| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (groovy-proposed/main) [1:20.10.11 => 1:20.10.12] (core) | 00:30 | |
| mwhudson | LocutusOfBorg: do you have any ideas about the vips and kio-extras failures? | 01:29 |
|---|---|---|
| mwhudson | oh vips is fixed in debian | 01:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vips (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.10.1-1build1 => 8.10.1-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 01:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vips [sync] (groovy-proposed) [8.10.1-2] | 01:38 | |
| mwhudson | my conclusion about kio-extras so far: i don't like cmake | 02:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kio-extras (groovy-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu3 => 4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu4] (kubuntu) | 03:38 | |
| mwhudson | i don't seem to be getting "waiting for approval" mails currently | 03:47 |
| mwhudson | is that expected? | 03:47 |
| cpaelzer | hi release team, After checking their results in the past and cross arch I think openjdk-lts tests are not gonna work. I have some words about is and a force-badtest ready in https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-groovy-openjdk-lts-i386/+merge/391860 | 05:54 |
| cpaelzer | mwhudson: the beta freeze is lifted since Friday https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-groovy-openjdk-lts-i386/revision/5013 | 05:55 |
| cpaelzer | mwhudson: maybe that is why you don't get these mails? | 05:55 |
| === ebarretto_ is now known as ebarretto | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-jsdom (groovy-proposed/universe) [16.2.2+~cs56.12.24-1 => 16.4.0+~cs56.14.27-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 06:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-sinon (groovy-proposed/universe) [9.0.3+ds+~cs48.19.16-2 => 9.1.0+ds+~cs48.21.19-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 06:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-rollup (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.32.1-3 => 2.28.2-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 06:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jqueryui (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.12.1+dfsg-6 => 1.12.1+dfsg-7] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 06:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jqueryui [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.12.1+dfsg-7] | 06:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-rollup [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.28.2-2] | 06:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-jsdom [sync] (groovy-proposed) [16.4.0+~cs56.14.27-1] | 06:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-sinon [sync] (groovy-proposed) [9.1.0+ds+~cs48.21.19-1] | 06:20 | |
| locutusofborg_ | oh... mwhudson looks like you already fixed it, thanks! | 06:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-jsdom [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [16.4.0+~cs56.14.27-1] (no packageset) | 06:22 | |
| === locutusofborg_ is now known as LocutusOfBorg | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kio-extras (groovy-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu3 => 4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu4] (kubuntu) | 07:32 | |
| apw | mwhudson, to ask a stupid question, you are the uploader and not just a sponsor right? | 08:21 |
| Laney | if it's a copy, you don't get an email until it's accepted https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/830614 | 08:33 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 830614 in Launchpad itself "Email not immediately sent for copied packages which end up in queues" [Low,Triaged] | 08:33 |
| Laney | ye olde buge | 08:33 |
| mwhudson | apw: yes, uploaded normally via dput | 08:39 |
| apw | then that is unexpected | 08:40 |
| mwhudson | LocutusOfBorg: yeah found something in the end | 08:40 |
| mwhudson | i didn't get emails for my kio-extras upload today or my zeromq3 upload yesterday | 08:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | now, you and RikMills should decide which upload is *better* | 08:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I think RikMills wins, because its an upstream patch :) | 08:42 |
| mwhudson | RikMills is more like to actually have a clue what they are doing :) | 08:43 |
| mwhudson | hmm the diff on the queue is massively unhelpful | 08:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ubuntu-archive please reject the older kio-extras and accept the newer one :D | 08:43 |
| RikMills | mwhudson: I added a one line upstream patch | 08:44 |
| RikMills | urgh. the queue is still doing the diff against a version that was removed from proposed | 08:45 |
| apw | yep it loves you very much | 08:45 |
| mwhudson | RikMills: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/mFsyX4CgJ9/ <- my actual diff | 08:45 |
| Laney | the groovy unapproved queue is ubuntu-release and not ubuntu-arc_hive fwiw | 08:45 |
| RikMills | mwhudson: that is LocutusOfBorg's not mine | 08:46 |
| mwhudson | RikMills: no, it was me | 08:46 |
| RikMills | oh | 08:47 |
| mwhudson | but i agree, yours is better now i've fished it out properly | 08:47 |
| RikMills | aha. thanks | 08:47 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected kio-extras [source] (groovy-proposed) [4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu4] | 08:49 | |
