sil2100Are the amd64 builders so busy?00:04
sil2100Also, bdmurray - for the livecd-rootfs amd64 ADT test to pass we need to trigger it with both snapd and the new secureboot-db00:07
sil2100Problem is that we still don't have secureboot-db for amd64 built *sigh*00:07
mwhudsonsil2100: loads of private builds happening00:09
mwhudsonsil2100: should be able to get someone to score the build way up, if you can't do that00:09
sil2100mwhudson: would be awesome, thanks!00:15
sil2100vorlon: can you somehow bump the build score of the secureboot-db amd64 build ^ ?00:36
sil2100It's blocking both secureboot-db and snapd00:37
sil2100Anyway, guess this probably means no candidates today, I think we'll just wait for stuff to move on its own and kick some in the morning00:38
cjwatsonsecureboot-db is building now00:49
rafaeldtinocofor any SRU team member, pacemaker SRU for focal (in -proposed now) has a bigger version change (2.0.3-3ubuntu3 -> 2.0.3-3ubuntu4 instead of 2.0.3-3ubuntu3 to 2.0.3-3ubuntu3.1)05:19
rafaeldtinocoand Im rebasing a new SRU on top of it.. should we drop the -proposed version and I upload it again ? Or just ignore this ?05:19
rafaeldtinococpaelzer: ^05:19
rafaeldtinoco(ill check tomorrow if someone got back on this)05:20
sil2100hm, does anyone know why secureboot-db doesn't want to start off its i386 build?07:21
sil2100Did we drop support for building any-i386 packages on LP or something?07:21
sil2100cjwatson: ^ do you know?07:22
sil2100wgrant: hello! Maybe you know by any chance: did anything change recently in LP or in the infra that we no longer build 'any-i386' packages?07:24
sil2100Trying to figure out why secureboot-db didn't build i386 binaries, since it does list 'any-i386' in its architecture list07:25
jibelsil2100, when do you plan to build candidates.07:31
sil2100jibel: once everything we need migrates, snapd and secureboot-db didn't yet07:32
jibelsil2100, ETA?07:33
sil2100snapd hopefully will migrate after the test-re-run I did against new secureboot-db, but the latter I need someone to tell me why the any-i386 package hasn't been built07:37
sil2100Wonder if we should not care and simply remove any-i386 from the arch list07:40
wgrantsil2100: That isn't just focal/groovy having the i386 whitelist in place?07:47
sil2100wgrant: oh, might be - do you know how this whitelist is managed? Since usually I leave this to Steve07:49
sil2100Is it via the seeds?07:50
sil2100Ok, I see it!07:54
sil2100wgrant: thanks!07:56
apwsil2100, it it not a package-set ... there is a tool in ubuntu-archive-tools to manage it isn't there ?08:01
sil2100Thought I'm really thinking of just removing the i386 old binaries, since hm, do we need it on ie86?08:01
sil2100I can't think of a reason why we'd need secureboot-db for i386 right now08:02
sil2100apw: what do you think?08:02
apwhow did we end up with i386 binaries in the first place?08:03
sil2100I guess from eoan08:04
apwwe had them in bionic, then they went away in focal, then they came back in groovy; which seems anomonlus08:04
sil2100Since the current release pocket version was last built on eoan, and there we still had i38608:04
apwno they are versioned at focal's level; oh perhaps they came back in the copy from focal -> groovy when groovy was opened -- that rings a bell that the copy brings them back08:05
apwbut, i'd say if focal-release didn't need them you are on good footing claiming the same in groovy-release08:05
apwso based on that i would be +1 on removing them08:06
apwsil2100, ok confirmed we copied this into focal from eoan with i386 binaries and then removed them; the copy from eoan to focal would have copied them back in.  They can be removed.08:09
sil2100apw: thanks for confirming! In progress of removing08:10
sil2100apw: ok, done, hopefully this will make things move08:10
tseliotsil2100, ok, I have just re-uploaded ubuntu-drivers-common08:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (groovy-proposed/main) [1: => 1:] (desktop-core)08:23
LocutusOfBorghello, we are close to release, and a simple haskell installation on ppa fails...08:32
LocutusOfBorgdid ghc broke?08:32
LocutusOfBorgsame for amd64 https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/2016472508:33
LocutusOfBorgdamn my bad08:34
* LocutusOfBorg had a ghc 8.8.4 rebuild on that ppa, to test why armhf was so slow in building08:35
* enyc meows08:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.9 (focal-proposed/universe) [3.9.0-1~20.04 => 3.9.0-5~20.04] (i386-whitelist)08:46
jamespagemorning rbasak08:57
jamespagewondering whether you might have cycles to push the SRU buttons for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/189510108:57
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1895101 in openvswitch (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] openvswitch 2.13.1" [High,Fix committed]08:57
jamespagethat resolves a slight nasty openstack/ovs issue08:57
seb128Laney, is bug #1900471 the same issue you had when upgrading? if so that's 3 reports now, could be a release issue?09:04
ubot5bug 1900471 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "System with SecureBoot enabled do not boot after do-release-upgrade from Focal to Groovy " [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190047109:04
