| callmepk | good morning | 00:46 |
|---|---|---|
| jamesh | morning callmepk | 01:18 |
| callmepk | morning jamesh | 01:33 |
| duflu | Morning jamesh, callmepk | 01:44 |
| callmepk | morning duflu | 01:44 |
| jamesh | hi duflu | 01:44 |
| jibel | Good morning | 06:00 |
| seb128 | goood morning desktopers | 06:11 |
| duflu | Morning jibel and seb128 | 06:12 |
| seb128 | hey duflu, how are you? | 06:14 |
| seb128 | lut jibel, t'as passé un bon weekend? | 06:14 |
| duflu | seb128, wet. Summer is cancelled it seems. How are you? | 06:14 |
| seb128 | I'm alright! Weekend was nice enough, we managed to enjoy the sunny weather and to see some friends on saturday | 06:21 |
| duflu | Nice | 06:22 |
| jibel | salut seb128 duflu | 06:24 |
| jibel | seb128, w-e de 3 jours, ça fait du bien. Pas super actif avec le confinement mais c'est agréable aussi | 06:25 |
| oSoMoN | good morning desktoppers | 07:00 |
| seb128 | lut oSoMoN, comment ça va ? passé un bon weekend? | 07:17 |
| duflu | Morning oSoMoN | 07:18 |
| oSoMoN | salut seb128, bon week-end, mais j’ai attrapé le rhume de ma fille. Et toi? | 07:26 |
| oSoMoN | good afternoon duflu | 07:26 |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, ah, soigne toi bien! ici weekend ensoleillé et sympa (par contre journée un peu galère un perspective, ma copine a choppé la gastro et y a un rdv de suivi de pédiatre, donc je vais devoir gérer) | 07:28 |
| oSoMoN | seb128, bon courage! | 07:33 |
| marcustomlinson | morning desktoppers | 07:43 |
| duflu | Morning marcustomlinson | 07:49 |
| didrocks | good morning | 08:08 |
| duflu | Hi didrocks | 08:08 |
| didrocks | hey duflu | 08:10 |
| marcustomlinson | hey duflu and didrocks | 08:13 |
| seb128 | hey marcustomlinson | 08:40 |
| seb128 | lut didrocks | 08:40 |
| seb128 | how are you? | 08:40 |
| didrocks | salut seb128, I’m fine, thanks! Nothing really exciting over the weekend apart advancing a little bit on the house. You? | 08:42 |
| didrocks | hey marcustomlinson | 08:42 |
| Laney | morning! | 09:02 |
| didrocks | hey Laney | 09:02 |
| seb128 | didrocks, I'm alright, we had some nice weather over the weekend and enjoyed some walks, and we saw some friends who stopped by on saturday, otherwise nothing special | 09:03 |
| seb128 | hey Laney | 09:03 |
| Laney | hey hey didrocks ho ho seb128 | 09:03 |
| duflu | Hi Laney | 09:04 |
| Laney | hi hi duflu | 09:05 |
| oSoMoN | good morning marcustomlinson, didrocks, Laney | 09:07 |
| didrocks | salut oSoMoN | 09:09 |
| Laney | hey oSoMoN | 09:14 |
| seb128 | $ git pull | 09:26 |
| seb128 | ssh: Could not resolve hostname lp: Name or service not known | 09:26 |
| seb128 | hum? | 09:26 |
| Laney | do you have this thing: https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Git#Configuring_Git ? | 09:27 |
| seb128 | yes, it's my normal machine | 09:27 |
| seb128 | what's going on today? | 09:28 |
| Laney | dunno then, sorry, that sounds like it is trying to use lp: as a hostname instead of rewriting it | 09:28 |
| seb128 | I added that snippet back there, I wonder how it had been working before or what config I lost over the weekend... | 09:30 |
| seb128 | git and I shall never be real friends :p | 09:31 |
| seb128 | I was reading https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu-desktop-versions/+git/ubuntu-desktop-versions/+merge/393487 , turns out the list of commits is incomplete | 09:32 |
| seb128 | which could be a launchpad bug, unsure if gitlab/github handle that better | 09:32 |
| seb128 | also I got confused by the snap-store branch showing the most recent comments as from april in the 3.38 branch | 09:34 |
| seb128 | the non linear history is confusing | 09:34 |
| seb128 | oh well, I probably just need more coffee to be able to get along with git again, requires to be really awake to make any sense ;-) | 09:35 |
| jibel | seb128, FYI, hirsute image has grown by 400MB at 3.1GB. I didn't look what changed. | 09:51 |
| jibel | compared to latest groovy image | 09:51 |
| Laney | doesn't dok_o turn on some gcc thing at the start of cycle which makes bigger binaries, could be that? | 09:55 |
| Laney | not sure I remember that correctly | 09:56 |
| jibel | yeah, that's what I was thinking too but didn't check the size of the binaries on the iso | 09:57 |
| GunnarHj | Hi seb128, Please read my comment at bug #1903449 and compare it with how Robert motivated the patch deletion here: | 10:53 |
| GunnarHj | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/0.6.55-0ubuntu7 | 10:53 |
| GunnarHj | Any doubts? | 10:53 |
| ubot5 | bug 1903449 in accountsservice (Ubuntu) "accountsservice displays "Libvirt Qemu"" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1903449 | 10:53 |
| ricotz | hello desktopers! | 11:27 |
| ricotz | is there progress to pick up gnome-shell/mutter 3.36.7 for focal? | 11:27 |
| cpaelzer | GunnarHj: isn't the old root-bug we dup all those to at 857651 ? | 11:38 |
