 libreoffice tests need a libreoffice rebuild in proposed, or some clever sets of triggers to not make autopackage tests fall back to all-proposed
 i.e. trying to test libreoffice in release with the liborcus in proposed breaks the ui tests
 If liborcus had breaking changes then I think it's better to rebuild LO
 sounds like the libreoffice guys will be doing that soon. fingers crossed
 I see in #ubuntu-desktop. Thanks for asking there :)
[12:36] <lisandro> the libqglviewer autopkgtest issue is... weird
[12:38] <lisandro> no it's not
[12:39] <lisandro> the autopkgtest depends upon qt5-default
[12:39] <lisandro> mitya57: ↑ I'll file a bug
[12:39] <mitya57> lisandro: aaaah, thanks for finding that!
[12:40] <mitya57> Please file a bug, yes
[12:40] <mitya57> And block the transition bug with it
[12:40] <lisandro> Sure!
[12:41] <mitya57> It's in science team, so I can do a team upload if Anton doesn't respond quickly enough
[12:48] <lisandro> kind of my mistake, I should have uploaded qtbase to experimental and checked autopkgtests when I removed that package
[12:48] <lisandro> on the other hand having tools to detect that would also become handy
[13:40] <mitya57> I think "reverse-depends -b pkgname" (from ubuntu-dev-tools) can show reverse testsuite triggers (also works on Debian).
[13:43] <lisandro> # reverse-depends -b qt5-default
[13:43] <lisandro> reverse-depends: Error: <p>Package not published in specified release</p>
[13:43] <lisandro> both on unstable and stable
[13:50] <mitya57> lisandro: "-r testing" works
[13:50] <mitya57> That package is indeed no longer published in unstable
[13:50] <lisandro> and catches our case
[13:50] <lisandro> great!
[13:52] <lisandro> ah, my stable system does not has deb-src entries
[13:52]  * lisandro facepalms
[13:52] <lisandro> mitya57: did you get the bug number (CCed you in the bug report)
[14:16] <mitya57> I didn't get it, but I'm from phone, will look later
[14:31] <mitya57> lisandro: I see it, Debian #973607
[14:32] <lisandro> great!