| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| RAOF | blackboxsw: That looks sensible, but ubuntu-release-upgrader hasn't had the usual 7 day aging process. I'm unclear if you're asking for an expedited release, and whether it's appropriate if so. | 00:15 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | blackboxsw: The update-notifier one is a little weird - all the bugs listed are fix released, and uploaded to Trusty, but these weren't fixed in the subsequent series? | 00:22 |
| amurray | RAOF: so sil2100 looked at apparmor-3.0.0 in groovy unapproved yesterday and asked if there was a list of changes from the previous -beta1 to the final version - I have highlighted in the changelog that most of the changes was dropping patches that got incorporated in this final release plus the addition of a minor leaf utility binary - is there anything else you need to review this? | 00:31 |
| RAOF | amurray: Does that apparmor want to be a 0-day SRU, or to go into groovy release? | 00:32 |
| RAOF | Because I'm not a release team member, so I can only do the former :) | 00:32 |
| amurray | RAOF: ah apologies - I thought you were release team too - yes ideally this goes into the release, not 0day SRU | 00:37 |
| amurray | Laney bdmurray: ^^^ ? | 00:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-control-center (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-1 => 3.0.1-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync) | 02:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-bpf (groovy-proposed/universe) [3 => 4] (no packageset) (sync) | 06:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-bpf [sync] (groovy-proposed) [4] | 06:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vips (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.10.1-4 => 8.10.2-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 07:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vips [sync] (groovy-proposed) [8.10.2-1] | 07:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted designate [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:11.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1] | 07:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted calamares-settings-ubuntu [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:20.10.10] | 07:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-control-center [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.0.1-1] | 07:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gobject-introspection [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.66.1-1] | 07:54 | |
| === _hc[m] is now known as _hc | ||
| mwhudson | hi release team, would any of you care to weigh in on the plan to reintroduce a bug to fix the server installer: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1893818 | 07:58 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1893818 in subiquity "Several blockprobe errors if trying to install the groovy daily live on LPAR" [Undecided,Triaged] | 07:58 |
| mwhudson | apw, Laney, sil2100, vorlon, bdmurray, stgraber, tumbleweed: ^ | 07:59 |
| apw | mwhudson, what is the downside of the bug being introduced; just those nodes existing and the risk of someone using them? | 08:04 |
| mwhudson | apw: the debian bug talks says 'I believe this causes problems further | 08:05 |
| mwhudson | down in the device stack / udev rule chain which then sometimes | 08:05 |
| mwhudson | doesn't create some device symlinks." but i don't know what they mean by that | 08:05 |
| mwhudson | the idea that anyone actually has expectations about what device mapper / udev do here that can then be violated seems a bit unlikely to me | 08:06 |
| mwhudson | vs just trying stuff and assuming what happens was what was intended | 08:06 |
| mwhudson | (but i may be a bit jaded) | 08:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jackd2 (groovy-proposed/main) [1.9.14-0ubuntu3 => 1.9.14-0ubuntu3.1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio) | 08:07 | |
| apw | well we are saying this makes it the same as the focal installer i assume | 08:07 |
| mwhudson | yes | 08:07 |
| apw | if the installer isn't working at all without the bug, and will if we go back to focal form, then that feels like a way forward. sad that we are only finding out about it so near to release | 08:08 |
| cpaelzer | also I wanted to mention that the new multipath is in groovy-proposed since mid July and -release since August. So there might be an unknown amount of other packages that rely on the new behavior | 08:09 |
| paride | apw, we hit the bug only on s390x LPAR installs | 08:09 |
| cpaelzer | Debian even backported the fix to active releases, so we can expect that Debian-syncs and updates will rely on the new (fixed) behavior | 08:10 |
| Laney | what is the moving forward option? | 08:10 |
| apw | paride, indeed, but that is an automatable testing platform unlike snapdragon or something | 08:11 |
| apw | cpaelzer, a good point; that is a concern | 08:11 |
| sil2100 | Laney: reintroducing bug #959727 is the proposed way forward, as this is what we had in focal | 08:11 |
| ubot5 | Error: Launchpad bug 959727 could not be found | 08:11 |
| cpaelzer | Laney: option 1) re-break the udev rule to fix the installer, but break an unknown amount of other things Option 2) try to fix curtin/subiquity for the new behavior (short runway) | 08:11 |
| mwhudson | it would be an awful hack | 08:12 |
| Laney | yeah talking more about 2 and what that entails, by 'moving forwards' (vs. 'backwards' which is the (1) proposal) | 08:12 |
| mwhudson | but we could disable the problematic rule *only* in the server installer | 08:12 |
