| sil2100 | huh | 00:04 |
|---|---|---|
| sil2100 | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/secureboot-db/1.8/+build/20165403 | 00:04 |
| sil2100 | Are the amd64 builders so busy? | 00:04 |
| sil2100 | Also, bdmurray - for the livecd-rootfs amd64 ADT test to pass we need to trigger it with both snapd and the new secureboot-db | 00:07 |
| sil2100 | Problem is that we still don't have secureboot-db for amd64 built *sigh* | 00:07 |
| mwhudson | sil2100: loads of private builds happening | 00:09 |
| mwhudson | sil2100: should be able to get someone to score the build way up, if you can't do that | 00:09 |
| sil2100 | mwhudson: would be awesome, thanks! | 00:15 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: can you somehow bump the build score of the secureboot-db amd64 build ^ ? | 00:36 |
| sil2100 | It's blocking both secureboot-db and snapd | 00:37 |
| sil2100 | Anyway, guess this probably means no candidates today, I think we'll just wait for stuff to move on its own and kick some in the morning | 00:38 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 00:43 |
| cjwatson | secureboot-db is building now | 00:49 |
| rafaeldtinoco | for any SRU team member, pacemaker SRU for focal (in -proposed now) has a bigger version change (2.0.3-3ubuntu3 -> 2.0.3-3ubuntu4 instead of 2.0.3-3ubuntu3 to 2.0.3-3ubuntu3.1) | 05:19 |
| rafaeldtinoco | and Im rebasing a new SRU on top of it.. should we drop the -proposed version and I upload it again ? Or just ignore this ? | 05:19 |
| rafaeldtinoco | cpaelzer: ^ | 05:19 |
| rafaeldtinoco | (ill check tomorrow if someone got back on this) | 05:20 |
| sil2100 | hm, does anyone know why secureboot-db doesn't want to start off its i386 build? | 07:21 |
| sil2100 | Did we drop support for building any-i386 packages on LP or something? | 07:21 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: ^ do you know? | 07:22 |
| sil2100 | wgrant: hello! Maybe you know by any chance: did anything change recently in LP or in the infra that we no longer build 'any-i386' packages? | 07:24 |
| sil2100 | Trying to figure out why secureboot-db didn't build i386 binaries, since it does list 'any-i386' in its architecture list | 07:25 |
| jibel | sil2100, when do you plan to build candidates. | 07:31 |
| jibel | ? | 07:31 |
| sil2100 | jibel: once everything we need migrates, snapd and secureboot-db didn't yet | 07:32 |
| jibel | sil2100, ETA? | 07:33 |
| sil2100 | snapd hopefully will migrate after the test-re-run I did against new secureboot-db, but the latter I need someone to tell me why the any-i386 package hasn't been built | 07:37 |
| sil2100 | Wonder if we should not care and simply remove any-i386 from the arch list | 07:40 |
| wgrant | sil2100: That isn't just focal/groovy having the i386 whitelist in place? | 07:47 |
| sil2100 | wgrant: oh, might be - do you know how this whitelist is managed? Since usually I leave this to Steve | 07:49 |
| sil2100 | Is it via the seeds? | 07:50 |
| sil2100 | Ok, I see it! | 07:54 |
| sil2100 | wgrant: thanks! | 07:56 |
| apw | sil2100, it it not a package-set ... there is a tool in ubuntu-archive-tools to manage it isn't there ? | 08:01 |
| sil2100 | Thought I'm really thinking of just removing the i386 old binaries, since hm, do we need it on ie86? | 08:01 |
| sil2100 | I can't think of a reason why we'd need secureboot-db for i386 right now | 08:02 |
| sil2100 | apw: what do you think? | 08:02 |
| apw | how did we end up with i386 binaries in the first place? | 08:03 |
| sil2100 | I guess from eoan | 08:04 |
| apw | we had them in bionic, then they went away in focal, then they came back in groovy; which seems anomonlus | 08:04 |
| sil2100 | Since the current release pocket version was last built on eoan, and there we still had i386 | 08:04 |
| apw | no they are versioned at focal's level; oh perhaps they came back in the copy from focal -> groovy when groovy was opened -- that rings a bell that the copy brings them back | 08:05 |
| apw | but, i'd say if focal-release didn't need them you are on good footing claiming the same in groovy-release | 08:05 |
| apw | so based on that i would be +1 on removing them | 08:06 |
| apw | sil2100, ok confirmed we copied this into focal from eoan with i386 binaries and then removed them; the copy from eoan to focal would have copied them back in. They can be removed. | 08:09 |
| sil2100 | apw: thanks for confirming! In progress of removing | 08:10 |
| sil2100 | apw: ok, done, hopefully this will make things move | 08:10 |
| tseliot | sil2100, ok, I have just re-uploaded ubuntu-drivers-common | 08:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (groovy-proposed/main) [1:0.8.6.1 => 1:0.8.6.2] (desktop-core) | 08:23 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | hello, we are close to release, and a simple haskell installation on ppa fails... | 08:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/20164728 | 08:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | did ghc broke? | 08:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | same for amd64 https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/20164725 | 08:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | damn my bad | 08:34 |
