[00:50] <vorlon> why is https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/groovy_outdate.txt suddenly a lie
[10:09] <Laney> The primary archive publisher is off for a little bit while we initialise the new series
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (groovy-proposed/main) [3.38.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.38.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 7889 entries have been added or removed
[11:20] <Laney> stgraber: mdeslaur: Either of you around to help us with an ACL change for the release please? should be: for pocket in proposed updates; do edit-acl -p ubuntu-sru -S groovy --pocket $pocket -t admin add; done && for pocket in release proposed; do edit-acl -p ubuntu-release -S groovy --pocket $pocket -t admin delete; done
[11:22] <mdeslaur> Laney: sure, one sec
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected golang-golang-x-exp [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.0~git20181112.a3060d4-2]
[11:23]  * Laney hands the baton to ~ubuntu-sru
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-golang-x-exp (hirsute-release/universe) [0.0~git20181112.a3060d4-1build1 => 0.0~git20181112.a3060d4-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:23] <Laney> whoops
[11:24] <mdeslaur> @Laney: done
[11:24] <Laney> cheers mdeslaur!
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected golang-golang-x-exp [sync] (hirsute-release) [0.0~git20181112.a3060d4-2]
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-golang-x-exp (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20181112.a3060d4-1build1 => 0.0~git20181112.a3060d4-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mysql-8.0 (groovy-proposed/main) [8.0.21-1 => 8.0.22-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:38] <Laney> no idea about that component-mismatches mail ...
[11:42] <doko> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.txt shows everything for demotion ;p
[11:42] <Laney> do it!
[11:53] <mdeslaur> oh crap, please kill mysql-8.0 there ^
[11:53] <mdeslaur> that was supposed to go to the security ppa
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mysql-8.0 [source] (groovy-proposed) [8.0.22-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[11:55] <apw> mdeslaur, ^
[11:55] <mdeslaur> thanks apw
[12:31] <Laney> Publisher back on, archive should be normalish now
[12:38] <Laney> (that might be unclear - hirsute is still closed)
[12:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby2.7 (focal-proposed/main) [2.7.0-5ubuntu1.1 => 2.7.0-5ubuntu1.2] (i386-whitelist)
[13:22] <tjaalton> tseliot: bug #1900452 is missing required sru information
[13:22] <tjaalton> as mentioned on the bug too, it seems
[13:22] <tseliot> tjaalton, yes, I noticed. I'll fix it
[13:23] <tjaalton> thanks
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:13.99.2-1ubuntu2]
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.11]
[14:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-guest-agent [source] (groovy-proposed) [20200617.00-0ubuntu6]
[14:15] <tjaalton> tdaitx: openjdk-lts in groovy-proposed should have a tracker bug
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openjfx [source] (focal-proposed) [11.0.7+0-2ubuntu2]
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected yaru-theme [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.9]
[14:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected borgbackup [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.14-2ubuntu1.20.04.1]
[14:29] <Laney> I'm just going to clean out groovy-proposed so it's nice and shiny for SRUs
[14:29] <tjaalton> I already did? :)
[14:29] <tjaalton> mostly
[14:29] <Laney> oh you did!
[14:30] <tjaalton> the remaining three have some issues
[14:31] <Laney> tjaalton: ah, I mean something else
[14:31] <Laney> removing all the things that didn't migrate
[14:31] <Laney> when it was devel
[14:31] <ijohnson> so what's the new codename for 21.04?
[14:31] <ogra> something hairy
[14:32] <Laney> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hirsute/
[14:32] <ogra> that doesnt tell the animal, does it ?
[14:34] <ijohnson> hmm yeah curious what the animal is
[14:34] <Laney> nobody knows
[14:34] <Laney> (seriously)
[14:35] <Laney> tjaalton: so what do I need to keep in proposed? pulseaudio apt google-guest-agent anything else?