Laneycould be, sil2100 was just talking about that09:05
Laneyseb128: I think Ɓukasz is going to work on a release upgrader quirk thing for that bug09:10
seb128Laney, thx09:11
Laneymy one is bug #1898729 which the fix is to add that Protected flag to some packages, probably not to groovy though09:11
ubot5bug 1898729 in shim (Ubuntu Groovy) "shim can end up being removed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189872909:11
Laneyjuliank: ^- any thoughts though?09:11
juliankLaney: same thing09:12
juliankLaney: groovy needs (wants) Protected, the older need XB-Important in debian/control09:12
juliankProtected being the new standardized field name and XB-Important (which becomes Important in the deb) being the apt-only hack09:13
juliankArguably, should set both09:13
juliankfor a transitional period09:13
Laneyany interest in working on something for groovy release / 0-day? ;-)09:14
juliankIt doesn't matter in which release the flag is set, as long as it is set in one of them you have in sources.list (so arguably the version you update too)09:14
juliankLaney: Well I could upload it, it's just adding two lines to debian/control after all09:15
juliankOh yes I definitely need XB-Important: yes, so that focal's apt understands it on upgrades09:17
sil2100juliank: hm hm, could you prep those for groovy then?09:34
sil2100At least for shim*09:34
julianksil2100: Yeah, we just need top-level shim-signed really09:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruamel.yaml [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.16.12-2]09:43
juliankOh hmm, I'll just set the old field only that's safer10:09
juliankwell no nonsense10:09
juliankWith the new protected field, if you upgrade dpkg first, and then try to remove shim-signed with old apt and new dpkg, it will fail10:10
juliankwhich is fine, since we're not removing it anymore automatically10:10
juliankbut you get like double protection against removal if you end up with a half-upgrade10:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (groovy-proposed/main) [1.43 => 1.44] (core)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:17
julianksil2100: ^ there is a shim-signed10:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opendht (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.1.4-1 => 2.1.6-1] (no packageset) (sync)10:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opendht [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.6-1]10:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] (20201020) has been added10:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.44]10:40
juliankThe following packages will be REMOVED:10:46
juliank  shim-signed10:46
juliankWARNING: The following essential packages will be removed.10:46
juliankThis should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!10:46
juliank  shim-signed10:46
juliank0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.10:46
juliankAfter this operation, 2.734 kB disk space will be freed.10:46
juliankYou are about to do something potentially harmful.10:46
juliankTo continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'10:46
juliank ?]10:46
juliankThis looks good to me10:46
juliankIt also does not get marked as ?garbage anymore, because Protected is part of the root set of the garbage collector10:48
juliank?garbage being the autoremovable set of packages10:48
juliankso this should all communicate well to the frontends10:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Groovy Final] (20201020.1) has been added11:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Groovy Final] (20201020.1) has been added11:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ring [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1] (no packageset)11:12
seb128sil2100, I was reading https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-20-10-release-status-tracking/18647/311:23
seb128:heavy_check_mark: [sil2100] NonLanguagePackTranslationDeadline , ensure uploads with updated translations downloaded from Rosetta are done for:11:23
seb128but the slideshow didn't get an upload11:23
seb128gfxboot-theme-ubuntu is deprecated and should probably be removed from that list?11:23
seb128the checkbox status seems a bit incurrate there?11:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ring [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1] (no packageset)11:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ring [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1] (no packageset)11:33
sil2100seb128: oh, true! I checked the checkbox since I saw a new ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu for groovy pushed last week and probably assumed it had updated translations, as this made sense11:41
sil2100I should have double checked11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ring [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1] (no packageset)11:46
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, can we remove giac on s390x, and hint sagetex on arm64 ppc64el s390x? sagemath is not built there anymore, so the test obviously fail...11:48
LocutusOfBorggiac FTBFS on ppc64el and s390x also in Debian and sagemath is the only reverse-deps11:48
Laneysil2100: so, rebuild of the slideshow for translations?11:53