| * LocutusOfBorg had a ghc 8.8.4 rebuild on that ppa, to test why armhf was so slow in building | 08:35 | |
| * enyc meows | 08:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.9 (focal-proposed/universe) [3.9.0-1~20.04 => 3.9.0-5~20.04] (i386-whitelist) | 08:46 | |
| jamespage | morning rbasak | 08:57 |
| jamespage | wondering whether you might have cycles to push the SRU buttons for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/1895101 | 08:57 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1895101 in openvswitch (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] openvswitch 2.13.1" [High,Fix committed] | 08:57 |
| jamespage | that resolves a slight nasty openstack/ovs issue | 08:57 |
| seb128 | Laney, is bug #1900471 the same issue you had when upgrading? if so that's 3 reports now, could be a release issue? | 09:04 |
| ubot5 | bug 1900471 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "System with SecureBoot enabled do not boot after do-release-upgrade from Focal to Groovy " [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1900471 | 09:04 |
| Laney | could be, sil2100 was just talking about that | 09:05 |
| Laney | seb128: I think Łukasz is going to work on a release upgrader quirk thing for that bug | 09:10 |
| seb128 | Laney, thx | 09:11 |
| Laney | my one is bug #1898729 which the fix is to add that Protected flag to some packages, probably not to groovy though | 09:11 |
| ubot5 | bug 1898729 in shim (Ubuntu Groovy) "shim can end up being removed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1898729 | 09:11 |
| Laney | juliank: ^- any thoughts though? | 09:11 |
| juliank | Laney: same thing | 09:12 |
| juliank | Laney: groovy needs (wants) Protected, the older need XB-Important in debian/control | 09:12 |
| juliank | Protected being the new standardized field name and XB-Important (which becomes Important in the deb) being the apt-only hack | 09:13 |
| juliank | Arguably, should set both | 09:13 |
| juliank | for a transitional period | 09:13 |
| juliank | :) | 09:13 |
| Laney | any interest in working on something for groovy release / 0-day? ;-) | 09:14 |
| juliank | It doesn't matter in which release the flag is set, as long as it is set in one of them you have in sources.list (so arguably the version you update too) | 09:14 |
| juliank | Laney: Well I could upload it, it's just adding two lines to debian/control after all | 09:15 |
| juliank | Oh yes I definitely need XB-Important: yes, so that focal's apt understands it on upgrades | 09:17 |
| sil2100 | juliank: hm hm, could you prep those for groovy then? | 09:34 |
| sil2100 | At least for shim* | 09:34 |
| juliank | sil2100: Yeah, we just need top-level shim-signed really | 09:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruamel.yaml [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.16.12-2] | 09:43 | |
| juliank | Oh hmm, I'll just set the old field only that's safer | 10:09 |
| juliank | well no nonsense | 10:09 |
| juliank | With the new protected field, if you upgrade dpkg first, and then try to remove shim-signed with old apt and new dpkg, it will fail | 10:10 |
| juliank | which is fine, since we're not removing it anymore automatically | 10:10 |
| juliank | but you get like double protection against removal if you end up with a half-upgrade | 10:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (groovy-proposed/main) [1.43 => 1.44] (core) | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:17 | |
| juliank | sil2100: ^ there is a shim-signed | 10:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opendht (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.1.4-1 => 2.1.6-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 10:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opendht [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.6-1] | 10:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added | 10:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.44] | 10:40 | |
| juliank | The following packages will be REMOVED: | 10:46 |
| juliank | shim-signed | 10:46 |
| juliank | WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed. | 10:46 |
| juliank | This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing! | 10:46 |
| juliank | shim-signed | 10:46 |
| juliank | 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. | 10:46 |
| juliank | After this operation, 2.734 kB disk space will be freed. | 10:46 |
| juliank | You are about to do something potentially harmful. | 10:46 |
| juliank | To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!' | 10:46 |
| juliank | ?] | 10:46 |
| juliank | This looks good to me | 10:46 |
| juliank | It also does not get marked as ?garbage anymore, because Protected is part of the root set of the garbage collector | 10:48 |
| juliank | ?garbage being the autoremovable set of packages | 10:48 |
