=== guiverc2 is now known as guiverc
RAOFblackboxsw: That looks sensible, but ubuntu-release-upgrader hasn't had the usual 7 day aging process. I'm unclear if you're asking for an expedited release, and whether it's appropriate if so.00:15
RAOFblackboxsw: The update-notifier one is a little weird - all the bugs listed are fix released, and uploaded to Trusty, but these weren't fixed in the subsequent series?00:22
amurrayRAOF: so sil2100 looked at apparmor-3.0.0 in groovy unapproved yesterday and asked if there was a list of changes from the previous -beta1 to the final version - I have highlighted in the changelog that most of the changes was dropping patches that got incorporated in this final release plus the addition of a minor leaf utility binary - is there anything else you need to review this?00:31
RAOFamurray: Does that apparmor want to be a 0-day SRU, or to go into groovy release?00:32
RAOFBecause I'm not a release team member, so I can only do the former :)00:32
amurrayRAOF: ah apologies - I thought you were release team too - yes ideally this goes into the release, not 0day SRU00:37
amurrayLaney bdmurray: ^^^ ?00:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-control-center (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-1 => 3.0.1-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync)02:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-bpf (groovy-proposed/universe) [3 => 4] (no packageset) (sync)06:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-bpf [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4]06:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vips (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.10.1-4 => 8.10.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)07:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vips [sync] (groovy-proposed) [8.10.2-1]07:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted designate [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:11.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1]07:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted calamares-settings-ubuntu [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:20.10.10]07:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-control-center [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.0.1-1]07:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gobject-introspection [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.66.1-1]07:54
=== _hc[m] is now known as _hc
mwhudsonhi release team, would any of you care to weigh in on the plan to reintroduce a bug to fix the server installer: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/189381807:58
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1893818 in subiquity "Several blockprobe errors if trying to install the groovy daily live on LPAR" [Undecided,Triaged]07:58
mwhudsonapw, Laney, sil2100, vorlon, bdmurray, stgraber, tumbleweed: ^07:59
apwmwhudson, what is the downside of the bug being introduced; just those nodes existing and the risk of someone using them?08:04
mwhudsonapw: the debian bug talks says 'I believe this causes problems further08:05
mwhudsondown in the device stack / udev rule chain which then sometimes08:05
mwhudsondoesn't create some device symlinks." but i don't know what they mean by that08:05
mwhudsonthe idea that anyone actually has expectations about what device mapper / udev do here that can then be violated seems a bit unlikely to me08:06
mwhudsonvs just trying stuff and assuming what happens was what was intended08:06
mwhudson(but i may be a bit jaded)08:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jackd2 (groovy-proposed/main) [1.9.14-0ubuntu3 => 1.9.14-0ubuntu3.1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio)08:07
apwwell we are saying this makes it the same as the focal installer i assume08:07
apwif the installer isn't working at all without the bug, and will if we go back to focal form, then that feels like a way forward.  sad that we are only finding out about it so near to release08:08
cpaelzeralso I wanted to mention that the new multipath is in groovy-proposed since mid July and -release since August. So there might be an unknown amount of other packages that rely on the new behavior08:09
parideapw, we hit the bug only on s390x LPAR installs08:09
cpaelzerDebian even backported the fix to active releases, so we can expect that Debian-syncs and updates will rely on the new (fixed) behavior08:10
Laneywhat is the moving forward option?08:10
apwparide, indeed, but that is an automatable testing platform unlike snapdragon or something08:11
apwcpaelzer, a good point; that is a concern08:11
sil2100Laney: reintroducing bug #959727 is the proposed way forward, as this is what we had in focal08:11
ubot5Error: Launchpad bug 959727 could not be found08:11
cpaelzerLaney: option 1) re-break the udev rule to fix the installer, but break an unknown amount of other things Option 2) try to fix curtin/subiquity for the new behavior (short runway)08:11
mwhudsonit would be an awful hack08:12
Laneyyeah talking more about 2 and what that entails, by 'moving forwards' (vs. 'backwards' which is the (1) proposal)08:12
mwhudsonbut we could disable the problematic rule *only* in the server installer08:12
mwhudson(by just rm-ing it in livecd-rootfs)08:13
cpaelzermwhudson: would that carry over to the installed system or just matter in the install-env?08:13
mwhudsoncpaelzer: latter08:13
cpaelzerawful hack that works for now, reduces the risk and can later be replaced by a proper fix08:13
amurraysil2100: so re apparmor/groovy - the main changes are summarised in the changelog (previous patches now upstream, new leaf binary util) plus minor tweaks of some profiles08:14
cpaelzerto me that sounds better than the two options we had considered so far08:14
mwhudsoni think so too08:14
parideI agree. What we don't want to do is to forget about it forever08:15
Laneythe udev rule mentions a kernel parameter or an environment variable that you can set to skip it fwiw08:16
sil2100mwhudson: just in theory, how risky and how much work do you anticipate is needed in subiquity/curtin to cope with this properly?08:17
sil2100Out of curiosity08:17
mwhudsonah maybe setting the environment variable would be better then08:17
mwhudsonsil2100: not sure, it's definitely a bit non-trivial08:18
parideanyway we do test a multipath install, I wonder why this is LPAR specific08:30
