[00:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (focal-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.12 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.13] (core, i386-whitelist)
[00:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (groovy-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu50.1 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[02:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.40 => 1:18.04.41] (core)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgaudit [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgaudit [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgaudit [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-prometheus-procfs [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgaudit [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-mvdan-xurls [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-alexflint-go-arg [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.3.0+ds-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgaudit [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-thedevsaddam-gojsonq [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.5.2-1] (no packageset)
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-mvdan-gofumpt [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20201107.a024667-1] (no packageset)
[05:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.5.1-4 => 1.5.1-4] (core)
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgaudit [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.5.1-4 => 1.5.1-4] (core)
[05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.5.1-4 => 1.5.1-4] (core)
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-alexflint-go-arg [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.3.0+ds-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-thedevsaddam-gojsonq [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.5.2-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-mvdan-xurls [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.2.0-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgaudit [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgaudit [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgaudit [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-prometheus-procfs [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.2.0-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgaudit [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgaudit [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-mvdan-gofumpt [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0~git20201107.a024667-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgaudit [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-1] (no packageset)
[08:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-1] (no packageset)
[08:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-1] (no packageset)
[08:21] <icey> Hey - any chance the nova that's been in the unnapproved queue for Focal for a few days could get accepted into propsed?
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-1] (no packageset)
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-1] (no packageset)
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-125.128]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-125.128]
[08:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-1] (no packageset)
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (groovy-proposed/main) [2020.04+dfsg-2ubuntu1 => 2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.10] (core)
[09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (focal-proposed/main) [2019.07+dfsg-1ubuntu6 => 2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.04] (core)
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.7]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.7]
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu35.1]
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu35.1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (bionic-proposed/main) [2019.07+dfsg-1ubuntu4~18.04.1 => 2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~18.04] (core)
[09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ktuberling [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [4:20.08.3-2] (kubuntu)
[09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot [source] (groovy-proposed) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.10]
[10:09] <sil2100> waveform: hey! I'm reviewing the focal u-boot backport right now, just a quick confirmation question: I see the rpi-config-migration script has been dropped with this release - is that safe?
[10:10] <waveform> sil2100, argh, knew I'd missed something - that's meant to be in bionic and focal, but not groovy
[10:10] <sil2100> waveform: like, isn't it needed for any upgrade scenarios? Or hm, do we already not use u-boot for focal? Can't remember
[10:11] <waveform> sil2100, sorry - I'll get that fixed up after this call
[10:11] <sil2100> Yeah, it wasn't there for groovy which is fine, but in the focal one I see it being removed
[10:11] <sil2100> Thanks! Poke mvo and he'll happily re-sponsor :)
[10:12] <waveform> will do
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected u-boot [source] (bionic-proposed) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~18.04]
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected u-boot [source] (focal-proposed) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.04]
[10:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.20]
[10:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.66.29]
[10:23] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: is mwhudson's patch at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973623#20 good enough to build with the BFD linker?
[10:24] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, no.
[10:25] <doko> do you have a more complete one?
[10:29] <Laney> doko: did you see mwhudson came up with a patch to gold (link posted on devel@)?
[10:30] <doko> Laney: yes, but gold isn't much maintained upstream, so the preferred option is to use the BFD linker
[10:31] <Laney> sure
[10:31] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: do you have a more complete one?
[10:31] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/4325
[10:31] <LocutusOfBorg> the problem is that now even that one doesn't build anymore
[10:31] <LocutusOfBorg> same in debian
[10:31] <LocutusOfBorg> some other binutils changes broke it again
[10:31] <Laney> just saying, this might be an easier way to unblock ghc and then you work on de-golding it separately
[10:31] <Laney> but if it's ftbfs anyway, ...
[10:31] <Laney> face <- palm
[10:32] <LocutusOfBorg> :/
[10:32] <LocutusOfBorg> let me try to no change reupload
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.02-2ubuntu8.20 => 2.02-2ubuntu8.20] (core)
[10:32] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, btw with parallel=2 armhf looks sooooooo faster (by some days=
[10:33] <Laney> huh
[10:33] <Laney> explain THAT
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.93.22]
[10:34] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4325/+build/20271746
[10:34] <LocutusOfBorg> Finished on 2020-11-14 (took 4 days, 13 hours, 25 minutes, 57.3 seconds)
[10:35] <LocutusOfBorg> the one in archive Finished on 2020-09-10 (took 6 days, 3 hours, 59 minutes, 59.5 seconds)
[10:35] <Laney> is that one data point or repeated over a few?
