[00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fonts-ibm-plex (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [5.0.0-1 => 5.1.3-1] (no packageset) (sync) [00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-ibm-plex [sync] (groovy-proposed) [5.1.3-1] [00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grcompiler (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.2-2 => 5.2-2.1] (no packageset) (sync) [00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grcompiler [sync] (groovy-proposed) [5.2-2.1] [03:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: malcontent (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-2 => 0.9.0-1] (no packageset) (sync) [03:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted malcontent [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.0-1] [03:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: android-platform-build (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:8.1.0+r23-3ubuntu2 => 1:8.1.0+r23-4.1] (no packageset) (sync) [03:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted android-platform-build [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:8.1.0+r23-4.1] [05:32] lots of non-amd64 errors last night, like https://launchpadlibrarian.net/499880916/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-arm64.file-roller_3.36.3-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz - rebuild seems to help [06:01] riscv64 still gives Could not connect to ftpmaster.internal:80 (91.189.89.100), connection timed out [06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: matlab-support (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0.21.1 => 0.0.22] (no packageset) (sync) [06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted matlab-support [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.0.22] [06:58] vorlon, cvc4, why3, coq, sslreflect [06:58] and probably also llvm-* when it builds [07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaru-theme [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.5] [07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-artwork [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.12.7] [07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted curtin [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.2-0ubuntu1] [07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) [07:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) [07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) [08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) [08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) [08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) [08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) [08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) [08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) [08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) [08:18] Mirv, yes there was a loss of connectivity to ftpmaster which affected a lot of builds; do you have an example of the failure on riscv64 [08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) [08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) [08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) [08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) === ebarretto_ is now known as ebarretto [08:35] Mirv: oh, interesting, I expected all those to show up as a different type of error [08:35] tempting to retry all failures since yesterday afternoon [08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-192.222] (core, kernel) [08:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930) [09:06] cjwatson, for some reasons, riscv64 is still sad [09:07] at least llvm-toolchain-11 is BD-uninst due to -ECONNECT [09:08] LocutusOfBorg: timestamp? [09:08] That should have been fixed as of about half an hour ago [09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtmultimedia-opensource-src (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.14.2-2 => 5.14.2-3] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5) (sync) [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-192.222] [09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected torbrowser-launcher [source] (focal-proposed) [0.3.2-9ubuntu1] [09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20200930.1) [10:09] cjwatson, confirmed, works now :D [10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cvise (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2 => 1.6.0-3] (no packageset) (sync) [10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cvise [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.6.0-3] [10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsejda-java [source] (focal-proposed) [3.2.84-2~20.04] [10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pdfsam [source] (focal-proposed) [4.0.4-1ubuntu2~20.04] [10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pkg-js-tools (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.9.40 => 0.9.41] (no packageset) (sync) [10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pkg-js-tools [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.41] [10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-10 (groovy-proposed/main) [10.2.0-11ubuntu1 => 10.2.0-13ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.100-0ubuntu4~20.04.1] [11:09] LocutusOfBorg: hrrm I saw your name mentioned on sane-backends source ;p I'm interested to know if there can be focal20.04 backport of sane-backends 1.0.31 to fix (at least) escl driver bugs, or (if appropriate) later an SRU [11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-apt (groovy-proposed/main) [2.1.3 => 2.