[00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: qtwayland-opensource-src [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.15.1-3] (kubuntu, qt5)
[00:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: qtwayland-opensource-src [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.15.1-3] (kubuntu, qt5)
[00:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: qtwayland-opensource-src [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.15.1-3] (kubuntu, qt5)
[00:52] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @RikMills [@tsimonq2 I think the ticket publishing from bileto worked, but please double ch …], Looking
[01:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: qtwayland-opensource-src [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.15.1-3] (kubuntu, qt5)
[01:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: qtwayland-opensource-src [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.15.1-3] (kubuntu, qt5)
[06:17] <lubot> <mitya57> Thank you @tsimonq2! All looks fine from the first sight.
[06:18] <lubot> <mitya57> Thank you all! I see that WebKit copied fine :)
[07:25] <lubot> <mitya57> Oh, qtwebengine also needs ruby :(
[07:32] <lubot> <Santa> good morning
[07:32] <lubot> <Santa> what's the deal with ruby?
[07:33] <lubot> <mitya57> @Santa [what's the deal with ruby?], Morning! There is a dependency loop between ruby and ruby-rubygems, so neither is installable.
[07:34] <lubot> <mitya57> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwebengine-opensource-src/5.15.1+dfsg-5/+build/20219754
[07:35] <lubot> <mitya57> Oh, qt3d needs link with -latomic on riscv64, I forgot to fix it :(
[08:13] <lubot> <Santa> @mitya57 am I missing something or this package needs to be synced from debian: https://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rubygems.html
[08:13] <lubot> <Santa> (to fix the ruby problem)
[08:14] <lubot> <Santa> https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-defaults/-/commit/909f416d20b7939585548d9f3afdf9970b0b2116
[08:14] <lubot> <Santa> "ruby is uninstallable before ruby-rubygems is actually in the … archive."
[08:21] <lubot> <mitya57> That package is synced. But it's also broken in Debian.
[08:26] <lubot> <Santa> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972702
[08:26] <ubottu> Debian bug 972702 in ruby-bundler "ruby-bundler: dependency resolution fails for compiled gems" [Grave,Open]
[08:26] <lubot> <Santa> aha
[08:26] <lubot> <Santa> soy maybe we could ask the archive admins to remove ruby-defaults temprorarily from -proposed ?
[08:27] <lubot> <Santa> s/soy/so/
[08:29] <lubot> <Santa> along with the other one (src:rubygems)
[08:31] <lubot> <mitya57> @Santa [soy maybe we could ask the archive admins to remove ruby-defaults temprorarily f …], I asked doko exactly about the same yesterday ;)
[08:32] <lubot> <Santa> ok, what a mess
[08:43] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [Thank you all! I see that WebKit copied fine :)], :)
[08:43] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [Oh, qtwebengine also needs ruby :(], :(
[08:46] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [I asked doko exactly about the same yesterday ;)], should we progress to asking in #ubuntu-release ?
[08:59] <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills [should we progress to asking in #ubuntu-release ?], Done
[08:59] <RikMills> great
[09:09] <lubot> <mitya57> I will wait 15 minutes and then retry qtwebengine
[09:09] <lubot> <RikMills> \o/
[09:10] <lubot> <Santa> thanks
[09:11] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [I will wait 15 minutes and then retry qtwebengine], then wait 20+ hrs for arm64 😢😂
[09:32] <lubot> <mitya57> It started building!
[09:33] <lubot> <RikMills> :)
[09:59] <lubot> <Santa> also: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwebkit-opensource-src
[10:00] <lubot> <Santa> needs to be retried at some point
[10:04] <lubot> <RikMills> @Santa [needs to be retried at some point], done
[11:05] <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills Can you tell me how to move the Qt transitions from planned to ongoing on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/ ? Or I should ask on #ubuntu-release?
[11:07] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [@RikMills Can you tell me how to move the Qt transitions from planned to ongoing …], https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-transition-trackers/ubuntu-transition-tracker/configs
[11:08] <lubot> <mitya57> Thanks!
