[03:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xmobar (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.33-1build1 => 0.33-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[03:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xmobar [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.33-1ubuntu1]
[05:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-pa (groovy-proposed/universe) [4:5.19.5-0ubuntu1 => 4:5.19.5-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)
[07:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted accountsservice [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.6.55-0ubuntu13]
[07:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdenlive [source] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aodh [source] (groovy-proposed) [11.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups-filters [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.28.4-0ubuntu1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-neutron-lib [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.6.1-0ubuntu1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted murano-dashboard [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:10.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdenlive (groovy-proposed/universe) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1 => 4:20.08.2-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)
[07:16] <RikMills> sil2100: ^^ fixes the kdenlive ubuntu1 that just got accepted
[07:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgweather (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.0-1 => 3.36.1-1~ubuntu20.04.1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[07:30] <sil2100> RikMills: looking o/
[07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (groovy-proposed) [2:22.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1]
[07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted placement [source] (groovy-proposed) [4.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1]
[07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octavia [source] (groovy-proposed) [7.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1]
[07:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdenlive [source] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu2]
[07:35] <sil2100> Reviewing the kde apps right now
[07:46] <sil2100> RikMills: I see some default keyboard shortcuts for annotations changed, are those used or documented somewhere? Might be good remembering
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cantor [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted elisa-player [sync] (groovy-proposed) [20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kajongg [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kate [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdialog [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kiten [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted konsole [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted krfb [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libkgapi [sync] (groovy-proposed) [20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted okular [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dolphin [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kamoso [sync] (groovy-proposed) [20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kget [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kpat [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lokalize [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gwenview [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmix [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kde-spectacle [sync] (groovy-proposed) [20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libkf5kmahjongg [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4:20.08.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted masakari-monitors [source] (groovy-proposed) [10.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1]
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaru-theme [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.6.1]
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libx11 [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2:1.6.12-1]
[07:53] <RikMills> sil2100: the short change is just reverting them back to what the okular version in focal had, so no change for people upgrading
[07:53] <RikMills> *shortcut
[07:54] <RikMills> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426009
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ovn (groovy-proposed/main) [20.06.0-0ubuntu1 => 20.06.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ovn (focal-proposed/main) [20.03.0-0ubuntu1 => 20.03.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:37] <sil2100> RikMills: ACK, thanks o/
[09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: r-bioc-monocle (groovy-proposed/primary) [2.16.0-2]
[09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: r-cran-hdf5r (groovy-proposed/primary) [1.3.3+dfsg-2]
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-seurat (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.2.0-1 => 3.2.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-seurat [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.2.2-1]
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gjs (groovy-proposed/main) [1.66.0-1 => 1.66.1-1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra, i386-whitelist, mozilla) (sync)
[09:42] <mitya57> mwhudson: yes, reproducible, I tried to sync a new version from Debian and it's also failing with the same error: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/syncthing/1.10.0~ds1-1/+build/20137412
[09:43] <mwhudson> mitya57: that makes a fix slightly less hopeless i guess
[09:43]  * mwhudson lobs it at jsing
[09:46] <mitya57> Thanks for looking at it!
[10:18] <Trevinho> SRU team: can you please have a look to the libappindicator SRU for bionic that it's staging there for some months now?
[10:18] <Trevinho> there are various snaps that were affected by that
[10:26] <seb128> bdmurray, RAOF, rbasak, tjaalton, sil2100, (any alias for SRU team?) ^, I'm also curious to understand how we end up with a simple fix being in the review queue since April and not being picked up?
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (groovy-proposed/main) [3.38.0-1ubuntu2 => 3.38.1-1ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (groovy-proposed/main) [3.38.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.38.1-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jhbuild (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.0-1 => 3.38.0-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jhbuild [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.0-3]
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-sctransform (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.1-1build2 => 0.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-sctransform [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.3-1]
[10:47] <tjaalton> seb128: it's a sync, no straightforward way to review it
[10:51] <mitya57> tjaalton: I rarely use syncs for SRUs but in my opinion it has even *more* information than normal uploads: the PPA (or Bileto ticket) has diff to currently published versions, and in addition to that there are built binaries, build logs and sometimes autopkgtest results.
