| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ncbi-blast+ (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.10.1-2 => 2.10.1-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 00:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ncbi-blast+ [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.10.1-3] | 00:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-biopython (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.77+dfsg-3 => 1.78+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 00:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-biopython [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.78+dfsg-3] | 00:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201020.2) | 00:14 | |
| vorlon | ^^ arm64+raspi successfully rebuilt and ready for testing | 00:27 |
|---|---|---|
| amurray | hmm so I accidentally published this freetype update to groovy-security - should that go to release or is it fine to sit in -security since we are so close to release? | 00:29 |
| bdmurray | given that it is seeded on most live media and we are so close to release I think letting it sit there is best | 03:30 |
| plars | swapfile seems to work fine now on pi-desktop | 03:47 |
| amurray | bdmurray: ok no worries | 04:10 |
| === Ukikie is now known as MrDark | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.14-2 => 6.1.16-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 05:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [sync] (groovy-proposed) [6.1.16-1] | 05:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.14-dfsg-4 => 6.1.16-dfsg-1~build1] (ubuntu-cloud) | 06:23 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | sigh ^^ | 06:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | if possible to grab the 6.1.16-dfsg-1 from sid even better :( | 06:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | there are few fixes in 3d host/guest and kernel side... | 06:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | we really should have them | 06:39 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 07:04 |
| === didrocks999 is now known as didrocks | ||
| seb128 | I've uploaded a language-pack-he fix, the change is a gnome-desktop translation update to fix the clock being inverted in hebrew (https://launchpadlibrarian.net/502434781/%D7%A6%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%9D%20%D7%9E%D7%A1%D7%9A%20%D7%9E%D6%BE2020-10-17%2018-59-26.png) | 08:27 |
| seb128 | (I basically copie the fix from -base with the fix from https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-desktop/-/commit/4db3e5d9 applied on top) | 08:27 |
| seb128 | it might be something nice to fix in the release, unsure if that langpack is on any ISO, otherwise 0 day SRU | 08:28 |
| seb128 | hum also unsure why the bot didn't pick up the upload | 08:28 |
| seb128 | but I also didn't get an email for it (but it's in the queue so it worked) | 08:28 |
| seb128 | probably some issue on the launchpad side of things? | 08:28 |
| handsome_feng | Hi, Is it possible for someone in ubiquity-slideshow team to review this before groovy release: https://code.launchpad.net/~feng-kylin/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/ubuntukylin-groovy/+merge/391419 ? It only affect two strings. | 08:29 |
| seb128 | handsome_feng, I could merge and upload, but I'm unsure the release team are wanting to accept an update to that package since it would mean respinning ISOs | 08:30 |
| seb128 | also it would invalid translations | 08:31 |
| seb128 | I'm not in the release team though so I'm going to let them +1 or -1, just feel free to ping me in you needed an uploader | 08:31 |
| handsome_feng | seb128: Thanks! So, hi, release team, what your opinion? And If we can't make it to this release, can I update this after release by SRU? | 08:35 |
| seb128 | handsome_feng, there is no much point updating the installer slides in a SRU since they are only shown on the ISO... | 08:37 |
| handsome_feng | Okay, Got it. :( | 08:38 |
| handsome_feng | seb128: BTW, Do you know how can I join the ubiquity-slideshow team? I sent an email, but no response yet. | 08:41 |
| seb128 | handsome_feng, no idea sorry | 08:41 |
| handsome_feng | seb128: Thank you anyway! | 08:42 |
| Laney | we probably need a new administrator for that ... https://launchpad.net/~ubiquity-slideshow/+members | 08:43 |
| Laney | does anybody know that person? | 08:43 |