| mwhudson | i got the mail for that! | 08:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted erlang [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:23.0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 08:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-taquin (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.0-1 => 3.38.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 09:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-mahjongg (groovy-proposed/main) [1:3.38.1-1 => 1:3.38.2-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 09:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-taquin [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1] | 09:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (groovy-proposed/main) [3.38.0-2 => 3.38.1-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 09:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.0-1 => 3.38.1-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync) | 09:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-tetravex (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:3.38.0-1 => 1:3.38.1-1] (desktop-extra) (sync) | 09:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-ews (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.0-1 => 3.38.1-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync) | 09:16 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | also please accept libvigraimpex and gmic no change rebuilds from unapproved | 09:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libshout [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.4.4-1] | 09:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvorbis [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.7-1] | 09:54 | |
| sil2100 | geh, I hate queue-reviewing syncs | 10:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libmbim [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.24.4-0.1] | 10:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vesa [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:2.5.0-1] | 10:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vala [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.48.11-1] | 10:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debianutils [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4.11.2] | 10:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gvfs [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.46.1-1ubuntu1] | 10:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-meta [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.233] | 10:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-jsdom [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [16.4.0+~cs56.14.27-1] | 10:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1] | 10:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1] | 10:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1] | 10:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1] | 10:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1] | 10:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1] | 10:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gmic [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.4.5-1.1build2] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-menu [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.49] | 10:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-bluetooth-quick-connect [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [13-3] | 10:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-greatroar-blobloom [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.0-3] | 10:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [sync] (groovy-proposed) [20.2.0-1] | 10:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cyrus-sasl2 [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.27+dfsg-2ubuntu1] | 10:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvigraimpex [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.11.1+dfsg-7ubuntu5] | 10:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-calendar [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1] | 10:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yelp [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1] | 10:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yelp-xsl [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1] | 10:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-calendar [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1] | 10:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nautilus [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:3.38.1-1ubuntu1] | 10:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:20.10.12] | 10:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1] | 10:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1] | 10:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-tetravex [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:3.38.1-1] | 10:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-ews [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1] | 10:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3-defaults (groovy-proposed/main) [3.8.2-0ubuntu2 => 3.8.6-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 10:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-mahjongg [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:3.38.2-1] | 10:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3-defaults [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.8.6-0ubuntu1] | 10:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3-stdlib-extensions [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.8.6-1] | 10:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted taglib [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.11.1+dfsg.1-3build2] | 10:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (groovy-proposed/main) [15.2.3-0ubuntu3 => 15.2.5-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 11:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kio-extras [source] (groovy-proposed) [4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu4] | 11:10 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | sil2100, since you usually do virtualbox, can you please have a look at LP: #1897378 | 11:42 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1897378 in liblzf (Ubuntu) "[SRU] liblzf backport to focal" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1897378 | 11:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cvise (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3 => 1.7.0-1] (no packageset) | 12:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cvise [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.7.0-1] | 12:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added yaru-theme to ubuntu-desktop in focal | 13:06 | |