| mwhudson | (by just rm-ing it in livecd-rootfs) | 08:13 |
| cpaelzer | mwhudson: would that carry over to the installed system or just matter in the install-env? | 08:13 |
| mwhudson | cpaelzer: latter | 08:13 |
| cpaelzer | awful hack that works for now, reduces the risk and can later be replaced by a proper fix | 08:13 |
| mwhudson | yeah | 08:14 |
| amurray | sil2100: so re apparmor/groovy - the main changes are summarised in the changelog (previous patches now upstream, new leaf binary util) plus minor tweaks of some profiles | 08:14 |
| cpaelzer | to me that sounds better than the two options we had considered so far | 08:14 |
| mwhudson | i think so too | 08:14 |
| paride | I agree. What we don't want to do is to forget about it forever | 08:15 |
| Laney | the udev rule mentions a kernel parameter or an environment variable that you can set to skip it fwiw | 08:16 |
| sil2100 | mwhudson: just in theory, how risky and how much work do you anticipate is needed in subiquity/curtin to cope with this properly? | 08:17 |
| sil2100 | Out of curiosity | 08:17 |
| mwhudson | ah maybe setting the environment variable would be better then | 08:17 |
| mwhudson | sil2100: not sure, it's definitely a bit non-trivial | 08:18 |
| paride | anyway we do test a multipath install, I wonder why this is LPAR specific | 08:30 |
| paride | (the current test is amd64 only) | 08:30 |
| Laney | does subiquity have the chance to install such a udev rule (to set that env var) or will it need to be in the image? | 08:30 |
| paride | just tested: an s390x multipath install succeeds in a VM. | 08:32 |
| mwhudson | Laney: i think it needs to be in the image | 08:36 |
| mwhudson | paride: ah so the multipathed disk needs to have partitions to hit this bug | 08:36 |
| mwhudson | Laney: well practically speaking, of course subiquity runs as root so it could install the new rule and restart udevd but that would be even more gross i think | 08:37 |
| Laney | dear me | 08:38 |
| Laney | I mean yeah, you can udevadm trigger, but nooooo | 08:38 |
| Laney | I was more getting at whether it would be able to install the rule early enough to have it run at the proper time :-) | 08:39 |
| Laney | image is ok with me if that's the best way | 08:40 |
| mwhudson | no | 08:43 |
| mwhudson | it can't install the rule early enough | 08:43 |
| Laney | I suppose the snap is unpacked during boot which is already too late | 08:43 |
| mwhudson | exactly | 08:47 |
| paride | utah doesn't support exposing existing disk images as multipath devices, but it shouldn't be too difficult to do | 08:58 |
| paride | then testing a "reuse existing partitions on multipath device" scenario should hit this bug | 08:59 |
| mwhudson | paride: right | 09:05 |
| mwhudson | paride: need some kind of "scenario combiner" :) | 09:05 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nmap (groovy-proposed/universe) [7.80+dfsg1-5 => 7.91+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 09:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nmap [sync] (groovy-proposed) [7.91+dfsg1-1] | 09:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-snapshot (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:20200917-1ubuntu1 => 1:20201014-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 09:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-snapshot [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:20201014-0ubuntu1] | 09:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-bluefield [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.4.0-1006.8] (no packageset) | 10:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-bluefield [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1006.8] | 10:09 | |
| xnox | Laney: mwhudson: paride: sil2100: however, this multipath-tools improvement I guess also affects maas ephemeral environment, and I guess it doesn't matter there, as they always wipe all the partitions? Or would it trip things up there too, if it had to remove partitions from multipath? | 10:19 |
| xnox | and purging udev rule in livecd-rootfs for subiquity isos only will not help maas. | 10:21 |
| xnox | however, we can fix maas with SRUs later. | 10:21 |
| Laney | no idea, sounds like one to check with the maas team to me ;-) | 10:23 |
| xnox | pinged ~MAAS as I don't see mass-y people here | 10:39 |
| Laney | nice one | 10:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jackd2 [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.14-0ubuntu3.1] | 11:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (groovy-proposed/main) [0.100-0ubuntu4 => 0.100-0ubuntu5] (core) | 11:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (groovy-proposed/main) [20.10.10 => 20.10.11] (desktop-core) | 12:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-artwork (groovy-proposed/universe) [20.10.0 => 20.10.1] (ubuntu-mate) | 12:33 | |
| apw | l | 12:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-settings (groovy-proposed/universe) [20.10.0 => 20.10.1] (ubuntu-mate) | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sbsigntool [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.6-3.2ubuntu2.18.04.1] | 12:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected budgie-desktop [source] (focal-proposed) [10.5.1-6.1] | 13:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: budgie-desktop (focal-proposed/universe) [10.5.1-6 => 10.5.1-6ubuntu0.1] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie) | 13:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-desktop [source] (focal-proposed) [10.5.1-6ubuntu0.1] | 13:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted indicator-applet [source] (focal-proposed) [12.10.2+20.04.20201004-0ubuntu1] | 13:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted prometheus-alertmanager [source] (focal-proposed) [0.15.3+ds-3ubuntu1] | 13:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted masakari [source] (focal-proposed) [9.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.3] | 13:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted accountsservice [source] (focal-proposed) [0.6.55-0ubuntu12~20.04.2] | 13:44 | |
