-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (groovy-proposed/main) [1:20.10.11 => 1:20.10.12] (core)00:30
mwhudsonLocutusOfBorg: do you have any ideas about the vips and kio-extras failures?01:29
mwhudsonoh vips is fixed in debian01:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vips (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.10.1-1build1 => 8.10.1-2] (no packageset) (sync)01:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vips [sync] (groovy-proposed) [8.10.1-2]01:38
mwhudsonmy conclusion about kio-extras so far: i don't like cmake02:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kio-extras (groovy-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu3 => 4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu4] (kubuntu)03:38
mwhudsoni don't seem to be getting "waiting for approval" mails currently03:47
mwhudsonis that expected?03:47
cpaelzerhi release team, After checking their results in the past and cross arch I think openjdk-lts tests are not gonna work. I have some words about is and a force-badtest ready in https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-groovy-openjdk-lts-i386/+merge/39186005:54
cpaelzermwhudson: the beta freeze is lifted since Friday https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-groovy-openjdk-lts-i386/revision/501305:55
cpaelzermwhudson: maybe that is why you don't get these mails?05:55
=== ebarretto_ is now known as ebarretto
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-jsdom (groovy-proposed/universe) [16.2.2+~cs56.12.24-1 => 16.4.0+~cs56.14.27-1] (no packageset) (sync)06:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-sinon (groovy-proposed/universe) [9.0.3+ds+~cs48.19.16-2 => 9.1.0+ds+~cs48.21.19-1] (no packageset) (sync)06:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-rollup (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.32.1-3 => 2.28.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)06:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jqueryui (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.12.1+dfsg-6 => 1.12.1+dfsg-7] (i386-whitelist) (sync)06:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jqueryui [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.12.1+dfsg-7]06:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-rollup [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.28.2-2]06:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-jsdom [sync] (groovy-proposed) [16.4.0+~cs56.14.27-1]06:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-sinon [sync] (groovy-proposed) [9.1.0+ds+~cs48.21.19-1]06:20
locutusofborg_oh... mwhudson looks like you already fixed it, thanks!06:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-jsdom [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [16.4.0+~cs56.14.27-1] (no packageset)06:22
=== locutusofborg_ is now known as LocutusOfBorg
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kio-extras (groovy-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu3 => 4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu4] (kubuntu)07:32
apwmwhudson, to ask a stupid question, you are the uploader and not just a sponsor right?08:21
Laneyif it's a copy, you don't get an email until it's accepted https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/83061408:33
ubot5Ubuntu bug 830614 in Launchpad itself "Email not immediately sent for copied packages which end up in queues" [Low,Triaged]08:33
Laneyye olde buge08:33
mwhudsonapw: yes, uploaded normally via dput08:39
apwthen that is unexpected08:40
mwhudsonLocutusOfBorg: yeah found something in the end08:40
mwhudsoni didn't get emails for my kio-extras upload today or my zeromq3 upload yesterday08:41
LocutusOfBorgnow, you and RikMills should decide which upload is *better*08:41
LocutusOfBorgI think RikMills wins, because its an upstream patch :)08:42
mwhudsonRikMills is more like to actually have a clue what they are doing :)08:43
mwhudsonhmm the diff on the queue is massively unhelpful08:43
LocutusOfBorgubuntu-archive please reject the older kio-extras and accept the newer one :D08:43
RikMillsmwhudson: I added a one line upstream patch08:44
RikMillsurgh. the queue is still doing the diff against a version that was removed from proposed08:45
apwyep it loves you very much08:45
mwhudsonRikMills: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/mFsyX4CgJ9/ <- my actual diff08:45
Laneythe groovy unapproved queue is ubuntu-release and not ubuntu-arc_hive fwiw08:45
RikMillsmwhudson: that is LocutusOfBorg's not mine08:46
mwhudsonRikMills: no, it was me08:46
mwhudsonbut i agree, yours is better now i've fished it out properly08:47
RikMillsaha. thanks08:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected kio-extras [source] (groovy-proposed) [4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu4]08:49
mwhudsoni got the mail for that!08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted erlang [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:23.0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1]08:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-taquin (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.0-1 => 3.38.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)09:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-mahjongg (groovy-proposed/main) [1:3.38.1-1 => 1:3.38.2-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)09:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-taquin [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]09:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (groovy-proposed/main) [3.38.0-2 => 3.38.1-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)09:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.0-1 => 3.38.1-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync)09:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-tetravex (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:3.38.0-1 => 1:3.38.1-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)09:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-ews (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.0-1 => 3.38.1-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)09:16
