=== phma_ is now known as phma
[00:37] <phma> What does "-us -uc" mean? It's not in the debuild man page.
[00:38] <phma> What's an innocent third party bug?
[00:38] <Unit193>        -uc, --unsigned-changes
[00:38] <Unit193>               Do not sign the .buildinfo and .changes files (long option since dpkg 1.18.8).
[00:38] <Unit193>        -us, --unsigned-source
[00:38] <Unit193>               Do not sign the source package (long option since dpkg 1.18.8).
[00:39] <jbicha> phma: https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/dpkg-buildpackage
[00:41] <phma> that's for dpkg-buildpackage, not debuild
[00:42] <Unit193> debuild is a wrapper for dpkg-buildpackage.
[00:42] <cjwatson> The debuild man page says "[dpkg-buildpackage options]" in its SYNOPSIS
[00:43] <cjwatson> So you need to refer to the dpkg-buildpackage man page for details of those
[00:43] <phma> https://wiki.debian.org/Packaging/Intro?action=show&redirect=IntroDebianPackaging says something about closing an ITP bug
[00:43] <phma> ah
[00:44] <phma> lintian says: W: mirasol: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
[03:30] <mwhudson> if anyone can figure out what's going on here, i'm all ears: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/z3/4.8.9-1/+build/19965574
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
[06:10] <Tuxist> hi can i build i386 libs for legay support with pbuilder in ubuntu 20.04
[06:11] <Tuxist> i wan't to build pipewire i386 libs
[06:12] <Tuxist> actuelly i got noe dev packages so pbuilder will aborted
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
[07:48] <mitya57> Tuxist: you can use pbuilder-dist, e.g. pbuilder-dist focal i386 create && pbuilder-dist focal i386 build *.dsc
[07:49] <mitya57> See http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/focal/man1/pbuilder-dist.1.html for details
[07:50] <mitya57> … reading your question again, I understand that probably some libs are not in i386 whitelist. In that case you have to build those libs in an i386 pbuilder first.
[07:53] <Tuxist> mitya57: thanks
[10:10] <Laney> paride: hey, just wanted to check/poke, would you be able to help get https://github.com/canonical/cloud-utils/pull/14 uploaded to groovy please?
[10:10] <Laney> merci for the merging, and to smoser for the developing
[10:12] <paride> Laney, yes, sure thing
[10:13] <Laney> :>
[10:14] <Laney> pi images thank you
[14:14] <paride> Laney, cloud-utils is in Unapproved
[14:17] <paride> Laney, the changes not related to the variable fix are on the tests and CI bits
[14:20] <Laney> paride: merci merci, i will look at the queue later on hopefully
=== seb128_ is now known as seb128
[19:02] <rbasak> !dmb-ping
[19:02] <ubottu> ddstreet, rafaeldtinoco, rbasak, sil2100, slashd, teward, tsimonq2: DMB ping
[19:21] <tampuriini> Hello, anyone here developing apt?
[19:22] <tampuriini> The ipv4 fallback is so slow and i got lots of AAA record lookups as refused and it tooks 2min to fallback to ipv4
[19:22] <tampuriini> i have looked the problem with wireshark etc and the problem exists in lots of places including countries in asia and europe
[19:23] <tampuriini> disabling ipv6 does the trick but it's not so customer friendly becouse people don't know always whats the problem
[19:48] <rbasak> tampuriini: I suggest you file a bug with details on your specific network circumstances that you've gathered with wireshark that result in the fallback being slow in your case.
[19:59] <doko> tjaalton: not sure if you can help ... which nvidia drivers am I supposed to install for an ubuntu server installation? the nouveau driver only shows a blurred text console
[20:01] <tjaalton> doko: you can disable nouveau with nomodeset
[20:01] <tjaalton> on the kernel cmdline
[20:13] <teward> rbasak: blah every single time the meeting is about to happen I get pulled into freaking "stuff broke dude" with work
[20:13] <teward> (DMB)
[20:13] <teward> (also IRC is not the best medium IMO for meetings anymore)
[20:13] <teward> (my 2 cents)
=== ladyfrid1y is now known as ladyfriday
=== Trevinho_ is now known as Trevinho
=== eruditass_ is now known as eruditass
[20:29] <mwhudson> doko, cjwatson: can you restart https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20200925-groovy/+build/20074318 ?
[20:29] <mwhudson> looks spurious
[20:31] <doko> mwhudson: all failed builds were already re-started. so this is at least the second time that this fails. anyway, given back
[20:31] <mwhudson> doko: hmm
[20:31] <mwhudson> thanks
[20:40] <mwhudson> i really should be NMUing these gcc 10 fixes to debian i guess