[00:26] <ahayzen> AsciiWolf, i have a PPA with an update prepared, just reviewing the diff with others :-)
[07:33] <ginggs> doko mwhudson xnox: i'm trying numpy in https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/4337
[08:53] <mwhudson> ginggs: oh, i just cheated and reduced the tolerance
[08:53] <mwhudson> ginggs: if what you're doing there works would be nice to remove my hack
[08:53] <mwhudson> uh increased the tolerance
[08:53] <mwhudson> whatever :)
[09:01] <ginggs> mwhudson: oh i didn't see that, I guess I can still upload meshio with your hack removed to ci-train-ppa-service/ubuntu/4337 to confirm
[09:02] <mwhudson> ginggs: would be great
[09:02] <mwhudson> come onnnnnnnnnnn autopkgtest.u.c tell me whether my retry of the meshio tests passed
[09:07] <Laney> mwhudson: someone should totally write a CLI tool to look up results directly :>
[09:07] <Laney> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/?format=json&prefix=hirsute/s390x/p/python-meshio
[09:09] <mwhudson> ah nice looks like it did work
[09:09] <mwhudson> Laney: is that url just something one has to know?
[09:09] <Laney> would have been better for such a tool if the URLs were the other way around
[09:09] <Laney> then you could prefix hirsute/p/python-meshio
[09:09] <Laney> um well it's the swift API
[09:10] <Laney> the same thing that the web frontend uses
[09:10] <Laney> no reason there couldn't be other clients to it as well
[09:12] <mwhudson> i guess i mean the AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac bit
[09:12] <Laney> ah
[09:12] <Laney> that's like our username I guess
[09:13] <Laney> so yes, basically it's something you need to know one way or another
[09:13] <ginggs> mwhudson: same as here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration#Testing_against_a_PPA
[09:13] <mwhudson> ginggs: oh right, i have seen that
[09:13] <mwhudson> i can certainly see why a cli client would be nice
[09:13] <Laney> the administrators of the cloud set up an account for autopkgtest to use
[09:14] <Laney> and we're allowed to upload stuff into it, everything ends up with that prefix
[09:16] <AsciiWolf> ahayzen, cool, great work! :-)
[10:10] <sil2100> teward, Eickmeyer: so I checked the agordejo package just now and the debian/watch file is still wrong
[10:10] <sil2100> teward, Eickmeyer: but I'll fix that, re-upload and approve
[10:11] <sil2100> Please be sure to always check with `uscan --report -v` if everything's working as it should
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: agordejo (hirsute-proposed/primary) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:20] <sil2100> Done
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected agordejo [source] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted agordejo [source] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: agordejo [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: agordejo [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: agordejo [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: agordejo [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: agordejo [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: agordejo [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted agordejo [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted agordejo [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted agordejo [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted agordejo [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted agordejo [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted agordejo [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.29]
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.29]
[11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.20]
[11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.20]
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-kab to langpack in hirsute
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-kab-base to langpack in hirsute
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-gnome-kab to langpack in hirsute
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-gnome-kab-base to langpack in hirsute
[14:15] <cpaelzer> is there a ubuntu-release member around to look at (and if necessary discuss) https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/394114 ?
[14:45] <sil2100> cpaelzer: looking
[14:51] <LocutusOfBorg> haskell fixedd
[14:51] <LocutusOfBorg> mwhudson, <3
[15:01] <doko> juliank, Laney: could we shift the amount of armhf/arm64 autopkg testers towards armhf for a while again?
