[00:48] <callmepk> goood morning
[05:09] <seb128> goood morning desktopers
[05:10] <duflu> Morning seb128 #firstpost
[05:11] <seb128> hey duflu , how are you?
[05:11] <seb128> ;-)
[05:11] <duflu> seb128, going OK. You?
[05:24] <jamesh> duflu: thanks for the tips of Mutter testing yesterday.  That was enough to work out how to check that Xwayland was activating on both sockets.
[05:24] <duflu> jamesh, I did hardly anything. No problem
[05:26] <jamesh> It looks like there are some people who see breaking the abstract socket support as a good thing, but hopefully they'll accept the patch
[05:29] <duflu> Yeah I know what it's like
[05:33] <duflu> jamesh, there's a red cross on the merge request because you just need to add an issue URL or MR URL to the bottom of each commit
[05:33] <duflu> -just
[05:34] <jamesh> duflu: there didn't seem to be any for other revert commits.  Would you suggest the MR's URL again, or the bug?
[05:35] <duflu> jamesh, I'm never sure so usually use both. If you prefix the issue with "Fixes: " or "Closes: " then it will get automatically closed
[05:36] <duflu> and you were probably looking at manual commits GNOME developers do without going through CI
[05:36] <jamesh> duflu: I've got the second commit saying it fixes the issue.  I didn't squash the two together to make it clear what was new.
[05:36] <seb128> duflu, I'm alright thanks
[05:37] <duflu> jamesh, ah yes the robots already noticed the bug being fixed
[05:38] <jamesh> duflu: I should have mentioned why I was reverting the commit in the message though, so it would make sense to reference the bug.  I'll do that
[06:19] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[06:27] <seb128> lut oSoMoN, comment ça va ?
[06:30] <oSoMoN> salut seb128, ça va bien, et toi?
[06:30] <seb128> ça va aussi mais va falloir marcher sous la pluie pour aller à la garderie :-)
[06:35] <oSoMoN> c’est presque aussi efficace que le café pour se réveiller
[06:51] <didrocks> good morning
[06:59] <duflu> Morning oSoMoN and didrocks 
[07:12] <didrocks> hey duflu 
[07:26] <seb128> lut didrocks , comment ça va ?
[07:27] <jibel> morning all
[07:27] <didrocks> seb128: ça va, petite nuit comme d’hab, en plus le bruit du vent (100km/h cette nuit) n’aide pas, mais la maison a tenu (moins les affaires de chantier sur le terrain par contre)
[07:27] <didrocks> hey jibel 
[07:27] <seb128> lut jibel
[07:28] <jibel> salut didrocks seb128 
[07:28] <seb128> didrocks, c'est bon alors, si le loup vient souffler ça tiendra :-)
[07:28] <didrocks> exactement :p
[07:48] <marcustomlinson> morning callmepk seb128 duflu jamesh oSoMoN didrocks jibel and other desktoppers
[07:48] <duflu> Morning marcustomlinson 
[07:49] <didrocks> hey marcustomlinson 
[07:52] <seb128> hey marcustomlinson , how are you?
[07:52] <marcustomlinson> seb128: well thanks, yourself?
[07:53] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks & jibel, good afternoon duflu, good morning marcustomlinson  
[07:58] <callmepk> hey marcustomlinson and morning/afternoon seb128 duflu jamesh oSoMoN jibel 
[07:58] <jamesh> hi marcustomlinson 
[07:58] <duflu> Afternoon callmepk 
[07:58] <oSoMoN> good afternoon callmepk 
[07:58] <seb128> hey callmepk 
[07:58] <oSoMoN> good afternoon jamesh 
[07:59] <seb128> marcustomlinson, I'm alright, having a kid home with an upset stomach though, might be another fun day...
[08:02] <Laney> yo
[08:04] <seb128> hey Laney , how are you?
[08:05] <seb128> what's the word on the candidate images?
[08:07] <Laney> hi seb128, I'm ok
[08:07] <Laney> what word are you after?
[08:07] <Laney> I don't know anything more than https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-20-10-release-status-tracking/18647
[08:08] <seb128> I saw you made some comment about swap I think, I was wondering if that meant there was some bug around swap handling found in the ISO testing
[08:08] <Laney> yes, it's referenced in that document and fixed (has a strikethrough there) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-image/+bug/1900718
[08:08] <seb128> also that topic didn't get much updates, hard to say if nothing got tested, if things are being validated and looking good so far
[08:09] <seb128> ah, I guess I didn't understand how to read the topic
[08:09] <seb128> it didn't show in recently edited on discourse and there was no new post
[08:09] <seb128> I didn't realize that it was like a wiki being edited
[08:09] <seb128> thanks
[08:09] <Laney> it's a wiki post, gets edited
[08:09] <oSoMoN> yo Laney 
[08:09] <Laney> moin oSoMoN 
[08:10] <seb128> is there an history log
[08:10] <seb128> seems like there is
[08:10] <seb128> Laney, sorry for the stupid question then
[08:10] <Laney> top right, there's a pencil thing
[08:10] <Laney> np!