| rbasak | sil2100: there's an s390-tools 2.12.0-0ubuntu3.1 in the queue and also already accepted. Normally I'd just reject on the assumption that's been superseded, but there's a pocket copy and signing going on so I thought I'd just check first. Am I right in thinking it can be rejected? | 13:48 |
| sil2100 | rbasak: no no, let me accept that | 13:51 |
| sil2100 | Those were the signed bits | 13:52 |
| sil2100 | (if that was what you were talking about) | 13:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.1] | 13:52 | |
| rbasak | Ah. Good thing I asked :) | 13:52 |
| sil2100 | Forgot s390-tools-signed is a thing! | 13:53 |
| sil2100 | So I didn't wait for those to pop up after accepting | 13:53 |
| sil2100 | cpaelzer: hey! Do you want me to do the promotions from LP: #1891157 ? | 13:56 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1891157 in golang-github-openprinting-goipp (Ubuntu) "[MIR] ipp-usb" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1891157 | 13:56 |
| sil2100 | jibel: hey! Any progress with LP: #1898029 ? | 13:57 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1898029 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "[OEM] ubiquity crashed with AttributeError in lookup_result(): 'PageGtk' object has no attribute 'hostname_error_text'" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1898029 | 13:57 |
| jibel | sil2100, it's fixed in master, it'll be in next release of Ubiquity | 13:58 |
| jibel | waiting for another fix from Laney | 13:58 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 13:59 |
| Laney | it is in the queue | 13:59 |
| sil2100 | Awesome | 13:59 |
| sil2100 | Oh my, didn't see it! Excellent | 13:59 |
| sil2100 | Let me review | 13:59 |
| sil2100 | Looking sane | 14:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.11] | 14:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-artwork [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.1] | 14:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-settings [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.1] | 14:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.1.0-0ubuntu2 => 2:16.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 14:23 | |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: I thourght we said last time that didrocks will do it | 14:25 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: let me recheck, but the answer likely is yes | 14:25 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: yes, ack to promote golang-github-openprinting-goipp | 14:26 |
| didrocks | cpaelzer: did we? I didn’t track it and the last message was 09/10. Maybe we discussed it in yesterday’s MIR meeting but I don’t remember in that case :) | 14:27 |
| cpaelzer | didrocks: it doesn't matter who promotes it :-) - it is ready and can be done | 14:28 |
| didrocks | right, if I forgot about it, sorry, but I really have 0 memory of this, which scares me :) | 14:28 |
| didrocks | let me handle this now | 14:29 |
| didrocks | sil2100: ^ | 14:29 |
| cpaelzer | didrocks: don't mind, it might as well be my bad memory | 14:29 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 14:30 |
| didrocks | (done) | 14:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-mate-artwork [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [20.10.1] (ubuntu-mate) | 14:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdm3 (groovy-proposed/main) [3.38.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.38.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 14:51 | |
| jdstrand | sil2100: hey, I know you and amurray have been talking about the aa3 upload. is there anything else you need? | 15:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected bind9 [source] (focal-proposed) [1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.4] | 15:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bind9 (focal-proposed/main) [1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.3 => 1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.4] (core, i386-whitelist) | 15:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bind9 [source] (focal-proposed) [1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.4] | 15:14 | |
| Laney | jdstrand: sil2100: I'll review that one if you like (unless you already started) | 15:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flash-kernel (groovy-proposed/main) [3.100ubuntu3 => 3.100ubuntu4] (core) | 15:16 | |
| vorlon | sil2100: https://code.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/xubuntu/+merge/392239 | 15:17 |
| sil2100 | I started looking at it, but feel free to take over o/ There's also netplan.io and flash-kernel that I'd like someone to review and accept | 15:17 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: awesome, looking | 15:17 |
| jdstrand | Laney: amurray may have provided additional context in backscroll. I had this to say right after uploading: 10:27 < jdstrand> fyi, we consider the apparmor upload bug fix. we got aa3 beta in, with patches a while ago. this is aa3 final without those patches (and a few others). there is a new aa-features-abi command that is arguably a new feature, but it is a very small, convenience leaf utility | 15:17 |