| juliank | so this should all communicate well to the frontends | 10:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Groovy Final] (20201020.1) has been added | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Groovy Final] (20201020.1) has been added | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ring [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1] (no packageset) | 11:12 | |
| seb128 | sil2100, I was reading https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-20-10-release-status-tracking/18647/3 | 11:23 |
| seb128 | :heavy_check_mark: [sil2100] NonLanguagePackTranslationDeadline , ensure uploads with updated translations downloaded from Rosetta are done for: | 11:23 |
| seb128 | but the slideshow didn't get an upload | 11:23 |
| seb128 | gfxboot-theme-ubuntu is deprecated and should probably be removed from that list? | 11:23 |
| seb128 | the checkbox status seems a bit incurrate there? | 11:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ring [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1] (no packageset) | 11:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ring [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1] (no packageset) | 11:33 | |
| sil2100 | seb128: oh, true! I checked the checkbox since I saw a new ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu for groovy pushed last week and probably assumed it had updated translations, as this made sense | 11:41 |
| sil2100 | I should have double checked | 11:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ring [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1] (no packageset) | 11:46 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, can we remove giac on s390x, and hint sagetex on arm64 ppc64el s390x? sagemath is not built there anymore, so the test obviously fail... | 11:48 |
| LocutusOfBorg | giac FTBFS on ppc64el and s390x also in Debian and sagemath is the only reverse-deps | 11:48 |
| Laney | sil2100: so, rebuild of the slideshow for translations? | 11:53 |
| Laney | but strings didn't change right, so depends if there are many/enough new ones? | 11:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ring [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1] (no packageset) | 11:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1] | 12:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1] | 12:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1] | 12:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1] | 12:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1] | 12:06 | |
| bdmurray | tsimonq2: Does https://ubuntu.com/download/flavours need to mention the desktop environment Lubuntu used to use? | 12:15 |
| tsimonq2 | bdmurray: Good point. I would say yes until April 2021 since we technically still support LXDE in 18.04 for that long. | 12:19 |
| tsimonq2 | On the other hand, it's nearing EOL so maybe it should be reworded... | 12:20 |
| rbalint | ubuntu-archive: please promote https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-guest-agent/+bug/1891929 | 12:47 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1891929 in google-guest-agent (Ubuntu) "[MIR] google-guest-agent" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 12:47 |
| didrocks999 | rbalint: done | 12:54 |
| === didrocks999 is now known as didrocks | ||
| rbalint | didrocks, thanks! | 12:55 |
| didrocks | yw | 12:56 |
| sil2100 | Laney: ok, checked ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu and I'd recommend not to respin for it - we didn't change anything in the strings + the translation updates seem rather minimal | 13:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Groovy Final] (20201020.1) has been added | 13:13 | |
| sil2100 | Though it's a bit of a guesswork, since the LP export changed wrapping of some strings and the diff is big because of it | 13:13 |
| sil2100 | plars: hey! Once you're around, we have just built the first set of raspi rc images: both server and desktop! | 13:16 |
| sil2100 | Testing would be appreciated | 13:16 |
| seb128 | sil2100, Laney , unsure if that's useful input for you guys, but I'm +1 for not blocking on slideshow translations, we didn't have english strings changes this cycle | 13:18 |
| plars | sil2100: I saw, I'll take a look today | 13:23 |
| Laney | sil2100: seb128: ok, merci for having a look | 13:30 |
| Laney | I know we didn't have changes in English but we might have had improvements to the existing strings, but fine if it's checked and acked | 13:30 |
| sil2100 | I have the package prepped in case we respin the world | 13:30 |
| teward | > in case we respin the world | 13:37 |
| teward | sil2100: if that's needed we have a bigger problem :P | 13:37 |
| Laney | juliank: don't suppose you would be able to construct a test case for your shim-signed and verify it would you? like install that version which got removed in focal that it seems mclemenceau had | 13:38 |
| tseliot | sil2100, hey, does the new ubuntu-drivers-common look ok now? | 13:39 |
| Laney | it was me that rejected that tseliot | 13:39 |