[08:10] <seb128> TIL
[08:10] <seb128> :-)
[08:11] <oSoMoN> wikis are making a comeback
[08:12] <didrocks> hey Laney, oSoMoN 
[08:20] <Laney> yo didrocks!
[08:25] <seb128> there is a command that tell if a package is seeded on one of the ISO right?
[08:27] <duflu> Morning Laney 
[08:32] <Laney> seb128: yeah, seeded-in-ubuntu
[08:32] <Laney> hey duflu 
[08:33] <seb128> Laney, thanks
[08:35] <marcustomlinson> hey Laney
[08:35] <marcustomlinson> seb128: :/ hope the wee one gets better soon
[08:36] <seb128> marcustomlinson, thx!
[08:39] <Laney> hey marcustomlinson 
[09:38] <seb128> xnox, the lightdm-gtk-greeter failure you report, that was in a vm right?
[09:39] <seb128> (it does fail in boxes here, something in the libgl stack according to valgrind, but works on real hardware)
[09:41] <xnox> seb128:  yes, VM, libvirt with virtio (cirrus?) graphics.
[09:42] <seb128> k
[14:32] <Laney> I just added some super basic content to the release notes
[14:33] <Laney> more welcomed
[14:54] <hellsworth> good morning desktopers
[14:54] <oSoMoN> good morning hellsworth 
[14:55] <hellsworth> hey there oSoMoN 
[14:58] <Trevinho> jibel: I've tried again that nvidia machine, however I'm not getting the nvidia driver loaded on reboot, I thinkk it's because I?m egtting some errors about the kernel Lockdown... But it's weird as I've set the password and I put in during reboot, any advice?
[14:59] <jibel> xnox, ^ any advice?
[14:59] <jibel> Trevinho, and you selected to install 3rd party drivers in ubiquity?
[14:59] <Trevinho> yes, and gave my pw...
[15:00] <xnox> Trevinho:  no mok; nor pw should be needed for nvidia
[15:00] <Trevinho> i've the nvidia stuff installed, but not running as the module doesn't load
[15:00] <xnox> Trevinho:  matching lrm should be installed for nvidia; which should be signed by the right key.....
[15:00] <Trevinho> eh, it's not the case  i  think
[15:01] <xnox> Trevinho:  can you please open the bug report against ubiquity with $ ubuntu-bug ubiquity => such that we can check the logs of what got installed
[15:01] <Trevinho> xnox: can I check the driver key?
[15:01] <xnox> Trevinho:  btw, was it offline install? 
[15:01] <xnox> Trevinho:  yes $ modinfo <name of th driver> should tell you which key has been used to sign a module
[15:02] <Trevinho> xnox: nope, not this time, but last week I was getting it working with both online and offline
[15:02] <xnox> cool.
[15:02] <xnox> $ ubuntu-bug ubiquity => please such that i can munch on the logs =)
[15:02] <Trevinho> xnox: can I pass that info so you can check the signature?
[15:02] <Trevinho> ah ok
[15:03] <Trevinho> xnox: want me to retry with an offline install first?
[15:03] <xnox> assuming you can do that =) and have enough graphics to complete that.
[15:03] <Trevinho> I disable the updates thjugh
[15:03] <xnox> Trevinho:  nah, no need.
[15:06] <marcustomlinson> hey hellsworth
[15:07] <hellsworth> hey there marcustomlinson 
[15:09] <jibel> Good morning hellsworth 
[15:11] <hellsworth> hi jibel :)
[15:15] <Trevinho> xnox: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1900865
[15:17] <Trevinho> not sure you also want the full dmesg for the reboot session
[15:24] <Laney> Trevinho: you should try the latest iso ;-)
[15:25] <Laney> BUT I think you did find a bug
[15:26] <seb128> shrug, that lightdm-gtk-greeter thing doesn't make much sense, the greeter log on the livecd has
[15:26] <seb128> Failed to load module: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gio/modules/libgvfsdbus.so
[15:26] <seb128> libgvfscommon.so: failed to map segment from shared object
[15:27] <seb128> also installing focal on a vm and updating systemd makes it unhappy
[15:27] <seb128> but on different error
[15:27] <seb128> gdbus thread error
[15:30] <jibel> Thanks Trevinho, efficient contribution :)
[15:31] <Trevinho> Laney: well the only difference was libfreetype iirc no?
[15:31] <Trevinho> libfontconfig o something like that, so...
[15:31] <jibel> shim-signed too
[15:31] <Trevinho> ah ok :P that could change things
[15:32] <Trevinho> well, I repeated with the iso test I did yesterday so let me know if you want one more
[15:32] <Trevinho> with latest
[15:33] <jibel> sure, once there is a new wiouth without nvidia-455
[15:33] <jibel> new image*
[15:36] <Trevinho> feels important https://i.imgur.com/TZjnB5B.png :P
[15:37] <Trevinho> ping me when needed
[15:44] <seb128> it works fine on real hardware, which is even stranger...
[15:44] <seb128> why would those 'failed to map segment from shared object' be different on virtual?