| jdstrand | not used by anything else, so I didn't think it needed an ffe | 15:17 |
| Laney | alright, cheers | 15:18 |
| Laney | just getting the patches applied view was quite helpful | 15:18 |
| Laney | woah, a manually written manpage | 15:19 |
| jdstrand | Laney: it looks like the most interesting thing wrt from amurray was: 03:14 < amurray> sil2100: so re apparmor/groovy - the main changes are summarised in the changelog (previous patches now upstream, new leaf binary util) plus minor tweaks of some profiles | 15:19 |
| jdstrand | Laney: at this time of day, if you have specific questions outside of the packaging, I suggest asking jjohansen | 15:20 |
| jdstrand | well, that said, he isn't here and I think he might've gone offline | 15:21 |
| Laney | No worries, I'll find someone if necessary | 15:23 |
| jdstrand | thanks! | 15:25 |
| jdstrand | Laney: ok, I'm not sure why gitlab doesn't have a tag for beta1, but you might find this helpful as well: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/commits/master/. Sept 22 through Oct 1 inclusive has the upstream commits from beta to final (and a number of those we pulled in as patches for what is in groovy now that we dropped in the upload) | 15:29 |
| tjaalton | some nodejs tests are now failing because phantomjs is missing? | 15:32 |
| jdstrand | Laney: sorry, I believe the start commit is 5a31e943 on Sept 18 | 15:33 |
| jdstrand | (the beta orig.tar.gz does not have that, but has the one before) | 15:34 |
| icey | can the upload of Neutron that's in the focal queue be rejected please, it needs another change for re-upload | 15:37 |
| tjaalton | so, since phantomjs is now gone, jquery.sparkline, node-headjs, node-platform need to be badtested | 15:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apparmor [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1] | 15:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shared-mime-info [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.0-1] | 15:58 | |
| jdstrand | thanks Laney :) | 16:08 |
| Laney | jdstrand: np! | 16:21 |
| Laney | WCPGW? | 16:21 |
| jdstrand | hehe | 16:21 |
| jdstrand | it should be 'nothing' and 'only better' :) | 16:21 |
| jdstrand | we'll obviously be responsive if that is not the case | 16:21 |
| * jdstrand is glad we did beta as an FFe earlier in the cycle so this update is incremental | 16:22 | |
| Laney | indeed, I think the full update right now would be untenable | 16:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-bleach (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.5-2 => 3.2.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 16:28 | |
| jamespage | sync of python-bleach into groovy ^^ will unblock the html5lib currently stuck in proposed | 16:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-bleach [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.2.1-1] | 16:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mariadb-10.3 (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:10.3.24-2 => 1:10.3.25-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 16:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-settings (groovy-proposed/main) [20.10.2 => 20.10.3] (ubuntu-desktop) | 16:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.100ubuntu4] | 16:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.100-0ubuntu5] | 16:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mariadb-10.3 [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:10.3.25-0ubuntu1] | 16:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clevis (bionic-proposed/universe) [8-1ubuntu0.1 => 8-1ubuntu0.2] (no packageset) | 17:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clevis (focal-proposed/universe) [12-1ubuntu2.1 => 12-1ubuntu2.2] (no packageset) | 17:29 | |
| mwhudson | xnox: does maas use the curtin.storage_config stuff? i didn't think it did | 18:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfm-qt (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.15.1-0ubuntu2 => 0.15.1-0ubuntu3] (lubuntu) | 18:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-monocle [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.16.0-2] | 18:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-hdf5r [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] | 18:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sagemath [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [9.2~beta12-1] | 18:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-mate-artwork [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.1] | 18:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-hdf5r [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 19:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-hdf5r [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 19:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-hdf5r [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 19:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-hdf5r [arm64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 19:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-hdf5r [armhf] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 19:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-hdf5r [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 19:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-hibinit-agent (groovy-proposed/main) [1.0.0-0ubuntu9 => 1.0.0-0ubuntu11] (core) | 19:23 | |
| rbalint | ^stability fixes to be sru-d, too | 19:24 |
| rbalint | ^fginther, | 19:24 |
