[07:54] <LocutusOfBorg> Unit193, I guess it is still worth...
[09:39] <Tuxist> hi i there any chance to build i386 packages with pbuilder for focal ?
[09:39] <Tuxist> i needed for pipewire pulse wrapper to run all my applications with pipewire
[09:40] <Tuxist> i think that will be in future also a problem in ubuntu
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> Tuxist, yes, you can
[10:24] <Tuxist> yes i'am rebuilding now all packages much work
[10:24] <LocutusOfBorg> pbuilder-dist focal amd64 login; dpkg --add-architecture i386; apt-get update
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> Tuxist, if you need some library added to i386 whitelist, you can ask in release channel, if they are needed, and they are leaf, I guess they can be still supported
[10:28] <Tuxist> LocutusOfBorg: i will help much to reenable apitude in i386
[10:33] <LocutusOfBorg> Tuxist, why? aptitude on i386 is probably one of the less useful packages...
[10:33] <Tuxist> it's needed for pbuilder
[10:34] <LocutusOfBorg> so, you don't understand
[10:34] <Laney> Tuxist: The process is to post on this thread on Discourse: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-process-for-32-bit-compatibility/ - but I'm not sure LocutusOfBorg is right when saying that 'leaf' packages will just be added. The i386 partial archive is mainly for compatibility with drivers and third party things. Don't just ask in #ubuntu-release please.
[10:34] <LocutusOfBorg> with "leaf packages" I mean, "if they don't need a lot of new dependencies on i386"
[10:35] <LocutusOfBorg> Tuxist, if you want to build i386 packages, you start from amd64 pbuilder, then add multiarch
[10:35] <LocutusOfBorg> not i386 pbuilder
[10:35] <LocutusOfBorg> you can use aptitude to resolve i386 dependencies
[10:36] <Tuxist> LocutusOfBorg thats not working good with pkg-build
[10:38] <LocutusOfBorg> btw "pbuilder-dist focal i386 create" seems to be still working...
[10:38]  * LocutusOfBorg does some testing
[10:43] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm nack, it fails
[11:14] <Tuxist> now is aptitude rady on my repo http://tuxist.de/debrepo/ubuntu/
[11:15] <Tuxist> a lot of perl dependencys
[11:15] <Tuxist> and elinks
[11:27] <Tuxist> now it works to build packages :-D
[12:00] <Mexit> Hello,I just tested the latest image of Ubuntu 20.10. Unfortunately, there is no loopback.cfg file that allows the system to boot directly from the ISO image (through grub2).Will this be permanent?
[12:26] <LocutusOfBorg> Mexit, I dont understand your question, did you download from there? http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20201016/
[12:26] <LocutusOfBorg> with boot directly from ISO you mean, live run?
[12:26] <Mexit> LocutusOfBorg: yes
[12:26] <LocutusOfBorg> it might be a bug then
[12:26] <Mexit> live boot via grub (isoboot)
[12:27] <LocutusOfBorg> you might want to open a bug against casper maybe?
[12:27] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/1.454
[12:28] <LocutusOfBorg> but 10 hours ago a new casper upload has been done, maybe it fixes some issues
[12:28] <LocutusOfBorg> does reading this help? https://askubuntu.com/questions/1251729/20-04-booting-iso-from-grub-menu
[12:46] <Mexit> LocutusOfBorg: Yes. This is my configuration file, it has been working for years: https://github.com/Mexit/MultiOS-USB/blob/master/config/ubuntu/ubuntu.cfg.
[12:46] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, ^^ do you think isoboot is still supported?
[15:14] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: isoboot> I don't think that's anything we've ever tested; I don't know the details of how it works and whether it's supportable going forward
[15:37] <Laney> I think we would 'just' need to resurrect the config file
[16:17] <Laney> bdmurray: I'm backporting the fix for that tzdata issue, since it landed upstream now.
[16:17] <Laney> also
[16:17] <Laney> I don't think it affects our update right away, since zic comes from libc-bin
[16:19] <bdmurray> Laney: backporting it where?
[16:19] <Laney> so it won't get the changed default for a while anyway - that is synced periodically I guess?
[16:19] <Laney> so in summary, do it
[16:19] <Laney> in the archive(s)
[16:19] <bdmurray> Laney: so are you upload 2020b then?
[16:20] <Laney> no, just telling you that the glib2.0 update isn't blocking you :p
[16:20] <Laney> but I could sync it if it's syncable
[16:20]  * Laney checks
[16:20] <bdmurray> Got it, it wasn't clear to me if you were changing tzdata or glib2.0!
[16:22] <Laney> not sure about syncability, there is an unmotivated change to add some things from icu
[16:22]  * Laney leaves that to bdmurray