-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.3]00:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sshuttle (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.76-1ubuntu1.1 => 0.76-1ubuntu1.2] (no packageset)01:03
arnatiousvorlon: I can't reproduce - I'm in a clean focal VM, ran mk-sbuild to get a clean schroot, build the three packages, and ran autopkgtests for elpy with no failures01:20
arnatiousAnything I can do to get closer to the buildfarm's environment?01:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nss (groovy-proposed/main) [2:3.55-1ubuntu1 => 2:3.55-1ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)06:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tgt (groovy-proposed/main) [1:1.0.79-2ubuntu1 => 1:1.0.79-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)06:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tgt [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:1.0.79-3ubuntu1]06:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pebble (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.5.3-1~18.04 => 4.5.3-1~18.04.1] (no packageset)07:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pebble [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.5.3-1~18.04.1]07:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pebble [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.5.3-1~18.04.1] (no packageset)07:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pebble [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.5.3-1~18.04.1]07:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvise [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3~18.04]08:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~20.04.2 => 0.100-0ubuntu4~20.04.2] (core)08:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cvise [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3~18.04] (no packageset)08:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cvise [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3~18.04] (no packageset)08:15
GunnarHjHi release team! Anyone who can take a stand about the UIFe at bug #1897858?08:22
ubot5bug 1897858 in ibus (Ubuntu) "[UIFe] IBus 1.5.23" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189785808:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cvise [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3~18.04] (no packageset)08:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cvise [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3~18.04] (no packageset)08:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvise [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3~18.04]08:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvise [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3~18.04]08:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvise [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3~18.04]08:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvise [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3~18.04]08:34
sil2100waveform: hey! Did you see this bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flash-kernel/+bug/189799908:35
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1897999 in flash-kernel (Ubuntu) "groovy flash-kernel fails on rpi4b 8GB" [Undecided,New]08:35
sil2100GunnarHj: looking08:36
sil2100GunnarHj: hm, how many new translatable strings are in this new release, do you know? And did a lot of existing strings change?08:36
GunnarHjsil2100: Don't know the number of new translatable strings, but they are pure upstream ones and already translated upstream into the most important languages.08:38
GunnarHjsil2100: It's not a huge number...08:38
sil2100GunnarHj: done o/08:44
GunnarHjsil2100: Thanks!08:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thermald [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.3-4]08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libaccounts-qt [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.15+17.04.20161104.1-0ubuntu4]08:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpdk [sync] (groovy-proposed) [19.11.5-1]08:58
waveformsil2100, yup - I realized while doing the flash-kernel changes last week that somehow focal had the rev1.4 entry, but groovy didn't (?!); patched that in my flash-kernel which is currently pending review09:00
cpaelzermdeslaur: the sync of the DPDK CVE was just accepted ^^09:04
sil2100waveform: ah!09:04
sil2100Forgot about it, looking09:04
sil2100(now I rememeber Dimitri poking me about it!)09:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.100ubuntu3]09:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware-raspi2 [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.20200902-0ubuntu1]09:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [source] (groovy-proposed) [450.80.02-0ubuntu1]09:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-settings [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.1]09:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-settings [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop)09:15
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1897962 in sane-backends (Ubuntu Focal) "Out of Memory Error with Brother DCP-J7720W " [High,New]09:29
LocutusOfBorgtkamppeter, enyc GunnarHj ^^ comments might be helpful :D09:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (groovy-proposed/restricted) [450.51.06-0ubuntu2 => 450.80.02-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)09:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cd-boot-images-amd64 (groovy-proposed/main) [6 => 7] (desktop-core)09:51
