[00:26] AsciiWolf, i have a PPA with an update prepared, just reviewing the diff with others :-) [07:33] doko mwhudson xnox: i'm trying numpy in https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/4337 [08:53] ginggs: oh, i just cheated and reduced the tolerance [08:53] ginggs: if what you're doing there works would be nice to remove my hack [08:53] uh increased the tolerance [08:53] whatever :) [09:01] mwhudson: oh i didn't see that, I guess I can still upload meshio with your hack removed to ci-train-ppa-service/ubuntu/4337 to confirm [09:02] ginggs: would be great [09:02] come onnnnnnnnnnn autopkgtest.u.c tell me whether my retry of the meshio tests passed [09:07] mwhudson: someone should totally write a CLI tool to look up results directly :> [09:07] https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/?format=json&prefix=hirsute/s390x/p/python-meshio [09:09] ah nice looks like it did work [09:09] Laney: is that url just something one has to know? [09:09] would have been better for such a tool if the URLs were the other way around [09:09] then you could prefix hirsute/p/python-meshio [09:09] um well it's the swift API [09:10] the same thing that the web frontend uses [09:10] no reason there couldn't be other clients to it as well [09:12] i guess i mean the AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac bit [09:12] ah [09:12] that's like our username I guess [09:13] so yes, basically it's something you need to know one way or another [09:13] mwhudson: same as here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration#Testing_against_a_PPA [09:13] ginggs: oh right, i have seen that [09:13] i can certainly see why a cli client would be nice [09:13] the administrators of the cloud set up an account for autopkgtest to use [09:14] and we're allowed to upload stuff into it, everything ends up with that prefix [09:16] ahayzen, cool, great work! :-) [10:10] teward, Eickmeyer: so I checked the agordejo package just now and the debian/watch file is still wrong [10:10] teward, Eickmeyer: but I'll fix that, re-upload and approve [10:11] Please be sure to always check with `uscan --report -v` if everything's working as it should [10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: agordejo (hirsute-proposed/primary) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] [10:20] Done [10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected agordejo [source] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] [10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted agordejo [source] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] [10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: agordejo [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: agordejo [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: agordejo [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: agordejo [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: agordejo [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: agordejo [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted agordejo [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] [10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted agordejo [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] [10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted agordejo [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] [10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted agordejo [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] [10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted agordejo [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] [10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted agordejo [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] [10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.29] [10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.29] [11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.20] [11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.20] [11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-kab to langpack in hirsute [11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-kab-base to langpack in hirsute [11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-gnome-kab to langpack in hirsute [11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-gnome-kab-base to langpack in hirsute [14:15] is there a ubuntu-release member around to look at (and if necessary discuss) https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/394114 ? === didrocks999 is now known as didrocks [14:45] cpaelzer: looking [14:51] haskell fixedd [14:51] mwhudson, <3 [15:01] juliank, Laney: could we shift the amount of armhf/arm64 autopkg testers towards armhf for a while again? [15:02] I should have stored the extra worker as an image [15:02] We can but it's 30 mins of work [15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: s390-tools [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.15.1-0ubuntu2] (core) [15:03] + node setup time to build lxd containers for all releases [15:03] like last time [15:03] this is why I felt it would be nicer if we build lxd worker images and like did dynamic lxd worker provisioning [15:06] it's too manual, I'm not going to get into the habit of shuffling those all the time [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-1] [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-1] [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-1] [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-2] [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-2] [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-2] [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ktuberling [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [4:20.08.3-2] [15:08] they should also be monitored for health since they seize up from time to time, but it's all stuff we don't have :( [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-1] [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-1] [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-2] [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [2.15.1-0ubuntu2] [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-1] [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-2] [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-2] [15:08] AA s390-tools has new subpackages for the the opensource library to talk to key management [15:09] previously that was only possible using a proprietary java app, packaged as .exe, downloadable from ibm.com, from hidden urls, with a cryptic UELA. So very useful. [15:15] sil2100: Yeah, I kinda stink at watch files, especially if they're not github or something easy. I also stink at regex, which is why I had no idea how to fix, so thanks. :) [15:22] Eickmeyer[m]: hah, that's fine, I don't like hacking on debian/watch files as well ;p [15:22] cpaelzer: merged o/ [15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (groovy-proposed/main) [1:7.