[11:08] <lubot> <RikMills> move the qt files from monitor/planned folder to monitor/ongoing folder
[11:08] <lubot> * mitya57 uploaded rebuilds for level 2 reverse dependencies
[11:10] <lubot> <mitya57> Pushed https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-transition-trackers/ubuntu-transition-tracker/configs/revision/850, thanks again
[11:12] <lubot> <RikMills> np
[11:13] <lubot> <mitya57> hedgewars failed to install build-dependencies because of some ghc stuff
[11:14] <lubot> <mitya57> fcitx-qt5 failed with symbols error, that is much easier to fix
[11:38] <lubot> <mitya57> qtpim failed with tests failures :(
[12:42] <lubot> <RikMills> :/
[12:45] <lubot> <RikMills> vorlon has been doing rebuilds for new ghc, so he may know the state of play
[13:44] <lubot> <Santa> qtpim looks like a timeout
[13:46] <lubot> <Santa> I mean, just retrying might built it I guess. it was build succesfully for riscv64
[13:46] <lubot> <Santa> * built
[13:59] <lubot> <mitya57> @Santa [qtpim looks like a timeout], qtpim has timeout on amd64, but it was already broken there. On other architectures it has a new test failure. On riscv64 the tests are not run at all.
[14:00] <lubot> <mitya57> In addition to all that, there is an endianness error on s390x, but it is also not new.
[14:00] <lubot> <mitya57> I will look at it a bit later.
[14:03] <lubot> <Santa> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-desktop-portal-kde/5.19.5-0ubuntu3/+build/20224640
[14:03] <lubot> <mitya57> Just retried.
[14:03] <lubot> <Santa> ↑ this one needs a rebuild I guess
[14:03] <lubot> <Santa> thanks
[19:27] <lubot> <mitya57> Day summary: … - all rebuilds are uploaded. … - qtwebengine built on amd64, but has NEW binaries. … - qt3d fixed in Debian, will be autosynced. … - Mike Gabriel seems to be working on the qtpim fix, I will leave it to him. … - hedgewars build-dependencies are still not installable.
[19:35] <lubot> <RikMills> thanks
[19:36] <lubot> <RikMills> ghc transition apparently has multiple levels of rebuilds to do before all works, so might not be quick
[19:44] <lubot> <Santa> @mitya57 who is Mike Gabriel?
[19:45] <lubot> <mitya57> @Santa [@mitya57 who is Mike Gabriel?], qtpim maintainer, see https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qtpim-opensource-src
[19:45] <lubot> <Santa> of the debian package
[19:45] <lubot> <mitya57> Yes
[19:46] <lubot> <Santa> alright can you please forward to him my guess about the failure?
[19:46] <lubot> <Santa> mu guess is:
[19:46] <lubot> <Santa> * my guess is:
[19:47] <lubot> <Santa> This commit is causing the autotest regression: https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/?id=edec095cf80b62057116ce75c581b5ca5866bdcc
[19:48] <lubot> <Santa> I'm also guessing "2.0" and "-1.0" are being read as ints since that commit
[19:48] <lubot> <Santa> therefore the autotests fails because it's expecting a double
[19:48] <lubot> <Santa> JUST A GUESS XD
[19:48] <lubot> <mitya57> @Santa [This commit is causing the autotest regression: https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbas …], That commit is included only in dev branch, it's not in 5.15
[19:49] <lubot> <mitya57> @Santa [I'm also guessing "2.0" and "-1.0" are being read as ints since that commit], But you are right, these numbers are now treated as integers for some reason.
[19:49] <lubot> <mitya57> Maybe it's an effect of the major parser rewrite in 5.15 (it now uses CBOR internally).
[19:50] <lubot> <Santa> I would bet for the JSON parser
[19:55] <lubot> <mitya57> If I'm reading this code correctly, all numbers with a dot should be treated as doubles, not integers: … https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/src/corelib/serialization/qjsonparser.cpp?h=5.15.1#n711
[19:55] <lubot> <mitya57> So I have no idea why they are actually becoming qlonglong :/
[19:56] <lubot> <Santa> so you are guessing this is the commit which broke the thing: https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/?h=v5.15.1&id=35adb74ddd915831789f0175423660f8e898942e
[19:56] <lubot> <mitya57> Yes, probably that one. But it's just a guess.
[20:05] <lubot> <mitya57> Maybe the best way to fix it is replacing 2.0 with 2.1 and -1.0 with -1.1
[20:05] <lubot> <mitya57> Anyway, end of day for me, good night
[20:26] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 thank you. I think progress has been good :)
[20:27] <lubot> <Santa> I guess it won't be a tragedy if the qtpim reads "2.0" as integer into a QVariant
[20:27] <lubot> <Santa> good night