| Laney | and we'll look at it, will be an SRU anyway so :> | 13:40 |
| tseliot | Laney, oh, ok | 13:40 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, I just poked about the cruft, it was Laney that was the rejector! | 13:41 |
| sil2100 | plars: do you have a list of tests you run through raspi desktop images? | 13:49 |
| bdmurray | rafaeldtinoco: regarding pacemaker versioning if you were to switch to ubuntu3.1 or ubuntu3.2 that would be a version number less than the current one in -proposed so anybody who had installed ubuntu4 would not upgrade to ubuntu3.1. So I'd just keep on with the current versioning scheme. | 13:49 |
| rafaeldtinoco | bdmurray: what about my next SRU | 13:50 |
| sil2100 | plars: since one test-case that would be good to always run is checking if the /swapfile swap file is working | 13:50 |
| rafaeldtinoco | bdmurray: should I do +1 or +0.1 ? | 13:50 |
| plars | sil2100: I don't have that one, but it would be good to add to the iso tracker. I think in the past, there was no automatic swap created on the raspi server images though. Are you saying there should be now? | 13:51 |
| bdmurray | rafaeldtinoco: well I guess +0.1 would look nicer but either is fine with me. | 13:51 |
| waveform | plars, not on server, but on the desktop image | 13:52 |
| rafaeldtinoco | bdmurray: thanks a lot for checking this. d | 13:52 |
| plars | ah, ok. That makes more sense :) | 13:52 |
| sil2100 | plars: we create one for desktop only now ;) | 13:52 |
| waveform | (on the 4Gb model, the desktop, or more precisely just about any web-browser, pushes it to swap pretty quickly :) | 13:52 |
| plars | yeah, no doubt. I'll make sure to include it when I look at the desktop image | 13:52 |
| rbasak | jamespage: sorry I'm off this week | 13:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (bionic-proposed/universe) [20190801-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 20190801-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] (ubuntu-cloud) | 14:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20190801-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 20190801-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] (ubuntu-cloud) | 14:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: google-compute-engine-oslogin (focal-proposed/primary) [20200925.00-0ubuntu3~20.04.0] | 14:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (focal-proposed/main) [20190801-0ubuntu4.1 => 20190801-0ubuntu4.2] (core, ubuntu-cloud) | 14:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: google-compute-engine-oslogin (xenial-proposed/primary) [20200925.00-0ubuntu3~16.04.0] | 14:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: google-compute-engine-oslogin (bionic-proposed/primary) [20200925.00-0ubuntu3~18.04.0] | 14:15 | |
| rbalint | RAOF, bdmurray please accept those ^, the they should migrate soon in groovy, too | 14:16 |
| juliank | Laney: Install shim-signed in chroot, mark as auto, upgrade to groovy? | 14:50 |
| juliank | Does that make sense? | 14:50 |
| Laney | sure, if that triggers the bug! | 14:50 |
| juliank | I just marked shim-signed as auto on my groovy system, installed the new shim and it was no longer auto-removable (and triggered that prompt if you manually removed it) | 14:50 |
| juliank | let's see what charmed-lamb has to say | 14:51 |
| Laney | [slight status update] rpi desktop images, and subiquity images will be respun to fix a couple of buglets | 14:52 |
| juliank | I sometimes hate myself | 14:58 |
| juliank | mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /boot/efi # hack around check | 15:01 |
| Trevinho | bdmurray: please can you check the focal SRU for gnome-shell-extension-appindicator? It's waiting for some time now but it addresses various bad problems | 15:14 |
| juliank | Laney: test case is good | 15:15 |
| juliank | :) | 15:15 |
| Laney | nice | 15:15 |
| Laney | can you write in the bug please? | 15:15 |
| juliank | I did update it | 15:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (groovy-proposed/main) [2.693 => 2.694] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 15:28 | |
| plars | sil2100: waveform: looks like /swapfile is there, but it's not activated: "swapon: /swapfile: skipping - it appears to have holes." | 15:33 |
| === Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Focal 20.04.1, Bionic 18.04.5 | Archive: Final Freeze | Track the status of the Groovy release: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-20-10-release-status-tracking/18647 | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Groovy Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis | ||
| vorlon | bdmurray: ah can we halt phasing on secureboot-db if we haven't already? | 15:56 |
| rbalint | plars, LP: #1892728 | 15:57 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1892728 in linux (Ubuntu Groovy) "ec2-hibinit-agent needs to properly initialize swap file" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1892728 | 15:57 |
