[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fence-agents (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.0.25-2ubuntu1.1 => 4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2] (no packageset)
[06:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-lts (groovy-proposed/main) [11.0.9+10-0ubuntu1 => 11.0.9+11-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[06:30] <abeato> vorlon, no, I'm not using it on groovy yet, but potentially we might want to use it. Unless the initramfs is switched to systemd as in UC, of course.
[06:57] <philroche> Happy release day folks. Myself (EU) and patviafore (US) are running release for the cloud images. Please ping once if you are aware of any respins being required
[06:58] <philroche> * Please ping once you are aware
[07:04] <sil2100> o/
[07:05] <RikMills> morning
[07:05] <RikMills> sil2100: hey, are we looking at an afternoon or evening release?
[07:05] <RikMills> UK time...
[07:09] <sil2100> RikMills: hard to say... I think it's safest to think 'evening'
[07:09] <sil2100> Though seeing that the audio regression is most likely a kernel thing, we won't be respinning
[07:11] <RikMills> sil2100: ok. just I am way behind on release notes etc so later would allow me less rush. but it is what it is
[07:11] <RikMills> I have had one of those weeks where time to do Ubuntu stuff just vanished :(
[07:16] <sil2100> No worries, can happen to anyone! Still thanks that you were able to find time to help out ;)
[07:17] <sil2100> This sound bug really makes me sad, I really have no idea how I could have missed it
[07:17] <sil2100> I'm angry at myself
[07:17] <sil2100> It's been there since beta, grrr
[07:17] <seb128> is there any indication it's likely to be kernel?
[07:18] <seb128> I didn't see any comment on the bug
[07:18] <sil2100> seb128: I only saw Hui changing the linux task to In Progress
[07:19] <seb128> k
[07:22] <sil2100> I also disagree with the bug importance being 'Low'
[07:23] <sil2100> This is almost a blocker bug
=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks
[07:26] <jibel> there are so many audio bugs, I wouldn't make this specific one a release blocker
[07:27] <jibel> you understood I love this audio stack
[07:28] <sil2100> Yeah, which is why I said 'almost'
[07:28] <sil2100> It just sucks
[07:31] <jibel> sil2100, is the lrm thing all sorted out or there is still something to verify on 20201021.2?
[07:31] <jibel> from the tracking doc I understand it's all good but would like a confirmation
[07:32] <sil2100> From what I know Trevinho was testing it and condirmed it to be working now
[07:33] <jibel> k, yeah he tested offline, I tested online, hence his bug.
[07:33] <tdaitx> sil2100: could you please approve openjdk-lts in groovy? it is a security update
[07:43] <seb128> it feels like we need to do a better job at beta testing next cycle
[07:43] <tdaitx> oh well, I am going back to bed, got up to see if my ppa upload completed after so long
[07:43] <tdaitx> been trying to upload openjdk-lts to a ppa but besides the very slow upload it gets forever stuck on the last bytes of the source, only groovy went through for whatever reason
[07:53] <jibel> seb128, why? because we missed an audio bug?
[08:16] <seb128> jibel, because some bugs were reported and not properly flagged, because the milestone was validated with mandatory testcases that should have flagged red issues (like the memtest item missing)
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.4 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.5] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[09:14] <dgadomski> hi sil2100, could you please consider releasing sudo from bionic-proposed?
[09:52] <sil2100> dgadomski: hey! Will try, but today is 20.10 release day so we have quite a lot of stuff going on!
[09:54] <dgadomski> I see, thanks and good luck with everything!
=== _hc[m] is now known as _hc
[10:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-lib (groovy-proposed/main) [1.2.3.2-1ubuntu2 => 1.2.3.2-1ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[10:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-lib [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.2.3.2-1ubuntu3]
[10:28] <seb128> sil2100, ^ uploaded debdiff for the audio issue
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-lib (groovy-proposed/main) [1.2.3.2-1ubuntu2 => 1.2.3.2-1ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[10:30] <seb128> sil2100, oh, I see you already uploaded that without ciommenting on the bug?
