[00:01] <OvenWerks> actually  can just leave the part in that is there and add the other and it will still work.
[00:08] <Eickmeyer[m]> OvenWerks: 👍️
[15:50] <sakrecoer[m]> <krytarik "Eickmeyer: Just skimming over th"> and maybe "new in* this release" in the second h2 :)
[15:51] <sakrecoer[m]> huge ups and lots of congratulations for the new release!
[15:52] <sakrecoer[m]> also, i'm super Happy for you that you've been granted to ask for fundings! y'all really diserve it!!
[15:53] <sakrecoer[m]> y'all the best!! 💜 enough noise from me in #dev !
[16:35] <MauroGaspari[m]> I might have found a big bug in 20.10. virt-manager storage no longer works. If I try to configure a storage repository, i get an error that virt-manager fails to check the COW status of the storage, and returns an error because I am not running BTRFS. Can anyone confirm this?
[16:35] <MauroGaspari[m]> I booted my 20.04.1 and virt-manager works fine there
=== ubott2 is now known as ubottu
=== Wimpress_ is now known as Wimpress
=== Tsesarevich_ is now known as Tsesarevich
[17:01] <Eickmeyer[m]> Mauro Gaspari: So, that's not an Ubuntu Studio issue at all.
[17:02] <Eickmeyer[m]> And, for the record, I'm running on BTRFS right now.
[17:02] <MauroGaspari[m]> I think if confirmed, this should affect all Ubuntu 20.10. possibly due to the fedora changes in their default file system?
[17:03] <Eickmeyer[m]> Probably not. Ubuntu's default file system is ext4. Distros don't guarantee interoperability with each other.
[17:04] <Eickmeyer[m]> If you believe you have an issue though, file a bug against virt-manager. (ubuntu-bug virt-manager)
[17:05] <Eickmeyer[m]> That said, that's definitely an Ubuntu thing, not Studio.
[17:06] <MauroGaspari[m]> I will go and file it right away, sounds pretty bad not to have kvm storage unless on BTRFS, which is not a default in ubuntu. Thanks Eickmeyer 
[17:07] <MauroGaspari[m]> I'll fire up my laptop which also runs 20.10 and confirm there first. but yes thanks!
[17:07] <Eickmeyer[m]> Mauro Gaspari: No problem. :)
[17:08] <MauroGaspari[m]> by the way, thanks to Michael
[17:08] <MauroGaspari[m]> https://frontpagelinux.com/news/ubuntu-studio-20-10-is-it-the-perfect-linux-distro/
[17:08] <Eickmeyer[m]> Nice!
[17:10] <MauroGaspari[m]> I got the tutorial ready as a separate article. This one is not based on ubuntu budgie but as you saw, on ubuntu studio 20.10, with all the updated looks, LSP plugins instead of Calf.
[17:10] <MauroGaspari[m]> Michael will probably wait a bit to publish it because he will want to leave some breathing time to this article
[17:11] <Eickmeyer[m]> Yeah, that makes sense. Michael and I have discussions about these things. :)
[18:54] <tomreyn> does http://ubuntustudio.net point into the void on purpose, or is this actually in use, just differently?
[18:55] <Eickmeyer[m]> tomreyn: As far as I know, we don't own that domain.
[18:59] <tomreyn> Eickmeyer[m]: whois says canonical does, so i was wondering
[19:01] <Eickmeyer[m]> tomreyn: Then it probably needs a simple redirect.
[19:04] <tomreyn> it's not important, i just happened to realize it resolves to an ip address (which is currently delegated to canonical), so i got curious.
[19:33] <Eickmeyer[m]> tomreyn: I just filed an rt ticket about it. Thanks for bringing it to my attention!
[21:19] <tomreyn> :)