Laneybut strings didn't change right, so depends if there are many/enough new ones?11:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ring [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1] (no packageset)11:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1]12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1]12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1]12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1]12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ring [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [20191214.1.07edb5e~ds1-1]12:06
bdmurraytsimonq2: Does https://ubuntu.com/download/flavours need to mention the desktop environment Lubuntu used to use?12:15
tsimonq2bdmurray: Good point. I would say yes until April 2021 since we technically still support LXDE in 18.04 for that long.12:19
tsimonq2On the other hand, it's nearing EOL so maybe it should be reworded...12:20
rbalintubuntu-archive: please promote https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-guest-agent/+bug/189192912:47
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1891929 in google-guest-agent (Ubuntu) "[MIR] google-guest-agent" [Undecided,Fix committed]12:47
didrocks999rbalint: done12:54
=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks
rbalintdidrocks, thanks!12:55
sil2100Laney: ok, checked ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu and I'd recommend not to respin for it - we didn't change anything in the strings + the translation updates seem rather minimal13:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Groovy Final] (20201020.1) has been added13:13
sil2100Though it's a bit of a guesswork, since the LP export changed wrapping of some strings and the diff is big because of it13:13
sil2100plars: hey! Once you're around, we have just built the first set of raspi rc images: both server and desktop!13:16
sil2100Testing would be appreciated13:16
seb128sil2100, Laney , unsure if that's useful input for you guys, but I'm +1 for not blocking on slideshow translations, we didn't have english strings changes this cycle13:18
plarssil2100: I saw, I'll take a look today13:23
Laneysil2100: seb128: ok, merci for having a look13:30
LaneyI know we didn't have changes in English but we might have had improvements to the existing strings, but fine if it's checked and acked13:30
sil2100I have the package prepped in case we respin the world13:30
teward> in case we respin the world13:37
tewardsil2100: if that's needed we have a bigger problem :P13:37
Laneyjuliank: don't suppose you would be able to construct a test case for your shim-signed and verify it would you? like install that version which got removed in focal that it seems mclemenceau had13:38
tseliotsil2100, hey, does the new ubuntu-drivers-common look ok now?13:39
Laneyit was me that rejected that tseliot13:39
Laneyand we'll look at it, will be an SRU anyway so :>13:40
tseliotLaney, oh, ok13:40
sil2100Yeah, I just poked about the cruft, it was Laney that was the rejector!13:41
sil2100plars: do you have a list of tests you run through raspi desktop images?13:49
bdmurrayrafaeldtinoco: regarding pacemaker versioning if you were to switch to ubuntu3.1 or ubuntu3.2 that would be a version number less than the current one in -proposed so anybody who had installed ubuntu4 would not upgrade to ubuntu3.1. So I'd just keep on with the current versioning scheme.13:49
rafaeldtinocobdmurray: what about my next SRU13:50
sil2100plars: since one test-case that would be good to always run is checking if the /swapfile swap file is working13:50
rafaeldtinocobdmurray: should I do +1 or +0.1 ?13:50
plarssil2100: I don't have that one, but it would be good to add to the iso tracker. I think in the past, there was no automatic swap created on the raspi server images though. Are you saying there should be now?13:51
bdmurrayrafaeldtinoco: well I guess +0.1 would look nicer but either is fine with me.13:51
waveformplars, not on server, but on the desktop image13:52
rafaeldtinocobdmurray: thanks a lot for checking this. d13:52
plarsah, ok. That makes more sense :)13:52
sil2100plars: we create one for desktop only now ;)13:52
waveform(on the 4Gb model, the desktop, or more precisely just about any web-browser, pushes it to swap pretty quickly :)13:52
plarsyeah, no doubt. I'll make sure to include it when I look at the desktop image13:52
rbasakjamespage: sorry I'm off this week13:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (bionic-proposed/universe) [20190801-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 20190801-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] (ubuntu-cloud)14:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20190801-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 20190801-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] (ubuntu-cloud)14:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: google-compute-engine-oslogin (focal-proposed/primary) [20200925.00-0ubuntu3~20.04.0]14:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (focal-proposed/main) [20190801-0ubuntu4.1 => 20190801-0ubuntu4.2] (core, ubuntu-cloud)14:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: google-compute-engine-oslogin (xenial-proposed/primary) [20200925.00-0ubuntu3~16.04.0]14:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: google-compute-engine-oslogin (bionic-proposed/primary) [20200925.00-0ubuntu3~18.04.0]14:15
