[06:31] <lubot> <RikMills> looks like that sync happened
[06:44] <lubot> <RikMills> qtox tests triggered
[08:09] <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills [qtox tests triggered], Thank you!
[08:09] <lubot> <RikMills> ```Laney  Just noticed that I missed a spot when fixing the cowboy in autopkgtest-cloud to work for hirsute ...  10:05 … Laney  ...  10:05 … Laney  i386 tests were running as amd64 ones but just with i386 in the instance name```
[08:10] <lubot> <RikMills> from Oct 30th on #ubuntu-release ^^
[08:11] <lubot> <mitya57> "Nice"
[08:11] <lubot> <mitya57> We should probably add force-reset-test trigger then for pyqt5chart?
[08:11] <lubot> <RikMills> I think that is why we got some odd i386 passes!
[08:11] <lubot> <RikMills> so probably explains odd i386 passes
[08:11] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [We should probably add force-reset-test trigger then for pyqt5chart?], I think so
[08:12] <lubot> <mitya57> I will be able to make a merge proposal in a few hours only. Maybe you can do it now?
[08:12] <lubot> <RikMills> Not right away, so lets see
[08:13] <lubot> <mitya57> Ok, no problem
[10:20] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [We should probably add force-reset-test trigger then for pyqt5chart?], or maybe just 'force-badtest pyqt5chart/all/i386', as it is not ever expected to pass again. it originally had an i386 build, but no more.
[12:57] <lubot> <mitya57> That will also work. I'm sorry but I will be able to do anything only in ~4 hours.
[14:32] <lubot> <RikMills> libreoffice tests are not hurrying, so now problem
[16:25] <lisandro> I think you get stuff from unstable, but just in case: Qt migrated to testing (today?)
[16:27] <mitya57> In Ubuntu Qt is also quite close to migration. But it's independent of testing, yes.
[17:26] <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills [or maybe just 'force-badtest pyqt5chart/all/i386', as it is not ever expected to …], Created https://code.launchpad.net/~mitya57/britney/+git/britney/+merge/393459
[17:26] <lubot> <RikMills> ty
[17:27] <lubot> <mitya57> hedgewars still can't be built on ppc64el :-(
[17:27] <lubot> <RikMills> hedgewars should probably be removed release pocket if it becomes that last blocker
[17:29] <lubot> <mitya57> Asked LocutusOfBorg on #-devel
[17:30] <lubot> <mitya57> Not sure if that is the last blocker, as we are probably entangled with other transitions
[17:31] <lubot> <RikMills> I think some other things may depend on Qt at the moment, but not the other way
[17:33] <lubot> <mitya57> But we will see that clearly only when it becomes a valid candidate (or at least when it shows on update_output_notest.txt, which is probably not the case yet because of hedgewars).
[17:34] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [Asked LocutusOfBorg on #-devel], I already asked via DM, and it is probably not soon
[17:35] <lubot> <mitya57> Then let's ask for its removal when LO tests pass
[17:35] <lubot> <RikMills> agreed