[10:30] <rbalint> sil2100, is there any chance that you could accept gce-compute-image-packages or google-compute-engine-oslogin SRUs today
[10:30] <rbalint> sil2100, or could you please suggest an SRU member who could?
[10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-lib (groovy-proposed/main) [1.2.3.2-1ubuntu2 => 1.2.3.2-1ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[10:30] <seb128> sil2100, it's a bit hard to try to be useful and keep in the loop when you guys don't use public communication channel...
[10:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected alsa-lib [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.2.3.2-1ubuntu3]
[10:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected alsa-lib [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.2.3.2-1ubuntu3]
[10:31]  * seb128 reject his upload and go do something else that doesn't step on toes of release people
[10:32] <seb128> shurg, I guess I failed to that one also, Laney did it
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-golang-x-exp (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20181112.a3060d4-1build1 => 0.0~git20181112.a3060d4-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:37] <Laney> yeah we were in crunchy mode on trying to fix that bug, thanks for the help
=== Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Focal 20.04.1, Bionic 18.04.5 | Archive: Closed | Track the status of the Groovy release: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-20-10-release-status-tracking/18647 | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Groovy Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis
[10:37] <Laney> no more stuff please!
[10:37] <Laney> auto accept is off, full proposed-migration block is in place
[10:38] <seb128> sil2100, please deal with the focal SRU for that one as well (after release rush of course) since you handled the G upload
[10:38] <seb128> also merge is yours for next cycle now :)
[10:41] <sil2100> I didn't sponsor it, I only approved the upload!
[10:41] <sil2100> My hands are clean ;)
[10:44] <seb128> well, whoever sponsored it, you win the SRU and the merge
[10:48] <AsciiWolf> Hello, is there someone who could remove steam package from the multiverse repository (ubuntu-archive) of new Ubuntu releases? It is outdated and problematic, see: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/steam/+bug/1759715 (last comment)
[10:48] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1759715 in steam (Ubuntu) "Remove steam and add to sync blacklist" [Undecided,Triaged]
[10:48] <AsciiWolf> Last time that package was updated was before Focal release by Wimpress and was not updated since then... It is not autosynced from Debian because of custom Ubuntu patches (steam-installer etc.)
[10:51] <doko> AsciiWolf: why don't you just propose a merge?
[10:52] <AsciiWolf> doko, you mean merging the Ubuntu changes into Debian?
[10:53] <doko> yes, and then proposing the merge for groovy
[10:54] <AsciiWolf> to be honest, I don't have any experience with doing this :) but maybe Wimpress or jbicha could do it?
[10:54] <tjaalton> jbicha filed that removal but, so doubt it?
[10:55] <tjaalton> *bug
[10:58] <AsciiWolf> well, I also think that removing the package could be a better solution... it tends to get really outdated and problematic during the Ubuntu release life time even if it is updated before the release, especially for LTS releases...
[10:58] <tjaalton> right
[10:58] <AsciiWolf> and the official, supported way of installing steam on Ubuntu is by using the official .deb package from Valve anyway... the distribution package can eventually be replaced by a Snap package in a future if needed
[10:58] <tjaalton> I'm using the flatpak, works well enough for me
[11:00] <AsciiWolf> yeah, me too, but that's not very user friendly way on Ubuntu :) works for us power users, but not for regular users that don't want to mess with a terminal :) Flatpak is not installed by-default on Ubuntu and not supported by Ubuntu Software GUI
[11:00] <tjaalton> just saying
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cvise (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1 => 1.8.0-1] (no packageset)
[11:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-lib (focal-proposed/main) [1.2.2-2.1ubuntu2 => 1.2.2-2.1ubuntu2.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:01] <philroche> sil2100: You mentioned a sound related bug. Will that require a respin and is there any way the package being updated will affect cloud images? I suspect no but wanted to make sure
[12:02] <philroche> sil2100: Here's our candidate manifest http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/groovy/20201022/groovy-server-cloudimg-amd64.manifest
[12:04] <Laney> philroche: libasound2:amd641.2.3.2-1ubuntu2 <- this is what we are respinning for, so yeah
[12:05] <Laney> (not migrated yet, don't respin now)
[12:11] <philroche> Laney: ack. libasound2:amd64	1.2.3.2-1ubuntu2 is in our cloud images but I don't feel that warrants a cloud respin. Is this the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-lib/+bug/1897934 ?