xnoxwaveform:  something missing in flash-kernel?!10:12
xnoxsil2100:  please remove grub2 & grub2-signed from focal-proposed, verification failed.10:12
sil2100xnox: suar10:17
sil2100jibel: hey! How's the isotesting going?10:17
* sil2100 is a bit freaking out when he sees 0 test results on the ubuntu desktop isotracker10:17
jibelsil2100, going well, the error I mentioned yesterday is actually gone. Let me finish a few things and I'll update the tracker10:29
sil2100jibel: phew, thank you for the good news!10:32
sil2100I know this beta will not be the best beta around, but I at least like that we fleshed out some bugs10:32
sil2100waveform, plars: JFYI, I don't think I'll be re-spinning the pi images for the flash-kernel issue on the 8GB - we have the fix in -proposed so we'll just make sure it migrates for the main release10:33
waveformsil2100, sure - that's fine10:34
sil2100Let me leave a comment on the bug10:34
waveformit only matters on upgrade anyway, which'd pull in that change when it's released10:35
sil2100Beta users will get the update and then everything will work dandy10:35
jibelsil2100, just OEM installation is broken, that's a post beta fix10:36
sil2100jibel: can you give me the bug number once it's filled? I'm trying to make a list (and put on the milestone) of things we need to make sure are attended before final10:37
didrocksjibel: waow, good catch on OEM installation, careful testing :)10:38
jibelsil2100, bug 189802910:44
ubot5bug 1898029 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "[OEM] ubiquity crashed with AttributeError in lookup_result(): 'PageGtk' object has no attribute 'hostname_error_text'" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189802910:44
sil2100jibel: also, I wonder if this is strictly related to VirtualBox - possibly not Kubuntu only? LP: #189396411:00
ubot5Launchpad bug 1893964 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Installation of Ubuntu Groovy in VirtualBox with manual partitioning fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda'" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189396411:00
jibelsil2100, there error is due to this apt_pkg.Error: E:can not open /var/lib/apt/lists/de.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy-updates_InRelease - fopen (13: Permission denied)11:12
jibelnot related to grub-install as the title suggests11:12
jibelhm, logs attached to the bug are not from installation11:14
sil2100Ok, bogus then!11:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firefox (groovy-proposed/main) [81.0+build2-0ubuntu1 => 81.0.1+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)11:26
arnatioussil2100 mind if I bug you in mattermost about an autopkgtest failure that's vexing me?11:29
arnatiousActually - nevermind - the failure was transient11:36
sil2100arnatious: sure, once something like that pops up, feel free to ping me11:50
arnatioussil2100 actually do have a comment, have some packages up but need to just change the header in the changelog, should I just have my sponsor re-upload with force-same-destination?11:55
sil2100arnatious: has that package you want to change already landed in -proposed? Then you need to bump the version number before re-uploading12:12
sil2100jibel: anyway, you think we are good to release beta as is?12:13
sil2100paride: hey! Did you manage to do some subiquity testing for groovy beta?12:14
sil2100paride: asking since I see no test results, which makes me a bit sad always :(12:14
arnatiousArgh yeah, does changing a changelog require a changelog entry or do I just pop a new version number in with the same parent version12:16
sil2100arnatious: you can do any of those, as long as the topmost changelog entry is different than the one already released12:17
paridesil2100, hi! getting to it, there's a failure in the automated iso test I need to look at12:18
sil2100paride: thank you!12:18
paridesil2100, we may have a problem with the amd64 iso :/12:22
parideeverything was good up to the latest alpha, and looks good on the other archs12:22
* paride digs12:23
jibelsil2100, yes I think we do12:43
kanashirocould someone please take a look at this FFe for ruby2.7? It'll fix the FTBFS: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.7/+bug/189789512:45
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1897895 in ruby2.7 (Ubuntu) "[FFe] FTBFS with glibc 2.32" [Undecided,New]12:45
sil2100paride: oh no, ok, now it depends on how serious the problem is12:51
paridesil2100, enough :( install fails proceeding with all defaults12:52
paridereason is curtin failing to call `multipath -r`12:52
paridewhich fails with message: "DM multipath kernel driver not loaded"12:52
paridethat's actually multipathd failing to load12:53
parideon my system there's a dm_multipath module which is not in the ISO's initrd12:53
paridethe latest successful run is the one of yesterday, the image had serial 2020092812:54
paridethe success record was perfect: https://platform-qa-jenkins.ubuntu.com/view/server-g/job/ubuntu-groovy-live-server-amd64-smoke-default/12:56
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1898045 in Ubuntu CD Images "groovy live-server amd64 beta (20200930) fails to load multipathd, crashes subiquity" [Undecided,New]13:12
xnoxparide:  fun.13:21