paride(the current test is amd64 only)08:30
Laneydoes subiquity have the chance to install such a udev rule (to set that env var) or will it need to be in the image?08:30
paridejust tested: an s390x multipath install succeeds in a VM.08:32
mwhudsonLaney: i think it needs to be in the image08:36
mwhudsonparide: ah so the multipathed disk needs to have partitions to hit this bug08:36
mwhudsonLaney: well practically speaking, of course subiquity runs as root so it could install the new rule and restart udevd but that would be even more gross i think08:37
Laneydear me08:38
LaneyI mean yeah, you can udevadm trigger, but nooooo08:38
LaneyI was more getting at whether it would be able to install the rule early enough to have it run at the proper time :-)08:39
Laneyimage is ok with me if that's the best way08:40
mwhudsonit can't install the rule early enough08:43
LaneyI suppose the snap is unpacked during boot which is already too late08:43
parideutah doesn't support exposing existing disk images as multipath devices, but it shouldn't be too difficult to do08:58
paridethen testing a "reuse existing partitions on multipath device" scenario should hit this bug08:59
mwhudsonparide: right09:05
mwhudsonparide: need some kind of "scenario combiner" :)09:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nmap (groovy-proposed/universe) [7.80+dfsg1-5 => 7.91+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) (sync)09:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nmap [sync] (groovy-proposed) [7.91+dfsg1-1]09:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-snapshot (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:20200917-1ubuntu1 => 1:20201014-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)09:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-snapshot [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:20201014-0ubuntu1]09:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-bluefield [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.4.0-1006.8] (no packageset)10:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-bluefield [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1006.8]10:09
xnoxLaney:  mwhudson: paride: sil2100: however, this multipath-tools improvement I guess also affects maas ephemeral environment, and I guess it doesn't matter there, as they always wipe all the partitions? Or would it trip things up there too, if it had to remove partitions from multipath?10:19
xnoxand purging udev rule in livecd-rootfs for subiquity isos only will not help maas.10:21
xnoxhowever, we can fix maas with SRUs later.10:21
Laneyno idea, sounds like one to check with the maas team to me ;-)10:23
xnoxpinged ~MAAS as I don't see mass-y people here10:39
Laneynice one10:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jackd2 [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.14-0ubuntu3.1]11:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (groovy-proposed/main) [0.100-0ubuntu4 => 0.100-0ubuntu5] (core)11:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (groovy-proposed/main) [20.10.10 => 20.10.11] (desktop-core)12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-artwork (groovy-proposed/universe) [20.10.0 => 20.10.1] (ubuntu-mate)12:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-settings (groovy-proposed/universe) [20.10.0 => 20.10.1] (ubuntu-mate)12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sbsigntool [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.6-3.2ubuntu2.18.04.1]12:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected budgie-desktop [source] (focal-proposed) [10.5.1-6.1]13:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: budgie-desktop (focal-proposed/universe) [10.5.1-6 => 10.5.1-6ubuntu0.1] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)13:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-desktop [source] (focal-proposed) [10.5.1-6ubuntu0.1]13:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted indicator-applet [source] (focal-proposed) [12.10.2+20.04.20201004-0ubuntu1]13:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted prometheus-alertmanager [source] (focal-proposed) [0.15.3+ds-3ubuntu1]13:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted masakari [source] (focal-proposed) [9.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.3]13:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted accountsservice [source] (focal-proposed) [0.6.55-0ubuntu12~20.04.2]13:44
rbasaksil2100: there's an s390-tools 2.12.0-0ubuntu3.1 in the queue and also already accepted. Normally I'd just reject on the assumption that's been superseded, but there's a pocket copy and signing going on so I thought I'd just check first. Am I right in thinking it can be rejected?13:48
sil2100rbasak: no no, let me accept that13:51
sil2100Those were the signed bits13:52
sil2100(if that was what you were talking about)13:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.1]13:52
rbasakAh. Good thing I asked :)13:52
sil2100Forgot s390-tools-signed is a thing!13:53
sil2100So I didn't wait for those to pop up after accepting13:53
sil2100cpaelzer: hey! Do you want me to do the promotions from LP: #1891157 ?13:56
ubot5Launchpad bug 1891157 in golang-github-openprinting-goipp (Ubuntu) "[MIR] ipp-usb" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189115713:56
sil2100jibel: hey! Any progress with LP: #1898029 ?13:57
ubot5Launchpad bug 1898029 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "[OEM] ubiquity crashed with AttributeError in lookup_result(): 'PageGtk' object has no attribute 'hostname_error_text'" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189802913:57
jibelsil2100, it's fixed in master, it'll be in next release of Ubiquity13:58
jibelwaiting for another fix from Laney13:58
Laneyit is in the queue13:59
sil2100Oh my, didn't see it! Excellent13:59
sil2100Let me review13:59
sil2100Looking sane14:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.11]14:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-artwork [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.1]14:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-settings [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.1]14:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.1.0-0ubuntu2 => 2:16.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)14:23
cpaelzersil2100: I thourght we said last time that didrocks will do it14:25