LocutusOfBorgalso please accept libvigraimpex and gmic no change rebuilds from unapproved09:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libshout [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.4.4-1]09:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvorbis [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.7-1]09:54
sil2100geh, I hate queue-reviewing syncs10:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libmbim [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.24.4-0.1]10:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vesa [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:2.5.0-1]10:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vala [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.48.11-1]10:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debianutils [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4.11.2]10:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gvfs [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.46.1-1ubuntu1]10:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-meta [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.233]10:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-jsdom [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [16.4.0+~cs56.14.27-1]10:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1]10:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1]10:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1]10:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1]10:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1]10:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1]10:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1]10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1]10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1]10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1]10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1]10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1]10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2]10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2]10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2]10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2]10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2]10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2]10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gmic [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.4.5-1.1build2]10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-menu [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.49]10:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-bluetooth-quick-connect [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [13-3]10:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-greatroar-blobloom [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.0-3]10:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [sync] (groovy-proposed) [20.2.0-1]10:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cyrus-sasl2 [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.27+dfsg-2ubuntu1]10:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvigraimpex [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.11.1+dfsg-7ubuntu5]10:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-calendar [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]10:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yelp [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]10:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yelp-xsl [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]10:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-calendar [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]10:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nautilus [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:3.38.1-1ubuntu1]10:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:20.10.12]10:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]10:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]10:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-tetravex [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:3.38.1-1]10:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-ews [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]10:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3-defaults (groovy-proposed/main) [3.8.2-0ubuntu2 => 3.8.6-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)10:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-mahjongg [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:3.38.2-1]10:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3-defaults [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.8.6-0ubuntu1]10:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3-stdlib-extensions [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.8.6-1]10:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted taglib [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.11.1+dfsg.1-3build2]10:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (groovy-proposed/main) [15.2.3-0ubuntu3 => 15.2.5-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)11:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kio-extras [source] (groovy-proposed) [4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu4]11:10
