pieq | Hi! | 06:29 |
---|---|---|
pieq | I'm writing a Python script using launchpadlib, and I'd like to know if it's possible to access the creation time of a given milestone | 06:30 |
pieq | https://launchpad.net/+apidoc/devel.html#milestone | 06:30 |
pieq | it doesn't seem possible from the API doc, but I want to make sure | 06:30 |
cjwatson | dlcusa: You have an old Launchpad account with the same email address; I guess at some point you deleted your Ubuntu One account and are now trying to recreate it. Do you want to reclaim the old Launchpad account? | 08:19 |
cjwatson | dlcusa: (We can do that for you, but either way it requires some manual fiddling.) | 08:19 |
cjwatson | pieq: Indeed, that's not currently exported (or even modelled in our Python code, although it's in the database schema). Feel free to file a bug if you need it - it wouldn't be too difficult to export | 08:21 |
=== tomwardill changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: tomwardill (08:00-17:00 UTC Mon-Fri) | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support and spam reporting: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
xnox | my dput uploads to ubuntu don't appear to go through / appear in the queue | 12:40 |
xnox | i had s390-tools / s390-tools-signed focal sru, which is not in the queue | 12:40 |
xnox | and no emails | 12:40 |
xnox | is there sftp upload available for ubuntu? | 12:41 |
cjwatson | Looking | 12:41 |
cjwatson | LP emailed you a rejection | 12:41 |
xnox | oh | 12:41 |
cjwatson | 2020-10-07 09:21:10 DEBUG Rejected: | 12:41 |
cjwatson | 2020-10-07 09:21:10 DEBUG File s390-tools-signed_2.12.0-0ubuntu4.tar.xz already exists in Primary Archive for Ubuntu, but uploaded version has different contents. See more information about this error in https://help.launchpad.net/Packa | 12:41 |
xnox | i'm looking at it, and it is a bad version number | 12:41 |
xnox | yeap | 12:41 |
cjwatson | ging/UploadErrors. | 12:41 |
cjwatson | 2020-10-07 09:21:10 DEBUG Files specified in DSC are broken or missing, skipping package unpack verification. | 12:42 |
cjwatson | Similar for s390-tools | 12:42 |
xnox | hm | 12:42 |
xnox | so my email must be bad | 12:42 |
cjwatson | But yes, if you want then this works for Ubuntu sftp: | 12:42 |
cjwatson | [ubuntu-sftp] | 12:42 |
cjwatson | fqdn = upload.ubuntu.com | 12:42 |
cjwatson | method = sftp | 12:42 |
cjwatson | incoming = ubuntu | 12:42 |
xnox | oooh nice, i shall do that. too | 12:42 |
xnox | what's the email title? | 12:42 |
xnox | i wonder if i delete them by accident | 12:43 |
cjwatson | 2020-10-07 09:18:11 DEBUG Subject: [ubuntu] s390-tools_2.12.0-0ubuntu4_source.changes (Rejected) | 12:43 |
xnox | tah | 12:43 |
cjwatson | 2020-10-07 09:21:10 DEBUG Subject: [ubuntu] s390-tools-signed_2.12.0-0ubuntu4_source.changes (Rejected) | 12:43 |
cjwatson | to your preferred address in LP | 12:43 |
dlcusa | cjwatson, I guess I'd prefer to use the original account, unless you can think of a good reason not to. | 12:46 |
xnox | https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#search/subject%3ARejected => gives me nothing | 12:49 |
xnox | only reject from yesterday (from the queue) =( | 12:49 |
xnox | it should go to xnox@ubuntu.com -> launchpad@surgut.co.uk | 12:49 |
dlcusa | cjwatson, if it matters, I'm not using Ubuntu. | 12:50 |
cjwatson | xnox: Directly to launchpad@surgut.co.uk, in fact | 12:51 |
cjwatson | dlcusa: It doesn't matter. Fixing it up for you now | 12:51 |
cjwatson | dlcusa: Try now, should be fixed | 12:51 |
dlcusa | Okay... | 12:51 |
xnox | cjwatson: hm. and gmail could have silently dropped it on the floor, cause it loves doing that sometimes. | 12:51 |
dlcusa | That worked--thanks! | 12:52 |
cjwatson | no problem | 12:53 |
xnox | cjwatson: changed address to @canonical.com instantly got the reject email for another upload. | 13:39 |
xnox | so yeah, it's me =( | 13:39 |
xnox | cjwatson: what does "Mismatch in binaryfulness. (arch) False != (files) True" mean? | 13:45 |
xnox | oh | 13:48 |
xnox | i think it's non clean source build, fixing. | 13:48 |
xnox | cjwatson: did my @surgut.co.uk send back a bounce to bounces@canonical.com ? or do i need to ask #is about that? | 14:34 |
xnox | email looks like it is taking a different path to deliver to @canonical.com (and it's faster) so actually might just stick to that for now. | 14:35 |
cjwatson | xnox: No idea, wouldn't be able to see it if it did | 14:37 |
LocutusOfBorg | does anybody please understand what is triggering this failure? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/silver-platter/0.3.0+git20200906.d2bd137-1/+build/19948268 | 17:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | we can't reproduce locally | 17:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | Missing build dependencies: brz-debian (>= 2.8.41), lintian-brush (>= 0.70) | 17:02 |
LocutusOfBorg | this is simply not true... | 17:02 |
LocutusOfBorg | lintian-brush | 0.81 | groovy-proposed/universe | source, all | 17:02 |
LocutusOfBorg | brz-debian | 2.8.42 | groovy-proposed/universe | all | 17:02 |
LocutusOfBorg | is it not even trying to use proposed pocket? | 17:02 |
LocutusOfBorg | I mean, I see it is not trying to use it, but I don't understand why | 17:03 |
LocutusOfBorg | (publishing history says that the package went in release by mistake, so maybe this is what happened) | 17:06 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'm tempted to just no change rebuild and live happy | 17:07 |
cjwatson | Well the build is in the release pocket, yet | 17:08 |
cjwatson | *yes | 17:08 |
cjwatson | Probably as you say | 17:09 |
cjwatson | Might be able to move it around somehow but a no-change rebuild would be by far the simplest | 17:10 |
LocutusOfBorg | yep thanks | 17:10 |
LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/silver-platter/0.3.0+git20200906.d2bd137-1build1/+build/20121361 | 17:10 |
LocutusOfBorg | and it worked thanks <3 | 17:19 |
=== diddledan5 is now known as diddledan |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!