| Laney | handsome_feng: it would mean rebuilding all of the ISOs that have the slideshow on, which is not planned this late, but we can pick it up if we need to do a respin for another reason | 08:48 |
| handsome_feng | Laney: That's fine, thank you very much! | 08:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (groovy-proposed/main) [1:13.99.2-1ubuntu1 => 1:13.99.2-1ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 08:49 | |
| Laney | sorry for missing it, I know I don't get emails for reviews on this project (: | 08:49 |
| Laney | :(* | 08:49 |
| juliank | Hey folks, we have a regression in shim-signed in groovy that breaks multi-esp installs (supported by subiquity) and DKMS modules - 1.41 never included the changes from 1.40.* which fixed those | 08:51 |
| juliank | Because 1.41 was earlier than 1.40.x due to the shim revert | 08:51 |
| juliank | so we reverted focal from 1.41 to 1.40 and kept going, but groovy continued on with 1.41, and lost all changes from focal | 08:52 |
| juliank | Pass --timeout -1 to mokutil in a separate mokutil run (LP: #1869187) | 08:52 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1869187 in shim-signed (Ubuntu Groovy) "mokutil ignores timeout parameter" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1869187 | 08:52 |
| juliank | Install grub to multiple ESPs (LP: #1871821) | 08:52 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1871821 in shim-signed (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Resilient boot" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1871821 | 08:52 |
| juliank | Depend on the correct version of grub-signed (LP: #1871895) | 08:52 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1871895 in shim-signed (Ubuntu Focal) "package shim-signed 1.40.2+15+1533136590.3beb971-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote shim-signed, o script post-installation retornou erro do status de saída 127" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1871895 | 08:52 |
| juliank | So, I'd just merge the focal branch into groovy and copy the changelog entries with the relevant bug numbers for groovy to the top entry | 08:55 |
| juliank | But does this need a respin after? | 08:55 |
| juliank | I don't know | 08:56 |
| juliank | should it be 0day sru? | 08:56 |
| juliank | If it's a 0day SRU, chances are subiquity multiple ESP installs are broken, though not sure | 08:56 |
| juliank | probably it's fine | 08:56 |
| Laney | juliank: We need it on the media I think, ubiquity can integrate with this | 08:58 |
| juliank | on it | 08:58 |
| handsome_feng | Laney: It's my fault, I just sent the email yesterday, I should have been on the irc earlier. | 08:58 |
| Laney | handsome_feng: looks like you might be lucky ;-) | 08:59 |
| handsome_feng | \o/ | 08:59 |
| juliank | Laney: uploaded | 09:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (groovy-proposed/main) [1.44 => 1.45] (core) | 09:05 | |
| juliank | I only have myself to blame :/ | 09:05 |
| juliank | I'd mark bug 1899678 as a duplicate of bug 1869187 | 09:06 |
| ubot5 | bug 1899678 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "No wifi after installation - does not work with secure boot enabled" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1899678 | 09:06 |
| ubot5 | bug 1869187 in mokutil (Ubuntu Groovy) "mokutil ignores timeout parameter" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1869187 | 09:06 |
| juliank | But oh well, we don't know for sure it's the same bug, but it's very unlikely to be not | 09:07 |
| juliank | :D | 09:07 |
| handsome_feng | seb128: Hi, Could you merge and upload the changes? Since we get a chance that all the iso might be respin. | 09:09 |
| seb128 | handsome_feng, k | 09:13 |
| handsome_feng | <& | 09:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.45] | 09:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (groovy-proposed/main) [162 => 163] (ubuntu-desktop) | 09:19 | |
| seb128 | Laney, handsome_feng ^ | 09:20 |
| Laney | thank you! | 09:20 |
| seb128 | np! | 09:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (groovy-proposed) [163] | 09:23 | |
| handsome_feng | Thank you, guys. \o/ | 09:27 |
| sil2100 | yw! | 09:30 |
| seb128 | handsome_feng, you are going to have those strings in english and not chinese though, I guess that's ok? | 09:32 |
| seb128 | handsome_feng, if you want to avoid that issue next time you can update the zh translation in the same merge request at least | 09:32 |
| handsome_feng | It's ok! It's better than wrong strings | 09:32 |
