[00:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (groovy-proposed/main) [1:20.10.11 => 1:20.10.12] (core)
[01:29] <mwhudson> LocutusOfBorg: do you have any ideas about the vips and kio-extras failures?
[01:30] <mwhudson> oh vips is fixed in debian
[01:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vips (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.10.1-1build1 => 8.10.1-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vips [sync] (groovy-proposed) [8.10.1-2]
[02:20] <mwhudson> my conclusion about kio-extras so far: i don't like cmake
[03:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kio-extras (groovy-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu3 => 4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu4] (kubuntu)
[03:47] <mwhudson> i don't seem to be getting "waiting for approval" mails currently
[03:47] <mwhudson> is that expected?
[05:54] <cpaelzer> hi release team, After checking their results in the past and cross arch I think openjdk-lts tests are not gonna work. I have some words about is and a force-badtest ready in https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-groovy-openjdk-lts-i386/+merge/391860
[05:55] <cpaelzer> mwhudson: the beta freeze is lifted since Friday https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-groovy-openjdk-lts-i386/revision/5013
[05:55] <cpaelzer> mwhudson: maybe that is why you don't get these mails?
=== ebarretto_ is now known as ebarretto
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-jsdom (groovy-proposed/universe) [16.2.2+~cs56.12.24-1 => 16.4.0+~cs56.14.27-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-sinon (groovy-proposed/universe) [9.0.3+ds+~cs48.19.16-2 => 9.1.0+ds+~cs48.21.19-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-rollup (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.32.1-3 => 2.28.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jqueryui (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.12.1+dfsg-6 => 1.12.1+dfsg-7] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jqueryui [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.12.1+dfsg-7]
[06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-rollup [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.28.2-2]
[06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-jsdom [sync] (groovy-proposed) [16.4.0+~cs56.14.27-1]
[06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-sinon [sync] (groovy-proposed) [9.1.0+ds+~cs48.21.19-1]
[06:22] <locutusofborg_> oh... mwhudson looks like you already fixed it, thanks!
[06:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-jsdom [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [16.4.0+~cs56.14.27-1] (no packageset)
=== locutusofborg_ is now known as LocutusOfBorg
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kio-extras (groovy-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu3 => 4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu4] (kubuntu)
[08:21] <apw> mwhudson, to ask a stupid question, you are the uploader and not just a sponsor right?
[08:33] <Laney> if it's a copy, you don't get an email until it's accepted https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/830614
[08:33] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 830614 in Launchpad itself "Email not immediately sent for copied packages which end up in queues" [Low,Triaged]
[08:33] <Laney> ye olde buge
[08:39] <mwhudson> apw: yes, uploaded normally via dput
[08:40] <apw> then that is unexpected
[08:40] <mwhudson> LocutusOfBorg: yeah found something in the end
[08:41] <mwhudson> i didn't get emails for my kio-extras upload today or my zeromq3 upload yesterday
[08:41] <LocutusOfBorg> now, you and RikMills should decide which upload is *better*
[08:42] <LocutusOfBorg> I think RikMills wins, because its an upstream patch :)
[08:43] <mwhudson> RikMills is more like to actually have a clue what they are doing :)
[08:43] <mwhudson> hmm the diff on the queue is massively unhelpful
[08:43] <LocutusOfBorg> ubuntu-archive please reject the older kio-extras and accept the newer one :D
[08:44] <RikMills> mwhudson: I added a one line upstream patch
[08:45] <RikMills> urgh. the queue is still doing the diff against a version that was removed from proposed
[08:45] <apw> yep it loves you very much
[08:45] <mwhudson> RikMills: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/mFsyX4CgJ9/ <- my actual diff
[08:45] <Laney> the groovy unapproved queue is ubuntu-release and not ubuntu-arc_hive fwiw
[08:46] <RikMills> mwhudson: that is LocutusOfBorg's not mine
[08:46] <mwhudson> RikMills: no, it was me
[08:47] <RikMills> oh
[08:47] <mwhudson> but i agree, yours is better now i've fished it out properly
[08:47] <RikMills> aha. thanks
[08:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected kio-extras [source] (groovy-proposed) [4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu4]
[08:55] <mwhudson> i got the mail for that!