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [15:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (focal-proposed/main) [2019.07+dfsg-1ubuntu6 => 2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.04.1] (core) [15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1088.101~16.04.1] (kernel) [15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (bionic-proposed/main) [2019.07+dfsg-1ubuntu4~18.04.1 => 2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~18.04.1] (core) [15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1088.101~16.04.1] [15:57] * Laney DoSes the NEW queue [15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-butterfree-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-rhyhorn-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-ivysaur-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.bachman-baker-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.bachman-baldhere-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.bachman-bale-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1088.101] (no packageset) [15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.newell-adalbrechta-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.newell-cadyna-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.bachman-banner-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.newell-adam-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.newell-cameo-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.newell-cara-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.simon-addison-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.simon-bailee-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.simon-banning-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.simon-camille-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.newell-candice-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.simon-adken-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.simon-camellia-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.newell-caralyn-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.simon-baird-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [16:00] I need to comment on all the LP bugs, will write an API script to do that in a bit [16:11] so how many times today is someone going to do a mass-giveback of haskell ftbfs out of order? [16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1088.101] [16:15] vorlon, I'm giving them back with the correct order... maybe I have to put some sleep before one level and the other, but some level are not waiting for anything anymore [16:15] this is why I did a full pass of retries without waiting [16:15] LocutusOfBorg: I've gotten two batches of emails this morning showing build failures for the lot [16:16] I'm rebuilding *now* that gold is fixed [16:16] not this morning ;) [16:16] LocutusOfBorg: my morning not yours :) [16:16] but this morning was discussed on -devel [16:16] oooooh :D [16:16] because some have been retried ~12h ago and some were found to be succeeding now [16:17] btw I don't think the ghc no change rebuild was useful to be honest [16:17] it is good to see light at the end of the tunnel, anyway [16:20] yep but slow armhf will make it uncandidate for another week [16:20] I would just kick it out to be honest... [16:22] slow armhf for what packages? [16:22] because https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/ghc.html doesn't show armhf blocking [16:22] ghc itself [16:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-instance-connect (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~18.04.0 => 1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~18.04.1] (no packageset) [16:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-instance-connect (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~16.04.0 => 1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~16.04.1] (no packageset) [16:22] ah [16:22] :) [16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot [source] (focal-proposed) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.04.1] [16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-instance-connect (groovy-proposed/main) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3 => 1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3.20.10.0] (core) [16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-instance-connect (focal-proposed/main) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3 => 1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3.20.04.0] (no packageset) [16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: u-boot [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.04.1] (core) [16:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot [source] (bionic-proposed) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~18.04.1] [16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: u-boot [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~18.04.1] (core) [16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: u-boot [riscv64] (focal-proposed/main) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.04.1] (core) [17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-process-exporter [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-1] (no packageset) [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-process-exporter [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-1] (no packageset) [17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-process-exporter [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-1] (no packageset) [17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-process-exporter [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-1] (no packageset) [17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: u-boot [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~18.04.1] (core) [17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-process-exporter [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-1] (no packageset) [17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby2.5 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.5.1-1ubuntu1.6 => 2.5.1-1ubuntu1.7] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-process-exporter [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-1] (no packageset) [17:55] ok that's now the THIRD full set of ppc64el build failure logs I've gotten this morning because of someone batch-retrying all the haskell builds [17:55] could whoever please not, it