[12:11] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1897934 in Release Notes for Ubuntu "[SRU][Intel HDA] The initial sound level is set to zero (muted)" [Undecided,New]
[12:12] <Laney> right
[12:12] <Laney> it's not because it affects you but because we wouldn't want to ship images with updates pending in the release pockt
[12:12] <philroche> understood
[12:13] <Laney> e.g. apt indices -> all clients will have to re-fetch those for the release pocket if they're out of date, and then the update itself
[12:13] <sil2100> Yeah, we have a policy of the final images being built from the release pocket 1:1
[12:14] <philroche> ack
[12:14] <Laney> should just be a smoke test I'd hope
[12:14] <sil2100> So sadly, a respin everywhere...
[12:14] <Laney> unless there's a 𝄞 disco cloud 𝄞 somewhere
[12:14] <Laney> 🕺 💃
[12:24] <mfo> lol
[12:53] <philroche> Laney: sil2100: Can you ping when libasound2 migrates and we'll respin the cloud base images?. libasound2:amd64 is not present in the cloud minimal images
[12:58] <sil2100> philroche: sure o/ I'm monitoring britney and rmadison
[12:58] <sil2100> Hopefully this will all happen soon
[13:41] <LocutusOfBorg> sil2100, is it possible to still accept virtualbox for groovu?
[13:41] <LocutusOfBorg> it is not seeded, and fixes quite a few things, 0 day SRU is a mess because of something already migrated :/
[13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (groovy-proposed/main) [2020b-1ubuntu1 => 2020d-1ubuntu1] (core)
[13:52] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: I think right now we don't really want to slow up anything!
[13:52] <sil2100> philroche: alsa-lib migrated o/
[13:52] <LocutusOfBorg> sil2100, what would it slow?
[13:53] <LocutusOfBorg> you can keep it in proposed :)
[14:03] <bdmurray> It would slow us up reviewing it‽
[14:06] <rcj> rbalint: You around?  I want to chat about a regression in google-guest-agent (LP: #1901033) and figure out what we're going to do for release.
[14:06] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1901033 in google-guest-agent (Ubuntu) "google-startup-scripts service no longer waits for cloud-init/snapd.seeded " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1901033
[14:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.02-2ubuntu8.18 => 2.02-2ubuntu8.19] (core)
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.93.20 => 1.93.21] (core)
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201022)
[14:16] <doko> sil2100, Laney: please hint openjdk-13 and openjdk-15, the triggers are bogus anyway, because everything is run against openjdk-11
[14:21] <ahayzen> AsciiWolf, i was going to see how tricky it would be to update the steam package, as i've been using the flatpak but the latest pressure-vessel (proton) requires nesting containers and will be a broken unless you allow lots of extra permissions or until upstream add support :-/
[14:22] <AsciiWolf> ahayzen, you mean the non-Flatpak (Ubuntu) package, right?
[14:23] <AsciiWolf> ah, sorry, I misunderstood :) I get your point now...