| vorlon | xnox: is there a reason we needed a new fakeroot synced? | 13:18 |
| xnox | vorlon: fixes FTBFS | 13:19 |
| xnox | vorlon: can defer, but then foundations-team is left with a FTBFS | 13:20 |
| vorlon | xnox: ok. but regresses autopkgtests apparently? | 13:20 |
| coreycb | hello release team, I have 3 packages in the groovy NEW queue for openstack ironic driver dependencies. they have no reverse dependencies. if it's too late for those, it's fine, I can put them in a PPA and re-upload next cycle. if someone has a moment I'd like to see if they could be accepted or rejected. | 13:21 |
| xnox | juliank: can you look at apt tests triggered by fakeroot? i'm not sure if apt regressed, or new fakeroot is broken - or in reverse "improved" | 13:21 |
| juliank | xnox: it makes me unhappy | 13:26 |
| juliank | xnox: let's sync new fakeroot | 13:27 |
| xnox | juliank: ack | 13:28 |
| juliank | xnox: see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971070 | 13:28 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 971070 in fakeroot "fakeroot 1.25.1-1 breaks fakechroot" [Important,Fixed] | 13:28 |
| xnox | vorlon: let's try with even newer fakeroot then =) | 13:28 |
| juliank | Not sure why it's not triggering apt in debian | 13:28 |
| juliank | oh it is | 13:29 |
| juliank | 1.25.1 failed, 1.25.2 passed | 13:29 |
| juliank | so synced that | 13:29 |
| Laney | you can test that without actually syncing to the primary archive ... | 13:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fakeroot (groovy-proposed/main) [1.25.1-1 => 1.25.2-1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) | 13:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (groovy-proposed/main) [20.10.5 => 20.10.6] (ubuntu-desktop) | 13:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fakeroot (groovy-proposed/main) [1.25.1-1 => 1.25.2-1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) | 13:30 | |
| juliank | huh who synced second time? | 13:31 |
| juliank | ah | 13:31 |
| juliank | Laney: well we know that it fixes it from debian CI :) | 13:32 |
| xnox | i synced a second time. | 13:33 |
| xnox | Laney: we have a broken on in groovy-proposed now. so we need to either superseed the one in groovy-proposed, or remove it. | 13:33 |
| Laney | k | 13:33 |
| Laney | I get that, not sure why testing in advance is controversial | 13:34 |
| teward | can the sru team approve/release torbrowser from focal-proposed to focal-updates please? asking because the bugs had verification-done-focal on it for some time (days) but verification-needed was not removed yet. Now those verification-needed have been removed. | 13:37 |
| teward | there's now a number of "Issues with Tor Browser" reports raised on Ask ubuntu all pending that SRU landing in -updates. | 13:38 |
| juliank | Laney: we're lazy :/ | 13:38 |
| juliank | we'd have to copy to a PPA and trigger tests from there once its built, or do it locally which is meh | 13:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spice (groovy-proposed/main) [0.14.3-1ubuntu1 => 0.14.3-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server) | 13:44 | |
| Laney | juliank: you've got the debs lying around because you test built before syncing, so you can do | 13:47 |
| Laney | dcmd --deb autopkgtest --shell-fail --timeout-copy=6000 --apt-upgrade fakeroot_1.25.2-1_amd64.changes apt -- qemu --ram-size=1592 autopkgtest-groovy-amd64.img | 13:47 |
| juliank | syncing wise I'm just glorified autosync and don't do a test build either | 13:49 |
| Laney | what :( | 13:51 |
| tjaalton | libllvm11 needs to be promoted for mesa | 14:03 |
| doko | tjaalton: needs a subscriber. It looks like somebody unsubscribed all the llvm packages ... | 14:26 |
| tjaalton | ok | 14:28 |
| === didrocks999 is now known as didrocks | ||
| tjaalton | doko: added ubuntu-x | 14:31 |
| doko | I'm just wondering who was subscribed before, and unsubscribed without giving any notice ... | 14:32 |
| tjaalton | dunno | 14:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-rcppparallel (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.0.2+dfsg-1 => 5.0.2+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 14:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-rcppparallel [sync] (groovy-proposed) [5.0.2+dfsg-3] | 14:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qscintilla2 (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.11.2+dfsg-7 => 2.11.5+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 14:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qscintilla2 [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.11.5+dfsg-3] | 14:46 | |
| Trevinho | please delete the yaru-theme from queue as upstream requested to add more fixes in... | 15:08 |
| Trevinho | seb128: can you^? | 15:08 |
| seb128 | Trevinho, rejected | 15:09 |
| Trevinho | thanks | 15:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected yaru-theme [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.6] | 15:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (groovy-proposed/main) [20.10.5 => 20.10.6] (ubuntu-desktop) | 15:10 | |
| sil2100 | Laney: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-20-10-release-status-tracking/18647 <- created something like this just now | 15:11 |
| sil2100 | Laney: I'd love us having real checklists in it, but I guess for that we'd have to ping IS to install an external discourse plugin | 15:11 |
| Laney | sil2100: nice | 15:24 |
| Laney | I guess we'll have to be a bit careful regarding conflicts | 15:24 |