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted erlang [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:23.0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-taquin (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.0-1 => 3.38.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-mahjongg (groovy-proposed/main) [1:3.38.1-1 => 1:3.38.2-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-taquin [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]
[09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (groovy-proposed/main) [3.38.0-2 => 3.38.1-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.0-1 => 3.38.1-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync)
[09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-tetravex (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:3.38.0-1 => 1:3.38.1-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-ews (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.0-1 => 3.38.1-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[09:37] <LocutusOfBorg> also please accept libvigraimpex and gmic no change rebuilds from unapproved
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libshout [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.4.4-1]
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvorbis [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.7-1]
[10:20] <sil2100> geh, I hate queue-reviewing syncs
[10:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libmbim [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.24.4-0.1]
[10:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vesa [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:2.5.0-1]
[10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vala [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.48.11-1]
[10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debianutils [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4.11.2]
[10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gvfs [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.46.1-1ubuntu1]
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-meta [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.233]
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-jsdom [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [16.4.0+~cs56.14.27-1]
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1]
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1]
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1]
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1]
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1]
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-calls [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-1]
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1]
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1]
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1]
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1]
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1]
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-metronome [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1]
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2]
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2]
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2]
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2]
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2]
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.46.g28656ac-2]
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gmic [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.4.5-1.1build2]
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-menu [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.49]
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-bluetooth-quick-connect [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [13-3]
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-greatroar-blobloom [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.0-3]
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [sync] (groovy-proposed) [20.2.0-1]
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cyrus-sasl2 [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.27+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvigraimpex [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.11.1+dfsg-7ubuntu5]
[10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-calendar [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]
[10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yelp [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]
[10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yelp-xsl [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]
[10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-calendar [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nautilus [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:3.38.1-1ubuntu1]
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:20.10.12]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-tetravex [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:3.38.1-1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-ews [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3-defaults (groovy-proposed/main) [3.8.2-0ubuntu2 => 3.8.6-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-mahjongg [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:3.38.2-1]
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3-defaults [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.8.6-0ubuntu1]
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3-stdlib-extensions [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.8.6-1]
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted taglib [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.11.1+dfsg.1-3build2]
[11:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (groovy-proposed/main) [15.2.3-0ubuntu3 => 15.2.5-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kio-extras [source] (groovy-proposed) [4:19.12.3a-0ubuntu4]
[11:42] <LocutusOfBorg> sil2100, since you usually do virtualbox, can you please have a look at LP: #1897378
[11:42] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1897378 in liblzf (Ubuntu) "[SRU] liblzf backport to focal" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1897378
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cvise (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3 => 1.7.0-1] (no packageset)
[12:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cvise [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.7.0-1]
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added yaru-theme to ubuntu-desktop in focal
[13:18] <vorlon> xnox: is there a reason we needed a new fakeroot synced?
[13:19] <xnox> vorlon:  fixes FTBFS
[13:20] <xnox> vorlon:  can defer, but then foundations-team is left with a FTBFS
[13:20] <vorlon> xnox: ok. but regresses autopkgtests apparently?
[13:21] <coreycb> hello release team, I have 3 packages in the groovy NEW queue for openstack ironic driver dependencies. they have no reverse dependencies. if it's too late for those, it's fine, I can put them in a PPA and re-upload next cycle. if someone has a moment I'd like to see if they could be accepted or rejected.
[13:21] <xnox> juliank:  can you look at apt tests triggered by fakeroot? i'm not sure if apt regressed, or new fakeroot is broken - or in reverse "improved"
[13:26] <juliank> xnox: it makes me unhappy
[13:27] <juliank> xnox: let's sync new fakeroot
[13:28] <xnox> juliank: ack
[13:28] <juliank> xnox: see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971070
[13:28] <ubot5> Debian bug 971070 in fakeroot "fakeroot 1.25.1-1 breaks fakechroot" [Important,Fixed]
[13:28] <xnox> vorlon:  let's try with even newer fakeroot then =)
[13:28] <juliank> Not sure why it's not triggering apt in debian
[13:29] <juliank> oh it is
[13:29] <juliank> 1.25.1 failed, 1.25.2 passed
[13:29] <juliank> so synced that
[13:30] <Laney> you can test that without actually syncing to the primary archive ...
