] (core)