[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.3]
[01:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sshuttle (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.76-1ubuntu1.1 => 0.76-1ubuntu1.2] (no packageset)
[01:20] <arnatious> vorlon: I can't reproduce - I'm in a clean focal VM, ran mk-sbuild to get a clean schroot, build the three packages, and ran autopkgtests for elpy with no failures
[01:20] <arnatious> Anything I can do to get closer to the buildfarm's environment?
[06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nss (groovy-proposed/main) [2:3.55-1ubuntu1 => 2:3.55-1ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[06:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tgt (groovy-proposed/main) [1:1.0.79-2ubuntu1 => 1:1.0.79-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tgt [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:1.0.79-3ubuntu1]
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pebble (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.5.3-1~18.04 => 4.5.3-1~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pebble [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.5.3-1~18.04.1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pebble [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.5.3-1~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[07:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pebble [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.5.3-1~18.04.1]
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvise [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3~18.04]
[08:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (focal-proposed/main) [0.99-0ubuntu3~20.04.2 => 0.100-0ubuntu4~20.04.2] (core)
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cvise [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3~18.04] (no packageset)
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cvise [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3~18.04] (no packageset)
[08:22] <GunnarHj> Hi release team! Anyone who can take a stand about the UIFe at bug #1897858?
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cvise [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3~18.04] (no packageset)
[08:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cvise [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3~18.04] (no packageset)
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvise [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3~18.04]
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvise [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3~18.04]
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvise [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3~18.04]
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cvise [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3~18.04]
[08:35] <sil2100> waveform: hey! Did you see this bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flash-kernel/+bug/1897999
[08:36] <sil2100> GunnarHj: looking
[08:36] <sil2100> GunnarHj: hm, how many new translatable strings are in this new release, do you know? And did a lot of existing strings change?
[08:38] <GunnarHj> sil2100: Don't know the number of new translatable strings, but they are pure upstream ones and already translated upstream into the most important languages.
[08:38] <GunnarHj> sil2100: It's not a huge number...
[08:42] <sil2100> Ok
[08:44] <sil2100> GunnarHj: done o/
[08:45] <GunnarHj> sil2100: Thanks!
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thermald [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.3-4]
[08:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libaccounts-qt [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.15+17.04.20161104.1-0ubuntu4]
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpdk [sync] (groovy-proposed) [19.11.5-1]
[09:00] <waveform> sil2100, yup - I realized while doing the flash-kernel changes last week that somehow focal had the rev1.4 entry, but groovy didn't (?!); patched that in my flash-kernel which is currently pending review
[09:04] <cpaelzer> mdeslaur: the sync of the DPDK CVE was just accepted ^^
[09:04] <sil2100> waveform: ah!
[09:04] <sil2100> Forgot about it, looking
[09:05] <sil2100> (now I rememeber Dimitri poking me about it!)
[09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.100ubuntu3]
[09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware-raspi2 [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.20200902-0ubuntu1]
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [source] (groovy-proposed) [450.80.02-0ubuntu1]
[09:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-settings [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.1]
[09:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-settings [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [20.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:29] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1897962
[09:30] <LocutusOfBorg> tkamppeter, enyc GunnarHj ^^ comments might be helpful :D
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (groovy-proposed/restricted) [450.51.06-0ubuntu2 => 450.80.02-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[09:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cd-boot-images-amd64 (groovy-proposed/main) [6 => 7] (desktop-core)
[10:12] <xnox> waveform:  something missing in flash-kernel?!
[10:12] <xnox> sil2100:  please remove grub2 & grub2-signed from focal-proposed, verification failed.
[10:17] <sil2100> xnox: suar
[10:17] <sil2100> jibel: hey! How's the isotesting going?
[10:17]  * sil2100 is a bit freaking out when he sees 0 test results on the ubuntu desktop isotracker
[10:29] <jibel> sil2100, going well, the error I mentioned yesterday is actually gone. Let me finish a few things and I'll update the tracker
[10:32] <sil2100> jibel: phew, thank you for the good news!