| rbalint | ubuntu-archive could you please let gce-compute-image-packages and google-compute-engine-oslogin migrate to groovy together? | 15:58 |
| waveform | plars, yes apparently ubuntu-image is converting a perfectly good, unholey swapfile into a rather more holey one; sil2100 is looking into it | 15:58 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: for which release? | 15:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-appindicator [source] (focal-proposed) [33.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] | 16:00 | |
| vorlon | bdmurray: focal | 16:00 |
| vorlon | rbalint: hinting | 16:00 |
| plars | waveform: sil2100 is making swap more evil, got it. I'll check again after, thanks! | 16:00 |
| rbalint | vorlon, thanks, i'm not sure why they are not tried together | 16:01 |
| vorlon | rbalint: me either, a hint should show us better why | 16:01 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: its not phasing afaik so no? | 16:01 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: not phasing> so it finished phasing already? | 16:01 |
| vorlon | I guess it's been almost 30 days :P | 16:02 |
| vorlon | well anyway, the intent is to roll the SRU back entirely for now, so I'll just do that | 16:03 |
| Trevinho | bdmurray: thanks :) | 16:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.694] | 16:14 | |
| vorlon | Laney: uh. do you know why old-releases.ubuntu.com has synced content from the old-images directory instead of the old-releases directory? | 16:22 |
| vorlon | hmm or maybe something else | 16:24 |
| vorlon | but http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/xubuntu/releases/ has contents not on the source | 16:24 |
| vorlon | (and there happen to be a set of matching directories in the old-images directory... but without contents) | 16:25 |
| bdmurray | tseliot: because it'll be an SRU the bug will need SRU information | 16:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hedgewars (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-12 => 1.0.0-13] (no packageset) (sync) | 16:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hedgewars [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.0-13] | 16:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libclass-load-xs-perl (groovy-release/universe) [0.10-1build5 => 0.10-1build5] (ubuntukylin) (sync) | 17:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libmoose-perl (groovy-release/universe) [2.2013-1 => 2.2013-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync) | 17:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpackage-stash-xs-perl (groovy-release/main) [0.29-1build2 => 0.29-1build2] (core) (sync) | 17:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libclass-load-xs-perl (groovy-release/universe) [0.10-1build5 => 0.10-1build5] (ubuntukylin) (sync) | 17:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201020.1) | 17:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201020.1) | 17:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201020.1) | 17:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201020.1) | 17:44 | |
| coreycb | hello, can an archive admin promote python3-octavia-lib to main? that will unblock ovn-octavia-provider from groovy-proposed. the corresponding MIR has received a security team ack. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864666 | 17:45 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1864666 in python-octavia-lib (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-octavia-lib, ovn-octavia-provider" [Medium,Fix committed] | 17:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (groovy-proposed/main) [1.10+20.10ubuntu1 => 1.10+20.10ubuntu2] (desktop-core) | 17:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-image [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.10+20.10ubuntu2] | 18:01 | |
| xnox | Laney: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1900754 doesn't look nice | 18:04 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1900754 in gdm3 (Ubuntu) "gdm is having crashes in livesession?" [Undecided,New] | 18:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (groovy-proposed/main) [1.10+20.10ubuntu1 => 1.10+20.10ubuntu2] (desktop-core) | 18:09 | |
| sil2100 | :( | 18:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: conserver (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [8.2.4-2 => 8.2.4-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 18:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted conserver [source] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.4-2ubuntu1] | 18:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: conserver (focal-proposed/multiverse) [8.2.4-2 => 8.2.4-2ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset) | 18:22 | |
| sil2100 | vorlon: ok, ubuntu-image that's in the queue should be good ^ | 18:24 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: I'd appreciate a review! | 18:24 |
| vorlon | sil2100: there is an added diffcov.html file that ended up in your debdiff, presumably something not cleaned up by debian/rules clean? I'll ignore it for review | 18:24 |