| seb128 | right | 09:33 |
| handsome_feng | seb128: Got it! I didn't update the zh translation this time because those would been overwritten by the translation on launchpad. | 09:35 |
| seb128 | handsome_feng, on the next export manually imported right? if would have been enough for that upload as a temporary thing | 09:36 |
| seb128 | you should still do translate on launchpad as well in those cases | 09:36 |
| handsome_feng | OK | 09:38 |
| seb128 | whoever is maintaining https://xubuntu.org/release/20-04/ , the torrent url needs to be updated for .1 , it's currently a notfound | 09:45 |
| seb128 | I should probably mention that on #xubuntu | 09:46 |
| juliank | Laney: I just realized I never uploaded the apt that changed focal to groovy in the docs | 09:53 |
| juliank | which people will get angry about | 09:54 |
| Laney | hm? | 09:54 |
| juliank | Laney: The docs and example sources.list say focal but should say groovy | 09:54 |
| juliank | Laney: And customers copy those examples into their sources.list and break their systems :D | 09:55 |
| sil2100 | Is that an apt upload then? | 09:56 |
| juliank | So I'm releasing 2.1.11 now which has that change, a "fix" for LP#1871268 (turns error into warning), a typo fix and a translation update | 09:56 |
| juliank | But I think we can SRU that | 09:56 |
| juliank | It doesn't have to be in the release pocket | 09:56 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, apt feels like not the best thing right now | 09:57 |
| sil2100 | So +1 on SRUing | 09:57 |
| juliank | Do we want SRU bugs for them all, or given that the other is just small stuff, are we fine just using bug 1871268? | 09:57 |
| ubot5 | bug 1871268 in apt (Ubuntu) "Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 | 09:57 |
| juliank | I don't think we need an SRU bug for the translation update, the typo fix and the s/focal/groovy/ | 09:59 |
| juliank | Seems like a waste of paperwork :) | 09:59 |
| juliank | oh ffs | 10:10 |
| juliank | I typed in launchpad for 10 or 20 mins and hit a wrong key combo and it's all gone | 10:11 |
| juliank | Oh I hit Esc | 10:11 |
| juliank | Because I mapped CapsLock to Esc | 10:11 |
| sil2100 | juliank: I guess maybe all in one SRU bug? Since it's nice to have something for tracking at least | 10:18 |
| juliank | sil2100: I've added SRU info about squashed changes to bug 1871268 in a [Groovy SRU] section | 10:18 |
| ubot5 | bug 1871268 in apt (Ubuntu Focal) "Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 | 10:18 |
| juliank | Someone ought to add this to beta testing | 10:20 |
| juliank | "Check that /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list points to the correct Ubuntu release" | 10:20 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 10:23 |
| juliank | fakesynced it for reviewability :) | 10:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (groovy-proposed/main) [2.1.10 => 2.1.11] (core, i386-whitelist) | 10:26 | |
| juliank | groovy will be tracking unstable for a bit, but it's not clear for how long | 10:29 |
| juliank | at some point we'll have changes not worth SRUing | 10:29 |
| Laney | sil2100: good to respin now I think | 11:24 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 11:31 |
| sil2100 | SPINNING | 11:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, is it possible to accept virtualbox, seeded in ubuntu-cloud? | 11:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I know its meh :/ | 11:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but the new release fixes some 3d acceleration issues and resize screen that we should have in the iso, if there | 11:50 |
| juliank | new upstream releases? that sounds like a lot | 11:55 |
| juliank | sounds more like an SRU to me | 11:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the diff is trivial, kernel fixes, 3d fixes, patches merged, end | 11:57 |
| Laney | in the iso, why? | 11:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | oh, virtualbox is not part of the iso anymore, right? | 11:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | because that "(ubuntu-cloud)" means nothing, wrt respins? | 11:59 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (this is a mistake I do exactly twice a year :p ) | 11:59 |
| Laney | it's a packageset | 11:59 |
| Laney | but I'm thinking SRU still, no time to fix any regressions if you introduce them with this | 12:01 |