| cpaelzer | Thanks btw your reference to 1841079 explains why some things got better in that regard already | 11:38 |
| seb128 | ricotz, hey, there is .6 in the SRU queue but it has been blocked on the discourse discussion with the SRU team about testing all the available extensions in the archive | 11:38 |
| seb128 | .7 is probably one to pick for Trevinho | 11:39 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, hey, I think we had that issue even before when we had that patch | 11:39 |
| seb128 | I will check the bug comment in a bit though | 11:39 |
| seb128 | Laney, jibel , I think it's something toolchainish yes, iirc not individual binaries but something debug in the toolchain itself | 11:40 |
| ricotz | seb128, I see, 3.36.8 will be there in soon too though | 11:42 |
| GunnarHj | cpaelzer: AFAIU there are different issues. accountsservice should always prevent non-human users from showing up at e.g. the login screen, while bug #857651 is more about the ability for a system admin to hide certain human users as well. | 11:43 |
| ubot5 | bug 857651 in accountsservice (Ubuntu) "Unable to hide users from login screen / user switcher" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/857651 | 11:43 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: Are you saying that we should consider to drop the patch in xenial too? | 11:46 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, I'm not going to invest any desktop work on xenial at this point it's LTS-- | 11:55 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: Thought so. But you mentioned "even before" which was the reason I asked. | 11:58 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, I just know that login screen listing users that it shouldn't has been a complain for ever | 11:58 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: Ok. | 11:59 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, it's not clear to me if we still have bug, I know that the libvirt case has been raised over the years, e.G bug #1674765 | 12:04 |
| ubot5 | bug 857651 in accountsservice (Ubuntu) "duplicate for #1674765 Unable to hide users from login screen / user switcher" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/857651 | 12:04 |
| seb128 | but they were also using an uid which wasn't < 500 so unsure if that was their fault | 12:04 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: "/usr/sbin/nologin" should be sufficient to prevent a user from being shown. So the bug is indeed valid. (I even reproduced it.) | 12:06 |
| seb128 | did we ever show those? | 12:07 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: The case in the bug is an example of it - that libvirt-qemu user has /usr/sbin/nologin. | 12:08 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: And dropping the patch fixes it. | 12:08 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, it doesn't make much sense bug #1841079 states 'Downgrading them to 0.6.50-0ubuntu1 version (as it was in 20190821 iso) fixes the issue:' | 12:10 |
| ubot5 | bug 1841079 in accountsservice (Ubuntu Eoan) "Speech Dispatcher and other non-human users should not be shown on LightdDM login screen and session menus" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1841079 | 12:10 |
| seb128 | or bionic and xenial versions are older than this | 12:10 |
| seb128 | sounds like it's a different issue? | 12:11 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: Or a variant of it... We know that dropping the patch fixes the latest bug and that the patch originally was there due to Ubuntu Touch. | 12:12 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, I wouldn't bother trying to SRU that to older series | 12:14 |
| seb128 | it's a behaviour change, I'm unsure how we would assert that no one in those series is relying on the feature (even if it creates issues) | 12:15 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: "Won't fix" then? | 12:15 |
| seb128 | fix released, it's fixed in focal and newer no? | 12:16 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: Yes. I meant for bionic. | 12:16 |
| seb128 | don't add a line for bionic, or delete it or wontfix, either way | 12:20 |
| seb128 | I don't think the issue has enough 'user heat' to bother | 12:21 |
| seb128 | 12:29 | |
| seb128 | git question for the experts, how in a git merge with conflicts do I tell I want to reset the content of a file to the initial one? | 12:30 |
| seb128 | e.g bar has some conflicts and such a bunch of <<< & co sections | 12:31 |
| seb128 | it's will be easier to do 'go back to what is currently in the vcs and edit by hand on top' | 12:31 |
| seb128 | I tried to git checkout bar, but it says that bar is unmerged :-( | 12:31 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: Got it. Just closed the bug report with a comment. | 12:34 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, thx | 12:34 |