rbalintRAOF, bdmurray  please accept those ^, the they should migrate soon in groovy, too14:16
juliankLaney: Install shim-signed in chroot, mark as auto, upgrade to groovy?14:50
juliankDoes that make sense?14:50
Laneysure, if that triggers the bug!14:50
juliankI just marked shim-signed as auto on my groovy system, installed the new shim and it was no longer auto-removable (and triggered that prompt if you manually removed it)14:50
julianklet's see what charmed-lamb has to say14:51
Laney[slight status update] rpi desktop images, and subiquity images will be respun to fix a couple of buglets14:52
juliankI sometimes hate myself14:58
juliankmount -t tmpfs tmpfs /boot/efi # hack around check15:01
Trevinhobdmurray: please can you check the focal SRU for  gnome-shell-extension-appindicator? It's waiting for some time now but it addresses various bad problems15:14
juliankLaney: test case is good15:15
Laneycan you write in the bug please?15:15
juliankI did update it15:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (groovy-proposed/main) [2.693 => 2.694] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)15:28
plarssil2100: waveform: looks like /swapfile is there, but it's not activated: "swapon: /swapfile: skipping - it appears to have holes."15:33
=== Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Focal 20.04.1, Bionic 18.04.5 | Archive: Final Freeze | Track the status of the Groovy release: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-20-10-release-status-tracking/18647 | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Groovy Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis
vorlonbdmurray: ah can we halt phasing on secureboot-db if we haven't already?15:56
rbalintplars, LP: #189272815:57
ubot5Launchpad bug 1892728 in linux (Ubuntu Groovy) "ec2-hibinit-agent needs to properly initialize swap file" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189272815:57
rbalintubuntu-archive could you please let gce-compute-image-packages and google-compute-engine-oslogin migrate to groovy together?15:58
waveformplars, yes apparently ubuntu-image is converting a perfectly good, unholey swapfile into a rather more holey one; sil2100 is looking into it15:58
bdmurrayvorlon: for which release?15:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-appindicator [source] (focal-proposed) [33.1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]16:00
vorlonbdmurray: focal16:00
vorlonrbalint: hinting16:00
plarswaveform: sil2100 is making swap more evil, got it. I'll check again after, thanks!16:00
rbalintvorlon, thanks, i'm not sure why they are not tried together16:01
vorlonrbalint: me either, a hint should show us better why16:01
bdmurrayvorlon: its not phasing afaik so no?16:01
vorlonbdmurray: not phasing> so it finished phasing already?16:01
vorlonI guess it's been almost 30 days :P16:02
vorlonwell anyway, the intent is to roll the SRU back entirely for now, so I'll just do that16:03
Trevinhobdmurray: thanks :)16:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.694]16:14
vorlonLaney: uh.  do you know why old-releases.ubuntu.com has synced content from the old-images directory instead of the old-releases directory?16:22
vorlonhmm or maybe something else16:24
vorlonbut http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/xubuntu/releases/ has contents not on the source16:24
vorlon(and there happen to be a set of matching directories in the old-images directory... but without contents)16:25
bdmurraytseliot: because it'll be an SRU the bug will need SRU information16:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hedgewars (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-12 => 1.0.0-13] (no packageset) (sync)16:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hedgewars [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.0-13]16:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libclass-load-xs-perl (groovy-release/universe) [0.10-1build5 => 0.10-1build5] (ubuntukylin) (sync)17:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libmoose-perl (groovy-release/universe) [2.2013-1 => 2.2013-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync)17:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpackage-stash-xs-perl (groovy-release/main) [0.29-1build2 => 0.29-1build2] (core) (sync)17:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libclass-load-xs-perl (groovy-release/universe) [0.10-1build5 => 0.10-1build5] (ubuntukylin) (sync)17:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201020.1)17:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201020.1)17:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201020.1)17:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201020.1)17:44
coreycbhello, can an archive admin promote python3-octavia-lib to main? that will unblock ovn-octavia-provider from groovy-proposed. the corresponding MIR has received a security team ack. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186466617:45