[10:32] <sil2100> I know this beta will not be the best beta around, but I at least like that we fleshed out some bugs
[10:33] <sil2100> waveform, plars: JFYI, I don't think I'll be re-spinning the pi images for the flash-kernel issue on the 8GB - we have the fix in -proposed so we'll just make sure it migrates for the main release
[10:34] <waveform> sil2100, sure - that's fine
[10:34] <sil2100> Let me leave a comment on the bug
[10:35] <waveform> it only matters on upgrade anyway, which'd pull in that change when it's released
[10:35] <sil2100> Beta users will get the update and then everything will work dandy
[10:35] <sil2100> Exactly
[10:36] <jibel> sil2100, just OEM installation is broken, that's a post beta fix
[10:37] <sil2100> jibel: can you give me the bug number once it's filled? I'm trying to make a list (and put on the milestone) of things we need to make sure are attended before final
[10:38] <didrocks> jibel: waow, good catch on OEM installation, careful testing :)
[10:44] <jibel> sil2100, bug 1898029
[10:47] <sil2100> Thanks!
[11:00] <sil2100> jibel: also, I wonder if this is strictly related to VirtualBox - possibly not Kubuntu only? LP: #1893964
[11:12] <jibel> sil2100, there error is due to this apt_pkg.Error: E:can not open /var/lib/apt/lists/de.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy-updates_InRelease - fopen (13: Permission denied)
[11:12] <jibel> not related to grub-install as the title suggests
[11:14] <jibel> hm, logs attached to the bug are not from installation
[11:22] <sil2100> huh
[11:22] <sil2100> Ok, bogus then!
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firefox (groovy-proposed/main) [81.0+build2-0ubuntu1 => 81.0.1+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:29] <arnatious> sil2100 mind if I bug you in mattermost about an autopkgtest failure that's vexing me?
[11:36] <arnatious> Actually - nevermind - the failure was transient
[11:50] <sil2100> arnatious: sure, once something like that pops up, feel free to ping me
[11:55] <arnatious> sil2100 actually do have a comment, have some packages up but need to just change the header in the changelog, should I just have my sponsor re-upload with force-same-destination?
[12:12] <sil2100> arnatious: has that package you want to change already landed in -proposed? Then you need to bump the version number before re-uploading
[12:13] <sil2100> jibel: anyway, you think we are good to release beta as is?
[12:14] <sil2100> paride: hey! Did you manage to do some subiquity testing for groovy beta?
[12:14] <sil2100> paride: asking since I see no test results, which makes me a bit sad always :(
[12:16] <arnatious> Argh yeah, does changing a changelog require a changelog entry or do I just pop a new version number in with the same parent version
[12:17] <sil2100> arnatious: you can do any of those, as long as the topmost changelog entry is different than the one already released
[12:18] <paride> sil2100, hi! getting to it, there's a failure in the automated iso test I need to look at
[12:18] <sil2100> paride: thank you!
[12:22] <paride> sil2100, we may have a problem with the amd64 iso :/
[12:22] <paride> everything was good up to the latest alpha, and looks good on the other archs
[12:23]  * paride digs
[12:43] <jibel> sil2100, yes I think we do
[12:45] <kanashiro> could someone please take a look at this FFe for ruby2.7? It'll fix the FTBFS: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.7/+bug/1897895
[12:51] <sil2100> paride: oh no, ok, now it depends on how serious the problem is
[12:52] <paride> sil2100, enough :( install fails proceeding with all defaults
[12:52] <paride> reason is curtin failing to call `multipath -r`
[12:52] <paride> which fails with message: "DM multipath kernel driver not loaded"
[12:53] <paride> that's actually multipathd failing to load
[12:53] <paride> on my system there's a dm_multipath module which is not in the ISO's initrd
[12:54] <paride> the latest successful run is the one of yesterday, the image had serial 20200928
[12:56] <paride> the success record was perfect: https://platform-qa-jenkins.ubuntu.com/view/server-g/job/ubuntu-groovy-live-server-amd64-smoke-default/
[13:12] <paride> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/1898045
[13:21] <xnox> paride:  fun.
[13:22] <xnox> kanashiro:  why are you requesting FFe for a non-feature? bugfixes need not an FFe.....