| mwhudson | vorlon, Laney, apw, sil2100, etc: https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/392248 | 19:31 |
| mwhudson | oh hm should add changelog | 19:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: r-cran-proxy (groovy-proposed/primary) [0.4-24-2] | 19:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cd-boot-images-amd64 (groovy-proposed/main) [8 => 9] (desktop-core) | 19:40 | |
| vorlon | mwhudson: why is this done in livecd-rootfs rather than in multipath-tools? | 19:47 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: because the discussion here yesterday was that it was less risky to do it in the installer live session only | 19:48 |
| vorlon | ok | 19:48 |
| mwhudson | which i think i agree with -- i don't think it would in fact break anything to do it in multipath-tools but why risk it | 19:49 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: approved then | 19:51 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: thanks | 19:51 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: i was doing a ppa build in prep for a test build but given the timing shall we test in prod? | 19:51 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: I'm good with test in prod | 19:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pitivi (groovy-proposed/universe) [2020.09-1 => 2020.09.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 19:56 | |
| mwhudson | ok uploading | 19:56 |
| mwhudson | i'll ping you when it migrates to start an iso build | 19:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pitivi [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2020.09.1-1] | 19:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (groovy-proposed/main) [2.690 => 2.691] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 19:57 | |
| mwhudson | vorlon: well of course you need to accept it first :) | 20:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-hdf5r [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] | 20:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-hdf5r [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] | 20:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-hdf5r [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] | 20:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-proxy [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.4-24-2] | 20:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-hdf5r [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] | 20:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-hdf5r [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] | 20:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-hdf5r [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] | 20:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-proxy [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.4-24-2] (no packageset) | 20:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-proxy [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.4-24-2] (no packageset) | 20:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-proxy [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.4-24-2] (no packageset) | 20:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-proxy [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4-24-2] (no packageset) | 20:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-proxy [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4-24-2] (no packageset) | 20:14 | |
| vorlon | mwhudson: accepted | 20:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.691] | 20:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-proxy [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4-24-2] | 20:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-proxy [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.4-24-2] | 20:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-proxy [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.4-24-2] | 20:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-proxy [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4-24-2] | 20:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-proxy [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.4-24-2] | 20:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-proxy [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4-24-2] (no packageset) | 20:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cctools (groovy-proposed/universe) [7.1.2-1ubuntu1 => 7.1.2-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 20:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cctools [sync] (groovy-proposed) [7.1.2-2] | 20:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cctools (groovy-proposed/universe) [7.1.2-1ubuntu1 => 7.1.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 20:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cctools [source] (groovy-proposed) [7.1.2-2ubuntu1] | 20:37 | |
| amurray | Laney: thanks re apparmor/groovy :) | 22:49 |
| mwhudson | ha, *now* i'm getting waiting for approvals mails for all my uploads for the last few weeks | 23:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calamares-settings-ubuntu (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:20.10.10 => 1:20.10.11] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio) | 23:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calamares-settings-ubuntu (focal-proposed/universe) [1:20.04.2 => 1:20.04.2.1] (lubuntu) | 23:40 | |
| cjwatson | mwhudson: Yep, just got the postfix config fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience | 23:47 |
| cjwatson | (I wasn't sure whether mail would have been lost or queued) | 23:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!