| Laney | and after final freeze basically everything should be SRU-level anyway | 12:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mmm but the guest-additions is already migrated, as well as the -hwe | 12:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, we are left with vbox and the ext-pack, but we will have inconsistencies between host and guest... | 12:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021) | 12:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021) | 12:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021) | 12:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021) | 12:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021) | 12:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021) | 12:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021) | 12:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021) | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021) | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021) | 12:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021) | 12:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021) | 12:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (bionic-proposed/main) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.32 => 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.33] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.46 => 1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.47] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.2-3ubuntu6.7 => 1:4.2-3ubuntu6.8] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 12:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021) | 12:42 | |
| handsome_feng | popey: Hi, I'm one of the leader of Ubuntu Kylin, could you give me write access to the release note post? Then I can modify the release note's link of Ubuntu Kylin. | 12:52 |
| handsome_feng | Discourse account name: handsome_feng mail: jianfengli@ubuntukylin.com | 12:55 |
| patviafore | sil2100: regarding cloud images, our plan is to make a build late US time today, check in with you tomorrow for any respins (building again if necessary), wait for your +1 and release | 13:07 |
| sil2100 | patviafore: sounds like a plan, thanks! | 13:09 |
| plars | sil2100: was the pi-desktop rebuild for today intentional? any idea what changed from the 20201020.2 image I saw last night? | 13:12 |
| sil2100 | plars: hey! Yes, we rebuilt it since there was a new slideshow that got accepted | 13:14 |
| sil2100 | No relevant changes really | 13:15 |
| plars | sil2100: ok, I'll try it still, just wondering if there was anything else I should pay close attention to | 13:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.9 [source] (focal-proposed) [3.9.0-5~20.04] | 13:21 | |
| jibel | plars, here is what changed https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/20-10-release-candidate-isos-ready-for-testing/18894/4 | 13:27 |
| plars | jibel: ah, I think I'm subscribed to the release one but not this, thanks for pointing it out | 13:29 |
| Laney | 👍 useful post | 13:30 |
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| bdmurray | juliank: can you add something to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetaProcess about apt doc updates? | 14:05 |
| juliank | bdmurray: Someone has to figure out which of those days :D | 14:10 |
| juliank | minus 7? | 14:10 |
| juliank | minus 10? | 14:10 |
| juliank | I don't know | 14:10 |
| juliank | We can also do it earlier | 14:10 |
| juliank | It really should happen during archive opening, I suppose | 14:10 |
| juliank | s/during/after/ | 14:10 |
| bdmurray | Then put it here! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NewReleaseCycleProcess | 14:11 |
| bdmurray | Or is it similar to "Update /usr/share/python-apt/templates/Ubuntu.info in python-apt to include the new release name." | 14:11 |
| Laney | could it be de-hardcoded so it's figured out at build time? | 14:12 |
| Laney | then it'd only be a problem if we manage to go a whole cycle without uploading apt ... | 14:12 |
| juliank | Laney: I don't know, I guess | 14:20 |
| coreycb | @bdmurray I've added SRU sections for the ceph bug. sorry I didn't realize that got backported to focal. | 14:22 |
| coreycb | bdmurray: ^ | 14:22 |
| coreycb | hello, please can an archive admin promote python3-octavia-lib to main? that will unblock ovn-octavia-provider from groovy-proposed. the corresponding MIR has received a security team ack. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864666 | 14:25 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1864666 in python-octavia-lib (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-octavia-lib, ovn-octavia-provider" [Medium,Fix committed] | 14:25 |