[14:35] <Laney> tzdata
[14:36] <ijohnson> fair enough thanks Laney
[14:36]  * ijohnson patiently waits
[14:42] <tjaalton> Laney: ah, yes that's all
[15:05] <Laney> tjaalton: done
[16:01] <juliank> I see failed builds on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.1.11, but no log, what's going on there?
[16:01] <juliank> Was the upload accepted to early and the builders not ready or something?
[16:01] <juliank> I'll go retry s390x
[16:02] <tjaalton> could be
[16:03] <tjaalton> same thing for pulseaudio
[16:03] <juliank> I guess it seems to be building now
[16:04] <tdaitx> tjaalton: the upload didn't get to the archive in time, so it will be done to groovy-security by the security team, it can be safely removed, I will upload to devel again when that is open, thanks for the reminder =)
[16:04] <vorlon> juliank: there shouldn't have been a time when the builders weren't ready to build groovy-proposed fwiw
[16:05] <juliank> vorlon: well, something happened
[16:05] <juliank> vorlon: since there are no logs, it's hard to say what
[16:07] <vorlon> yeah, probably a transient launchpad failure
[16:13] <arnatious> tjaalton - can I get a lookover on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/1883175
[16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.8]
[16:15] <tjaalton> arnatious: and do what?
[16:15] <arnatious> The packages have been staged for a few weeks, afaik I covered the autopkgtest failures in #34, are those acceptable explanations?
[16:17] <vorlon> sil2100: https://monicaserrano.com/The-Citrus-Family
[16:17] <tjaalton> arnatious: they are all in proposed and haven't been verified?
[16:19] <arnatious> tjaalton: Yes, vorlon copied them to focal-proposed in #25-#27
[16:19] <tjaalton> arnatious: so.. test them?
[16:23] <bdmurray> I thought python-flake8 was previously removed because it would cause autopkgtest failures with follow on SRUs e.g. update-manager.
[16:25] <arnatious> bdmurray correct, those failures are expected though, those packages contain code style errors
[16:28] <arnatious> and tjaalton gotcha, is there a report format I should use? I've been using the packages without issue this whole time
[16:28] <bdmurray> Right but now if somebody uploads update-manager they have additional work to do fix those failures. Its also possible those failures would by the developer so they'd need to upload update-manager twice.
[16:28] <bdmurray> s/would/wouldn't bee seen/
[16:28] <tjaalton> arnatious: change the tags to 'done'
[16:28] <tjaalton> needed -> done
[16:29] <tjaalton> but they won't move to updates on a Friday ;)
[16:29] <arnatious> bdmurray gotcha - should I sru those packages as well?
[16:29] <bdmurray> arnatious: that'd be helpful and then we can stage them in -proposed until there is an SRU which fixes a bug for users.
[16:32] <arnatious> bdmurray will do
[16:32] <arnatious> tjaalton thanks!
[16:32] <bdmurray> arnatious: I'm happy to sponsor the update-manager changes
[16:33] <arnatious> bdmurray budgie-extras, update-manager, and ubuntu-release-upgrader are all in the same boat (just a variable named 'i' in a test failing the style check)
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-golang-x-exp [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0~git20181112.a3060d4-2]
[16:59] <tumbleweed> are we expecting an animal name soon?
[17:01] <Laney> hopefully :(
[17:03] <vorlon> bdmurray: ah the release notes were updated to say "no longer possible (to do memory test) under EFI - BIOS OK"; but this is not a regression at all and I don't think it needs to be in the release notes, so I've deleted it
[17:04] <Laney> ubuntu-release - you can accept toolchain uploads now, so other things build with them
[17:05] <Laney> No autopkgtest or proposed-migration yet, I'm still waiting for that to be initialised, will turn it on at some point over the weekend and let this channel know
[17:05] <Laney> I told doko in private to upload stuff if there are things to upload
[17:12] <bdmurray> vorlon: are you doing limequat or am I?
[17:12] <vorlon> bdmurray: I'm higher up in the checklist right now doing things on anonster
[17:12] <vorlon> so you might get to it before me?