[13:25] <kanashiro> xnox: I answered your question in the bug description, last paragraph
[13:26] <sil2100> paride: crap
[13:27] <sil2100> Looking
[13:35] <sil2100> paride: I wonder how this happened, just in the two day period between 28 and 30
[13:35] <paride> sil2100, no idea, but thing is all the kernel modules are missing from the ISO
[13:36] <paride>  /lib/modules of the live system is empty
[13:36] <paride> /lib/modules of the live system is empty
[13:42] <sil2100> Yeah, trying to figure out, since this won't be visible in the manifest diff (but for reference I still did it: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/dJDn8Q37fz/ ) - in that moment we did have a new kernel, but seeing if we did any infra changes too
[13:45] <sil2100> Only the kernel landed after 28, since we were already in Beta Freeze then
[13:45] <paride> 2020-09-30 08:22:03 URL:https://launchpadlibrarian.net/499979966/livecd.ubuntu-server.squashfs [375091200/375091200] -> "/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/scratch/ubuntu-server/groovy/daily-live/live/amd64.squashfs" [1]
[13:45] <paride> failed: Network is unreachable.
[13:45] <paride> failed: Network is unreachable.
[13:45] <paride> this is in the image build log
[13:45] <sil2100> Ah the fuck
[13:46] <Eickmeyer[m]> Woah, woah!
[13:46] <Eickmeyer[m]> !paste
[13:46] <sil2100> paride: how did that not result in an image build failure?
[13:47] <sil2100> Actually, let me look at those, maybe there's retries
[13:49] <sil2100> paride: I'm still looking at it, but this might be somthing as I don't see amd64.modules.squashfs-generic in the logs
[13:50] <sil2100> This might have been what timed out and that's why it's missing, but the build STILL SUCCEEDED
[13:50] <sil2100> eh
[13:50] <sil2100> I'll fill in a bug for this and see if I can re-run the build without restarting the livefs build
[13:51] <sil2100> Looks like LP still has the artifacts, so I guess I'll try that
[13:51] <sil2100> paride: good catch!
[13:51] <rbasak> tjaalton, vorlon: I half-SRU-reviewed pacemaker yesterday and am planning on finishing it today, so you can leave that today if you wish
[13:51] <rbasak> (it's in the Focal queue)
[13:51] <paride> sil2100, it was basically wishful thinking about maybe it being an image build fail
[13:52] <paride> sometimes it turns out to be true :P
[13:52] <tjaalton> rbasak: we're on tomorrow, isn't today bdmurray's shift?
[13:52] <sil2100> paride: haha, if you didn't look we'd probably be wondering for hours more!
[13:54] <rbasak> tjaalton: oh yes, sorry. bdmurray ^
[13:57] <paride> sil2100, so you'll respin the image with the same serial now I suppose
[13:57] <sil2100> And mine! But I'm busy with the beta
[13:57] <sil2100> paride: it will have a different serial, since serials are per-publishing, but it'll use the same livefs at least
[13:57] <sil2100> No changes in the archive so it should be all safe
[13:58] <paride> OK. Waiting for it then. In the meantime I'll +1 the other archs on the iso tracker
[13:58] <sil2100> paride: I'll run all of them just in case btw., the contents will be identical so I guess just a sanity check would be sufficient
[13:58] <paride> ok
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20201001)
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20201001)
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20201001)
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Groovy Beta] has been updated (20201001)
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready
[14:10] <Eickmeyer[m]> I realize we might have rebuilds, but... ^
[14:14] <xnox> kanashiro:  i'm pretty sure things like this need not need approval. upload of the package, will be stuck in Unapproved queue anyway. Meaning release team reviews every upload.
[14:14] <xnox> as they are queued up. See all the uploads in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/groovy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=
[14:25] <sil2100> paride: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/20201001/
[14:25] <sil2100> Eickmeyer[m]: hey! No rebuilds besides subiquity server!
[14:26] <sil2100> Eickmeyer[m]: thank you for marking!
[14:26] <sil2100> \o/
[14:26] <Eickmeyer[m]> Woot Woot!
[14:27] <paride> sil2100, triggering some builds
[14:43]  * sil2100 is prepublishing images anyway right now
[14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: azure-cli (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.81+ds-4ubuntu0.1 => 2.0.81+ds-4ubuntu0.2] (no packageset)
[14:50] <paride> sil2100, passed on amd64, s390x, ppc64el. Waiting for arm64 (slow)
[14:50] <sil2100> paride: yaaay
[14:51] <sil2100> paride: can you mark subiquity as ready once it's done?
[14:51] <paride> sil2100, sure
[14:55] <kanashiro> xnox: ok, I can upload it. I was trying to stick to the process described here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetaFreeze
[14:55] <kanashiro> maybe it needs some update?
[14:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sshuttle (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.4-1ubuntu3 => 1.0.4-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)
[14:57] <sil2100> kanashiro: hey! What is this discussion about?