[15:02] <juliank> I should have stored the extra worker as an image
[15:02] <juliank> We can but it's 30 mins of work
[15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: s390-tools [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.15.1-0ubuntu2] (core)
[15:03] <juliank> + node setup time to build lxd containers for all releases
[15:03] <juliank> like last time
[15:03] <juliank> this is why I felt it would be nicer if we build lxd worker images and like did dynamic lxd worker provisioning
[15:06] <Laney>  it's too manual, I'm not going to get into the habit of shuffling those all the time
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-1]
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-1]
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-1]
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-2]
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-2]
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-2]
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ktuberling [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [4:20.08.3-2]
[15:08] <Laney> they should also be monitored for health since they seize up from time to time, but it's all stuff we don't have :(
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-1]
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-1]
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-2]
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [2.15.1-0ubuntu2]
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-1]
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-2]
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ggd-utils [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0.7+ds-2]
[15:08] <xnox> AA s390-tools has new subpackages for the the opensource library to talk to key management
[15:09] <xnox> previously that was only possible using a proprietary java app, packaged as .exe, downloadable from ibm.com, from hidden urls, with a cryptic UELA. So very useful.
[15:15] <Eickmeyer[m]> sil2100: Yeah, I kinda stink at watch files, especially if they're not github or something easy. I also stink at regex, which is why I had no idea how to fix, so thanks. :)
[15:22] <sil2100> Eickmeyer[m]: hah, that's fine, I don't like hacking on debian/watch files as well ;p
[15:22] <sil2100> cpaelzer: merged o/
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (groovy-proposed/main) [1:7.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[15:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (focal-proposed/main) [2019.07+dfsg-1ubuntu6 => 2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.04.1] (core)
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1088.101~16.04.1] (kernel)
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (bionic-proposed/main) [2019.07+dfsg-1ubuntu4~18.04.1 => 2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~18.04.1] (core)
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1088.101~16.04.1]
[15:57]  * Laney DoSes the NEW queue
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-butterfree-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-rhyhorn-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-ivysaur-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.bachman-baker-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.bachman-baldhere-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.bachman-bale-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1088.101] (no packageset)
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.newell-adalbrechta-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.newell-cadyna-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.bachman-banner-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.newell-adam-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.newell-cameo-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.newell-cara-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.simon-addison-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.simon-bailee-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.simon-banning-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.simon-camille-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.newell-candice-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.simon-adken-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.simon-camellia-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.newell-caralyn-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-sutton.simon-baird-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[16:00] <Laney> I need to comment on all the LP bugs, will write an API script to do that in a bit
[16:11] <vorlon> so how many times today is someone going to do a mass-giveback of haskell ftbfs out of order?
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1088.101]
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I'm giving them back with the correct order... maybe I have to put some sleep before one level and the other, but some level are not waiting for anything anymore
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg> this is why I did a full pass of retries without waiting
[16:15] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I've gotten two batches of emails this morning showing build failures for the lot
[16:16] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm rebuilding *now* that gold is fixed
[16:16] <LocutusOfBorg> not this morning ;)
[16:16] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: my morning not yours :)
[16:16] <LocutusOfBorg> but this morning was discussed on -devel
[16:16] <LocutusOfBorg> oooooh :D
[16:16] <LocutusOfBorg> because some have been retried ~12h ago and some were found to be succeeding now
[16:17] <LocutusOfBorg> btw I don't think the ghc no change rebuild was useful to be honest
[16:17] <vorlon> it is good to see light at the end of the tunnel, anyway
[16:20] <LocutusOfBorg> yep but slow armhf will make it uncandidate for another week
[16:20] <LocutusOfBorg> I would just kick it out to be honest...
[16:22] <vorlon> slow armhf for what packages?