| sil2100 | Oh, was there? Darn, thought I cleaned it all up | 18:24 |
| sil2100 | This one will be better, I swear | 18:26 |
| sil2100 | Rejecting the old one | 18:26 |
| vorlon | sil2100: hnngh I don't love the interfaces here, assuming that there is a file named 'swapfile' and that if it's there we should desparsify it | 18:26 |
| vorlon | sil2100: nooooo | 18:26 |
| vorlon | I said I was ignoring it for review :) | 18:26 |
| sil2100 | eeek | 18:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-image [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.10+20.10ubuntu2] | 18:27 | |
| * sil2100 trigger-happy | 18:27 | |
| vorlon | sil2100: accepted from rejected | 18:27 |
| vorlon | so that I can go afk again for a bit ;P | 18:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (groovy-proposed/main) [1.10+20.10ubuntu1 => 1.10+20.10ubuntu2] (desktop-core) | 18:27 | |
| sil2100 | hah, thanks! | 18:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-image [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.10+20.10ubuntu2] | 18:29 | |
| sil2100 | I already tested it locally with some dummy rootfses, but once this builds in -proposed I'll kick a real livefs proposed enabled build on my private livefs builder to see if everything ticks with the final raspi desktop image | 18:32 |
| sil2100 | Since we anyway need to wait for this to migrate | 18:32 |
| sil2100 | I'll unblock it if you didn't yet | 18:32 |
| mitya57 | Hi, please consider letting metacity migrate to -release, it is a small fix for users upgrading from previous releases (Debian #972316). | 19:03 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 972316 in metacity-common "metacity-common: conffile not removed: /etc/sgml/metacity-common.cat" [Normal,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/972316 | 19:03 |
| sil2100 | mitya57: if it's an upgrade fix then I guess it can be an SRU, right? I mean, we will try but only if we decide that we need to respin | 19:08 |
| sil2100 | Since we have candidate images already, and we'd have to respin kylin if we accept it | 19:09 |
| juliank | sil2100: this one candiate? http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20201020/ | 19:16 |
| juliank | * is this one the candidate | 19:16 |
| juliank | I really need to get to the point where I can reinstall every 6 months as opposed to upgrading dirty systems with all sorts of local hacks :D | 19:17 |
| mitya57 | sil2100: ah, I didn't follow closely. If it's included in built images then it can be a SRU, yes. | 19:18 |
| mitya57 | I just don't want this fix to be completely lost :) | 19:18 |
| sil2100 | vorlon, waveform, bdmurray, Laney: I have just ran a test livefs build of raspi desktop and I confirm (at least via rootfs inspection) that the swapfile is no longer sparse! | 20:09 |
| bdmurray | \o/ | 20:09 |
| sil2100 | Ok, unblocking ubuntu-image in that case | 20:10 |
| sil2100 | juliank: yep, that's it! | 20:10 |
| sil2100 | mitya57: we can 0-day SRU it even, I guess? | 20:10 |
| sil2100 | I go AFK again, get some exercise | 20:12 |
| mitya57 | sil2100: yes, please | 20:15 |
| * mitya57 also AFK, for sleep | 20:16 | |
| vorlon | sil2100: woohoo! | 20:26 |
| doko | looking at https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running I see all autopkg tests running for SRUs / security updates on the "big" side. why? | 20:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgweather [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-1~ubuntu20.04.1] | 20:46 | |
| vorlon | doko: the only ones I see currently in the queue are all in the 'ppa' queue? | 20:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-hibinit-agent (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.0-0ubuntu9 => 1.0.0-0ubuntu9.1] (no packageset) | 20:57 | |
| rbalint | juliank, i'd like to reinstall on every weekend, fully automatically | 21:01 |
| mwhudson | anything useful i can do for release? | 21:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.2.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:08 | |
| bdmurray | mwhudson: add release notey things? | 21:14 |
| mwhudson | ah yes | 21:14 |
| bdmurray | plars: any raspi testing news? | 21:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clevis [source] (focal-proposed) [12-1ubuntu2.2] | 21:20 | |
| plars | bdmurray: yes, ok so far except for the issue mentioned on desktop with swapfile. I'll get isotracker updated today with progress so far | 21:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zlib [source] (focal-proposed) [1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.2] | 21:23 | |
| bdmurray | plars: great, thanks! | 21:24 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: hmm so I just noticed https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-20-10-release-status-tracking/18647 said shim-signed was for 0-day SRU, /after/ I unblocked it and it migrated; should I be rolling this back to avoid forcing respins? | 21:31 |