LocutusOfBorgsil2100, since you usually do virtualbox, can you please have a look at LP: #189737811:42
ubot5Launchpad bug 1897378 in liblzf (Ubuntu) "[SRU] liblzf backport to focal" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189737811:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cvise (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3 => 1.7.0-1] (no packageset)12:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cvise [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.7.0-1]12:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added yaru-theme to ubuntu-desktop in focal13:06
vorlonxnox: is there a reason we needed a new fakeroot synced?13:18
xnoxvorlon:  fixes FTBFS13:19
xnoxvorlon:  can defer, but then foundations-team is left with a FTBFS13:20
vorlonxnox: ok. but regresses autopkgtests apparently?13:20
coreycbhello release team, I have 3 packages in the groovy NEW queue for openstack ironic driver dependencies. they have no reverse dependencies. if it's too late for those, it's fine, I can put them in a PPA and re-upload next cycle. if someone has a moment I'd like to see if they could be accepted or rejected.13:21
xnoxjuliank:  can you look at apt tests triggered by fakeroot? i'm not sure if apt regressed, or new fakeroot is broken - or in reverse "improved"13:21
juliankxnox: it makes me unhappy13:26
juliankxnox: let's sync new fakeroot13:27
xnoxjuliank: ack13:28
juliankxnox: see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=97107013:28
ubot5Debian bug 971070 in fakeroot "fakeroot 1.25.1-1 breaks fakechroot" [Important,Fixed]13:28
xnoxvorlon:  let's try with even newer fakeroot then =)13:28
juliankNot sure why it's not triggering apt in debian13:28
juliankoh it is13:29
juliank1.25.1 failed, 1.25.2 passed13:29
juliankso synced that13:29
Laneyyou can test that without actually syncing to the primary archive ...13:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fakeroot (groovy-proposed/main) [1.25.1-1 => 1.25.2-1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)13:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (groovy-proposed/main) [20.10.5 => 20.10.6] (ubuntu-desktop)13:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fakeroot (groovy-proposed/main) [1.25.1-1 => 1.25.2-1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)13:30
juliankhuh who synced second time?13:31
juliankLaney: well we know that it fixes it from debian CI :)13:32
xnoxi synced a second time.13:33
xnoxLaney:  we have a broken on in groovy-proposed now. so we need to either superseed the one in groovy-proposed, or remove it.13:33
LaneyI get that, not sure why testing in advance is controversial13:34
tewardcan the sru team approve/release torbrowser from focal-proposed to focal-updates please?  asking because the bugs had verification-done-focal on it for some time (days) but verification-needed was not removed yet.  Now those verification-needed have been removed.13:37
tewardthere's now a number of "Issues with Tor Browser" reports raised on Ask ubuntu all pending that SRU landing in -updates.13:38
juliankLaney: we're lazy :/13:38
juliankwe'd have to copy to a PPA and trigger tests from there once its built, or do it locally which is meh13:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spice (groovy-proposed/main) [0.14.3-1ubuntu1 => 0.14.3-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)13:44
Laneyjuliank: you've got the debs lying around because you test built before syncing, so you can do13:47
Laneydcmd --deb autopkgtest --shell-fail --timeout-copy=6000 --apt-upgrade fakeroot_1.25.2-1_amd64.changes apt -- qemu --ram-size=1592 autopkgtest-groovy-amd64.img13:47
julianksyncing wise I'm just glorified autosync and don't do a test build either13:49
Laneywhat :(13:51
tjaaltonlibllvm11 needs to be promoted for mesa14:03
dokotjaalton: needs a subscriber. It looks like somebody unsubscribed all the llvm packages ...14:26
=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks
tjaaltondoko: added ubuntu-x14:31
dokoI'm just wondering who was subscribed before, and unsubscribed without giving any notice ...14:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-rcppparallel (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.0.2+dfsg-1 => 5.0.2+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync)14:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-rcppparallel [sync] (groovy-proposed) [5.0.2+dfsg-3]14:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qscintilla2 (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.11.2+dfsg-7 => 2.11.5+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync)14:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qscintilla2 [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.11.5+dfsg-3]14:46
Trevinhoplease delete the yaru-theme from queue as upstream requested to add more fixes in...15:08
Trevinhoseb128: can you^?15:08
seb128Trevinho, rejected15:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected yaru-theme [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.6]15:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (groovy-proposed/main) [20.10.5 => 20.10.6] (ubuntu-desktop)15:10
sil2100Laney: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-20-10-release-status-tracking/18647 <- created something like this just now15:11
sil2100Laney: I'd love us having real checklists in it, but I guess for that we'd have to ping IS to install an external discourse plugin15:11
Laneysil2100: nice15:24