xnoxkanashiro:  why are you requesting FFe for a non-feature? bugfixes need not an FFe.....13:22
kanashiroxnox: I answered your question in the bug description, last paragraph13:25
sil2100paride: crap13:26
sil2100paride: I wonder how this happened, just in the two day period between 28 and 3013:35
paridesil2100, no idea, but thing is all the kernel modules are missing from the ISO13:35
paride /lib/modules of the live system is empty13:36
paride/lib/modules of the live system is empty13:36
sil2100Yeah, trying to figure out, since this won't be visible in the manifest diff (but for reference I still did it: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/dJDn8Q37fz/ ) - in that moment we did have a new kernel, but seeing if we did any infra changes too13:42
sil2100Only the kernel landed after 28, since we were already in Beta Freeze then13:45
paride2020-09-30 08:22:03 URL:https://launchpadlibrarian.net/499979966/livecd.ubuntu-server.squashfs [375091200/375091200] -> "/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/scratch/ubuntu-server/groovy/daily-live/live/amd64.squashfs" [1]13:45
paridefailed: Network is unreachable.13:45
paridefailed: Network is unreachable.13:45
paridethis is in the image build log13:45
sil2100Ah the fuck13:45
Eickmeyer[m]Woah, woah!13:46
ubot5For posting multi-line texts into the channel, please use https://paste.ubuntu.com | To post !screenshots use https://imgur.com/ !pastebinit to paste directly from command line | Make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic.13:46
sil2100paride: how did that not result in an image build failure?13:46
sil2100Actually, let me look at those, maybe there's retries13:47
sil2100paride: I'm still looking at it, but this might be somthing as I don't see amd64.modules.squashfs-generic in the logs13:49
sil2100This might have been what timed out and that's why it's missing, but the build STILL SUCCEEDED13:50
sil2100I'll fill in a bug for this and see if I can re-run the build without restarting the livefs build13:50
sil2100Looks like LP still has the artifacts, so I guess I'll try that13:51
sil2100paride: good catch!13:51
rbasaktjaalton, vorlon: I half-SRU-reviewed pacemaker yesterday and am planning on finishing it today, so you can leave that today if you wish13:51
rbasak(it's in the Focal queue)13:51
paridesil2100, it was basically wishful thinking about maybe it being an image build fail13:51
paridesometimes it turns out to be true :P13:52
tjaaltonrbasak: we're on tomorrow, isn't today bdmurray's shift?13:52
sil2100paride: haha, if you didn't look we'd probably be wondering for hours more!13:52
rbasaktjaalton: oh yes, sorry. bdmurray ^13:54
paridesil2100, so you'll respin the image with the same serial now I suppose13:57
sil2100And mine! But I'm busy with the beta13:57
sil2100paride: it will have a different serial, since serials are per-publishing, but it'll use the same livefs at least13:57
sil2100No changes in the archive so it should be all safe13:57
parideOK. Waiting for it then. In the meantime I'll +1 the other archs on the iso tracker13:58
sil2100paride: I'll run all of them just in case btw., the contents will be identical so I guess just a sanity check would be sufficient13:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20201001)14:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20201001)14:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20201001)14:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20201001)14:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready14:10
Eickmeyer[m]I realize we might have rebuilds, but... ^14:10
xnoxkanashiro:  i'm pretty sure things like this need not need approval. upload of the package, will be stuck in Unapproved queue anyway. Meaning release team reviews every upload.14:14
xnoxas they are queued up. See all the uploads in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/groovy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=14:14
sil2100paride: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/20201001/14:25
sil2100Eickmeyer[m]: hey! No rebuilds besides subiquity server!14:25
sil2100Eickmeyer[m]: thank you for marking!14:26
Eickmeyer[m]Woot Woot!14:26
paridesil2100, triggering some builds14:27
* sil2100 is prepublishing images anyway right now14:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: azure-cli (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.81+ds-4ubuntu0.1 => 2.0.81+ds-4ubuntu0.2] (no packageset)14:49
paridesil2100, passed on amd64, s390x, ppc64el. Waiting for arm64 (slow)14:50
sil2100paride: yaaay14:50
sil2100paride: can you mark subiquity as ready once it's done?14:51
paridesil2100, sure14:51
kanashiroxnox: ok, I can upload it. I was trying to stick to the process described here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetaFreeze14:55
kanashiromaybe it needs some update?14:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sshuttle (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.4-1ubuntu3 => 1.0.4-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)14:56
sil2100kanashiro: hey! What is this discussion about?14:57
sil2100(sorry, too much going on)14:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sshuttle [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.4-1ubuntu4]14:57
kanashirosil2100: I requested a FFe for ruby2.7 here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.7/+bug/189789515:00