actually slows down the rebuilds due to the will-fail builds competing for buildd time with the ones that will succeed. I'm happy to handle the retries in order as per https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/ghc.html [17:58] LocutusOfBorg: ^^ ? [18:03] and this ghc changes ABI on amd64? :/ [18:05] Also if you're doing batch rebuilds then you'll need to get them finished by end of tomorrow or wait for Sunday ... [18:05] (Due to the Boston datacentre work) [18:06] the one I uploaded? that was a no-change rebuild to build with fixed gold on ppc64el === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch [18:20] no rebuild of ghc was required for that [18:20] aiui anyway [18:20] we can remove that rebuild and restore the previous one, then retry [18:20] ? [18:20] i think so, yes [18:20] especially if the "no change" rebuild changes abi [18:23] why does it change the ABI? [18:23] ARGH WHY IS NUMPY STILL IN PROPOSED [18:23] I don't know, but GHC isn't known for its stable ABIs exactly [18:26] I have to go, can someone arrange the ghc thing? [18:30] mwhudson: because synced packages are adding triggers again :-/ [18:30] doko: ah [18:30] i wonder if disabling sync is a good idea [18:31] of course we're going to lose all non-intel builders soon anyway [18:31] mwhudson: did you retry those? [18:31] doko: no [18:32] doko: i think they'll pass with all-proposed=1 [18:32] ok, doing that [18:33] mwhudson, Laney: I've already triggered rebuilds for the handful of packages affected on amd64, I think we should run with it [18:35] aren't they going to skew with the other arches? [18:36] or are we getting helpful uninstallability for some reason? [18:36] skew in what sense? [18:36] vorlon: the ghc build only finished on amd64 and ppc64el ... [18:36] pick up old ghc [18:36] ah. lovely. [18:36] get ABIs from that [18:36] then yeah [18:36] need a second rebuild... [18:36] back it all out? [18:36] I would [18:36] ok, doing [18:36] and just gb on ppc64el [18:37] so removing the ppc64el binaries, and then copying to the same series to rebuild? [18:38] removing ghc which we've asserted didn't need a rebuild; removing the 7 packages I had uploaded for the ABI change; restoring previous versions to -proposed for all 8 packages [18:52] vorlon: thanks [18:52] are haskell packages building on ppc64el now? [18:53] queues are empty, I think the old packages need publishing first [18:53] mwhudson: prior to the ghc revert, yes; waiting to see what happens post revert [19:18] vorlon, I'm not doing rebuilds [19:18] I was afk :) [19:19] I might had some old script running, but I'm not sure, and when I came back they were all finished [19:21] vorlon, please, restore libguestfs/1:1.42.0-11ubuntu1 on hirsute-proposed, wait for ocaml to publish, copy back 1:1.42.0-11ubuntu2 in proposed please? [19:21] so we disentangle ocaml and perl and everything? [19:21] thanks sil2100 [19:31] bdmurray, hello, do you have any vim news? the fact that builds only on riscv64 (due to disabled tests) is making riscv64 sad (e.g libguestfs) [19:32] I'm poking around with it now but am not getting anywhere quickly [19:32] ack, I hope some ubuntu-archive will then copy back the old libguestfs in proposed (and the old vim) to let some transition end [19:33] the old vim ftbfs in hirsute too [19:38] yes, but it is installable :) [19:43] who is giving back vim/amd64 and hoping that the timeout gets solved? 10 expected, needed 18 [19:47] bdmurray, i've just updated LP: #1903849 [19:47] Launchpad bug 1903849 in vim (Ubuntu) "vim ftbfs" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1903849 [19:49] let me try a simple patch [19:50] rbalint: disable it? [19:50] doko, no, fix mouse in the test [19:50] doko, if it was not a joke :-) [19:55] * doko throws some rotten cheese to rbalint ;p [19:55] tasty response :-) [19:57] ok, so just increasing the timeout for the failing amd64 test [19:59] LocutusOfBorg: not doing rebuilds> ack, so who knows where those are coming from :/ [20:00] mwhudson: confirmed that previously ftbfs ppc64el packages are now building successfully after the ghc rollback; though I haven't checked which of these were actually affected by the bug, vs build-depending on packages that were [20:01] vorlon: cool, i did check that my linker fix fixed the package you mentioned in the debian bug report so at least 1 package is fixed by this! [20:04] mwhudson, I also gave back llvm-toolchain-snapshot on ppc64el in debian and ubuntu [20:04] maybe the fix is the same? [20:04] vorlon, any help for ocaml? [20:05] LocutusOfBorg: looking now. is libguestfs the only blocker? [20:05] yep [20:05] snapshot is the not relevant for the release pocket [20:05] doko, seems ok, locally, uploading [20:05] doko, is relevant to understand if the fix works or not [20:05] rbalint: wait! [20:06] doko,? [20:06] * rbalint waiting [20:06] LocutusOfBorg: revert dance done [20:06] thanks [20:06] rbalint: did you fix the timeout for the amd64 test? [20:07] doko, no, but it does not fail in the timeout now, just in the test missing mouse support [20:07] rbalint: that's what I have: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Rhv42PGFpj/ [20:07] doko, you can check my diff https://launchpad.net/~rbalint/+archive/ubuntu/scratch/+packages [20:08] mine is basically the same, without the timeout [20:08] ok, that's the same fix, uploading [20:10] doko how come i wrote on #ubuntu-devel that i'm looking into vim and you already looked into it in parallel? [20:10] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PlusOneMaintenanceTeam lists #ubuntu-devel for coordination [20:12] rbalint: we should change that. probably should happen here like all other transition stuff === ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson [20:18] doko, rbalint: agreed, I think this is the better channel for coordination [20:20] mwhudson: so building numpy without -std=c99 seems to have worked, https://bileto.ubuntu.com/excuses/4337/hirsute.html shows python-meshio/4.1.0-2 autokpkgtests passed on s390x where numpy/1:1.19.4-1 did not -- shall I publish, or wait for 1:1.19.4-1 to migrate first? [20:20] @pilot in [20:21] vorlon, doko ok, but then piloting should also be here [20:23] vorlon, doko i've updated the wiki to use #ubuntu-release, but kept #ubuntu-devel for piloting [20:25] ginggs, publishing bileto reset autopkgtests [20:26] LocutusOfBorg: that's why i asked [20:32] ginggs: yeah let's get what's there to migrate first [20:34] mwhudson, a test failed [20:34] but was already retried [20:34] lots of things fail because pandas and numpy are both in proposed still [20:35] so at a minimum anything that uses both needs to be retried [20:36] oh looks like the retries