| plars | sil2100: waveform: one thing I did just notice - sound defaults seem to be different on pi-desktop. With the server image, it seems to default to whichever hdmi is plugged in, and I can reconfigure using .asoundrc for headphones. On desktop it seems to default to headphones even if they are not plugged in | 14:25 |
| waveform | plars, yup - I've got that in the release notes pointing to the relevant bug | 14:25 |
| waveform | (nearly done writing - should have them done in a few minutes) | 14:26 |
| bdmurray | coreycb: Do you have anything we could add to https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-release-notes/15533 for openstack? | 14:26 |
| Laney | waveform: I wrote a short sentence about the new pi desktop image, don't know if you want to expand that and also I don't know what the right link to the rasperry pi imager is. | 14:26 |
| plars | waveform: ok, good, I couldn't find a bug for it yet but I thought I'd check to make sure | 14:26 |
| coreycb | bdmurray: yes, I've been meaning to do that. I'll do that now. | 14:26 |
| Laney | waveform: Or maybe there's going to be a proper page on ubuntu.com which we should link to there instead? | 14:27 |
| waveform | Laney, I've written a quick post about installation here: https://waldorf.waveform.org.uk/2020/boot-configuration-with-pibootctl.html - I think Rhys is organizing something for ubuntu.com ? | 14:27 |
| Laney | waveform: ok, I asked Rhys | 14:30 |
| Laney | coreycb: there's no ack on octavia itself yet, is that ok? | 14:32 |
| coreycb | Laney: yes we can hold off on that MIR until next release | 14:32 |
| Laney | alright | 14:32 |
| coreycb | thanks Laney | 14:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (focal-proposed/main) [0.100-0ubuntu4~20.04.2 => 0.100-0ubuntu4~20.04.3] (core) | 14:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-13 (groovy-proposed/universe) [13.0.4+8-1 => 13.0.5+3-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 15:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-13 [source] (groovy-proposed) [13.0.5+3-2ubuntu1] | 15:03 | |
| xnox | apw: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 how come this migrated; and yet we don't have lrm modules built for 455? | 15:14 |
| waveform | sil2100, updated release notes; plars, the issue for the incorrect audio device selection is LP: #1899962 which is now in the release notes | 15:14 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1899962 in pulseaudio (Ubuntu) "Wrong audio output device selected on Raspberry Pi Desktop" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1899962 | 15:14 |
| xnox | apw: didn't the monday kernel respin, build lrm for 455 nvidia? | 15:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-15 (groovy-proposed/universe) [15+36-1 => 15.0.1+9-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 15:20 | |
| xnox | sforshee: are you online? | 15:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-15 [source] (groovy-proposed) [15.0.1+9-0ubuntu1] | 15:22 | |
| xnox | fginther: are you online? | 15:22 |
| sil2100 | waveform: thank you! | 15:23 |
| xnox | one way for us to fix this is to remove nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 from the archive | 15:23 |
| fginther | xnox, yes I am | 15:23 |
| sforshee | xnox: yes | 15:25 |
| xnox | sforshee: tah, fginther is quicker. Shipping nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 without matching lrm; breaks ubiquity installer =( cause it picks the highest one, instead of picking the highest one WITH lrm =) hence we are removing 455 from release; and publish it into -proposed; you can publish 455 into groovy-updates; | 15:33 |
| xnox | once there is matching lrm for 455 with the next kernel sru. | 15:33 |
| sforshee | ack, I wasn't even aware that a -455 driver had landed | 15:35 |
| sforshee | tseliot: ^ | 15:36 |
| tseliot | sforshee, yes, I am aware of the problem. The 455 series doesn't replace any other series, so that the l-r-m are not broken. Of course, then, things break with secureboot | 15:37 |
| xnox | tseliot: issue is that we automatically included 455 on the iso; and during ubiquity isntallation ubuntu-drivers picked to install 455 driver as the best one; despite it having only dkms module provider, and not lrm one. | 15:38 |