| Laney | so discourse doesn't support checklists like github out of the box? | 15:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (xenial-proposed/partner) [212.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 311.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (no packageset) | 15:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-cloud-sdk [source] (xenial-proposed) [311.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] | 15:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (bionic-proposed/main) [3.9.1-1ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 4.0-1~ubuntu0.18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 15:45 | |
| sil2100 | Laney: sadly, no, but there is an almost-like-official plugin for it from what I saw | 15:57 |
| sil2100 | Laney: well, discourse is much better with conflicts, so we'll never really overwrite eachother | 15:57 |
| sil2100 | But yes, it's less dynamic than google docs | 15:58 |
| Laney | nod | 16:02 |
| Laney | but we'll be nice and O P E N | 16:02 |
| bdmurray | sil2100: I'm gonna release cvise and python-pebble to -updates even those its less than 7 days. I think the waiting period is not needed for new packages. | 16:04 |
| bdmurray | Okay? | 16:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fakeroot [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.25.2-1] | 16:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fakeroot [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.25.2-1] | 16:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spice [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.14.3-1ubuntu2] | 16:22 | |
| bdmurray | vorlon: Do you have an opinion on cvise and python-pebble? ^^ | 17:15 |
| bdmurray | xnox: Could you verify bug 1867157? | 18:28 |
| ubot5 | bug 1867157 in python3.8 (Ubuntu Focal) "Improve command-not-found package headers" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1867157 | 18:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: swi-prolog (groovy-proposed/universe) [7.6.4+dfsg-2ubuntu2 => 8.2.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 18:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swi-prolog [sync] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] | 18:36 | |
| vorlon | bdmurray: sounds good to me | 18:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swi-prolog [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 18:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swi-prolog [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 18:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swi-prolog [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] | 18:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swi-prolog [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] | 18:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swi-prolog [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 18:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swi-prolog [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 18:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swi-prolog [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] | 18:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swi-prolog [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] | 18:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: swi-prolog (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.2.1+dfsg-2 => 8.2.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 18:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swi-prolog [source] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1] | 18:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-perftools (groovy-proposed/main) [2.7-1ubuntu2 => 2.7-1ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 19:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-perftools [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.7-1ubuntu3] | 19:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: eye (groovy-proposed/universe) [20.0703.0848~ds-1 => 20.0703.0848~ds-1build1] (no packageset) | 19:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted eye [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.0703.0848~ds-1build1] | 19:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.60 => 2.408.61] (desktop-core) | 19:58 | |
| bdmurray | bryce: bug 1644057 could use verification to finish off logwatch | 20:03 |
| ubot5 | bug 1644057 in logwatch (Ubuntu Bionic) "Excessive Disconnect unmatched entries from sshd" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1644057 | 20:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.61] | 20:04 | |
| bryce | bdmurray, ah thanks was wondering what was holding it up. I must have missed updating that bug report. I'll doublecheck it. | 20:08 |
| bdmurray | bryce: cool | 20:27 |
| bryce | bdmurray, ok for bionic it's good to go. For xenial I noticed another related log message that is unmatched. See my comment on LP: #1644057 | 20:39 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1644057 in logwatch (Ubuntu Bionic) "Excessive Disconnect unmatched entries from sshd" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1644057 | 20:39 |
| bryce | bdmurray, let me know your preference if I should fix the additional log message as well, or if we should go with the sru as-is and leave that for followup. | 20:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plymouth [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu6.1] | 20:44 | |
| bryce | bbl | 20:47 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-rstan (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.21.2-1 => 2.21.2-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 20:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-rstan [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.21.2-2] | 20:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lasso [source] (focal-proposed) [2.6.0-7ubuntu1.1] | 20:51 | |
| bdmurray | bryce: I think a follow on SRU is fine as it is an incremental improvement and doesn't make things worse. | 21:05 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted epiphany-browser [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.4-0ubuntu1] | 21:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.100-0ubuntu4~20.04.2] | 21:15 | |