[14:23] <AsciiWolf> yeah, sub-sandboxes are not supported in Flatpak at the moment
[14:23] <ahayzen> AsciiWolf, yup, due to smcv's comments here https://github.com/flathub/com.valvesoftware.Steam/issues/642 i think sticking to the deb version will be required for a bit
[14:24] <AsciiWolf> and they, as far as I know, also do not work in the Ubuntu version of steam package because they require bubblewrap as a dependency... latest Debian package has it in dependencies
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201022)
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201022)
[14:27] <ahayzen> quite possible, i likely already had the right depends installed, anyway seems like an offtopic discussion :-)
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201022)
[14:28] <AsciiWolf> ahayzen, well, the discussion about Ubuntu (non-Flatpak) version of Steam is not offtopic at all, at least in my opinion :)
[14:29] <philroche> sil2100: Ack on alsa-lib migration
[14:30] <AsciiWolf> ahayzen, anyway, if you could update the outdated steam package in Ubuntu, it would be great :)
[14:30] <AsciiWolf> or get it removed entirely so users are not confused by this outdated, problematic steam package version
[14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201022)
[14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201022)
[14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201022)
[14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201022)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201022)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201022)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201022)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201022)
=== didrocks1 is now known as didrocks
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201022)
[14:44] <rbalint> rcj, o/
[14:44] <Deano59> oh!
[14:45] <rcj> rbalint: So what do you think of LP: #1901033?
[14:45] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1901033 in google-guest-agent (Ubuntu) "google-startup-scripts service no longer waits for cloud-init/snapd.seeded " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1901033
[14:46] <rcj> Not sure if you can do anything today for a respin before release.
[14:47] <rbalint> i agree that it does not have to be a blocker for the release because it is not on the installer images and the impact is limited to a small portion of users
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: microcode-initrd (focal-proposed/primary) [2~20.04.0]
[14:48] <rcj> I don't know about "small portion of users" but I'd agree with "subset of users"
[14:48] <xnox> does subscribing ubuntu-archive to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/microcode-initrd/+bug/1890612 make it appear in the normal AA queues of bugs that you process?
[14:48] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1890612 in microcode-initrd (Ubuntu Focal) "[Source NEW SRU FOCAL] ITP: Please support loading microcode early, whilst otherwise booting without initrd" [Undecided,New]
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201022)
[14:50] <rbalint> rcj, well, yes
[14:50] <andol> Additional GitHub Enterprise licenses
[14:50] <rbalint> rcj, i'm preparing a fix quickly anyway
[14:50] <rcj> rbalint: We'll document in the release notes as a known issue.
[14:50] <rcj> rbalint: we also filed and linked an upstream issue
[14:52] <rcj> rbalint: Can you review the cloud images known issue text on this @ https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-release-notes/15533 ?
[14:54] <rbalint> rcj, yes, thank you, that's accurate
[14:55] <rcj> rbalint: Thanks for taking a look at this.
[14:55] <andol> Sorry, bad paste
[14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Groovy Final] has been updated (20201022)
[15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.7 => 2.664.8] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[15:09] <bdmurray> coreycb: Do you have something to add to the release notes?
[15:10] <coreycb> bdmurray: I do but I still can't seem to edit
[15:10] <bdmurray> popey said he gave you access, try logging out and in again?
[15:11] <coreycb> bdmurray: I tried that. should I see an edit button, maybe I'm just being dumb.
[15:12] <bdmurray> coreycb: there is a pencil to the right of the post author name Wimpress
[15:12] <coreycb> bdmurray: ok I tried that and it's read-only once I get in
[15:13] <bdmurray> coreycb: okay, I can do it for you then
[15:13] <coreycb> bdmurray: thanks, what we have in that email from yesterday is good
[15:15] <sil2100> plars, waveform: can you do a quick sanity test of the new pi server/desktop images? We only changed alsa-lib so a quick test on a single platform seems enough
[15:17] <bjf> yes
[15:17] <bjf> EWRONGCHANNEL
[15:18] <plars> sil2100: will do
[15:21] <sil2100> philroche, patviafore: how are the cloud images looking so far?
[15:22] <xnox> bjf:  you volunteered to test Pi images? thanks =)
[15:22] <bdmurray> bjf: Are you excited about the desktop pi image?