| xnox | tseliot: see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/+bug/1900870 i think ideally we should prefer to install the driver that is highest with lrm; and if none found, then prefer highest dkms one. | 15:39 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1900870 in ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu) "maybe nvidia drivers should pick the highest one with lrm, if more than one is available" [Undecided,New] | 15:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.14-dfsg-4 => 6.1.16-dfsg-1] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync) | 15:40 | |
| tseliot | xnox, yes, I can implement that, so that drivers with the lrm sort before the dkms ones | 15:40 |
| xnox | tseliot: hence out of the box ubiquity 3rd party drivers is broken on nvidia =( anyway, removing 455 from the archive which can come in ubuntu-updates later. | 15:40 |
| xnox | tseliot: tah, but for next cycle. | 15:40 |
| tseliot | ok | 15:40 |
| xnox | sforshee: so 455 landed on the 10-14; and kernel rebuild was done on 10-15 => not sure about timezones though, i doubt that the people who kicked kernel rebuild knew about 455 at the same time. | 15:41 |
| tseliot | xnox, no, that was intentional on my side. I can't share the reasoning behind it here. | 15:42 |
| xnox | horum. | 15:42 |
| tseliot | xnox, making ubuntu-drivers prefer the LTS driver (450) over the NFB (455) would also do it. That's a very easy change to make. | 15:49 |
| xnox | tseliot: no, as it will need respinning squashfs of all the live .isos which takes a long time. and affects more flavours. | 15:50 |
| xnox | tseliot: by removing 455, we can respin /pool/ directory of 5 flavours only to fix things; without rebuilding the full squashfs even. as the nvidia debs are only in the iso /pool/ and not in the live session at all. | 15:51 |
| tseliot | ok | 15:51 |
| xnox | tseliot: i mean we should probably do both; as ubuntu-drivers change will be useful when you upload 460 =) | 15:53 |
| xnox | as this removal juggling is one off fix to ship groovy. | 15:54 |
| xnox | tseliot: but no need to stay up over this; can land ubuntu-drivers next week or whatever. | 15:54 |
| Laney | yes, it should be SRUed | 15:55 |
| tseliot | xnox, ok. We will be losing support for the new NVIDIA Ampere architecture without 455 | 15:55 |
| Laney | it can go back in via -updates as soon as either LRM exists or the ubuntu-drivers fixes are uploaded | 15:55 |
| Laney | (and accepted :p) | 15:57 |
| xnox | tseliot: until the next kernel sru.... yes. Do a nochange kernel rebuild, with lrm with 455 and release to updates this week. | 15:57 |
| tseliot | xnox, I don't think we can do this. sforshee ^^ | 15:57 |
| xnox | tseliot: it's not like you are gonna gain support for that architecture with secureboot anyway without lrm =) since nobody knows how to do mok. | 15:57 |
| tseliot | xnox, doesn't dkms enroll its own key these days? | 15:58 |
| xnox | tseliot: it needs user interaction on reboot...... lrm ones just modprobe | 15:58 |
| tseliot | oh, ok | 15:59 |
| xnox | tseliot: yeah, if we can't have lrm soon => then ubuntu-drivers might be a quicker | 16:02 |
| xnox | way to publish 455 back into updates. | 16:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021.1) | 16:08 | |
| tseliot | xnox, yes, that's what I was thinking | 16:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021.1) | 16:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021.1) | 16:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021.1) | 16:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021.1) | 16:17 | |
| coreycb | popey: may I have access to the groovy release notes to update them for openstack? | 16:48 |
| jibel | xnox, verified with 20201021.1 and 450 + corresponding lrm are installed | 16:57 |
| vorlon | Laney: I see you processed LP: #1867813; fwiw you missed promoting the source package. You generally want the '-S' option to change-override | 17:07 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1867813 in linux-firmware-raspi2 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] linux-firmware-raspi2 to restricted" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1867813 | 17:07 |
| xnox | jibel: whoop whoop | 17:08 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 17:31 |
| Laney | vorlon: cheers | 17:41 |
| mwhudson | good morning how on fire are things today? | 18:29 |
| Laney | small flames | 18:31 |
| Laney | nice to keep your hands warm | 18:31 |
| sil2100 | A thousand little respins | 18:31 |