| Laney | seb128: like 'git restore --source=<some commit> some/path' maybe? | 12:40 |
| Laney | did you ever try using meld to resolve conflicts btw? | 12:40 |
| Laney | like git mergetool -t meld | 12:40 |
| seb128 | no, thanks for the tip | 12:40 |
| mgedmin | there's some magic syntax for git checkout to refer to the original file on either side of the merge by prefixing the filename with :1: and :2: | 12:43 |
| mgedmin | but it's usually easier to use a mergetool that displays everything | 12:44 |
| * mgedmin personally gets confused about which file is which and prefers the diff3 format of conflict markers, git config --global merge.conflictStyle diff3) | 12:45 | |
| Laney | lol | 12:47 |
| Laney | git questions always quickly turn complicated | 12:47 |
| seb128 | at least I learnt about git mergetool :p | 12:47 |
| seb128 | I went the 'easy' way | 12:47 |
| seb128 | cp file file.before | 12:47 |
| seb128 | git merge | 12:47 |
| seb128 | mv file.before file | 12:47 |
| seb128 | :p | 12:47 |
| seb128 | now I can edit and git add :) | 12:48 |
| luna_ | oSoMoN: another Firefox Dot release to package up today: https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/82.0.3/ | 14:30 |
| oSoMoN | luna_, ack: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/82.0.3+build1-0ubuntu1 | 14:30 |
| luna_ | great | 14:30 |
| luna_ | but [FAILEDTOBUILD] Failed to build does not sound that promising | 14:31 |
| oSoMoN | yes, that's a problem with build dependencies (perl in that case), that's rather typical at the beginning of the cycle where building blocks are moving fast | 14:35 |
| luna_ | ah i see | 14:36 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: Can you please advise about these autopkgtests blocking gtk+3.0: | 15:10 |
| GunnarHj | 1. juce i386 - should probably be ignored since juce isn't built for i386. | 15:10 |
| GunnarHj | 2. isenkram amd64 - probably needs some investigation | 15:10 |
| GunnarHj | Can you help with juce? How would you go about isenkram? Debian bug? | 15:10 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, unsure why 1) is getting tested at all if it isn't build on that arch indeed | 15:13 |
| seb128 | I think I will never understand how the partial archive is done for i386 | 15:14 |
| GunnarHj | :) | 15:14 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, I would suggest to try to mp an hint to badtest it and see how it goes, maybe ping vorlon for review | 15:14 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, isenkram did you try to reproduce in a vm or something? | 15:15 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: Please translate: "mp a hint to badtest it". | 15:15 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu | 15:16 |
| seb128 | see the recent commits | 15:16 |
| seb128 | do a merge proposed with a such change | 15:16 |
| seb128 | merge proposal | 15:16 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: I haven't tried anything yet (besides requesting new attempts). | 15:16 |
| seb128 | k, I would try in a fresh instance | 15:16 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: Ok, will do. | 15:17 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, https://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/auto-pkg-test.html#executing-the-test | 15:17 |
| seb128 | if you never really tried that | 15:17 |
| === acheronuk is now known as RikMills | ||
| hellsworth | good (late) morning desktopers! | 17:31 |
| oSoMoN | good morning hellsworth | 17:31 |
| hellsworth | hey ther oSoMoN how are you today? | 17:32 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: As regards isenkram I submitted bug #1903574 with some info which may or may not be useful. It doesn't seem to have very much with gtk+3.0 to do, though. | 17:44 |
| ubot5 | bug 1903574 in isenkram (Ubuntu) "isenkram-lookup crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1903574 | 17:44 |
| oSoMoN | hellsworth, I've caught a cold, so not feeling at 100%, but I'm otherwise good, how are you yourself? | 17:49 |
| hellsworth | oh that's too bad.. hopefully just a cold though :) | 17:52 |
| hellsworth | and it's an excuse to drink lots of tea.. i hope you feel better soon | 17:52 |
| hellsworth | oh i'm pretty good. a little hungry and excited to work on fun things this week :) | 17:52 |
| oSoMoN | yeah, tea with lots of honey in it :) | 17:53 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, great, if that's an issue in Debian could you report it there as well? | 19:32 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: Sure. | 19:33 |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, kenvandine , Lukazs was nice enough to review and accept the focal/yaru SRU, now to find someone to do the verification and then we should be able to move forward with the snap changes | 19:43 |
| oSoMoN | nice | 20:02 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!