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1897895 in ruby2.7 (Ubuntu) "[FFe] FTBFS with glibc 2.32" [Undecided,New]15:00
kanashirobut xnox was telling me it would not be needed15:00
kanashiroand I mentioned I was following the process here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.7/+bug/189789515:01
sil2100I'll look after my meeting what's up with that15:01
xnoxkanashiro:  hm, i think that wiki is a bit ambigious.15:01
kanashirosorr, this one: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetaFreeze15:01
sil2100kanashiro: yeah, from what I see this doesn't need an FFe, just upload!15:01
sil2100paride: hey! Do you test on actual real hardware for arm64?15:03
paridesil2100, no, in a VM15:03
sil2100paride: ouch15:04
sil2100Since xnox just reported this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/189781915:05
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1897819 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "boot fails on hi1620, thunderx2 platforms" [Critical,In progress]15:05
sil2100I mean, xnox informed me of this15:05
sil2100I need to think about that, but feels like we can't do much about it in such a short amount of time, we might need to release note it15:05
paridesil2100, testing on real hardware would require me having it :)15:09
paridenot easy to do remotely15:09
tkamppeterLocutusOfBorg, thanks, looking into it. One solution would be using sane-airscan, here we need to complete the MIR bug 1891682.15:09
ubot5bug 1891682 in sane-airscan (Ubuntu) "[MIR] sane-airscan" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189168215:09
kanashirothanks sil210015:09
tkamppeterLocutusOfBorg, it is currently stuck at the security team.15:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-bluetooth (focal-proposed/main) [3.34.1-1 => 3.34.3-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)15:23
sil2100paride: yeah, I imagine ;/15:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pacemaker [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.3-3ubuntu4]15:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready16:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [450.66-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 450.80.02-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)16:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (focal-proposed/restricted) [450.66-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 450.80.02-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)16:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready16:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:20.10.12]16:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: memcached (groovy-proposed/main) [1.6.6-3 => 1.6.6-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)17:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby2.7 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.7.1-3build1 => 2.7.1-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)17:34
mitya57Hi! Can some archive admin please process bug 1877047? It's pending since May.17:34
ubot5bug 1877047 in unity-mail (Ubuntu) " Please remove unity-mail from the archive" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187704717:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sudo [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.8.21p2-3ubuntu1.3]17:39
sil2100I think we're goodish on the beta front, as good as we can, ETA for release is in a few hours though!18:11
sil2100uh, ok, the xorriso cmdline for cd-boot-images-amd64 is just too much for me, but Steve knows what he's doing!18:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-amd64 [source] (groovy-proposed) [7]18:23
vorlonheh :)18:26
vorlonfwiw the xorriso commandline within cd-boot-images-amd64 isn't used by debian-cd, it's basically just documentation18:26
vorlonmitya57: done18:31
sil2100vorlon: oh, good to know ;)18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready18:39
sil2100Slowly prepping for release, guess I don't even need to mark those as ready but I like to anyway18:40
vorlonsil2100: and debian-cd needs changes to match cd-boot-images-amd64 in lockstep; are you done rolling images for beta, should I go ahead and make that change now?18:41
sil2100vorlon: yeah, I won't be re-spinning anything, just running cdimage publisher commands18:41
sil2100So go for it!18:42
vorlonsil2100: ok. image builds will fail then until cd-boot-images-amd64 migrates to release pocket18:42
sil2100vorlon: don't you need to wait for cd-boot-images-amd64 to move into release btw.? Since I think we're usually building images based on the release pocket18:42
sil2100Ok, just as I thought, hopefully cd-boot-images-amd64 will migrate quickly18:43
vorlonsil2100: yeah but I don't precisely control the migration, and I want to get this done during my workday :)18:44
vorlonsil2100: what do you think about reversing the handling of the debian-cd branch, so that https://people.canonical.com/~cjwatson/bzr/debian-cd/ubuntu is the parent and ancientminister pulls from it? that would simplify my bzr workflow18:51
sil2100vorlon: I would be fine with that, I actually never knew why it's like this in the first place. Just assumed there was some uh, valid reason?18:57
vorlonsil2100: legacy, and the question of coordinating a transition among the committers18:57
vorlonsil2100: ok switched, so please update any local checkouts to push to bzr+ssh://people.canonical.com/~cjwatson/public_html/bzr/debian-cd/ubuntu/ instead19:11