[16:22] <vorlon> because https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/ghc.html doesn't show armhf blocking
[16:22] <LocutusOfBorg> ghc itself
[16:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-instance-connect (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~18.04.0 => 1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-instance-connect (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~16.04.0 => 1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:22] <vorlon> ah
[16:22] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot [source] (focal-proposed) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.04.1]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-instance-connect (groovy-proposed/main) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3 => 1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3.20.10.0] (core)
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-instance-connect (focal-proposed/main) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3 => 1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3.20.04.0] (no packageset)
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: u-boot [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.04.1] (core)
[16:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot [source] (bionic-proposed) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~18.04.1]
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: u-boot [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~18.04.1] (core)
[16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: u-boot [riscv64] (focal-proposed/main) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.04.1] (core)
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-process-exporter [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-1] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-process-exporter [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-1] (no packageset)
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-process-exporter [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-1] (no packageset)
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-process-exporter [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-1] (no packageset)
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: u-boot [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~18.04.1] (core)
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-process-exporter [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-1] (no packageset)
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby2.5 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.5.1-1ubuntu1.6 => 2.5.1-1ubuntu1.7] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-process-exporter [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-1] (no packageset)
[17:55] <vorlon> ok that's now the THIRD full set of ppc64el build failure logs I've gotten this morning because of someone batch-retrying all the haskell builds
[17:55] <vorlon> could whoever please not, it actually slows down the rebuilds due to the will-fail builds competing for buildd time with the ones that will succeed.  I'm happy to handle the retries in order as per https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/ghc.html
[17:58] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ^^ ?
[18:03] <vorlon> and this ghc changes ABI on amd64? :/
[18:05] <cjwatson> Also if you're doing batch rebuilds then you'll need to get them finished by end of tomorrow or wait for Sunday ...
[18:05] <cjwatson> (Due to the Boston datacentre work)
[18:06] <doko> the one I uploaded? that was a no-change rebuild to build with fixed gold on ppc64el
[18:20] <mwhudson> no rebuild of ghc was required for that
[18:20] <mwhudson> aiui anyway
[18:20] <Laney> we can remove that rebuild and restore the previous one, then retry
[18:20] <Laney> ?
[18:20] <mwhudson> i think so, yes
[18:20] <mwhudson> especially if the "no change" rebuild changes abi
[18:23] <doko> why does it change the ABI?
[18:23] <mwhudson> ARGH WHY IS NUMPY STILL IN PROPOSED
[18:23] <Laney> I don't know, but GHC isn't known for its stable ABIs exactly
[18:26] <Laney> I have to go, can someone arrange the ghc thing?
[18:30] <doko> mwhudson: because synced packages are adding triggers again :-/
[18:30] <mwhudson> doko: ah
[18:30] <mwhudson> i wonder if disabling sync is a good idea
[18:31] <mwhudson> of course we're going to lose all non-intel builders soon anyway
[18:31] <doko> mwhudson: did you retry those?
[18:31] <mwhudson> doko: no
[18:32] <mwhudson> doko: i think they'll pass with all-proposed=1
[18:32] <doko> ok, doing that
[18:33] <vorlon> mwhudson, Laney: I've already triggered rebuilds for the handful of packages affected on amd64, I think we should run with it
[18:35] <Laney> aren't they going to skew with the other arches?
[18:36] <Laney> or are we getting helpful uninstallability for some reason?
[18:36] <vorlon> skew in what sense?
[18:36] <doko> vorlon: the ghc build only finished on amd64 and ppc64el ...
[18:36] <Laney> pick up old ghc
[18:36] <vorlon> ah. lovely.
[18:36] <Laney> get ABIs from that
[18:36] <vorlon> then yeah
[18:36] <Laney> need a second rebuild...
[18:36] <vorlon> back it all out?
[18:36] <Laney> I would
[18:36] <vorlon> ok, doing
[18:36] <Laney> and just gb on ppc64el
[18:37] <doko> so removing the ppc64el binaries, and then copying to the same series to rebuild?
[18:38] <vorlon> removing ghc which we've asserted didn't need a rebuild; removing the 7 packages I had uploaded for the ABI change; restoring previous versions to -proposed for all 8 packages
[18:52] <mwhudson> vorlon: thanks
[18:52] <mwhudson> are haskell packages building on ppc64el now?
[18:53] <doko> queues are empty, I think the old packages need publishing first
[18:53] <vorlon> mwhudson: prior to the ghc revert, yes; waiting to see what happens post revert
[19:18] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I'm not doing rebuilds
[19:18] <LocutusOfBorg> I was afk :)
[19:19] <LocutusOfBorg> I might had some old script running, but I'm not sure, and when I came back they were all finished
[19:21] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, please, restore libguestfs/1:1.42.0-11ubuntu1 on hirsute-proposed, wait for ocaml to publish, copy back 1:1.42.0-11ubuntu2 in proposed please?