LaneyI guess we'll have to be a bit careful regarding conflicts15:24
Laneyso discourse doesn't support checklists like github out of the box?15:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (xenial-proposed/partner) [212.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 311.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (no packageset)15:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-cloud-sdk [source] (xenial-proposed) [311.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]15:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (bionic-proposed/main) [3.9.1-1ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 4.0-1~ubuntu0.18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)15:45
sil2100Laney: sadly, no, but there is an almost-like-official plugin for it from what I saw15:57
sil2100Laney: well, discourse is much better with conflicts, so we'll never really overwrite eachother15:57
sil2100But yes, it's less dynamic than google docs15:58
Laneybut we'll be nice and O P E N16:02
bdmurraysil2100: I'm gonna release cvise and python-pebble to -updates even those its less than 7 days. I think the waiting period is not needed for new packages.16:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fakeroot [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.25.2-1]16:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fakeroot [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.25.2-1]16:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spice [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.14.3-1ubuntu2]16:22
bdmurrayvorlon: Do you have an opinion on cvise and python-pebble? ^^17:15
bdmurrayxnox: Could you verify bug 1867157?18:28
ubot5bug 1867157 in python3.8 (Ubuntu Focal) "Improve command-not-found package headers" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186715718:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: swi-prolog (groovy-proposed/universe) [7.6.4+dfsg-2ubuntu2 => 8.2.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset) (sync)18:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swi-prolog [sync] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2]18:36
vorlonbdmurray: sounds good to me18:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swi-prolog [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset)18:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swi-prolog [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset)18:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swi-prolog [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2]18:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swi-prolog [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2]18:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swi-prolog [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset)18:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swi-prolog [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset)18:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swi-prolog [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2]18:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swi-prolog [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2]18:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: swi-prolog (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.2.1+dfsg-2 => 8.2.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)18:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swi-prolog [source] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1]18:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-perftools (groovy-proposed/main) [2.7-1ubuntu2 => 2.7-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)19:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-perftools [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.7-1ubuntu3]19:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: eye (groovy-proposed/universe) [20.0703.0848~ds-1 => 20.0703.0848~ds-1build1] (no packageset)19:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted eye [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.0703.0848~ds-1build1]19:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.60 => 2.408.61] (desktop-core)19:58
bdmurraybryce: bug 1644057 could use verification to finish off logwatch20:03
ubot5bug 1644057 in logwatch (Ubuntu Bionic) "Excessive Disconnect unmatched entries from sshd" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164405720:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.61]20:04
brycebdmurray, ah thanks was wondering what was holding it up.  I must have missed updating that bug report.  I'll doublecheck it.20:08
bdmurraybryce: cool20:27
brycebdmurray, ok for bionic it's good to go.  For xenial I noticed another related log message that is unmatched.  See my comment on LP: #164405720:39
ubot5Launchpad bug 1644057 in logwatch (Ubuntu Bionic) "Excessive Disconnect unmatched entries from sshd" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164405720:39
brycebdmurray, let me know your preference if I should fix the additional log message as well, or if we should go with the sru as-is and leave that for followup.20:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plymouth [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu6.1]20:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-rstan (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.21.2-1 => 2.21.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)20:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-rstan [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.21.2-2]20:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lasso [source] (focal-proposed) [2.6.0-7ubuntu1.1]20:51