[10:52] <tjaalton> yeah, but everything else would need to be handled by the reviewer
[10:52] <tjaalton> manually
[10:53] <tjaalton> like adding series nomitation, marking it fix committed, adding the blurp about testing, adding verification-needed tag etc etc
[10:53] <mitya57> Ah, I didn't know that.
[10:53] <mitya57> tjaalton: I have indicator-applet in focal queue which is a sync. Should I re-do it as normal upload then?
[10:54] <tjaalton> maybe?
[10:54] <mitya57> Can I ask you to reject it then?
[10:55] <tjaalton> done
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected indicator-applet [sync] (focal-proposed) [12.10.2+20.04.20201004-0ubuntu1]
[10:58] <mitya57> Thanks! Reuploaded.
[10:58] <seb128> tjaalton, if syncs are that problematic maybe it should be documented that they should be avoided or be rejected in a timelined fashion?
[10:58] <seb128> just silently skipping over isn't helpful
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: indicator-applet (focal-proposed/universe) [12.10.2+20.04.20200409-0ubuntu1 => 12.10.2+20.04.20201004-0ubuntu1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-budgie)
[10:58] <seb128> tjaalton, also didn't Trevinho submit some tooling update to be able to deal better with those?
[10:59] <tjaalton> I don't know
[10:59] <Trevinho> indeed... https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-review-bileto-support/+merge/364193
[10:59] <Trevinho> it was approved, but then needed a small change, and still didn't get into..
[11:00] <Trevinho> tjaalton: just use that branch so will be any other SRU...
[11:00] <tjaalton> apw: ^
[11:01] <Trevinho> s/will be any other/will be like any other/
[11:09] <rbasak> Also how do I verify that the binary has been built correctly?
[11:13] <rbasak> IMHO a problem with SRU queue processing is the ad-hoc way in which SRU team members decide what to work on
[11:13] <rbasak> I made https://trello.com/b/XgBxtrZ9/sru (it's automatic) to try and help with that, but nobody else seems interested to use it
[11:15] <icey> rbasak: I love that trello board :)
[11:15] <icey> rbasak: also, I took motivation from some of your boards to make one for OpenStack Package bugs!
[11:15] <rbasak> Thanks!
[11:15] <tjaalton> rbasak: wouldn't it need one for each series?
[11:16] <rbasak> tjaalton: uploads to multiple series are merged into a single card
[11:16] <tjaalton> ok
[11:16] <rbasak> That way when someone uploads the same fix to multiple series, the review can be more efficient
[11:16] <tjaalton> right
[11:17] <rbasak> Right now some SRU team members miss that the same upload happened to mutiple series and only accept one, which nearly doubles the effort required :-/
[11:17] <rbasak> icey: are you using my tool to maintain it? Feel free to land a report script into there if you like.
[11:19] <seb128> rbasak, @build correctly, the queue has a clickable link to the ppa, I guess it's just a matter to check on the ppa that the serie is correct and that there is no other content?
[11:19] <icey> rbasak: it is! I've poked around in the tool itself rather than just adding a report so I'd have to see if there's a good way to merge those changes :-/
[11:21] <rbasak> seb128: I'm not sure exactly. I believe it matters that the set of build dependencies used is correct. I'm not sure exactly what the archive uses (though I can guess I don't know of it being documented anywhere for certain). I'm not sure if there are any other relevant settings apart from the build dependency list either.
[11:21] <rbasak> icey: ah. No problem. I am curious though to try and adjust the tool to support more real world use cases. But no rush :)
[11:22] <seb128> rbasak, if it's problematic maybe the SRU team should decide that syncs are not accepted for SRUs and reject asking for a manual upload
[11:22] <seb128> rbasak, just ignoring a fix for ages isn't helping anyone
[11:22] <seb128> it's noise in the queue for you, it's time waster for the team which uploaded to the fix and it's user who don't get their issue resolved
[11:23] <rbasak> seb128: I'd prefer some tooling/documentation that makes it easy to accept those the same as everything else. I agree it's not helpful for others to "just ignore it". I think to fix that needs a change to the SRU team workflow. Like I said I tried.