[19:21] <LocutusOfBorg> so we disentangle ocaml and perl and everything?
[19:21] <cpaelzer> thanks sil2100
[19:31] <LocutusOfBorg> bdmurray, hello, do you have any vim news? the fact that builds only on riscv64 (due to disabled tests) is making riscv64 sad (e.g libguestfs)
[19:32] <bdmurray> I'm poking around with it now but am not getting anywhere quickly
[19:32] <LocutusOfBorg> ack, I hope some ubuntu-archive will then copy back the old libguestfs in proposed (and the old vim) to let some transition end
[19:33] <bdmurray> the old vim ftbfs in hirsute too
[19:38] <LocutusOfBorg> yes, but it is installable :)
[19:43] <doko> who is giving back vim/amd64 and hoping that the timeout gets solved? 10 expected, needed 18
[19:47] <rbalint> bdmurray, i've just updated LP: #1903849
[19:49] <rbalint> let me try a simple patch
[19:50] <doko> rbalint: disable it?
[19:50] <rbalint> doko, no, fix mouse in the test
[19:50] <rbalint> doko, if it was not a joke :-)
[19:55]  * doko throws some rotten cheese to rbalint ;p
[19:55] <rbalint> tasty response :-)
[19:57] <doko> ok, so just increasing the timeout for the failing amd64 test
[19:59] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: not doing rebuilds> ack, so who knows where those are coming from :/
[20:00] <vorlon> mwhudson: confirmed that previously ftbfs ppc64el packages are now building successfully after the ghc rollback; though I haven't checked which of these were actually affected by the bug, vs build-depending on packages that were
[20:01] <mwhudson> vorlon: cool, i did check that my linker fix fixed the package you mentioned in the debian bug report so at least 1 package is fixed by this!
[20:04] <LocutusOfBorg> mwhudson, I also gave back llvm-toolchain-snapshot on ppc64el in debian and ubuntu
[20:04] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe the fix is the same?
[20:04] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, any help for ocaml?
[20:05] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: looking now.  is libguestfs the only blocker?
[20:05] <LocutusOfBorg> yep
[20:05] <doko> snapshot is the not relevant for the release pocket
[20:05] <rbalint> doko, seems ok, locally, uploading
[20:05] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, is relevant to understand if the fix works or not
[20:05] <doko> rbalint: wait!
[20:06] <rbalint> doko,?
[20:06]  * rbalint waiting
[20:06] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: revert dance done
[20:06] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[20:06] <doko> rbalint: did you fix the timeout for the amd64 test?
[20:07] <rbalint> doko, no, but it does not fail in the timeout now, just in the test missing mouse support
[20:07] <doko> rbalint: that's what I have: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Rhv42PGFpj/
[20:07] <rbalint> doko, you can check my diff https://launchpad.net/~rbalint/+archive/ubuntu/scratch/+packages
[20:08] <rbalint> mine is basically the same, without the timeout
[20:08] <doko> ok, that's the same fix, uploading
[20:10] <rbalint> doko how come i wrote on #ubuntu-devel that i'm looking into vim and you already looked into it in parallel?
[20:10] <rbalint> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PlusOneMaintenanceTeam lists #ubuntu-devel for coordination
[20:12] <doko> rbalint: we should change that. probably should happen here like all other transition stuff
[20:18] <vorlon> doko, rbalint: agreed, I think this is the better channel for coordination
[20:20] <ginggs> mwhudson: so building numpy without  -std=c99 seems to have worked, https://bileto.ubuntu.com/excuses/4337/hirsute.html shows python-meshio/4.1.0-2 autokpkgtests passed on s390x where numpy/1:1.19.4-1 did not -- shall I publish, or wait for 1:1.19.4-1 to migrate first?