[10:36] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, the previous build, the Ubuntu 5 without that hack, failed after 6 days https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4325/+build/20267580
[10:36] <LocutusOfBorg> mostly 7 days
[10:36] <Laney> so one good, but many bad, interesting to see if it is really good after the next build then
[10:37] <LocutusOfBorg> no sorry Laney it didn't fail
[10:37] <LocutusOfBorg> it just failed to publish because in parallel I uploaded the ubuntu6 on same bileto
[10:41] <LocutusOfBorg> that is the only difference between ubuntu5 and ubuntu6, the first has parallel=4 the second has max-parallel=2 on armhf
[10:43] <LocutusOfBorg> the problem is: I switched away from gold on ppc64el, fixed a build failure, about bootstrapping with a bfd ghc archive version, and the build was good
[10:43] <LocutusOfBorg> then, the very same build, started to fail again for no reason
[10:45] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, what about adding this patch to binutils? https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=f1e05b19786669d29d59f48f26bc06ad67c221e2
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.29]
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.66.29]
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.02-2ubuntu8.20 => 2.02-2ubuntu8.20] (core)
[10:51] <ginggs> mwhudson doko: do we still need to build numpy without -srd=c99? as in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/numpy/1:1.18.4-1ubuntu1
[10:54] <doko> ginggs: I don't know. I would be better to investigate about the rounding errors?
[10:55] <doko> I'll ask Mathieu today
[11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.28 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.29] (core)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1074.79] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1103.114] (kernel)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1007.11] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gkeop-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1005.6] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1059.65] (kernel)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1032.33] (core, kernel)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1030.32] (core, kernel)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1027.28] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1032.33]
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1]
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1]
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1027.28]
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1030.32]
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1]
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1007.11]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gkeop-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1005.6]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1059.65]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1074.79]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1103.114]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.29 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.29] (core)
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.6.0-1035.37] (no packageset)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1013.14] (core, kernel)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1012.12] (core, kernel)
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1030.32] (core, kernel)
[12:12] <AsciiWolf> ahayzen, hi, anything new about the Steam package update in Ubuntu? :-)
[13:07] <xnox> ginggs:  yes. upstream fixed it, but then broke it, and fixed it again. i'm not sure if it is fixed in latest release of numpy or not.
[13:07] <xnox> ginggs:  it is meant to detect things correctly and not emit std=c99 anymore.
[13:08] <xnox> ginggs:  latest debian build still has std=c99 everywhere.....
[13:14] <ginggs> xnox: thanks
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1035.37]
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1013.14]
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1030.32]
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1012.12]
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-125.128~16.04.1] (kernel)
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1010.11] (core)
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1011.11] (core, kernel)
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-125.128~16.04.1] (kernel)
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1010.11]
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1011.11]
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-125.128~16.04.1]
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-125.128~16.04.1]
[14:14] <rbalint> is ubuntu-release a valid call sign, like ubuntu-archive?
[14:15] <apw> rbalint, not sure it is, it likely _should_ be, then again u-a didn't work for me either, wtf
[14:16] <seb128> I'm probably going to end up unconfiguring ubuntu-archive, it's mostly noise from urls copied, we should pick one that isn't conflicting with existing resources
[14:19] <rbalint> seb128, maybe a regex filter [^~]ubuntu-release would be better
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.1-1]
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.1-3]
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.1-4]
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.1-4]
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.1-3]
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.1-4]
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.1-3]
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [2.14.0-2ubuntu1]
[14:19] <apw> seb128, mine doesn't trigger on URLs, though how that works i think triggered it to miss the one above
[14:20] <seb128> apw, rbalint, I'm not sure hexchat accepts regexps for highlights
[14:20] <seb128> and I'm not going to change to a text IRC client
[14:20] <apw>   * CVE-2020-12351 // CVE-2020-12352 // CVE-2020-24490
[14:20] <apw>     - [Config] raspi: Disable BlueZ highspeed support
[14:20] <rbalint> seb128, apw call signs are immensely useful for people seeking for help, please keep watching it
[14:20] <apw> oh how much do i hate paste buffers,, just how much
[14:20] <seb128> rbalint, I was suggesting we change in something which isn't used 95% of the time in urls copied
[14:21] <apw> seb128, mine is definatly a regexp similar to that above, but with beginning of line too
[14:21] <seb128> apw, what IRC client are you using?
