[18:36] We have a new release! https://ubuntustudio.org/2020/10/ubuntu-studio-20-10-released/ [21:07] * OvenWerks sees a problem :( [21:07] /lib/systemd/system/ondemand* no longer exists [21:11] well the subdirectory does, but the service does not... so the sub dirrectory is not worth anything [21:14] OvenWerks: If that's the case, then maybe we need to use the systemd service file I made? [21:14] The one that got it working in Fedora. [21:15] could be thats where ubuntu got it [21:15] And, to be fair, ondemand was an Ubuntu-only thing that replaced something from upstart. [21:15] So, it was a hack at best. [21:15] I was thinking of moving studio to multi-user [21:16] I think it was an unneeded hack as the cpu comes up in powersave anyway [21:16] Yeah, maybe it was removed for that very reason. [21:17] anyway the service would still work it is just not being run [21:18] So, I don't see it as an issue, since everything works regardless. [21:19] system always comes up in powersave regardless of setting [21:20] Oh, I see. [21:21] Yeah, I'm sure there's a way, and that way would be distro-agnostic and might solve the same problem in Fedora. [21:23] I am not at the right computer right now, but it looks like just moving the /lib/systemd/system/ondemandservice.wants/studio.* file to /lib/systemd/system/multi-user*/should work [21:23] Ok, cool. [21:26] nope, have to remake the file first but they are all short anyway. [21:30] Yeah, systemd service files are pretty easy once you do a few. [21:33] OvenWerks: Is this true in both Focal and Groovy? [21:38] Eickmeyer[m]: Just skimming over the release post, the "ardour" at the link to their website needs capitalized. >_< [21:41] krytarik: Fixed [21:52] Eickmeyer[m]: Also found a "cowdfunded" >_< [21:53] krytarik: That's correct. It can be either crowd-funded or crowdfunded. [21:53] Well, it's missing an 'r' in the crowd though! [21:54] Ohhhh I didn't see that. [21:54] "We are still hammering-out what those benefits might be, and we would love to hear some feedback about what those benefits might be." - and I think the repetition could be folded here. [21:58] krytarik: "We are still hammering-out the benefits to patrons, and we would love to hear some feedback about what those benefits might be." is that better? [22:04] I think in context to the preceding sentence, the original beginning was right and I was thinking of just shortening the second part of the sentence to like "and we would love to hear some feedback regarding that." [22:12] Well, repetition or not, I'm not changing it again. === WrathOfAchilles is now known as IchabodCrane [23:58] Eickmeyer[m]: just groovy, focal is fine. [23:58] OvenWerks: Ok, that is going to make backporting future versions of studio-controls very difficult then. [23:59] maybe not, the new way should work with both. [23:59] Ok, we'll go with that hypothesis then. [23:59] I may need to put a delay in though