[13:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fakeroot (groovy-proposed/main) [1.25.1-1 => 1.25.2-1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[13:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (groovy-proposed/main) [20.10.5 => 20.10.6] (ubuntu-desktop)
[13:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fakeroot (groovy-proposed/main) [1.25.1-1 => 1.25.2-1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[13:31] <juliank> huh who synced second time?
[13:31] <juliank> ah
[13:32] <juliank> Laney: well we know that it fixes it from debian CI :)
[13:33] <xnox> i synced a second time.
[13:33] <xnox> Laney:  we have a broken on in groovy-proposed now. so we need to either superseed the one in groovy-proposed, or remove it.
[13:33] <Laney> k
[13:34] <Laney> I get that, not sure why testing in advance is controversial
[13:37] <teward> can the sru team approve/release torbrowser from focal-proposed to focal-updates please?  asking because the bugs had verification-done-focal on it for some time (days) but verification-needed was not removed yet.  Now those verification-needed have been removed.
[13:38] <teward> there's now a number of "Issues with Tor Browser" reports raised on Ask ubuntu all pending that SRU landing in -updates.
[13:38] <juliank> Laney: we're lazy :/
[13:39] <juliank> we'd have to copy to a PPA and trigger tests from there once its built, or do it locally which is meh
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spice (groovy-proposed/main) [0.14.3-1ubuntu1 => 0.14.3-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[13:47] <Laney> juliank: you've got the debs lying around because you test built before syncing, so you can do
[13:47] <Laney> dcmd --deb autopkgtest --shell-fail --timeout-copy=6000 --apt-upgrade fakeroot_1.25.2-1_amd64.changes apt -- qemu --ram-size=1592 autopkgtest-groovy-amd64.img
[13:49] <juliank> syncing wise I'm just glorified autosync and don't do a test build either
[13:51] <Laney> what :(
[14:03] <tjaalton> libllvm11 needs to be promoted for mesa
[14:26] <doko> tjaalton: needs a subscriber. It looks like somebody unsubscribed all the llvm packages ...
[14:28] <tjaalton> ok
=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks
[14:31] <tjaalton> doko: added ubuntu-x
[14:32] <doko> I'm just wondering who was subscribed before, and unsubscribed without giving any notice ...
[14:32] <tjaalton> dunno
[14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-rcppparallel (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.0.2+dfsg-1 => 5.0.2+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[14:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-rcppparallel [sync] (groovy-proposed) [5.0.2+dfsg-3]
[14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qscintilla2 (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.11.2+dfsg-7 => 2.11.5+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qscintilla2 [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.11.5+dfsg-3]
[15:08] <Trevinho> please delete the yaru-theme from queue as upstream requested to add more fixes in...
[15:08] <Trevinho> seb128: can you^?
[15:09] <seb128> Trevinho, rejected
[15:09] <Trevinho> thanks
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected yaru-theme [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.6]
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (groovy-proposed/main) [20.10.5 => 20.10.6] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:11] <sil2100> Laney: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-20-10-release-status-tracking/18647 <- created something like this just now
[15:11] <sil2100> Laney: I'd love us having real checklists in it, but I guess for that we'd have to ping IS to install an external discourse plugin
[15:24] <Laney> sil2100: nice
[15:24] <Laney> I guess we'll have to be a bit careful regarding conflicts
[15:25] <Laney> so discourse doesn't support checklists like github out of the box?
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (xenial-proposed/partner) [212.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 311.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (no packageset)
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-cloud-sdk [source] (xenial-proposed) [311.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (bionic-proposed/main) [3.9.1-1ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 4.0-1~ubuntu0.18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[15:57] <sil2100> Laney: sadly, no, but there is an almost-like-official plugin for it from what I saw
[15:57] <sil2100> Laney: well, discourse is much better with conflicts, so we'll never really overwrite eachother
[15:58] <sil2100> But yes, it's less dynamic than google docs
[16:02] <Laney> nod
[16:02] <Laney> but we'll be nice and O P E N
[16:04] <bdmurray> sil2100: I'm gonna release cvise and python-pebble to -updates even those its less than 7 days. I think the waiting period is not needed for new packages.