| Laney | continuous delivery right | 18:32 |
| Laney | Trevinho: will you be around in ~1h to retest? | 18:33 |
| Trevinho | Laney: yeah | 18:33 |
| mwhudson | every week should be release week! | 18:33 |
| Laney | Trevinho: cool, look out for a notification from queuebot | 18:34 |
| Laney | I guess it would be helpful to do offline and online unless jibel comes back :> | 18:35 |
| Laney | bdmurray: sil2100: just double checking that someone notified the flavours of this respin | 18:38 |
| Laney | (not waiting for the response though, consider this a poke :P) | 18:38 |
| Laney | see ya | 18:38 |
| bdmurray | I did | 18:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021.2) | 18:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021.2) | 18:54 | |
| bdmurray | Trevinho: ^ | 19:02 |
| Trevinho | thanks | 19:02 |
| bdmurray | thank you for testing! | 19:02 |
| vorlon | xnox: should initramfs-tools-devices be removed from the archive in groovy? | 19:06 |
| vorlon | xnox: it currently wants demoting because initramfs-tools-ubuntu-core is removed; but if initramfs-tools-ubuntu-core is removed I'm not sure why we still want it at all in groovy | 19:06 |
| vorlon | abeato: ^^ perhaps you would be a better person to answer | 19:07 |
| abeato | vorlon, well, we have used it some times for resizing of the rootfs on first boot - not sure if there is an alternative | 19:08 |
| abeato | vorlon, we use it on classic, not UC | 19:10 |
| popey | coreycb done | 19:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021.2) | 19:22 | |
| xnox | vorlon: it should die. | 19:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021.2) | 19:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201021.2) | 19:34 | |
| plars | bdmurray: did you want to put some sort of testcase on isotracker for Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi? I don't think we can log that anything was tested on it unless there's something there | 19:35 |
| bdmurray | plars: Is there some template we could copy over? | 19:40 |
| bdmurray | plars: I haven't tried the image myself | 19:40 |
| Odd_Bloke | vorlon: Is it expected that http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-base/releases/18.04.3/release/ will only contain the .5 files (rather than redirecting or 404ing)? | 19:44 |
| plars | bdmurray: Well, I wouldn't copy over the desktop tests, because most of them wouldn't apply since they focus on ubiquity (pi desktop more like a preinstall image with oem-config to set up lang, tz, user, etc). In the interest of time, it may make more sense to just have an entry for rpi4b 4G and 8G. I know there are people trying it out, would just be good to have a place to log it rather than leave | 19:46 |
| plars | you wondering whether anyone tried it or not when making the release | 19:46 |
| bdmurray | Odd_Bloke: what are you doing snooping around in our cupboards | 19:46 |
| Odd_Bloke | bdmurray: Answering questions for users in #ubuntu-server. :p | 19:51 |
| Trevinho | bdmurray: confirm working now! | 19:57 |
| bdmurray | Trevinho: right on | 19:57 |
| bdmurray | plars: here you go http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/418/builds/222055/testcases | 19:57 |
| vorlon | Odd_Bloke: well, it's not ideal to have an 18.04.3 that doesn't point to 18.04.3 objects. https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2020-October/005113.html for context | 19:58 |
| vorlon | I also wonder why we didn't do an 18.04.6 for ubuntu-base, since AFAIK the 18.04.5 misses the apt security fix | 19:59 |
| vorlon | abeato: so you're using it in classic images based on releases later than 20.04? | 19:59 |
| vorlon | (or expect that you will do) | 20:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-osconfig-agent (groovy-proposed/universe) [20200625.00-0ubuntu2 => 20200625.00-0ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 20:33 | |
| rbalint | ^later SRU or punting to h* | 20:33 |
| rbalint | not super urgent but would be nice to have | 20:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-osconfig-agent [source] (groovy-proposed) [20200625.00-0ubuntu3] | 20:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resource-agents (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.5.0-2ubuntu2 => 1:4.5.0-2ubuntu2.1] (ubuntu-server) | 21:14 | |
| plars | sil2100: waveform: heads up, new regression found for rpi - lp#1900904 | 21:18 |
| waveform | plars, hmm, that's a consequence of us getting rid of net.ifnames=0; I'll release note it for now | 21:20 |