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cvise (focal-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2~20.04 => 1.6.0-3~20.04] (no packageset) [11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: cvise (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.6.0-3~18.04] [11:31] note the rpi-eeprom has never made it to release pocket in any series, thus it's ok to get a better one in at least -proposed. The current one in -proposed is quite bad. [11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware-raspi2 (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [1.20200601+arm64-0ubuntu3 => 1.20200902-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rpi-eeprom (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [7.8-0ubuntu2 => 9.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [12:01] so above two are hwe basically [12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rpi-eeprom [source] (groovy-proposed) [9.0-1ubuntu1] [12:12] flash-kernel is matching for linux-firmware-raspi2 upload [12:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flash-kernel (groovy-proposed/main) [3.100ubuntu2 => 3.100ubuntu3] (core) [12:15] Sure! Will get to queue reviews soonish, sorry o/ [12:22] i also uploaded a bunch of ftbfs fixes (or syncs) [12:22] if there are any questions about things i uploaded, just ping me. [12:53] enyc, do you have a bug? [13:06] LocutusOfBorg: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962539 is general issue experienced and debian 968949 related. [13:06] Debian bug 962539 in src:sane-backends "sane-backends: the escl backend is obselete, in its packaged version, it contains many malfunctions" [Wishlist,Fixed] [13:06] Debian bug 968949 in src:sane-backends "src:sane-backends: SANE Backends 1.0.31 released. Please upgrade" [Wishlist,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/968949 [13:07] LocutusOfBorg: have asked the reporter-to-me to try ppa https://launchpad.net/~sane-project/+archive/ubuntu/sane-git on their focal20.04 [13:12] apw: sorry, yes I had riscv64 example, seems like it's all fixed now finally [13:15] enyc, I don't see any ubuntu bug... [13:15] LocutusOfBorg: maybe not, its been imported into ubuntu by default i think [13:15] I mean, if nobody complains, SRUing is no-go [13:15] LocutusOfBorg: rigth yes, well i'l getthem to confirm that helps [13:16] we need an Ubuntu bug with somebody checking/testing the fix [13:16] LocutusOfBorg: the question is, if to backport escl only or try to suggest SRU of all such bugs [13:16] indeed [13:16] LocutusOfBorg: that makes sense ,thankyou for helpful answer =) [13:16] I don't know which path to take to be honest [13:17] is the patch available somewhere? [13:17] LocutusOfBorg: not sure separate-patch, sane-backends update to 1.0.31 fixeh escl amnogst all the other changes! [13:17] if we have a one-line patch, better SRU just that, because changing version is not trivial [13:17] yes but jumping from .29 to .31 is... meh [13:18] LocutusOfBorg: what would be involved in putting .31 into focal-backports ? [13:18] testing the world for no regressions... [13:19] i don't mean focal-updates, just -backports [13:19] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#New_upstream_microreleases [13:19] oh... probably it need backporters team.... [13:19] it would be ok for backports, if we could reach somebody accepting it [13:19] LocutusOfBorg: okay, well i'll see what fedeback get first ;p [13:20] thankyou [13:24] yw! [13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (groovy-proposed/universe) [20200617.00-0ubuntu3 => 20200617.00-0ubuntu4] (no packageset) (sync) [13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-guest-agent [sync] (groovy-proposed) [20200617.00-0ubuntu4] [13:36] LocutusOfBorg: aaah acutalyl I have a report that the ppa does fix it for thei escl scanner... so will try to ask them to create appropriate bug. Not sure if there is a good guide! [13:51] nice [13:56] hello, please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vala/+bug/1897901 [13:56] Ubuntu bug 1897901 in vala (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync vala 0.48.11-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] [14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (focal-proposed/main) [2:21.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.3 => 2:21.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.4] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (groovy-proposed/main) [2:22.0.0~b3~git2020091410.76b2fbd90e-0ubuntu2 => 2:22.0.0~b3~git2020091410.76b2fbd90e-0ubuntu3] (openstack) [14:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plymouth (focal-proposed/main) [0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu6 => 0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu6.1] (core) [14:14] aha, it's here now. good. [14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (groovy-proposed/restricted) [450.66-0ubuntu1 => 450.80.02-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: epiphany-browser (focal-proposed/universe) [3.36.3-0ubuntu1 => 3.36.4-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra) [14:39] hi sil2100 , can you have a look at nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 when you have the time, please? [14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-settings (groovy-proposed/main) [20.04.5 => 20.