[00:00] <lubot> <HMollerCl> not sure if we have/need/ to do
[00:01] <lubot> <kc2bez> I fixed that
[00:01] <lubot> <kc2bez> Groovy is default.
[00:01] <lubot> <HMollerCl> nice
[00:02] <lubot> <HMollerCl> thanks!
[00:02] <lubot> <HMollerCl> I had some lintian warnings that came from before One that is releated with cleaning and the other I don't get it,
[00:02] <lubot> <HMollerCl> W: lubuntu-default-settings: executable-not-elf-or-script usr/share/Lubuntu/applications/lximage-qt-screenshot.desktop … W: lubuntu-default-settings: package-relation-with-self Breaks: lubuntu-default-settings (<< 1.0)
[00:03] <lubot> <HMollerCl> The first one I believe we don't need anymore, since we use screengrab no.
[00:03] <lubot> <HMollerCl> *now
[00:04] <lubot> <HMollerCl> The second one, I think is safe to keep it lubuntu-default-settings «1.0 should be lxde.
[00:04] <wxl> i have griped about this before in the past but it didn't seem like a certain someone wanted to take it seriously, but i think we should override those with comments
[00:05] <kc2bez> wxl can fix it when he uploads it ;)
[00:06] <lubot> <HMollerCl> I would leave it as a task for the other cycle. There is some clenaing to do. we have /usr/share/lubuntu and /usr/share/Lubuntu
[00:06] <wxl> heh you changed that desktop entry to NoDisplay=true because of that change
[00:06] <wxl> (screengrab)
[00:07] <wxl> i think the solution would be:
[00:07] <wxl>  1. remove th executable bit on that desktop entry or delete it altogether
[00:07] <wxl>  2. override the latter, citing the lxde/lxqt transition
[00:08] <lubot> <HMollerCl> mmm, I'm not sure now If I don't delete it before because it coudl breaks something...
[00:09] <lubot> <HMollerCl> mmm, maybe lxqt comes with that .desktop and we overide it
[00:09] <wxl> then remove the executable bit
[00:11] <lubot> <HMollerCl> and move it to /usr/share/lubuntu/applications/* ?
[00:12] <lubot> <HMollerCl> I mean, there is some investigation to do on that
[00:12] <wxl> naw i wouldn't worry about that for now
[00:14] <lubot> <HMollerCl> good, I will leave it for 21.04, do we have codename?
[00:15] <kc2bez> h@x0r haddock
[00:16] <lubot> <HMollerCl> heheh
[00:20] <kc2bez> wxl: that swap commit is only a few hours old. It hasn't made it to CI yet. I will give it go later.
[00:21] <wxl> ah there you go
[00:22] <kc2bez> It will be nice to have that back.
[00:25] <lubot> <HMollerCl> LXQt is planning a new release for november
[00:26] <lubot> <HMollerCl> https://github.com/lxqt/lxqt/issues/1848
[01:06] <kc2bez> wxl: did you upload @HMollerCl 's change?
[16:34] <wxl> @kc2bez: no, i didn't. didn't know i was supposed to :) also afk
[16:36] <lubot> <kc2bez> No worries. I didn't either :). I just didn't want both of us doing it. XD
[16:38] <lubot> <kc2bez> I can do it tonight if you want wxl
[16:49] <wxl> @kc2bez: please and thank you
[16:51] <lubot> <HMollerCl> @wxl @kc2bez regarding lxqt regular releases, we have ci/stable and ci/unstable? one point to lxqt latest release and the other to master?
[16:51] <lubot> <HMollerCl> I'm thinking in how we can help lxqt for the releases.
[16:52] <wxl> well i think the real question is: what is the process? and ultimately that's something the project will need to decide
[16:53] <lubot> <HMollerCl> yes, but I was thinking in testing
[16:54] <lubot> <HMollerCl> It's easier for people to test from our ci than to build all lxqt fo testing
[17:44] <lubot> <tsimonq2> Heya everyone
[17:45] <lubot> <tsimonq2> I'm going to be around a lot more these days to help with the release
[17:45] <tsimonq2> I can start by reviewing and uploading Hans' package
[17:46] <tsimonq2> <wxl "i have griped about this before "> I did go to Lintian directly to fix some of this
[17:47] <tsimonq2> By the way, I'm on Matrix now
[17:47] <tsimonq2> I'll actually migrate to the Matrix channel I think heh...
[17:48] <tsimonq2> Oh wait, it's just the IRC bridge XD
[17:50] <kc2bez> O/ tsimonq2 
[17:50] <kc2bez> thanks for the help. 
[17:51] <kc2bez> hans pushed his changes to phab already. 
[17:51] <tsimonq2> Yep, I saw :)
[17:51] <tsimonq2> Uploaded, tagged, pushed the tag
[17:51] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Unapproved: lubuntu-default-settings (groovy-proposed/universe) [20.04.4 => 20.10.1] (lubuntu)
[17:52] <tsimonq2> Funny enough, I had to do this for myself locally the other day
[17:52] <tsimonq2> So thanks Hans :)
[18:15] <lubot> <HMollerCl> I should have done it before (not against the clock) I forgot that 20.10 had LO7 so the other bug was gone.
[18:16] <tsimonq2> What do you mean by that?
[18:36] <lubot> <HMollerCl> your coment was about the env var, or something else?
[18:36] <lubot> <HMollerCl> @tsimonq2
[18:37] <lubot> <HMollerCl> the env var wasn't set because LO6  has a problem with it, but it is fixed in LO7.
[21:53] <wxl> @leokolb re bug 1898936 do you have similar issues with ubiquity?
[21:53] <ubot93> Bug 1898936 in calamares (Ubuntu) "Calamares installation failed" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1898936