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1864666 in python-octavia-lib (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-octavia-lib, ovn-octavia-provider" [Medium,Fix committed]17:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (groovy-proposed/main) [1.10+20.10ubuntu1 => 1.10+20.10ubuntu2] (desktop-core)17:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-image [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.10+20.10ubuntu2]18:01
xnoxLaney:  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1900754 doesn't look nice18:04
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1900754 in gdm3 (Ubuntu) "gdm is having crashes in livesession?" [Undecided,New]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (groovy-proposed/main) [1.10+20.10ubuntu1 => 1.10+20.10ubuntu2] (desktop-core)18:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: conserver (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [8.2.4-2 => 8.2.4-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)18:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted conserver [source] (groovy-proposed) [8.2.4-2ubuntu1]18:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: conserver (focal-proposed/multiverse) [8.2.4-2 => 8.2.4-2ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)18:22
sil2100vorlon: ok, ubuntu-image that's in the queue should be good ^18:24
sil2100vorlon: I'd appreciate a review!18:24
vorlonsil2100: there is an added diffcov.html file that ended up in your debdiff, presumably something not cleaned up by debian/rules clean?  I'll ignore it for review18:24
sil2100Oh, was there? Darn, thought I cleaned it all up18:24
sil2100This one will be better, I swear18:26
sil2100Rejecting the old one18:26
vorlonsil2100: hnngh I don't love the interfaces here, assuming that there is a file named 'swapfile' and that if it's there we should desparsify it18:26
vorlonsil2100: nooooo18:26
vorlonI said I was ignoring it for review :)18:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-image [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.10+20.10ubuntu2]18:27
* sil2100 trigger-happy18:27
vorlonsil2100: accepted from rejected18:27
vorlonso that I can go afk again for a bit ;P18:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (groovy-proposed/main) [1.10+20.10ubuntu1 => 1.10+20.10ubuntu2] (desktop-core)18:27
sil2100hah, thanks!18:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-image [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.10+20.10ubuntu2]18:29
sil2100I already tested it locally with some dummy rootfses, but once this builds in -proposed I'll kick a real livefs proposed enabled build on my private livefs builder to see if everything ticks with the final raspi desktop image18:32
sil2100Since we anyway need to wait for this to migrate18:32
sil2100I'll unblock it if you didn't yet18:32
mitya57Hi, please consider letting metacity migrate to -release, it is a small fix for users upgrading from previous releases (Debian #972316).19:03
ubot5Debian bug 972316 in metacity-common "metacity-common: conffile not removed: /etc/sgml/metacity-common.cat" [Normal,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/97231619:03
sil2100mitya57: if it's an upgrade fix then I guess it can be an SRU, right? I mean, we will try but only if we decide that we need to respin19:08
sil2100Since we have candidate images already, and we'd have to respin kylin if we accept it19:09
julianksil2100: this one candiate? http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20201020/19:16
juliank* is this one the candidate19:16
juliankI really need to get to the point where I can reinstall every 6 months as opposed to upgrading dirty systems with all sorts of local hacks :D19:17
mitya57sil2100: ah, I didn't follow closely. If it's included in built images then it can be a SRU, yes.19:18
mitya57I just don't want this fix to be completely lost :)19:18
sil2100vorlon, waveform, bdmurray, Laney: I have just ran a test livefs build of raspi desktop and I confirm (at least via rootfs inspection) that the swapfile is no longer sparse!20:09
sil2100Ok, unblocking ubuntu-image in that case20:10
sil2100juliank: yep, that's it!20:10
sil2100mitya57: we can 0-day SRU it even, I guess?20:10
sil2100I go AFK again, get some exercise20:12
mitya57sil2100: yes, please20:15
* mitya57 also AFK, for sleep20:16
vorlonsil2100: woohoo!20:26
dokolooking at https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running I see all autopkg tests running for SRUs / security updates on the "big" side. why?20:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgweather [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-1~ubuntu20.04.1]20:46
vorlondoko: the only ones I see currently in the queue are all in the 'ppa' queue?20:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-hibinit-agent (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.0-0ubuntu9 => 1.0.0-0ubuntu9.1] (no packageset)20:57
rbalintjuliank, i'd like to reinstall on every weekend, fully automatically21:01
mwhudsonanything useful i can do for release?21:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.2.0-0ubuntu1]21:08
bdmurraymwhudson: add release notey things?21:14
mwhudsonah yes21:14
bdmurrayplars: any raspi testing news?21:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clevis [source] (focal-proposed) [12-1ubuntu2.2]21:20