[14:22] <rbalint> seb128, google says that hexchat has regexp script
[14:22] <apw> seb128, weechat ... which has them by default, i am feeling hexchat has a plugin or something for this; i am sure people in the kernel-team do this
[14:22] <seb128> rbalint, thanks for the hint, I'm adding a backlog item to my todo to check on that, the default preferences doesn't have that option
[14:23] <seb128> apw, right, what rbalint said
[14:23] <rbalint> seb128, i hope it will work for you
[14:23] <rbalint> seb128, i think the established call sign is quite natural
[14:24] <seb128> right, just conflicted as I said :)
[14:24] <rbalint> by the way apw could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/393876 to let cross-toolchain-base finaly
[14:24] <rbalint> lly pass on arm64?
[14:25] <rbalint> apw, Laney and i have a bunch of hints, too: https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/393859
[15:03] <doko> mwhudson, LocutusOfBorg: test builds running in https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ubuntu/test/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=hirsute
[16:01] <bdmurray> waveform: the test case in bug 1903048 shouldn't refer to a PPA
[16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bluez [source] (groovy-proposed) [5.55-0ubuntu1.1]
[16:05] <bdmurray> waveform: I fieed it
[16:06] <bdmurray> fixed?
[16:06] <bdmurray> something
[16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu50.2]
[16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.13]
[16:34] <bdmurray> sil2100: What does "Let's think about it in the nearest time" mean practically? bug 1830746
[16:48] <teward> sil2100: you busy?
[16:48] <teward> or you able to poke agordejo in NEW since you were looking at it last?
[17:13] <vorlon> mwhudson: https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/393889 deployed, you can reschedule tests at any time
[17:17] <Laney> rbalint: can you rebase pls?
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-2] (no packageset)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-2] (no packageset)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-2] (no packageset)
[17:21] <rbalint> Laney, just saw the ping, thanks for the merge
[17:21] <Laney> only one of them, the big_packages thing conflicts now
[17:22] <rbalint> Laney, ah, that one!
[17:24] <rbalint> Laney, done
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-2] (no packageset)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-2] (no packageset)
[17:29] <Laney> cheers
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1032.33~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adcli [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.0-1ubuntu1.1]
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-2] (no packageset)
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1032.33~18.04.1]
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.58-0ubuntu0.20.10.0]
[17:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (focal-proposed) [1.58-0ubuntu0.20.04.0]
[18:02] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer[m]: can you explain the SRU of darktable to me? The description in bug 1903892 mentions "introduction of new dependencies" but no new dependencies were actually added to the package.
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby2.7 [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.7.1-3ubuntu1.1]
[18:10] <Eickmeyer[m]> bdmurray: You know, now that I look at it, there's really no difference other than the **removal** of deps. It's really just a Debian pull with LocutusOfBorg 's delta inserted. Perhaps we can treat as a no-change rebuild?
[18:11] <Eickmeyer[m]> I had to refresh my memory as to what was going on there. A lot has happened in my life this past week.
[18:11] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer[m]: So removing the Depends actually fixes the issue
[18:11] <Eickmeyer[m]> bdmurray: According to upstream, yes.
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: efivar (focal-proposed/main) [37-2ubuntu2.1 => 37-2ubuntu2.2] (core)
[18:17] <juliank> FWIW, I filed a Chrome bug about update_excuses.html rendering speed at https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1149988
[18:17] <juliank> Because um Firefox is two times faster and actually usable
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted darktable [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.2.1-3~ubuntu0.20.10.1]
[18:22] <Laney> might want to upload the html in case it changes before someone gets to it?