[17:40]  * sil2100 is prepping debootstrap uploads if anything
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.0.123ubuntu1 => 1.0.123ubuntu2] (desktop-core)
[17:47] <bdmurray> vorlon, sil2100: Could one of you look at my tzdata 2020d debdiff for Focal? The strange bit is restoring the SystemV timezones. https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/vpYvXG3fkK/
[17:56] <sil2100> hm, I remember seeing those dropped in your previous upload, the patch looks similar - but I guess vorlon has more experience with this package perhaps?
[17:57] <bdmurray> sil2100: They were dropped in groovy b/c it was the development release. I figured we should keep it for stable releases just in case.
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.95ubuntu0.7 => 1.0.95ubuntu0.8] (core)
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (xenial-proposed/main) [1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.11 => 1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.12] (core)
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.118ubuntu1.2 => 1.0.118ubuntu1.3] (core)
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (groovy-proposed/main) [1.0.123ubuntu1 => 1.0.123ubuntu1.1] (desktop-core)
[18:09] <sil2100> bdmurray: it *looks* correct, don't see anything fishy there, but I can't really tell if it's really how it's supposed to be
[18:10] <sil2100> bdmurray: debootstrap SRUs uploaded - can you review if you have a moment?
[18:11]  * sil2100 goes exercise for a bit
[18:12] <bdmurray> sil2100: I guess you could look at https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/tree/systemv?h=applied/ubuntu/focal-updates for comparison
[18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.118ubuntu1.3]
[18:42] <bdmurray> zabUdka ?
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.123ubuntu1.1]
[18:45] <bdmurray> vorlon: can you fix sru-review to default to groovy now?
[18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.95ubuntu0.8]
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.12]
[19:30] <vorlon> bdmurray: done; and fixed up a number of other series references
[19:31] <bdmurray> vorlon: thanks! Do you have any opinion on the tzdata diff?
[19:31] <vorlon> bdmurray: hadn't looked yet; looking now
[19:32] <vorlon> bdmurray: oh. I don't see it in the queue for focal?
[19:32] <bdmurray> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/vpYvXG3fkK/
[19:32] <vorlon> ah
[19:33] <bdmurray> The SystemV stuff is the only thing that might be contentious.
[19:33] <bdmurray> Or odd
[19:33] <bdmurray> Or hirsute!
[19:36] <vorlon> bdmurray: I agree that it's important we keep those timezone files around in stable releases where they currently exist.  How do we test that the output is correct?
[19:42] <bdmurray> vorlon: probably zdmup -v SystemVPST8PDT
[19:42] <vorlon> bdmurray: are you planning to do this after archive accept?
[19:42] <bdmurray> vorlon: this what?
[19:44] <bdmurray> I can add checking for SystemV stuff to the test case
[19:47] <tjaalton> tdaitx: thanks, dropped from the queue (now that I noticed your msg)
[19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openjdk-lts [source] (groovy-proposed) [11.0.9+11-0ubuntu1]
[19:52] <vorlon> bdmurray: run the zdump check, yeah
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.123ubuntu2]
[20:01] <vorlon> Laney, sil2100: seems to me that one of the items on the opening checklist is out of order, if checking for results.cache under proposed-migration can't happen until after autopkgtest initialization is done
[20:01] <vorlon> Laney, sil2100: at least, the blockers are not declared
[20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.14-dfsg-4 => 6.1.16-dfsg-1] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync)
[21:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (bionic-proposed/main) [2020a-0ubuntu0.18.04 => 2020d-0ubuntu0.18.04] (core)
[21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (focal-proposed/main) [2020a-0ubuntu0.20.04 => 2020d-0ubuntu0.20.04] (core)
[21:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (xenial-proposed/main) [2020a-0ubuntu0.16.04 => 2020d-0ubuntu0.16.04] (core)
[22:57] <vorlon> doko: I haven't seen anything that states what toolchain updates are coming before we open the archive; do you have a list?