[16:10] <Laney> Trevinho: try again with 20201021.1 please?
[16:10] <jibel> Trevinho, can you sync 20201021.1 and try again?
[16:10] <Trevinho> ok
[16:11] <Laney> I WON!
[16:26] <Trevinho> net or not net?
[16:26]  * Trevinho will go without, as typing the coworking password is annoying enough :D
[16:26] <jibel> tell me which one you do and I'll do the over
[16:26] <jibel> other*
[16:27] <jibel> k, I'll do net
[16:33] <Trevinho> those XDG_RUNTIME_DIR warnings are nothing important, right?
[16:35] <jibel> it's important but never fixed, it's because ubiquity spends its time raising and dropping privileges
[16:35] <jibel> so it tries to use xdg_runtime_dir from the other user
[16:37] <Trevinho> not sure I should ever work much on installer myself as I'm totally affected by the "Progressbar watching disease"
[16:38] <jibel> what it that?
[16:39] <Trevinho> ahaha, maybe it's just me, but when there's a progress bar I can't stop stearing at it :D
[16:39] <jibel> lol
[16:39] <Trevinho> spinners are somewhat better, as I don't hope for an end...
[16:39] <jibel> hopefully I am not affected
[16:40] <jibel> imagine if I would. I roughly submitted 7800 results to the tracker, 10min/install that's a lot of minutes watching progress bards
[16:40] <jibel> bars*
[16:41] <jibel> roughly 53 days, 24h a day
[16:41] <jibel> lol
[16:45] <Trevinho> damn I assume http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/groovy-desktop-amd64.iso.zsync is not updated right? I was looking at the timestaps, intead of the SUMS... [/me redoing]
[17:07] <oSoMoN> kenvandine, have you seen that I submitted a couple of merge requests against gtk-common-themes?
[17:12] <oSoMoN> !26 is the important one, !27 is mostly cosmetics
[17:43] <Laney> Trevinho: use the dated directories at this point, not those symlinks
[17:44] <Trevinho> Laney: yeah, it's installing now 
[17:45] <Laney> goOOOOOOOOOOOd
[17:51] <Laney> but jibel says it worked so I'm confident enough :>
[17:53] <Trevinho> aaaand... no drivers installed :o, and I *did* select to install them.. unless I'm stupid, but I've been asked for the password so...
[17:53] <Trevinho> where was it the install log?
[17:53] <Trevinho> ah I remember
[17:54] <Trevinho> Laney: so without network it still fails
[17:55] <Trevinho> as it tries to install 455 and they're not available....
[17:55] <Laney> you got the wrong image
[17:55] <Trevinho> No...
[17:55] <Laney> 455 is removed from the new one completely
[17:55] <Laney> no trace of it
[17:56] <Trevinho> Laney: this is with http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20201021.1/groovy-desktop-amd64.iso.zsync
[17:56] <Trevinho> Laney: something changed, as before I was getting the wrong driver installed
[17:56] <Trevinho> now NO driver installed
[17:57]  * Trevinho connects...
[17:57] <Laney> pastebin the syslog?
[17:58] <Trevinho> Laney: yeah, I'm on it
[17:58] <Laney> and what does ubuntu-drivers list say?
[18:01] <Trevinho> Laney: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/XyMwBxtMG7/ see around line 2294
[18:01] <Trevinho> Laney: well, now it may say things, but before network was just blank
[18:01] <Trevinho> ok, on list no 455
[18:03] <Trevinho> and yes it was 20201021.1
[18:05] <Laney> what is in that file
[18:05] <Laney> /run/ubuntu-drivers.autoinstall or something like that
[18:05] <Trevinho> Laney: connected?
[18:05] <Trevinho> ah, ok sorry
[18:05] <Trevinho> I read run...
[18:06] <Trevinho> it's just a content :D
[18:06] <Trevinho> Laney: I've not that
[18:07] <Laney> scripts/simple-plugins:    ubuntu-drivers install $FREEONLY $NOOEM --package-list /run/ubuntu-drivers.autoinstall || \
[18:07] <Laney> this thing
[18:08] <Laney> that's where ubuntu-drivers records what it needs to install
[18:09] <Trevinho> not sure if some other needed log may have been attached, but I've opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1900888
[18:09] <Laney> I dunno what's going on, I'm looking in this iso and there is no mention of 455 anywhere 
[18:22] <kenvandine> Os
[18:22] <kenvandine> oSoMoN: yeah, I'll look tomorrow, off today
[18:24] <Trevinho> Laney: bah, I don't have that file neither during install...
[18:24] <Laney> lol
[18:24] <Laney> Trevinho: I think we see what the problem is
[18:24] <Laney> we didn't respin the images hard enough
[18:26] <Laney> merci for the testing!
[18:26] <Trevinho> de nada
[18:28] <oSoMoN> kenvandine, oh, enjoy the day off then!
[18:29] <kenvandine> Enjoy is a stretch, digging up my old flower bed to make room for new stuff.  
[18:30] <Laney> that sounds GREAT!