cpaelzersil2100: let me recheck, but the answer likely is yes14:25
cpaelzersil2100: yes, ack to promote golang-github-openprinting-goipp14:26
didrockscpaelzer: did we? I didn’t track it and the last message was 09/10. Maybe we discussed it in yesterday’s MIR meeting but I don’t remember in that case :)14:27
cpaelzerdidrocks: it doesn't matter who promotes it :-) - it is ready and can be done14:28
didrocksright, if I forgot about it, sorry, but I really have 0 memory of this, which scares me :)14:28
didrockslet me handle this now14:29
didrockssil2100: ^14:29
cpaelzerdidrocks: don't mind, it might as well be my bad memory14:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-mate-artwork [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [20.10.1] (ubuntu-mate)14:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdm3 (groovy-proposed/main) [3.38.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.38.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core)14:51
jdstrandsil2100: hey, I know you and amurray have been talking about the aa3 upload. is there anything else you need?15:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected bind9 [source] (focal-proposed) [1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.4]15:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bind9 (focal-proposed/main) [1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.3 => 1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.4] (core, i386-whitelist)15:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bind9 [source] (focal-proposed) [1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.4]15:14
Laneyjdstrand: sil2100: I'll review that one if you like (unless you already started)15:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flash-kernel (groovy-proposed/main) [3.100ubuntu3 => 3.100ubuntu4] (core)15:16
vorlonsil2100: https://code.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/xubuntu/+merge/39223915:17
sil2100I started looking at it, but feel free to take over o/ There's also netplan.io and flash-kernel that I'd like someone to review and accept15:17
sil2100vorlon: awesome, looking15:17
jdstrandLaney: amurray may have provided additional context in backscroll. I had this to say right after uploading: 10:27 < jdstrand> fyi, we consider the apparmor upload bug fix. we got aa3 beta in, with patches a while ago. this is aa3 final without those patches (and a few others). there is a new aa-features-abi command that is arguably a new feature, but it is a very small, convenience leaf utility15:17
jdstrandnot used by anything else, so I didn't think it needed an ffe15:17
Laneyalright, cheers15:18
Laneyjust getting the patches applied view was quite helpful15:18
Laneywoah, a manually written manpage15:19
jdstrandLaney: it looks like the most interesting thing wrt from amurray was: 03:14 < amurray> sil2100: so re apparmor/groovy - the main changes are summarised in the changelog (previous patches now upstream, new leaf binary util) plus minor tweaks of some profiles15:19
jdstrandLaney: at this time of day, if you have specific questions outside of the packaging, I suggest asking jjohansen15:20
jdstrandwell, that said, he isn't here and I think he might've gone offline15:21
LaneyNo worries, I'll find someone if necessary15:23
jdstrandLaney: ok, I'm not sure why gitlab doesn't have a tag for beta1, but you might find this helpful as well: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/commits/master/. Sept 22 through Oct 1 inclusive has the upstream commits from beta to final (and a number of those we pulled in as patches for what is in groovy now that we dropped in the upload)15:29
tjaaltonsome nodejs tests are now failing because phantomjs is missing?15:32
jdstrandLaney: sorry, I believe the start commit is 5a31e943 on Sept 1815:33
jdstrand(the beta orig.tar.gz does not have that, but has the one before)15:34
iceycan the upload of Neutron that's in the focal queue be rejected please, it needs another change for re-upload15:37
tjaaltonso, since phantomjs is now gone, jquery.sparkline, node-headjs, node-platform need to be badtested15:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apparmor [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1]15:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shared-mime-info [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.0-1]15:58
jdstrandthanks Laney :)16:08
Laneyjdstrand: np!16:21
jdstrandit should be 'nothing' and 'only better' :)16:21
jdstrandwe'll obviously be responsive if that is not the case16:21
* jdstrand is glad we did beta as an FFe earlier in the cycle so this update is incremental16:22
Laneyindeed, I think the full update right now would be untenable16:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-bleach (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.5-2 => 3.2.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)16:28
jamespagesync of python-bleach into groovy ^^ will unblock the html5lib currently stuck in proposed16:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-bleach [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.2.1-1]16:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mariadb-10.3 (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:10.3.24-2 => 1:10.3.25-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)16:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-settings (groovy-proposed/main) [20.10.2 => 20.10.3] (ubuntu-desktop)16:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.100ubuntu4]16:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.100-0ubuntu5]16:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mariadb-10.3 [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:10.3.25-0ubuntu1]16:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clevis (bionic-proposed/universe) [8-1ubuntu0.1 => 8-1ubuntu0.2] (no packageset)17:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clevis (focal-proposed/universe) [12-1ubuntu2.1 => 12-1ubuntu2.2] (no packageset)17:29