[15:22] <bdmurray> coreycb: updated if you want to double check it
[15:23] <waveform> sil2100, will do
[15:23] <patviafore> sil2100: with the respin, we're a few hours out from being ready to start release promotion. Other than that, just waiting on your +1
[15:24] <bjf> xnox, bdmurray, you know how i get this close to a release, i'm just excited about everything
[15:24] <bjf> hard to contain myself
[15:30] <luna_> heh i am on rolling rhino but still excited for that ISO to drop
[15:32] <sil2100> \o/
[15:34] <Deano59> I'm super excited to use 20.10 on a 4gb PI4 :D
[15:40] <coreycb> bdmurray: looks good, thank you
[15:46] <patviafore> sil2100: our initial round of builds/test for download images have passed, cloud-specific build and tests are in progress right now
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[15:49] <sil2100> patviafore: excellent! We see that the new rebuilds seem to be looking good, just a few more sanity tests
[15:49] <sil2100> But we're basically prepping for release
[15:49] <sil2100> I'll give you a poke once we press the buttons
[15:50] <patviafore> ack
[15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[15:56] <waveform> sil2100, just testing pi desktop image - all fine so far (have tested audio as a priority - the release noted stuff is still present, but that's fine)
[15:56] <RikMills> damn. kubuntu has no release notes as I cannot log in to the wiki
[15:58] <sil2100> waveform: thanks! I think that's good enough o/
[15:59] <sil2100> RikMills: oh no
[15:59] <sil2100> btw. grabbing a kubuntu iso to do a quick sanity test too
[16:01] <RikMills> sil2100: thanks. I have asked if anyone who can login can put something placeholder up for now on the wiki. just not good timing. I logged out as I was getting other errors, and now login just times out
[16:02]  * RikMills thinks that wiki need binning
[16:04] <plars> sil2100: I've booted all 3 locally on an 8GB rpi4, so far so good. The automated tests should be running soon too if they are not already
[16:05] <ogra> are they so automated that you dont know anymore ? 🙂
[16:09] <sil2100> plars: \o/
[16:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chromium-browser (focal-proposed/universe) [1:85.0.4183.83-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 1:85.0.4183.83-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:17] <sil2100> plars, waveform: I guess we can mark raspi server as ready, right?
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:21] <rbalint> Laney, sil2100 i'd like to upload the fix for LP: #1901033 either for a 0-day SRU or to get in early to the next release, what should I do?
[16:21] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1901033 in google-guest-agent (Ubuntu) "google-startup-scripts service no longer waits for cloud-init/snapd.seeded " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1901033
[16:21] <rbalint> rcj, ^
[16:22] <Laney> Upload to the queue, make sure there's an SRU bug
[16:23] <rcj> rbalint: 0-day SRU sounds good to me.  patviafore, with that we could spin an new image in the coming days and promote to release with a fix.  yeah?
[16:23] <patviafore> rcj, rbalint: absolutely
[16:26] <plars> sil2100: from my pov, yes - unless you need full testing on this respin, but it sounded like it was a minor change from what we tested before
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:36] <sil2100> plars: that's good enough for me! THank you!
[16:37] <waveform> sil2100, yup - I'd say it's good to go (just booted server on a spare pi)
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:42] <sil2100> patviafore: ok, we're publishing now!
[16:42] <sil2100> patviafore: +1 for you to go all out as well o/
[16:42] <philroche> sil2100: ack ack ack :)
[16:42] <patviafore> sil2100: acknowledged, we'll start getting our images out too
[16:42] <sil2100> \o/
[16:42] <philroche> Our base images will be a bit delayed
[16:46] <sil2100> No worries
[16:49] <sil2100> rbalint: hey! Yeah, as Laney mentioned, please prep and upload
[16:50] <rbalint> sil2100, just updated the bug, a sec!
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Groovy Final] has been marked as ready
[16:52] <Laney> 👍
[16:54] <rbalint> sil2100, what's the plan for strace in Unapproved?
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (groovy-proposed/main) [20200617.00-0ubuntu5 => 20200617.00-0ubuntu6] (no packageset)
[16:55] <vorlon> well it's not getting into the release pocket
[16:55] <rbalint> vorlon, but to updates? :-)
[16:55] <bdmurray> Is there an SRU bug?