[11:24] <seb128> do you guys have a place, mailing list or such where to discuss that?
[11:25] <seb128> merging https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-review-bileto-support/+merge/364193 would help with reviewing the diff part
[11:25] <seb128> but doesn't resolve the 'was it built the correct way' question
[11:25] <rbasak> There is various weird stuff that happens in the SRU team FWIW. As a newer member not fully up to speed on every edge case, when I see an edge case I assume that the uploader and some other SRU team membber knows what's going on and they'll handle it. I'm reluctant to reject just because _I_ don't understand the edge caes.
[11:26] <rbasak> There is a monthly SRU team meeting, though that has very poor attendance
[11:26] <rbasak> Besides that I'd just use ubuntu-devel@
[11:32] <seb128> our teams should probably having mailing lists or equivalent (same problem for ubuntu archive), it's annoying that there is no an appropriate place to discuss such problems and also to raise them
[11:33] <rbasak> What's wrong with ubuntu-devel@
[11:33] <rbasak> I prefer that over having many different lists each with a different subset of readers. IMHO, the only reason to split off from ubuntu-devel@ is if the traffic for one area gets too high
[11:36] <seb128> I guess it work, I'm just unsure how directly it reach team member, is everyone in the SRU team reading devel on a regular basis?
[11:36] <seb128> also the way a team works might be something the team want to discuss rather than having an open forum
[11:38] <icey> rbasak: seb128: what if the mailing list users prepend subjects if they think it'll be interesting to only a subset, ie: "[SRU] my awesome discussion topic", or "This is a topic for the whole list"
[11:38] <sil2100> tjaalton: well, sru-review handles syncs properly, so there's no need to manually mark the bugs etc.
[11:38] <tjaalton> sil2100: it does? shows that no diff available here
[11:38] <sil2100> tjaalton: you just need to handle the review part manually, but for Bileto PPAs it's easy if you go through Bileto
[11:39] <sil2100> tjaalton: you need to pass --no-diff
[11:39] <tjaalton> uh ok
[11:39] <Laney> or merge Marco's branch...
[11:39] <rbasak> FWIW, "git ubuntu queue sync" works on syncs too, though git-ubuntu doesn't cover the entire archive yet - just main
[11:40] <sil2100> So when I see a Bileto sync I just go to the Bileto PPA, that has a link to all the diffs and bileto URLs, review it, and if it's all good I do `sru-review --no-diff -s <etc>`, check if all the bugs are properly popping up and accept/reject accordingly
[11:40] <sil2100> So yeah, there's some additional steps, but from my experience those aren't very problematic
[11:41] <Trevinho> but really.... that branch is easy enough to give this checks all done automatically...
[11:41] <Trevinho> it's an issue going on for years, and there's no point of accepting a solution given that it handles a case that right now is handled anyway, but causing manual labor and worse diffing experience
[11:42] <Trevinho> but up to you guys, for sure as uploaders we can't expect that something that was in queue in april didn't hit proposed 6 moths after
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libappindicator [sync] (bionic-proposed) [12.10.1+18.04.20200408.1-0ubuntu1]
[11:42] <tjaalton> there
[12:02] <Trevinho> thanks
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: schroot (groovy-proposed/main) [1.6.10-9build1 => 1.6.10-11] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[12:11] <rbasak> sil2100: ping for sup-mail in Focal NEW please. Bug 1888749
[12:21] <sil2100> rbasak: ah, yes! Sorry about that, fell of my radar ;/
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: schroot (groovy-proposed/main) [1.6.10-9build1 => 1.6.10-11ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:29] <doko> ^^^please review, the schroot in groovy is not working at all
[12:40] <sil2100> Looking
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sup-mail [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0-3~0ubuntu20.04.1]
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected schroot [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.6.10-11]
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted schroot [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.6.10-11ubuntu1]
[12:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sup-mail [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0-3~0ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sup-mail [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.0-3~0ubuntu20.04.1]
[12:53] <blackboxsw> sil2100: morning/afternoon. If you have a chance today, we have an update-notifier upload queued (unapproved) for Xenial Bionic and Focal https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=update-notifier
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (groovy-proposed/main) [6.6.0-1ubuntu2 => 6.6.0-1ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[12:55] <sil2100> blackboxsw: sure, I'll try doing some reviews once I'm done with proposed->updates publishing
[12:55] <blackboxsw> thanks much
[13:05] <RikMills> sil2100: forgot to say thank you for the KDE apps earlier. thank you!