plarsbdmurray: yes, ok so far except for the issue mentioned on desktop with swapfile. I'll get isotracker updated today with progress so far21:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zlib [source] (focal-proposed) [1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.2]21:23
bdmurrayplars: great, thanks!21:24
vorlonbdmurray: hmm so I just noticed https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-20-10-release-status-tracking/18647 said shim-signed was for 0-day SRU, /after/ I unblocked it and it migrated; should I be rolling this back to avoid forcing respins?21:31
vorlon(rolling back)21:35
bdmurraycoreycb: bug 1894453 is missing SRU information21:36
ubot5bug 1894453 in ceph (Ubuntu) "Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189445321:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (groovy-proposed/none) [none => 1.44] (core) (sync)21:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: shim-signed (groovy-release/primary) [1.43]21:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.44]21:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted shim-signed [sync] (groovy-release) [1.43]21:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinnamon-session [source] (focal-proposed) [4.4.1-1ubuntu0.1]21:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libclass-load-xs-perl [sync] (groovy-release) [0.10-1build5]21:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libpackage-stash-xs-perl [sync] (groovy-release) [0.29-1build2]21:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libclass-load-xs-perl [sync] (groovy-release) [0.10-1build5]21:41
vorlonxnox: you never replied to my suggestion that debian-cd should grab memtest86 separately from the archive instead of via cd-boot-images-amd64; I think I would like to argue that it's not part of the bootloader at all21:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libmoose-perl [sync] (groovy-release) [2.2013-1]21:41
sil2100vorlon: I re-triggered the failing ubuntu-image amd64 test, but it's just a flaky test if anything21:43
sil2100So if it fails again, I'd opt for skiptesting it (if other arches are good) to get things moving21:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted heat [source] (focal-proposed) [1:14.1.0-0ubuntu1]21:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octavia [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.0-0ubuntu1]21:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.2.0-0ubuntu1]21:52
vorlonsil2100: I also retriggered it, so one of the two retriggers should pass ;)21:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpaste (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.36.3-1 => 3.38.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)21:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gpaste [sync] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.2-1]21:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swift [source] (focal-proposed) [2.25.1-0ubuntu1]21:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.2-1] (no packageset)21:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.2-1] (no packageset)21:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.2-1] (no packageset)21:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpaste [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.2-1]22:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpaste [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.2-1]22:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpaste [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.2-1]22:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.2-1] (no packageset)22:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted v4l2loopback [source] (focal-proposed) [0.12.3-1ubuntu0.1]22:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpaste [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.2-1]22:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpaste [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.38.2-1] (no packageset)22:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clevis [source] (bionic-proposed) [8-1ubuntu0.2]22:11
vorlonsil2100: my run passed22:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.14-dfsg-4ubuntu1.20.10.1 => 6.1.16-dfsg-1ubuntu1.20.10.1] (no packageset)22:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (groovy-proposed) [6.1.16-dfsg-1ubuntu1.20.10.1]22:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpaste [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.2-1]22:50
sil2100vorlon: will you be around to rebuild the raspi desktop images once ubuntu-image migrates?22:59
sil2100I guess we also had a fix in subiquity server?22:59
vorlonsil2100: yes23:00
vorlonsubiquity server> I know xnox said this morning that a snap has been migrated to the stable channel; did no one do the respin for that yet?23:00
sil2100Not sure, hm, I didn't hear anything at least! We might need to check the timestamps23:02
sil2100vorlon: looks like someone did23:03
sil2100So nvm that!23:03
sil2100Ok, I go to sleep now, thanks and see you tomorrow o/23:03
bdmurrayRemoving subiquity respin from the status tracking then23:12
vorlonI also confirmed that the correct revision of subiquity was shown in the build log23:23
vorlon(on amd64)23:23

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!