| kelvinliu | ty hpidcock | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| kelvinliu | wallyworld: yes, I will have a pr for 2.7 | 00:00 |
| wallyworld | no need for a 2.7 fix, they claimed it was working in 2.7 | 00:01 |
| wallyworld | so i was curious if we had introduced a regression in 2.8 | 00:01 |
| wallyworld | kelvinliu: i think we're ok to $$mergre$$ into 2.8? | 00:06 |
| kelvinliu | wallyworld: we have this for legacy podspec in 2.7 | 00:08 |
| kelvinliu | and podspecV2 in 2.8 | 00:08 |
| wallyworld | so v3 is ok? | 00:09 |
| kelvinliu | latest/current podspec has no issue | 00:09 |
| kelvinliu | coz only previous version can have ProviderPod == nil | 00:10 |
| wallyworld | let's land in 2.8 so we can get the release candidate built. we're not doing any more 2.7 | 00:10 |
| kelvinliu | yep | 00:10 |
| wallyworld | kelvinliu: here the port of the 2.8 fix https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/12143 | 00:44 |
| kelvinliu | wallyworld: lgtm thx for doing this port pr | 00:47 |
| wallyworld | np | 00:47 |
| thumper | o/ | 01:06 |
| thumper | how's things going? | 01:06 |
| wallyworld | getting 2.8.6 candidate packaged today, 2.9 beta as well, so busy | 01:07 |
| thumper | how's the new k8s stuff going? | 01:08 |
| wallyworld | having "fun with leadership/locks" on heavily loaded microk8s deployments | 01:08 |
| wallyworld | 2.9 beta will allow a POC/MVP charm with v2 metadata to be tried | 01:08 |
| thumper | nice | 01:10 |
| thumper | how does it feel to use? | 01:10 |
| wallyworld | hard to say because it's not much more than a simple pod with a stateful set. so all the other things people use not there yet | 01:11 |
| wallyworld | v2 metadata much better though (not just for k8s), it ditches series in favour of os/version/arch | 01:12 |
| wallyworld | kelvinliu: to help debug the k8s dex-auth issue, i've added extra logging https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/12144 | 02:47 |
| wallyworld | we'll also want to run the kubeflow CI tests with TRACE turned on for | 02:47 |
| wallyworld | juju.worker.raft | 02:47 |
| wallyworld | juju.worker.raft.raftforwarder | 02:47 |
| wallyworld | juju.worker.lease.raft | 02:47 |
| kelvinliu | looking | 02:48 |
| kelvinliu | wallyworld: lgtm, will just set the root to trace | 02:55 |
| wallyworld | that will be a lot of trace, might load it up even more | 02:55 |
| kelvinliu | we only have those logs uploaded if the tests failed | 02:57 |
| kelvinliu | so it might be ok, u know we can't change this whenever we want see something different, | 03:01 |
| wallyworld | kelvinliu: yeah, we can't change, but my thought was trace for everything would make things worse, as opposed to just trace for those selected packages. but we can try with trace for root and see | 03:08 |
| kelvinliu | yeah the logger sender would be more busy | 03:12 |
| wallyworld | kelvinliu: ah, i landed that logging PR to develop not 2.8. will have to do another PR | 03:55 |
| kelvinliu | ok | 03:56 |
| kelvinliu | wallyworld: u wanna change the log level for both controller and model, right? | 03:57 |
| wallyworld | yeah, lets | 03:57 |
| wallyworld | kelvinliu: here's the backport https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/12145 | 03:58 |
| kelvinliu | lgtm | 04:00 |
| kelvinliu | just set the logging level to trace for ken's pr | 04:01 |
| wallyworld | great ty, i'll get the 2.8 edge snap built as soon as the PR lands | 04:01 |
| wallyworld | hopefully we can then trigger a run manually | 04:02 |
| manadart | achilleasa: Can you take another look at https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/12118 ? I reverted the change to return NoSupported, because there are so many test suites that use the method. I'll use an alternative and clean it all up in a later patch. | 08:04 |
| achilleasa | manadart: still got a failing client test | 08:26 |
| === mup_ is now known as mup | ||
| achilleasa | manadart: or stickupkid can either of you take a quick look at a small typo fix? https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/12147 | 10:04 |
| stickupkid | manadart, I've just disabled the test for now https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/12148 | 10:26 |
| manadart | stickupkid: Ack. | 10:27 |
| stickupkid | manadart, https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/12149 | 10:32 |
| elox | Hey, I'm struck by a bug I would like some help in understanding how to resolve. I get an error from pip when trying to install PyYAML which seems to come from the reactive framework. It blows up my installation of nextcloud. Here is a screenshot of the error. https://pasteboard.co/JvUDbhx.png | 13:09 |
| Chipaca | elox: looks like the error is from trying to _uninstall_ pyyaml | 13:38 |
| Chipaca | anyway, probably not helpful :-/ | 13:38 |
| manadart | Needs review: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/12151 | 14:04 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