[14:57] <sil2100> (sorry, too much going on)
[14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sshuttle [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.4-1ubuntu4]
[15:00] <kanashiro> sil2100: I requested a FFe for ruby2.7 here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.7/+bug/1897895
[15:00] <kanashiro> but xnox was telling me it would not be needed
[15:01] <kanashiro> and I mentioned I was following the process here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.7/+bug/1897895
[15:01] <sil2100> I'll look after my meeting what's up with that
[15:01] <xnox> kanashiro:  hm, i think that wiki is a bit ambigious.
[15:01] <kanashiro> sorr, this one: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetaFreeze
[15:01] <sil2100> kanashiro: yeah, from what I see this doesn't need an FFe, just upload!
[15:03] <sil2100> paride: hey! Do you test on actual real hardware for arm64?
[15:03] <paride> sil2100, no, in a VM
[15:04] <sil2100> paride: ouch
[15:05] <sil2100> Since xnox just reported this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1897819
[15:05] <sil2100> I mean, xnox informed me of this
[15:05] <sil2100> I need to think about that, but feels like we can't do much about it in such a short amount of time, we might need to release note it
[15:08] <paride> :/
[15:09] <paride> sil2100, testing on real hardware would require me having it :)
[15:09] <paride> not easy to do remotely
[15:09] <tkamppeter> LocutusOfBorg, thanks, looking into it. One solution would be using sane-airscan, here we need to complete the MIR bug 1891682.
[15:09] <kanashiro> thanks sil2100
[15:10] <tkamppeter> LocutusOfBorg, it is currently stuck at the security team.
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-bluetooth (focal-proposed/main) [3.34.1-1 => 3.34.3-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[15:37] <sil2100> paride: yeah, I imagine ;/
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pacemaker [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.3-3ubuntu4]
[16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready
[16:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [450.66-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 450.80.02-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (focal-proposed/restricted) [450.66-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 450.80.02-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:20.10.12]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: memcached (groovy-proposed/main) [1.6.6-3 => 1.6.6-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby2.7 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.7.1-3build1 => 2.7.1-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[17:34] <mitya57> Hi! Can some archive admin please process bug 1877047? It's pending since May.
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sudo [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.8.21p2-3ubuntu1.3]
[18:11] <sil2100> I think we're goodish on the beta front, as good as we can, ETA for release is in a few hours though!
[18:22] <sil2100> uh, ok, the xorriso cmdline for cd-boot-images-amd64 is just too much for me, but Steve knows what he's doing!
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-amd64 [source] (groovy-proposed) [7]
[18:26] <vorlon> heh :)
[18:26] <vorlon> fwiw the xorriso commandline within cd-boot-images-amd64 isn't used by debian-cd, it's basically just documentation
[18:31] <vorlon> mitya57: done
[18:31] <mitya57> thanks!
[18:39] <sil2100> vorlon: oh, good to know ;)
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready
[18:40] <sil2100> Slowly prepping for release, guess I don't even need to mark those as ready but I like to anyway
[18:41] <vorlon> sil2100: and debian-cd needs changes to match cd-boot-images-amd64 in lockstep; are you done rolling images for beta, should I go ahead and make that change now?
[18:41] <sil2100> vorlon: yeah, I won't be re-spinning anything, just running cdimage publisher commands
[18:42] <sil2100> So go for it!
[18:42] <vorlon> sil2100: ok. image builds will fail then until cd-boot-images-amd64 migrates to release pocket
[18:42] <sil2100> vorlon: don't you need to wait for cd-boot-images-amd64 to move into release btw.? Since I think we're usually building images based on the release pocket
[18:42] <sil2100> Yeah
[18:43] <sil2100> Ok, just as I thought, hopefully cd-boot-images-amd64 will migrate quickly
[18:44] <vorlon> sil2100: yeah but I don't precisely control the migration, and I want to get this done during my workday :)
[18:51] <vorlon> sil2100: what do you think about reversing the handling of the debian-cd branch, so that https://people.canonical.com/~cjwatson/bzr/debian-cd/ubuntu is the parent and ancientminister pulls from it? that would simplify my bzr workflow
[18:57] <sil2100> vorlon: I would be fine with that, I actually never knew why it's like this in the first place. Just assumed there was some uh, valid reason?
