 Agree
 Agree with ppa
[01:52] <tsimonq2> I'll send out a call for testing in an hour or two 
[01:52] <tsimonq2> If anyone is awake I'd appreciate a second set of eyes :)
 *throws a pair of eyes at simon he 'found'*
 there's your second set of eyes simon :)
[02:01] <teward> tsimonq2: ^
 @tsimonq2 what exactly did you need in terms of a second set of eyes on something
 'cause i'm bored :)
 @teward001 [@tsimonq2 what exactly did you need in terms of a second set of eyes on somethin …], See PM
[05:20] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Lubuntu CI] jobgenerator just failed after succeeding: https://ci.lubuntu.me/job/jobgenerator/785/
 @kc2bez @tsimonq2 Can we sync calamares?
 I have no issue with that if @tsimonq2 has no issue with it.
 any (l)ubuntu centric patches we have to drop if we sync?
 'cause the sync tool is gonna ask :P
 that was my implicit question
 @kc2bez because if the patches currently in the .deb in Ubuntu's repos need to stay then we have to merge not sync
 this is why I was 1st asking the people who have done the majority of ubuntu maintenance :P
 Yeah, we should merge then. We have 2 patches and need them both.
 One is for our apport hook and that is pretty important.
 ok. merge needs doing then, as this is blocking new kpmcore which has a CVE
 https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-announce/2020-October/000124.html
 Thanks for the info @RikMills
 the other way to do this is sync and then readd the patches - the merge kind of does both things together
 syncs are easy, merges are harder :P
 Moving the patches to cala-settings?
 Fwd from mitya57: I'm going to publish the current contents of https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4316/+packages in a few hours and let the rest of Qt be autosynced (the Debian transition will also start today).
 Fwd from mitya57: Then I will do the rdepends rebuilds in a day or two, when Qt is built.
 from #ubuntu-qt, FYI
 yeah prob wait for Qt to sync over first before poking Cala
 in case things asplode