mwhudsonxnox: does maas use the curtin.storage_config stuff? i didn't think it did18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfm-qt (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.15.1-0ubuntu2 => 0.15.1-0ubuntu3] (lubuntu)18:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-monocle [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.16.0-2]18:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-hdf5r [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2]18:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sagemath [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [9.2~beta12-1]18:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-mate-artwork [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.1]18:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-hdf5r [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset)19:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-hdf5r [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset)19:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-hdf5r [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset)19:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-hdf5r [arm64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset)19:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-hdf5r [armhf] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset)19:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-hdf5r [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset)19:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-hibinit-agent (groovy-proposed/main) [1.0.0-0ubuntu9 => 1.0.0-0ubuntu11] (core)19:23
rbalint^stability fixes to be sru-d, too19:24
mwhudsonvorlon, Laney, apw, sil2100, etc: https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/39224819:31
mwhudsonoh hm should add changelog19:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: r-cran-proxy (groovy-proposed/primary) [0.4-24-2]19:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cd-boot-images-amd64 (groovy-proposed/main) [8 => 9] (desktop-core)19:40
vorlonmwhudson: why is this done in livecd-rootfs rather than in multipath-tools?19:47
mwhudsonvorlon: because the discussion here yesterday was that it was less risky to do it in the installer live session only19:48
mwhudsonwhich i think i agree with -- i don't think it would in fact break anything to do it in multipath-tools but why risk it19:49
vorlonmwhudson: approved then19:51
mwhudsonvorlon: thanks19:51
mwhudsonvorlon: i was doing a ppa build in prep for a test build but given the timing shall we test in prod?19:51
vorlonmwhudson: I'm good with test in prod19:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pitivi (groovy-proposed/universe) [2020.09-1 => 2020.09.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)19:56
mwhudsonok uploading19:56
mwhudsoni'll ping you when it migrates to start an iso build19:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pitivi [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2020.09.1-1]19:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (groovy-proposed/main) [2.690 => 2.691] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)19:57
mwhudsonvorlon: well of course you need to accept it first :)20:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-hdf5r [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2]20:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-hdf5r [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2]20:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-hdf5r [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2]20:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-proxy [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.4-24-2]20:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-hdf5r [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2]20:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-hdf5r [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2]20:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-hdf5r [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2]20:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-proxy [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.4-24-2] (no packageset)20:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-proxy [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.4-24-2] (no packageset)20:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-proxy [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.4-24-2] (no packageset)20:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-proxy [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4-24-2] (no packageset)20:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-proxy [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4-24-2] (no packageset)20:14
vorlonmwhudson: accepted20:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.691]20:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-proxy [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4-24-2]20:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-proxy [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.4-24-2]20:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-proxy [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.4-24-2]20:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-proxy [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4-24-2]20:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-proxy [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.4-24-2]20:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-proxy [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4-24-2] (no packageset)20:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cctools (groovy-proposed/universe) [7.1.2-1ubuntu1 => 7.1.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)20:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cctools [sync] (groovy-proposed) [7.1.2-2]20:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cctools (groovy-proposed/universe) [7.1.2-1ubuntu1 => 7.1.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)20:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cctools [source] (groovy-proposed) [7.1.2-2ubuntu1]20:37
amurrayLaney: thanks re apparmor/groovy :)22:49
mwhudsonha, *now* i'm getting waiting for approvals mails for all my uploads for the last few weeks23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calamares-settings-ubuntu (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:20.10.10 => 1:20.10.11] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio)23:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calamares-settings-ubuntu (focal-proposed/universe) [1:20.04.2 => 1:] (lubuntu)23:40
cjwatsonmwhudson: Yep, just got the postfix config fixed.  Sorry for the inconvenience23:47
cjwatson(I wasn't sure whether mail would have been lost or queued)23:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!