[08:26] libreoffice tests need a libreoffice rebuild in proposed, or some clever sets of triggers to not make autopackage tests fall back to all-proposed [08:27] i.e. trying to test libreoffice in release with the liborcus in proposed breaks the ui tests [08:28] If liborcus had breaking changes then I think it's better to rebuild LO [08:33] sounds like the libreoffice guys will be doing that soon. fingers crossed [08:35] I see in #ubuntu-desktop. Thanks for asking there :) [12:36] the libqglviewer autopkgtest issue is... weird [12:38] no it's not [12:39] the autopkgtest depends upon qt5-default [12:39] mitya57: ↑ I'll file a bug [12:39] lisandro: aaaah, thanks for finding that! [12:40] Please file a bug, yes [12:40] And block the transition bug with it [12:40] Sure! [12:41] It's in science team, so I can do a team upload if Anton doesn't respond quickly enough [12:48] kind of my mistake, I should have uploaded qtbase to experimental and checked autopkgtests when I removed that package [12:48] on the other hand having tools to detect that would also become handy [13:40] I think "reverse-depends -b pkgname" (from ubuntu-dev-tools) can show reverse testsuite triggers (also works on Debian). [13:43] # reverse-depends -b qt5-default [13:43] reverse-depends: Error:

Package not published in specified release

[13:43] both on unstable and stable [13:50] lisandro: "-r testing" works [13:50] That package is indeed no longer published in unstable [13:50] and catches our case [13:50] great! [13:52] ah, my stable system does not has deb-src entries [13:52] * lisandro facepalms [13:52] mitya57: did you get the bug number (CCed you in the bug report) [14:16] I didn't get it, but I'm from phone, will look later [14:31] lisandro: I see it, Debian #973607 [14:31] Debian bug 973607 in src:libqglviewer "libqglviewer: Depends upon removed package qt5-default" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/973607 [14:32] great!