[16:55] <vorlon> a new upstream version? looks unlikely
[16:56] <rbalint> vorlon, it happened for focal ;-)
[16:57] <vorlon> heh
[16:58] <vorlon> with no SRU bug
[16:58] <vorlon> who did this thing
[16:58] <rbalint> vorlon, i'm more sad about LP: #1871268, not having apt the fix on the iso will break 3rd party enabled installs when the first glibc update is out
[16:58] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1871268 in apt (Ubuntu Focal) "Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
[16:58] <rbalint> vorlon, ok, forget strace, it never happened :-)
[16:59] <vorlon> rbalint: release day is a bit late to tell the release team that you think a bug should be a blocker
[16:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cvise [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.8.0-1]
[16:59] <rbalint> vorlon, i had the impression that it would make it
[17:00] <vorlon> if no one talks to the release team to ensure it's tracked, then no
[17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox [sync] (groovy-proposed) [6.1.16-dfsg-1]
[17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox [source] (groovy-proposed) [6.1.16-dfsg-1~build1]
[17:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected strace [source] (groovy-proposed) [5.9-0ubuntu1]
[17:02] <sil2100> rbalint: hey! Yeah, so we can't really let it in without any way of tracking the testing
[17:02] <sil2100> rbalint: previously I asked for it to be done in bileto so ADT tests and testing could be performed on the built binaries
[17:03] <sil2100> Which is why I exceptionally got it into -updates without a tracking bug
[17:03] <sil2100> In this case I'd say: let's follow the SRU process if possible!
=== sil2100 changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Groovy 20.10, Focal 20.04.1, Bionic 18.04.5 | Archive: Closed | Track the status of the Groovy release: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/groovy-gorilla-20-10-release-status-tracking/18647 | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Groovy Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis
[17:18] <sil2100> \o/
[17:18] <Deano59> released?
[17:19] <sil2100> Mirrors are stil syncing, but basically yes
[17:20] <doko> sil2100: is the last britney run already done?
[17:25] <sil2100> doko: no, I think britney is still running
[17:25] <doko> sil2100: did you see my request on openjdk-13 and -15 some hours ago?
[17:27] <Laney> It's running, but the release pocket is frozen and nothing further will be published to it (block-all source is in place, and the release is closed in Launchpad)
[17:27] <Laney> SRUs from now on
[17:31] <pmarreck> congrats! :cheer:
[17:42] <patviafore> sil2100: our cloud image are in various states of release; we are looking good on our end
[17:45] <ogra> congrats !
[17:53] <rbalint> 🎉
[17:58] <rbalint> dle
[17:59] <rbalint> do we have a name for the uploads for the next cycle?
[18:04] <RikMills> Hippy Hyrax?
[18:09] <bdmurray> Hipster
[18:10] <philroche> Hangry Hipster
[18:10] <rbalint> Happy Birthday bdmurray, it rhymes  :-)
[18:10] <luna_> Downloading the torrent now, was busy hanging out a bit with dad
[18:10] <bdmurray> rbalint: thanks!
[18:10]  * ogra hugs bdmurray 
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.8 => 20.04.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-desktop)
[18:17] <mitya57> Hoary Heron or Hardy Hedgehog? These were not used yet.
[18:17]  * mitya57 hides
[18:18] <bdmurray> That'd be confusing
[18:19] <xnox> rbalint:  you can use "devel" which always redirects in launchpad.
[18:20] <xnox> if you need to prepare now; but dput on monday =)
[18:31] <vorlon> Helical Heffalump
[18:34] <luna_> congrats to the release :)
[18:35] <Eickmeyer> Congrats everyone!
[18:40] <slyon> Congratulations folks!
[18:42] <mdeslaur> congrats!
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (groovy-proposed) [2020d-1ubuntu1]
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (groovy-proposed/main) [2020b-1ubuntu1 => 2020d-1ubuntu1] (core)
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (groovy-proposed) [2020d-1ubuntu1]
[20:14] <Deano59> it's been fun... bye! (until next time... :D)
=== WrathOfAchilles is now known as IchabodCrane
=== mfo_ is now known as mfo