[18:36] <Eickmeyer> We have a new release! https://ubuntustudio.org/2020/10/ubuntu-studio-20-10-released/
[21:07]  * OvenWerks sees a problem :(
[21:07] <OvenWerks> /lib/systemd/system/ondemand* no longer exists
[21:11] <OvenWerks> well the subdirectory does, but the service does not... so the sub dirrectory is not worth anything
[21:14] <Eickmeyer[m]> OvenWerks: If that's the case, then maybe we need to use the systemd service file I made?
[21:14] <Eickmeyer[m]> The one that got it working in Fedora.
[21:15] <OvenWerks> could be thats where ubuntu got it
[21:15] <Eickmeyer[m]> And, to be fair, ondemand was an Ubuntu-only thing that replaced something from upstart.
[21:15] <Eickmeyer[m]> So, it was a hack at best.
[21:15] <OvenWerks> I was thinking of moving studio to multi-user
[21:16] <OvenWerks> I think it was an unneeded hack as the cpu comes up in powersave anyway
[21:16] <Eickmeyer[m]> Yeah, maybe it was removed for that very reason.
[21:17] <OvenWerks> anyway the service would still work it is just not being run
[21:18] <Eickmeyer[m]> So, I don't see it as an issue, since everything works regardless.
[21:19] <OvenWerks> system always comes up in powersave regardless of setting
[21:20] <Eickmeyer[m]> Oh, I see.
[21:21] <Eickmeyer[m]> Yeah, I'm sure there's a way, and that way would be distro-agnostic and might solve the same problem in Fedora.
[21:23] <OvenWerks> I am not at the right computer right now, but it looks like just moving the /lib/systemd/system/ondemandservice.wants/studio.* file to /lib/systemd/system/multi-user*/should work
[21:23] <Eickmeyer[m]> Ok, cool.
[21:26] <OvenWerks> nope, have to remake the file first but they are all short anyway.
[21:30] <Eickmeyer[m]> Yeah, systemd service files are pretty easy once you do a few.
[21:33] <Eickmeyer[m]> OvenWerks: Is this true in both Focal and Groovy?
[21:38] <krytarik> Eickmeyer[m]: Just skimming over the release post, the "ardour" at the link to their website needs capitalized. >_<
[21:41] <Eickmeyer[m]> krytarik: Fixed
[21:52] <krytarik> Eickmeyer[m]: Also found a "cowdfunded" >_<
[21:53] <Eickmeyer[m]> krytarik: That's correct. It can be either crowd-funded or crowdfunded.
[21:53] <krytarik> Well, it's missing an 'r' in the crowd though!
[21:54] <Eickmeyer[m]> Ohhhh I didn't see that.
[21:54] <krytarik> "We are still hammering-out what those benefits might be, and we would love to hear some feedback about what those benefits might be." - and I think the repetition could be folded here.
[21:58] <Eickmeyer[m]> krytarik: "We are still hammering-out the benefits to patrons, and we would love to hear some feedback about what those benefits might be." is that better?
[22:04] <krytarik> I think in context to the preceding sentence, the original beginning was right and I was thinking of just shortening the second part of the sentence to like "and we would love to hear some feedback regarding that."
[22:12] <Eickmeyer[m]> Well, repetition or not, I'm not changing it again.
[23:58] <OvenWerks> Eickmeyer[m]: just groovy, focal is fine.
[23:58] <Eickmeyer[m]> OvenWerks: Ok, that is going to make backporting future versions of studio-controls very difficult then.
[23:59] <OvenWerks> maybe not, the new way should work with both.
[23:59] <Eickmeyer[m]> Ok, we'll go with that hypothesis then.
[23:59] <OvenWerks> I may need to put a delay in though