bdmurraybryce: I think a follow on SRU is fine as it is an incremental improvement and doesn't make things worse.21:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted epiphany-browser [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.4-0ubuntu1]21:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.100-0ubuntu4~20.04.2]21:15
brycebdmurray, ok great thanks21:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142.8]21:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.6]21:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: studio-controls (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.0.8-0ubuntu1 => 2.0.9-0ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)22:03
Eickmeyer[m]^ bug 189836922:04
ubot5bug 1898369 in studio-controls (Ubuntu) "studio-controls autoconnects the wrong ports" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189836922:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: babl (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:0.1.80-1 => 1:0.1.82-1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu) (sync)22:39
xnoxbdmurray:  why did you reject my fix of the regression in proposed?22:41
xnoxbdmurray: the second bug report in the 26.6 is the fix for the regression reported against 26.522:41
xnoxbdmurray:  we need still need it, otherwise we do not have arm64 secureboot fixed.22:42
xnoxbdmurray:  it has been tested out of bileto, by dannf and myself that it fixes the reported regression22:42
xnoxi worked good portion of last week to resolve it.22:43
xnoxalso that's now what's in groovy.22:43
xnoxin the release pocket22:43
xnoxboth the original patch, and fix up of it, to make it non-regressing on some arm machines.22:43
bdmurrayIf the fix for bug 1897819 was something that fixed the verification of bug 1862279 that wasn't clear from the changelog22:43
ubot5bug 1897819 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "boot fails on hi1620, thunderx2 platforms" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189781922:44
ubot5bug 1862279 in grub2-signed (Ubuntu Focal) "arm64 Secure Boot fails w/ "error: cannot load image."" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186227922:44
xnoxbdmurray:  https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/grub/+git/grub/+merge/39170022:44
bdmurrayIf its also fixing bug 1862279 I'm pretty sure that wasn't included in Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed.22:45
ubot5bug 1862279 in grub2-signed (Ubuntu Focal) "arm64 Secure Boot fails w/ "error: cannot load image."" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186227922:45
xnoxbdmurray:  the patch introduced arm64 support, in a buggy way, follow up change to said patch by me made it non-broken.22:45
bdmurrayOkay but 1862279 was never verified so I think you want to upload it with -v...26.4 so it gets included in L-B-F22:46
xnox26.4 is in updates22:46
xnoxthus my upload was 26.5 & 26.6, or was it not?22:47
bdmurrayDouble checking but I'm pretty sure it was only 26.622:47
xnoxthat's broken =)22:47
xnoxhow can one even see changes? =/22:48
xnoxin the queue ui, I only see files without the changes22:48
xnoxbdmurray:  so you didn't check / try to compare what is shipped in groovy?22:49
xnoxcause 26.6 is the same, as wha'ts in groovy-release now.22:49
xnox26.5 was buggy; 26.6 fixed the 26.5 bugginess, and added one more SRU fix. => what should I do now to upload it right?22:50
xnox26.6 explicitely referenced the bug, that reported the regression of the 26.5 one22:50
xnoxyeap, has both entries. all three things are now correctly fixed.22:51
xnoxthe bug that 26.5 claimed to fix; the regression that that fix made; and the postinst.in regression from 26.4.22:51
xnox26.6 is fix for 26.5 & 26.4 regressions =)))))))22:51
bdmurrayI see that now its just not obvious that 1897819 is what caused the verification of 26.5 to fail22:52
xnoxyeah, i don't know how to report regressions right22:53
xnoxshould i ahve closed the regression bug, and keep the same bug reference? i.e. introduce linuxefi-arm64 harder #old-bug-number ?22:53
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1862279 in grub2-signed (Ubuntu Focal) "arm64 Secure Boot fails w/ "error: cannot load image."" [Undecided,In progress]22:54
bdmurraythis also didn't help22:54
bdmurray"ubuntu-linuxefi-arm64.patch: Fix build on armhf"22:54
xnoxthis is the comment that links the two.22:54
xnoxbdmurray:  for that description i blame juliank22:54
bdmurraywell and whoever reviewed it22:54
xnoxthe descriptions should be "cherry-pick dropped on the floor secureboot arm codepaths in the linuxefi patch"22:54
bdmurrayanyway we could keep talking about it or I could really review it22:55
xnoxbecause really, 26.5 is just "regression when we merged 2.04 badly during dev cycle of eoan"22:55
* xnox send virtual beer from Santiago Product sprint, which is sadly virtual/remote22:55
xnoxbdmurray:  unpack groovy's grub, and compare the new introduced changes with the patches in groovy.22:56
xnoxusing like interdiff of the diffs.22:56
xnoxor just comparing the patched trees.22:56
bdmurrayxnox: this would be more appropriate - especially in two weeks https://gorillaspirits.co.uk/silverback-mountain-strength-gin/22:57
xnoxbdmurray:  Thank you. Your order has been received.23:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.6 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.6] (core)23:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.6 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.6] (core)23:43

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!