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceilometer (groovy-proposed/main) [1:15.0.0~b3~git2020091007.6a502f88-0ubuntu1 => 1:15.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.1]
[13:36] <sil2100> RikMills: yw!
[13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.1]
[13:37] <sil2100> slyon: accepted s390-tools* - my recommendation for the future would be to maybe include the bug reference to the s390-tools-signed package changelog
[13:37] <slyon> sil2100: thank you! I will keep this in mind for the next time
[13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (focal-proposed/main) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3 => 2.12.0-0ubuntu3.1] (core)
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (groovy-proposed/main) [2:17.0.0~b3~git2020091007.afcaf0b9d-0ubuntu3 => 2:17.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flatpak [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.8.2-2]
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1ubuntu1]
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted malcontent [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.0-2]
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (groovy-proposed) [2:17.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1]
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gjs [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.66.1-1]
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1ubuntu1]
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (groovy-proposed) [4:18.6.0-0ubuntu1]
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swift [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.26.0-0ubuntu1]
[14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected discount [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.2.6-1ubuntu1]
[14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-11 [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:11.0.0~+rc6-1]
[14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-docs [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.3]
[14:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.8.0-22.23~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.8.0-22.23~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.8.0-22.23~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.8.0-22.23~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:22] <sil2100> blackboxsw: a quick question regarding the update-notifier SRU - how would it be tested for the non-trusty series? Since the test case mentions using a trusty lxd
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-22.23~20.04.1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-22.23~20.04.1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-22.23~20.04.1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-22.23~20.04.1]
[14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: torbrowser-launcher (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2.9-2 => 0.2.9-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:32] <sil2100> blackboxsw: left the same question on the bug, will get back to it a bit later
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport-symptoms (groovy-proposed/main) [0.23 => 0.24] (core)
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-prime (groovy-proposed/main) [0.8.14 => 0.8.15] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (focal-proposed) [2.47.1+20.04]
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (groovy-proposed/main) [1:0.8.5.4 => 1:0.8.6] (desktop-core)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.47.1+18.04]
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (groovy-proposed/main) [3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu6 => 3.0.0-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:27] <jdstrand> fyi, we consider the apparmor upload bug fix. we got aa3 beta in, with patches a while ago. this is aa3 final without those patches (and a few others). there is a new aa-features-abi command that is arguably a new feature, but it is a very small, convenience leaf utility not used by anything else, so I didn't think it needed an ffe
[15:32] <jdstrand> if you have questions, please talk with amurray or jjohansen
[15:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpsl (groovy-proposed/main) [0.21.0-1.1 => 0.21.0-1.1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.47.1]
[16:04] <blackboxsw> sil2100: sorry about missing the question.. This is testable on xenial, bionic, focal we have a proposed PPA that supports all series. I'll update the test case
[16:04] <blackboxsw> and I'll respond on the bug
[16:25] <blackboxsw> sil2100: thanks again just updated test case on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/1822340 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/1842508
[16:48] <blackboxsw> updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/1881632 too
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-devel-docs [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.1-1]
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted metacity [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:3.38.0-1]
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-getting-started-docs [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.36.2+git20201004-0ubuntu1]
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-pa [source] (groovy-proposed) [4:5.19.5-0ubuntu2]
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (focal-proposed/main) [2:11.1.0-2~ubuntu20.04.1 => 2:11.1.5-1~ubuntu20.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [2:11.1.5-1~ubuntu20.04.1]
[20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (groovy-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu49 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu50] (core, i386-whitelist)
[21:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-pixelsaver (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.20-2 => 1.24-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[21:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-pixelsaver [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.24-1]
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: borgbackup (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.12-0ubuntu1.16.04.1 => 1.0.13-0ubuntu1.16.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: borgbackup (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.5-1 => 1.1.14-2ubuntu1.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (groovy-proposed/main) [1.3.7-0ubuntu2 => 1.3.7-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server)