| vorlon | (rolling back) | 21:35 |
| bdmurray | thanks | 21:35 |
| bdmurray | coreycb: bug 1894453 is missing SRU information | 21:36 |
| ubot5 | bug 1894453 in ceph (Ubuntu) "Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894453 | 21:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (groovy-proposed/none) [none => 1.44] (core) (sync) | 21:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: shim-signed (groovy-release/primary) [1.43] | 21:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.44] | 21:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted shim-signed [sync] (groovy-release) [1.43] | 21:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinnamon-session [source] (focal-proposed) [4.4.1-1ubuntu0.1] | 21:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libclass-load-xs-perl [sync] (groovy-release) [0.10-1build5] | 21:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libpackage-stash-xs-perl [sync] (groovy-release) [0.29-1build2] | 21:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libclass-load-xs-perl [sync] (groovy-release) [0.10-1build5] | 21:41 | |
| vorlon | xnox: you never replied to my suggestion that debian-cd should grab memtest86 separately from the archive instead of via cd-boot-images-amd64; I think I would like to argue that it's not part of the bootloader at all | 21:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libmoose-perl [sync] (groovy-release) [2.2013-1] | 21:41 | |
| sil2100 | vorlon: I re-triggered the failing ubuntu-image amd64 test, but it's just a flaky test if anything | 21:43 |
| sil2100 | So if it fails again, I'd opt for skiptesting it (if other arches are good) to get things moving | 21:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted heat [source] (focal-proposed) [1:14.1.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octavia [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.2.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:52 | |
| vorlon | sil2100: I also retriggered it, so one of the two retriggers should pass ;) | 21:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpaste (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.36.3-1 => 3.38.2-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 21:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gpaste [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.2-1] | 21:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swift [source] (focal-proposed) [2.25.1-0ubuntu1] | 21:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.2-1] (no packageset) | 21:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.2-1] (no packageset) | 21:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.2-1] (no packageset) | 21:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpaste [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.2-1] | 22:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpaste [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.2-1] | 22:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpaste [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.2-1] | 22:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.2-1] (no packageset) | 22:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted v4l2loopback [source] (focal-proposed) [0.12.3-1ubuntu0.1] | 22:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpaste [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.2-1] | 22:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.2-1] (no packageset) | 22:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clevis [source] (bionic-proposed) [8-1ubuntu0.2] | 22:11 | |
| vorlon | sil2100: my run passed | 22:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.14-dfsg-4ubuntu1.20.10.1 => 6.1.16-dfsg-1ubuntu1.20.10.1] (no packageset) | 22:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (groovy-proposed) [6.1.16-dfsg-1ubuntu1.20.10.1] | 22:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpaste [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.2-1] | 22:50 | |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 22:57 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: will you be around to rebuild the raspi desktop images once ubuntu-image migrates? | 22:59 |
| sil2100 | I guess we also had a fix in subiquity server? | 22:59 |
| vorlon | sil2100: yes | 23:00 |
| vorlon | subiquity server> I know xnox said this morning that a snap has been migrated to the stable channel; did no one do the respin for that yet? | 23:00 |
| sil2100 | Not sure, hm, I didn't hear anything at least! We might need to check the timestamps | 23:02 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: looks like someone did | 23:03 |
| sil2100 | So nvm that! | 23:03 |
| sil2100 | Ok, I go to sleep now, thanks and see you tomorrow o/ | 23:03 |
| bdmurray | Removing subiquity respin from the status tracking then | 23:12 |
| vorlon | I also confirmed that the correct revision of subiquity was shown in the build log | 23:23 |
| vorlon | (on amd64) | 23:23 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!