have succeeded already [20:36] * mwhudson crosses fingers [20:36] same for scipy [20:38] yeah i was too lazy to retry all the scipy tests with numpy as a trigger / all-proposed=1 [20:38] because i thought numpy was about to migrate :/ [20:39] vorlon, could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/394123 [20:41] vorlon, and push back ruby-entypo-rails to -proposed? it will need newer ruby-defaults due to ruby-rubygems [20:41] +# passed onece as a fluke [20:41] rbalint: ^^ ? [20:43] vorlon, thanks, fixed [20:45] rbalint, bdmurray: looks like both the timeout and mouse issues are fixed in vim [20:52] vorlon, what about kicking fsl out? Updating fsl introduces new bugs: #936564, #966112. [20:52] bug 966112 in unity (Ubuntu) "maximizing a window snapped to the side doesn't work properly" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/966112 [20:52] Error: Could not gather data from Launchpad for bug #936564 (https://launchpad.net/bugs/936564). The error has been logged [20:52] ftbfs, blocking another transition [20:52] LocutusOfBorg: so you mean kick it out of release because it's blocking a transition? [20:52] looks ok to me [20:52] vorlon, I mean, its out from debian testing and needs sourceful fixes [20:53] vorlon, its a sad story [20:53] related to a sad bug https://bugs.debian.org/968730 [20:53] Debian bug 968730 in libnifti2 "libnifti2: libniftiio.so.2 not provided" [Serious,Open] [20:53] basically they renamed a library without changing soname... so its broken at runtime now :/ [20:54] heh [20:54] well job [20:54] I did no change rebuild stuff to "unbreak them at runtime" [20:54] fsl removed [20:54] :/ [20:54] thanks [20:54] rbalint: I read 'ruby-entypo-rails' as 'ruby-entrails' [20:55] so at least now with my rebuilds the archive is again consistent, hopefully we will have a sourceful fix [20:55] LocutusOfBorg: well, yuck - I would make the maintainer fix the package name before doing any rebuilds :) [20:56] vorlon, all itk4 reverse dependencies weren't linking anymore [20:56] and it was blocking 2/3 transitions [20:56] rbalint: I'm trying to understand the ruby-entypo-rails situation - do you want me to roll back to 3.0.0-2 or remove it altogether? also why did 3.0.0-3 previously pass in the release pocket and then regress? [20:57] LocutusOfBorg: 0-day NMU then :) [20:57] lol true, but I don't want to change soname, trigger a transition, package split, go binNEW for a package I don't really care about, and the team is meh [20:58] rbalint: ... because the autopkgtest run for ruby-entrails used the rails from -proposed, bah. ok [20:58] doko: fixed where? [20:58] btw the new release vorlon has the fix for cmake, and the wrong library name, but needs a transition [20:58] see changes emails [20:58] so I hope before hirsute it will self heal [20:59] (dcmtk was the entangled transition, via plastimatch) [21:00] vorlon, isn't it better to also remove from proposed pocket? so it gets autosyncd [21:01] LocutusOfBorg: are the changes from 5.0.8-6ubuntu1 upstreamed in Debian? [21:02] LocutusOfBorg: they aren't in the distro; so I wouldn't be inclined to remove it from -proposed before we know that's fixed? [21:02] not needed anymore IIRC [21:02] python2 instead of python is absolutely still needed [21:02] in Ubuntu [21:02] oh wait, its one of the two rc bugs? [21:02] yeah [21:02] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936564 [21:02] Debian bug 936564 in src:fsl "fsl: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye" [Serious,Open] [21:03] ok let me commit on git the change if this is ok [21:11] vorlon, https://salsa.debian.org/neurodebian-team/fsl/-/commit/c1febf62b17d39a9d885aa679475dcd4292a980f [21:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iptables (groovy-proposed/main) [1.8.5-3ubuntu2.20.10.1 => 1.8.5-3ubuntu2.20.10.2] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) [21:48] LocutusOfBorg: cheers [22:25] ok i think numpy will migrate on the next run [22:32] How can I get whoopsie out of -proposed? The indicator sesion failure is unrelated to it. [23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-arg [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1] (no packageset) [23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-script [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset) [23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-script [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset) [23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-script [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset) [23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-script [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset) [23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-script [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset) [23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-script [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.2-1] [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-script [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.2-1] [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-script [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.2-1] [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-script [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.2-1] [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-arg [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.0.0-1] [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-process-exporter [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.7.5-1] [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-process-exporter [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.7.5-1] [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-process-exporter [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.7.5-1] [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-process-exporter [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.7.5-1] [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-process-exporter [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.7.5-1] [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-process-exporter [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.7.5-1] [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-script [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.2-1] [23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1030.32~18.04.1] (no packageset) [23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.8.0-30.32+21.04.2+1] (core, kernel) [23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.8.0-30.32+21.04.2+1] (core, kernel) [23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1030.32~18.04.1] (no packageset)