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (focal-proposed) [2:21.1.0-0ubuntu2]
[18:28] <teward> ubuntu-archive: in case sil2100 doesn't get to it, can someone look at agordejo in hirsute NEW please?  (cc Eickmeyer Eickmeyer[m] who is the driver behind wanting this in the repos)
[18:29] <bdmurray> seb128: bug 1861769 is missing SRU info
[18:38] <sil2100> Oh!
[18:38] <sil2100> It got re-uploaded!
[18:39] <teward> sil2100: yes, it did
[18:39] <teward> i reuploaded it.. um... *checks date*
[18:40] <teward> ... five days ago :p
[18:40] <teward> sil2100: ^
[18:40] <sil2100> I can take care of it tomorrow morning, since now it's already late evening here and I already feel I overstayed doing work
[18:40] <teward> makes sense.
[18:40] <sil2100> hm, did you guys ping me about it after re-uploading? Since I remember poking last week about if it's reuploaded or not
[18:40] <teward> sil2100: i did yes
[18:40] <teward> and i pinged ubuntu-archive too shortly after i reupped it
[18:40] <sil2100> Then apologies, missed that
[18:41] <teward> *tosses rotting fish at sil2100 for reasons* :P
[18:41] <teward> 'cause that one's deserved xD
[18:41] <teward> ANYWAYS
[18:41] <teward> as long as it's on your list for tomorrow
[18:41] <sil2100> Well, I can't keep track of every ping sadly, but it'll be done now sure
[18:41] <teward> i'll prod you again tomorrow.  becuase i'm incessantly annoying that way >:D
[18:41] <sil2100> Added to my TODO!
[18:45] <sil2100> And just for the record - 5 days ago was on Friday, so obviously I wasn't doing queue reviews on the weekend, so it was there only for ~2-3 workdays
[18:45] <sil2100> ;)
[18:45] <Eickmeyer[m]> sil2100: Thanks so much for your help, even in advance! :)
[18:47] <sil2100> Thanks for the re-ping though, there's uh, a bit too many queues to look at!
[18:48] <teward> yup
[18:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (groovy-proposed/main) [20.10.13 => 20.10.13.1] (desktop-core)
[19:05] <seb128> bdmurray, hum, sorry, I though I had typed those, maybe I screwed something, description updated now!
[19:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.13.1]
[19:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdm3 [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.3]
[21:04] <vorlon> so who's blindly retrying all the haskell failed packages this time
[21:05] <vorlon> ah, rbalint :)
[21:33] <vorlon> apw: could we perhaps drop the di packages from the linux-riscv source package :)
[21:35] <apw> vorlon, i have been meaning to ask do we need them anywhere by default
[21:35] <apw> sforshee, ^
[21:38] <sforshee> vorlon, apw: ack, we can drop those when we update it for 5.10 then SRU the changes back to f/g
[21:41] <vorlon> apw: I've been reluctant to ask you to drop them across the board because there might be some userspace udebs that we have floating around still (built from source packages in Debian that ship both debs and udebs) that have dependencies on provides of some of those udebs
[21:41] <vorlon> apw: but I think for riscv we really don't care
[21:41] <vorlon> (I mean, we don't /really/ care for the other archs either, it just makes some of the reports messier if there are uninstallable udebs)
[21:41] <apw> vorlon, oh yeah, dependancies ... uggg, it would publish _so_ much faster if they were one
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (focal-proposed) [2:1.20.8-2ubuntu2.5]
[21:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby2.7 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.7.0-5ubuntu1.2]
[22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wpa [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:2.6-15ubuntu2.6]
[22:55] <mwhudson> uh this doesn't look good https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#pkg-dask
[22:56] <mwhudson> (running for 30 mins and got nowhere yet)
[22:57] <xnox> vorlon:  apw: imho we should make britney ignore udeb dependencies. because there are too many virtual provides from kernel <-> userspace udebs, and we don't care about unwinding them in locksteps
[22:58] <xnox> rather ignore udeb installability.
[22:58] <xnox> i wonder if i can just take a dump of all of the udebs, and declare them as available
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (groovy-proposed/main) [1:20.10.13 => 1:20.10.14] (core)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.13.1]
[23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.28 => 1:20.04.29] (core)