vorlonLaney: ^^19:11
sil2100vorlon: thanks! Works for me19:14
sil2100vorlon: btw. I updated LP: #1896215 with our latest 'case'19:15
ubot5Launchpad bug 1896215 in Ubuntu CD Images "Network failures when downloading assets from Launchpad are not notified about and can result in broken images" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189621519:15
* vorlon nods19:15
sil2100I guess I'd like to tackle that one day, since to me it's absurd that the arm64 image was still successfully built even though it failed downloading the module squashfs19:15
sil2100Ok, hm, I guess I'll start the publishing19:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready19:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready19:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-bluetooth [source] (focal-proposed) [3.34.3-0ubuntu1]20:03
sil2100Beta images syncing to mirrors \o/20:13
sil2100I'm checking torrents right now20:13
sil2100Ok, I think I'm slowly starting to see something20:19
sil2100...or maybe not, can anyone else check if the torrents seem to be working?20:21
bdmurraysil2100: I can check20:25
sil2100Thanks o/20:25
bdmurraysil2100: "Downloading from 0 of 0 peers"20:30
bdmurrayvorlon: can you update autopkgtest-cloud?20:30
vorlonbdmurray: mmm seemingly not, the local checkout is in some kind of state. working on it20:40
vorlonbdmurray: ok, done20:45
vorlonsil2100: should we really be linking to http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/netboot/20.10/ from the beta announcement?20:46
cjwatsonvorlon: Can it be moved to a proper LP branch rather than coming from a weird mirror in my homedir?20:58
cjwatsonvorlon: It's only that way because this dates from before it was possible to use LP code branches within the datacentre and I never got round to fixing it ...20:58
cjwatsonvorlon: (That is, if you're incurring the cost of transitioning committers anyway you might as well do it properly :) )20:59
cjwatsonvorlon: Also could you update https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseTeam/CDImageSetup?20:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rna-star (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.7.5c+dfsg-1 => 2.7.5c+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync)21:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rna-star [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.7.5c+dfsg-3]21:09
vorloncjwatson: can I do that for an existing branch that's set up for syncing, or do I have to create a new branch in LP to do that?21:25
vorlonah, edit import source21:26
vorlonnope, doesn't accept a null value ;)21:26
cjwatsonvorlon: Needs a new branch, though possibly with a careful rename dance you can end up with it having the same name21:30
cjwatsonPush content to new branch, rename old one aside, rename new one into place21:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-snapshot (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:12~++20200715052739+d6e79e3dd6d-1~exp1build2 => 1:12~++20200929085817+962a247aebb-1~exp1] (no packageset) (sync)21:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-snapshot [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:12~++20200929085817+962a247aebb-1~exp1]21:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jsonrpc-glib (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.34.0-1 => 3.38.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)22:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jsonrpc-glib [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.0-1]22:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: polari (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.36.2-1 => 3.38.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)22:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted polari [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.0-1]22:11
sil2100vorlon: well, it was linked in the focal beta announcement22:33
sil2100vorlon: but I can remove that and re-send if you think that's best22:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.142.7 => 1.142.8] (core)22:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu34 => 2.04-1ubuntu35] (core)22:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.5 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.6] (core)22:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (groovy-proposed/main) [1.154 => 1.155] (core)22:49
xnoxvorlon:  apw: how about having launchpad-side no change rebuilds? All of these signed/resigned/vendored package chains are becoming a pain. Upload of grub is now 5 source packages: grub2, grub2-signed, cd-boot-images-{amd64,arm64,ppc64el} => 4 of which are no-change rebuilds.22:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (groovy-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu48 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu49] (core, i386-whitelist)23:09
sil2100I'll lift the britney freeze today already23:24
sil2100bdmurray: beta freeze lifted, so now stuff should be auto-migrating from -proposed to release23:30
sil2100But the queue freeze stays until final release23:30
sil2100I go now o/23:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: goffice (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.10.47-1 => 0.10.48-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)23:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!