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop) [14:51] rbasak: any chance you could take a look at a minor SRU that's been in the focal unapproved queue for a few weeks? openvswitch was uploaded on the 10th related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/1887177 [14:51] Ubuntu bug 1887177 in openvswitch (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] ovsdb-server.service needs a depedency on local-fs.target" [Undecided,New] [15:03] LocutusOfBorg: ok, looks like it's migrated then [15:24] thanks! [15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cvc4 (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.6-2build2 => 1.8-2] (no packageset) (sync) [15:26] sadly I forgot cvc4 in the ocaml migration [15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cvc4 [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.8-2] [15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ardour (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:6.2.0+ds1-1 => 1:6.3.0+ds0-1] (ubuntustudio) (sync) [15:32] sil2100: bug 1897173 would have been fixed by the new kernel correct? [15:32] bug 1897173 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "20.10 Installer crashes with partitions being written but unable to inform kernel of the change" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1897173 [15:33] rbalint, looks like the new glibc regressed mozjs build [15:33] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozjs52/52.9.1-1.1 [15:33] I can't really understand what is failing... [15:34] after commenting the sys/sysctl.h include in memory/mozjemalloc/jemalloc.c and changing sysctl(mib, 2, &ret, &len, (void *) 0, 0) into syscall(RR__sysctl, mib, 2, &ret, &len, (void *) 0, 0) I go a little bit further [15:35] Writing an FFe for that ardour sync ^ [15:38] tseliot: let me try getting to that, yes o/ [15:41] ubuntu-release: bug 1897922, package is sync'd, needs an ACK. [15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sudo (bionic-proposed/main) [1.8.21p2-3ubuntu1.2 => 1.8.21p2-3ubuntu1.3] (core) [15:41] bug 1897922 in ardour (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Upgrade Ardour to 6.3" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1897922 [15:42] but the build stops here https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+sourcepub/11637831/+listing-archive-extra [15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cvc4 [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.8-2] (no packageset) [15:50] LocutusOfBorg, https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-announce/2020/000029.html https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Linux-5.5-Kills-SYSCTL-SYSCALL [15:50] sourceware.org bug 2020 in translator "probe kernel audit hooks" [Normal,Resolved: wontfix] [15:52] interesting, the build works in ppa [15:52] rbalint, isn't my patch good then? [15:53] using the new syscall... [15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cvc4 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.8-2] (no packageset) [15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvc4 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.8-2] [15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvc4 [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.8-2] [16:00] can we please have when convenient accepted sane-backends? its the very same release, just some packaging fixes an one patch [16:05] LocutusOfBorg: Is this important for the Beta? [16:05] bdmurray, no, the bugfix regards a bug that returns empty when you request local devices during the scan [16:06] I don't think anybody will search for scanners during live testing :p [16:06] this is the fix https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/-/merge_requests/506 [16:06] LocutusOfBorg: Okay, we'll review all the packages in the queue after the Beta release is over so pinging seems kind of redundant. [16:07] ok sure, I didn't remember it was seeded and the beta was not yet over :) sorry for the ping [16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: carla (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.2.0-0ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio) [16:17] ^ bug 1897808 [16:17] bug 1897808 in carla (Ubuntu) "Carla 2.2 hangs when zita-ajbridge ends after device removal" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1897808 [16:17] One-line patch, if that could get a quick ACK before beta that would be nice. [16:18] If not, then we can live with it being outside the beta images. [16:57] rbasak thanks for the more detailed addition to regression potential on the OVS bug [16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (focal-proposed) [2.13.