| plars | waveform: ack | 21:22 |
| plars | waveform: it should have still caught it without the driver restriction in the netplan yaml though, shouldn't it? | 21:22 |
| waveform | I don't think so - I think the way it's configured at the moment I'd need an *additional* section to deal with "other" ethernet interfaces | 21:23 |
| waveform | (optional obviously) | 21:23 |
| vorlon | do we really have to be using set-name >_< | 21:24 |
| waveform | without that, on the most common model Bs we wind up with wlan0 and enxMACMACMAC which is ... incongruous to say the least | 21:25 |
| vorlon | right | 21:25 |
| waveform | I agree it's hacky though | 21:25 |
| vorlon | so yes, you'd want another section, for the case of drivers where you don't intend to rename the interface | 21:25 |
| plars | waveform: interesting side-note - since we override the cloud-init data for creating the default user in automated provisioning (but we don't touch anything network related), we don't see this happen there. I only saw this when booting fresh with a local device and nothing added. When we add the extra cloud-init bits to create a user, it seems to generate something that IDs it by mac | 21:26 |
| waveform | plars, yup - that's the "default" configuration - unfortunately that configuration also breaks the "move your SD card between pis" use-case | 21:26 |
| plars | indeed | 21:27 |
| sil2100 | waveform, plars: thanks for the heads-up guys o/ | 21:31 |
| === ebarretto_ is now known as ebarretto | ||
| sil2100 | bdmurray: hey! Did you try chasing down the pulseaudio guys regarding LP: #1897934 ? | 23:08 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1897934 in pulseaudio (Ubuntu) "The initial sound level is set to zero (mute)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1897934 | 23:08 |
| sil2100 | I'm a bit angry at myself, how did I miss this on my radar | 23:12 |
| bdmurray | sil2100: I have not, steve suggested desktop. | 23:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready | 23:14 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | Might be premature but... ^ | 23:14 |
| vorlon | sil2100: well, I think we need to work on making sure we have explicit tracking of the run-once tests at beta | 23:15 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: agreed | 23:22 |
| sil2100 | Anyway, maybe we should try reaching out to Kai-Heng Feng, or Hui Wang? Since I see they worked on pulseaudio uploads before | 23:23 |
| sil2100 | They could start investigating before the desktop team wakes up | 23:23 |
| sil2100 | Since otherwise we'll waste precious time in the morning, leaving us not so much time to respin and retest | 23:24 |
| vorlon | sil2100: I think this is going to just have to be release-noted, unless we want to slip the release. It could be either a kernel regression or a pulseaudio regression, and either is going to take time to sort out | 23:25 |
| sil2100 | I consider that a possibility, yes, but it is a accessibility regression, making it potentially harder for people with disabilities to install/test groovy | 23:28 |
| sil2100 | Since I assume it might not always be trivial for them, in such case, to change the volume to make the sound appear | 23:28 |
| sil2100 | So if there's a chance that someone can possibly figure this out before release still, I'd like to try | 23:29 |
| vorlon | yes. I'm not happy about it, I'm just trying to be realistic about our chances of fixing it in the next 24 hours | 23:29 |
| vorlon | sil2100: so certainly, reaching out to anyone who might be available to look into it is a good idea IMHO | 23:29 |
| sil2100 | I'll send an e-mail and try to get things moving | 23:30 |
| vorlon | sil2100, xnox, bdmurray: opinions on https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/debian-cd/lp.1899615/+merge/392638 ? it's a small change to restore the boot option; I don't think it warrants a respin, and I don't feel strongly that we should block the merge until after release | 23:32 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: hm, no strong preference here - but maybe we could add that in case we respin the world (in the unlikely case of getting a fix for the audio issue) | 23:51 |
| sil2100 | Ok, updated the status tracking post | 23:53 |
| sil2100 | E-mail sent, not much we can do now but wait... | 23:53 |
| sil2100 | I go to sleep in the meantime, see you tomorrow o/ | 23:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