[16:04] <bdmurray> Okay?
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fakeroot [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.25.2-1]
[16:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fakeroot [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.25.2-1]
[16:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spice [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.14.3-1ubuntu2]
[17:15] <bdmurray> vorlon: Do you have an opinion on cvise and python-pebble? ^^
[18:28] <bdmurray> xnox: Could you verify bug 1867157?
[18:28] <ubot5> bug 1867157 in python3.8 (Ubuntu Focal) "Improve command-not-found package headers" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1867157
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: swi-prolog (groovy-proposed/universe) [7.6.4+dfsg-2ubuntu2 => 8.2.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swi-prolog [sync] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2]
[18:44] <vorlon> bdmurray: sounds good to me
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swi-prolog [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swi-prolog [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swi-prolog [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2]
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swi-prolog [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2]
[18:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swi-prolog [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[18:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swi-prolog [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.2.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swi-prolog [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2]
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swi-prolog [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2]
[18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: swi-prolog (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.2.1+dfsg-2 => 8.2.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swi-prolog [source] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-perftools (groovy-proposed/main) [2.7-1ubuntu2 => 2.7-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-perftools [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.7-1ubuntu3]
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: eye (groovy-proposed/universe) [20.0703.0848~ds-1 => 20.0703.0848~ds-1build1] (no packageset)
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted eye [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.0703.0848~ds-1build1]
[19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.60 => 2.408.61] (desktop-core)
[20:03] <bdmurray> bryce: bug 1644057 could use verification to finish off logwatch
[20:03] <ubot5> bug 1644057 in logwatch (Ubuntu Bionic) "Excessive Disconnect unmatched entries from sshd" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1644057
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.61]
[20:08] <bryce> bdmurray, ah thanks was wondering what was holding it up.  I must have missed updating that bug report.  I'll doublecheck it.
[20:27] <bdmurray> bryce: cool
[20:39] <bryce> bdmurray, ok for bionic it's good to go.  For xenial I noticed another related log message that is unmatched.  See my comment on LP: #1644057
[20:39] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1644057 in logwatch (Ubuntu Bionic) "Excessive Disconnect unmatched entries from sshd" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1644057
[20:39] <bryce> bdmurray, let me know your preference if I should fix the additional log message as well, or if we should go with the sru as-is and leave that for followup.
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plymouth [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu6.1]
[20:47] <bryce> bbl
[20:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-rstan (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.21.2-1 => 2.21.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-rstan [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.21.2-2]
[20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lasso [source] (focal-proposed) [2.6.0-7ubuntu1.1]
[21:05] <bdmurray> bryce: I think a follow on SRU is fine as it is an incremental improvement and doesn't make things worse.
[21:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted epiphany-browser [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.4-0ubuntu1]
[21:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.100-0ubuntu4~20.04.2]
[21:22] <bryce> bdmurray, ok great thanks
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142.8]
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.6]
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: studio-controls (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.0.8-0ubuntu1 => 2.0.9-0ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[22:04] <Eickmeyer[m]> ^ bug 1898369
[22:04] <ubot5> bug 1898369 in studio-controls (Ubuntu) "studio-controls autoconnects the wrong ports" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1898369
[22:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: babl (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:0.1.80-1 => 1:0.1.82-1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu) (sync)
[22:41] <xnox> bdmurray:  why did you reject my fix of the regression in proposed?
[22:41] <xnox> bdmurray: the second bug report in the 26.6 is the fix for the regression reported against 26.5
[22:42] <xnox> bdmurray:  we need still need it, otherwise we do not have arm64 secureboot fixed.
[22:42] <xnox> bdmurray:  it has been tested out of bileto, by dannf and myself that it fixes the reported regression
[22:43] <xnox> i worked good portion of last week to resolve it.
[22:43] <xnox> also that's now what's in groovy.
[22:43] <xnox> in the release pocket
[22:43] <xnox> both the original patch, and fix up of it, to make it non-regressing on some arm machines.