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] [16:58] is there a way I can see how many users have updated their libreoffice to 6.4.6 before phasing stopped? [16:59] hellsworth: nope [16:59] darn [16:59] ok thanks :) [16:59] what's going on? [17:03] well looks like there's a real problem detected by the phased rollout of 6.4.6. a huge increase of a specific error has caused the phasing to stop. i reported it upstream yesterday and the devs are actively looking into it but a question came up of what other new packages might have been installed on the users system that could cause the error [17:03] that somehow led me to wonder the percentage of folks that updated to 6.4.6 before phasing had stopped [17:04] there's 23k errors of this kubuntu stacktrace. was 17k yesterday. [17:04] well upstream thinks there's a legit LO bug and they're trying to find it. i wanted to be ready with helpful info in case :) [17:04] and satisfy my own curiosities :) [17:05] * enyc meows [17:05] 😸 [17:05] I might have some code that queries individual crashes in a bucket but I haven't used it in a while. [17:06] that's alright. no need to dust it off yet. upstream seems on the right trail.. [17:07] well hooray for the Error Tracker either way [17:07] i'm hoping they can fix it before 6.4.7 is published in 2 weeks [17:07] i know! good job error tracker :) [17:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (groovy-proposed/main) [1:20.10.11 => 1:20.10.12] (core) [17:46] ubuntu-archive is it possible to get https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/1883175 back into proposed? [17:46] Ubuntu bug 1883175 in python-flake8 (Ubuntu Focal) "missing support for python3.8 language features" [Low,Confirmed] [17:55] arnatious: how does reviving the same version address the autopkgtest regressions mentioned in the removal? [18:01] vorlon those aren't actual regressions, the failing packages are due to linting tests in those packages that now fail correctly [18:01] i.e. they have style errors that weren't caught originally [18:03] elpy's failure was due to another package that's update was included in its test run, was not able to reproduce on a clean configuration [18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (focal-proposed/main) [4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: torbrowser-launcher (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.2-9 => 0.3.2-9ubuntu1] (no packageset) [19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted torbrowser-launcher [source] (focal-proposed) [0.3.2-9ubuntu1] [19:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cvise [source] (focal-proposed) [1.6.0-3~20.04] [19:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected cvise [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-2~18.04] [19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pebble [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.5.3-1~18.04] [19:58] LocutusOfBorg: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1897962 [19:58] Ubuntu bug 1897962 in sane-backends (Ubuntu) "Out of Memory Error with Brother DCP-J7720W " [Undecided,Confirmed] [19:58] LocutusOfBorg: i could create a different backport request if needbe [20:39] arnatious: where did you do the reproducing of the elpy failure? Since the package is no longer in -proposed and therefore no results are visible on autopkgtest.ubuntu.com [20:39] arnatious: (which is argument enough IMHO to pull the package back in for testing) [20:41] arnatious: and did you mean all three source packages? since you only mentioned python-flake8 by url [20:43] ubuntu-archive: please process LP: #1897912 [20:43] Launchpad bug 1897912 in golang-goprotobuf (Ubuntu) "Please remove golang-google-genproto and golang-goprotobuf from groovy-proposed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1897912 [20:50] vorlon yes all three, I repro'd using autopkgtest in a clean schroot [20:52] i.e. built three debs, ran `autopkgtest ubuntu-release-upgrader pycodestyle/*.deb pyflakes/*.deb python-flake8/*.deb -- schroot aptests-amd64`, etc for each package [20:52] (included that because I am a noob at packaging so if that's not the way to vet these things let me know) [20:53] rbalint: done [20:53] arnatious: ok, they're all copied back now [20:53] vorlon: cheers, when the tests fail again I'll comment that they should be ignored [20:54] not the elpy one; we should get a clean autopkgtest run (which I've queued) [20:54] Agreed since that one was a segfault [21:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-scrypt (groovy-proposed/main) [0.8.0-0.3ubuntu1 => 0.8.0-0.3ubuntu2] (no packageset) [21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-scrypt [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.0-0.3ubuntu2] [21:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pam [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.3] [21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (focal-proposed/main) [2:21.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.3 => 2:21.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-nibbles (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:3.36.0-1 => 1:3.38.0-1] (desktop-extra) (sync) [22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-chess (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:3.36.1-1 => 1:3.38.0-1] (desktop-extra) (sync) [22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Groovy Beta] (20200930) has been added [22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Groovy Beta] (20200930) has been added [22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (groovy-proposed/main) [2.688 => 2.689] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) [22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.20200820-1ubuntu1 => 1.0.20200827-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.20200827-1ubuntu1] [23:06] arnatious: I retested elpy with only python-flake8 upgraded and it still failed; only packages pulled from proposed are python3-pycodestyle, python3-pyflakes, pypython3-flake8, flake8 https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/e/elpy/focal/amd64 [23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (xenial-proposed/main) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.1 => 1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.3] (core)