| bryce | bdmurray, ok great thanks | 21:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142.8] | 21:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.6] | 21:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: studio-controls (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.0.8-0ubuntu1 => 2.0.9-0ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio) | 22:03 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | ^ bug 1898369 | 22:04 |
| ubot5 | bug 1898369 in studio-controls (Ubuntu) "studio-controls autoconnects the wrong ports" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1898369 | 22:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: babl (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:0.1.80-1 => 1:0.1.82-1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu) (sync) | 22:39 | |
| xnox | bdmurray: why did you reject my fix of the regression in proposed? | 22:41 |
| xnox | bdmurray: the second bug report in the 26.6 is the fix for the regression reported against 26.5 | 22:41 |
| xnox | bdmurray: we need still need it, otherwise we do not have arm64 secureboot fixed. | 22:42 |
| xnox | bdmurray: it has been tested out of bileto, by dannf and myself that it fixes the reported regression | 22:42 |
| xnox | i worked good portion of last week to resolve it. | 22:43 |
| xnox | also that's now what's in groovy. | 22:43 |
| xnox | in the release pocket | 22:43 |
| xnox | both the original patch, and fix up of it, to make it non-regressing on some arm machines. | 22:43 |
| bdmurray | If the fix for bug 1897819 was something that fixed the verification of bug 1862279 that wasn't clear from the changelog | 22:43 |
| ubot5 | bug 1897819 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "boot fails on hi1620, thunderx2 platforms" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1897819 | 22:44 |
| ubot5 | bug 1862279 in grub2-signed (Ubuntu Focal) "arm64 Secure Boot fails w/ "error: cannot load image."" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862279 | 22:44 |
| xnox | bdmurray: https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/grub/+git/grub/+merge/391700 | 22:44 |
| bdmurray | If its also fixing bug 1862279 I'm pretty sure that wasn't included in Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed. | 22:45 |
| ubot5 | bug 1862279 in grub2-signed (Ubuntu Focal) "arm64 Secure Boot fails w/ "error: cannot load image."" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862279 | 22:45 |
| xnox | bdmurray: the patch introduced arm64 support, in a buggy way, follow up change to said patch by me made it non-broken. | 22:45 |
| bdmurray | Okay but 1862279 was never verified so I think you want to upload it with -v...26.4 so it gets included in L-B-F | 22:46 |
| xnox | 26.4 is in updates | 22:46 |
| xnox | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/2.04-1ubuntu26.4 | 22:46 |
| xnox | thus my upload was 26.5 & 26.6, or was it not? | 22:47 |
| bdmurray | Double checking but I'm pretty sure it was only 26.6 | 22:47 |
| xnox | that's broken =) | 22:47 |
| xnox | how can one even see changes? =/ | 22:48 |
| xnox | in the queue ui, I only see files without the changes | 22:48 |
| xnox | bdmurray: so you didn't check / try to compare what is shipped in groovy? | 22:49 |
| xnox | cause 26.6 is the same, as wha'ts in groovy-release now. | 22:49 |
| xnox | 26.5 was buggy; 26.6 fixed the 26.5 bugginess, and added one more SRU fix. => what should I do now to upload it right? | 22:50 |
| bdmurray | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+upload/24459621/+files/grub2_2.04-1ubuntu26.6_source.changes | 22:50 |
| xnox | 26.6 explicitely referenced the bug, that reported the regression of the 26.5 one | 22:50 |
| xnox | yeap, has both entries. all three things are now correctly fixed. | 22:51 |
| xnox | the bug that 26.5 claimed to fix; the regression that that fix made; and the postinst.in regression from 26.4. | 22:51 |
| xnox | 26.6 is fix for 26.5 & 26.4 regressions =))))))) | 22:51 |
| bdmurray | I see that now its just not obvious that 1897819 is what caused the verification of 26.5 to fail | 22:52 |
| xnox | yeah, i don't know how to report regressions right | 22:53 |
| xnox | should i ahve closed the regression bug, and keep the same bug reference? i.e. introduce linuxefi-arm64 harder #old-bug-number ? | 22:53 |
| xnox | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1862279/comments/22 | 22:54 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1862279 in grub2-signed (Ubuntu Focal) "arm64 Secure Boot fails w/ "error: cannot load image."" [Undecided,In progress] | 22:54 |
| bdmurray | this also didn't help | 22:54 |
| bdmurray | "ubuntu-linuxefi-arm64.patch: Fix build on armhf" | 22:54 |
| xnox | this is the comment that links the two. | 22:54 |
| xnox | bdmurray: for that description i blame juliank | 22:54 |
| bdmurray | well and whoever reviewed it | 22:54 |
| xnox | the descriptions should be "cherry-pick dropped on the floor secureboot arm codepaths in the linuxefi patch" | 22:54 |
| bdmurray | anyway we could keep talking about it or I could really review it | 22:55 |
| xnox | because really, 26.5 is just "regression when we merged 2.04 badly during dev cycle of eoan" | 22:55 |
| xnox | =))))))))))))))))))))) | 22:55 |
| * xnox send virtual beer from Santiago Product sprint, which is sadly virtual/remote | 22:55 | |
| xnox | bdmurray: unpack groovy's grub, and compare the new introduced changes with the patches in groovy. | 22:56 |
| xnox | using like interdiff of the diffs. | 22:56 |
| xnox | or just comparing the patched trees. | 22:56 |
| bdmurray | xnox: this would be more appropriate - especially in two weeks https://gorillaspirits.co.uk/silverback-mountain-strength-gin/ | 22:57 |
| xnox | bdmurray: Thank you. Your order has been received. | 23:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.6 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.6] (core) | 23:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.6 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.6] (core) | 23:43 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!