[22:43] <bdmurray> If the fix for bug 1897819 was something that fixed the verification of bug 1862279 that wasn't clear from the changelog
[22:44] <ubot5> bug 1897819 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "boot fails on hi1620, thunderx2 platforms" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1897819
[22:44] <ubot5> bug 1862279 in grub2-signed (Ubuntu Focal) "arm64 Secure Boot fails w/ "error: cannot load image."" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862279
[22:44] <xnox> bdmurray:  https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/grub/+git/grub/+merge/391700
[22:45] <bdmurray> If its also fixing bug 1862279 I'm pretty sure that wasn't included in Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed.
[22:45] <ubot5> bug 1862279 in grub2-signed (Ubuntu Focal) "arm64 Secure Boot fails w/ "error: cannot load image."" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862279
[22:45] <xnox> bdmurray:  the patch introduced arm64 support, in a buggy way, follow up change to said patch by me made it non-broken.
[22:46] <bdmurray> Okay but 1862279 was never verified so I think you want to upload it with -v...26.4 so it gets included in L-B-F
[22:46] <xnox> 26.4 is in updates
[22:46] <xnox> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/2.04-1ubuntu26.4
[22:47] <xnox> thus my upload was 26.5 & 26.6, or was it not?
[22:47] <bdmurray> Double checking but I'm pretty sure it was only 26.6
[22:47] <xnox> that's broken =)
[22:48] <xnox> how can one even see changes? =/
[22:48] <xnox> in the queue ui, I only see files without the changes
[22:49] <xnox> bdmurray:  so you didn't check / try to compare what is shipped in groovy?
[22:49] <xnox> cause 26.6 is the same, as wha'ts in groovy-release now.
[22:50] <xnox> 26.5 was buggy; 26.6 fixed the 26.5 bugginess, and added one more SRU fix. => what should I do now to upload it right?
[22:50] <bdmurray> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+upload/24459621/+files/grub2_2.04-1ubuntu26.6_source.changes
[22:50] <xnox> 26.6 explicitely referenced the bug, that reported the regression of the 26.5 one
[22:51] <xnox> yeap, has both entries. all three things are now correctly fixed.
[22:51] <xnox> the bug that 26.5 claimed to fix; the regression that that fix made; and the postinst.in regression from 26.4.
[22:51] <xnox> 26.6 is fix for 26.5 & 26.4 regressions =)))))))
[22:52] <bdmurray> I see that now its just not obvious that 1897819 is what caused the verification of 26.5 to fail
[22:53] <xnox> yeah, i don't know how to report regressions right
[22:53] <xnox> should i ahve closed the regression bug, and keep the same bug reference? i.e. introduce linuxefi-arm64 harder #old-bug-number ?
[22:54] <xnox> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1862279/comments/22
[22:54] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1862279 in grub2-signed (Ubuntu Focal) "arm64 Secure Boot fails w/ "error: cannot load image."" [Undecided,In progress]
[22:54] <bdmurray> this also didn't help
[22:54] <bdmurray> "ubuntu-linuxefi-arm64.patch: Fix build on armhf"
[22:54] <xnox> this is the comment that links the two.
[22:54] <xnox> bdmurray:  for that description i blame juliank
[22:54] <bdmurray> well and whoever reviewed it
[22:54] <xnox> the descriptions should be "cherry-pick dropped on the floor secureboot arm codepaths in the linuxefi patch"
[22:55] <bdmurray> anyway we could keep talking about it or I could really review it
[22:55] <xnox> because really, 26.5 is just "regression when we merged 2.04 badly during dev cycle of eoan"
[22:55] <xnox> =)))))))))))))))))))))
[22:55]  * xnox send virtual beer from Santiago Product sprint, which is sadly virtual/remote
[22:56] <xnox> bdmurray:  unpack groovy's grub, and compare the new introduced changes with the patches in groovy.
[22:56] <xnox> using like interdiff of the diffs.
[22:56] <xnox> or just comparing the patched trees.
[22:57] <bdmurray> xnox: this would be more appropriate - especially in two weeks https://gorillaspirits.co.uk/silverback-mountain-strength-gin/
[23:00] <xnox> bdmurray:  Thank you. Your order has been received.
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.6 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.6] (core)
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.6 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.6] (core)