[18:57] <vorlon> sil2100: legacy, and the question of coordinating a transition among the committers
[19:11] <vorlon> sil2100: ok switched, so please update any local checkouts to push to bzr+ssh://people.canonical.com/~cjwatson/public_html/bzr/debian-cd/ubuntu/ instead
[19:11] <vorlon> Laney: ^^
[19:14] <sil2100> \o/
[19:14] <sil2100> vorlon: thanks! Works for me
[19:15] <sil2100> vorlon: btw. I updated LP: #1896215 with our latest 'case'
[19:15]  * vorlon nods
[19:15] <sil2100> I guess I'd like to tackle that one day, since to me it's absurd that the arm64 image was still successfully built even though it failed downloading the module squashfs
[19:19] <sil2100> Ok, hm, I guess I'll start the publishing
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Groovy Beta] has been marked as ready
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-bluetooth [source] (focal-proposed) [3.34.3-0ubuntu1]
[20:13] <sil2100> Beta images syncing to mirrors \o/
[20:13] <sil2100> I'm checking torrents right now
[20:19] <sil2100> Ok, I think I'm slowly starting to see something
[20:21] <sil2100> ...or maybe not, can anyone else check if the torrents seem to be working?
[20:25] <bdmurray> sil2100: I can check
[20:25] <sil2100> Thanks o/
[20:30] <bdmurray> sil2100: "Downloading from 0 of 0 peers"
[20:30] <bdmurray> vorlon: can you update autopkgtest-cloud?
[20:40] <vorlon> bdmurray: mmm seemingly not, the local checkout is in some kind of state. working on it
[20:45] <vorlon> bdmurray: ok, done
[20:46] <vorlon> sil2100: should we really be linking to http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/netboot/20.10/ from the beta announcement?
[20:58] <cjwatson> vorlon: Can it be moved to a proper LP branch rather than coming from a weird mirror in my homedir?
[20:58] <cjwatson> vorlon: It's only that way because this dates from before it was possible to use LP code branches within the datacentre and I never got round to fixing it ...
[20:59] <cjwatson> vorlon: (That is, if you're incurring the cost of transitioning committers anyway you might as well do it properly :) )
[20:59] <cjwatson> vorlon: Also could you update https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseTeam/CDImageSetup?
[21:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rna-star (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.7.5c+dfsg-1 => 2.7.5c+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[21:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rna-star [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.7.5c+dfsg-3]
[21:25] <vorlon> cjwatson: can I do that for an existing branch that's set up for syncing, or do I have to create a new branch in LP to do that?
[21:26] <vorlon> ah, edit import source
[21:26] <vorlon> nope, doesn't accept a null value ;)
[21:30] <cjwatson> vorlon: Needs a new branch, though possibly with a careful rename dance you can end up with it having the same name
[21:31] <cjwatson> Push content to new branch, rename old one aside, rename new one into place
[21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-snapshot (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:12~++20200715052739+d6e79e3dd6d-1~exp1build2 => 1:12~++20200929085817+962a247aebb-1~exp1] (no packageset) (sync)
[21:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-snapshot [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:12~++20200929085817+962a247aebb-1~exp1]
[22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jsonrpc-glib (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.34.0-1 => 3.38.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jsonrpc-glib [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.0-1]
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: polari (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.36.2-1 => 3.38.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted polari [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.0-1]
[22:33] <sil2100> vorlon: well, it was linked in the focal beta announcement
[22:33] <sil2100> vorlon: but I can remove that and re-send if you think that's best
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.142.7 => 1.142.8] (core)
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu34 => 2.04-1ubuntu35] (core)
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.5 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.6] (core)
[22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (groovy-proposed/main) [1.154 => 1.155] (core)
[22:52] <xnox> vorlon:  apw: how about having launchpad-side no change rebuilds? All of these signed/resigned/vendored package chains are becoming a pain. Upload of grub is now 5 source packages: grub2, grub2-signed, cd-boot-images-{amd64,arm64,ppc64el} => 4 of which are no-change rebuilds.
[23:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (groovy-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu48 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu49] (core, i386-whitelist)
[23:24] <sil2100> I'll lift the britney freeze today already
[23:30] <sil2100> bdmurray: beta freeze lifted, so now stuff should be auto-migrating from -proposed to release
[23:30] <sil2100> But the queue freeze stays until final release
[23:30] <sil2100> I go now o/
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: goffice (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.10.47-1 => 0.10.48-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)