[20:20] <rbalint> @pilot in
[20:21] <rbalint> vorlon, doko ok, but then piloting should also be here
[20:23] <rbalint> vorlon, doko i've updated the wiki to use #ubuntu-release, but kept #ubuntu-devel for piloting
[20:25] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, publishing bileto reset autopkgtests
[20:26] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: that's why i asked
[20:32] <mwhudson> ginggs: yeah let's get what's there to migrate first
[20:34] <LocutusOfBorg> mwhudson, a test failed
[20:34] <LocutusOfBorg> but was already retried
[20:34] <mwhudson> lots of things fail because pandas and numpy are both in proposed still
[20:35] <mwhudson> so at a minimum anything that uses both needs to be retried
[20:36] <mwhudson> oh looks like the retries have succeeded already
[20:36]  * mwhudson crosses fingers
[20:36] <doko> same for scipy
[20:38] <mwhudson> yeah i was too lazy to retry all the scipy tests with numpy as a trigger / all-proposed=1
[20:38] <mwhudson> because i thought numpy was about to migrate :/
[20:39] <rbalint> vorlon, could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/394123
[20:41] <rbalint> vorlon, and push back ruby-entypo-rails to -proposed? it will need newer ruby-defaults due to ruby-rubygems
[20:41] <vorlon> +# passed onece as a fluke
[20:41] <vorlon> rbalint: ^^ ?
[20:43] <rbalint> vorlon, thanks, fixed
[20:45] <doko> rbalint, bdmurray: looks like both the timeout and mouse issues are fixed in vim
[20:52] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, what about kicking fsl out? Updating fsl introduces new bugs: #936564, #966112.
[20:52] <LocutusOfBorg> ftbfs, blocking another transition
[20:52] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: so you mean kick it out of release because it's blocking a transition?
[20:52] <vorlon> looks ok to me
[20:52] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I mean, its out from debian testing and needs sourceful fixes
[20:53] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, its a sad story
[20:53] <LocutusOfBorg> related to a sad bug https://bugs.debian.org/968730
[20:53] <LocutusOfBorg> basically they renamed a library without changing soname... so its broken at runtime now :/
[20:54] <vorlon> heh
[20:54] <vorlon> well job
[20:54] <LocutusOfBorg> I did no change rebuild stuff to "unbreak them at runtime"
[20:54] <vorlon> fsl removed
[20:54] <LocutusOfBorg> :/
[20:54] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[20:54] <vorlon> rbalint: I read 'ruby-entypo-rails' as 'ruby-entrails'
[20:55] <LocutusOfBorg> so at least now with my rebuilds the archive is again consistent, hopefully we will have a sourceful fix
[20:55] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: well, yuck - I would make the maintainer fix the package name before doing any rebuilds :)
[20:56] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, all itk4 reverse dependencies weren't linking anymore
[20:56] <LocutusOfBorg> and it was blocking 2/3 transitions
[20:56] <vorlon> rbalint: I'm trying to understand the ruby-entypo-rails situation - do you want me to roll back to 3.0.0-2 or remove it altogether?  also why did 3.0.0-3 previously pass in the release pocket and then regress?
[20:57] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: 0-day NMU then :)
[20:57] <LocutusOfBorg> lol true, but I don't want to change soname, trigger a transition, package split, go binNEW for a package I don't really care about, and the team is meh
[20:58] <vorlon> rbalint: ... because the autopkgtest run for ruby-entrails used the rails from -proposed, bah. ok
[20:58] <bdmurray> doko: fixed where?
[20:58] <LocutusOfBorg> btw the new release vorlon has the fix for cmake, and the wrong library name, but needs a transition
[20:58] <doko> see changes emails
[20:58] <LocutusOfBorg> so I hope before hirsute it will self heal
[20:59] <LocutusOfBorg> (dcmtk was the entangled transition, via plastimatch)
[21:00] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, isn't it better to also remove from proposed pocket? so it gets autosyncd
[21:01] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: are the changes from 5.0.8-6ubuntu1 upstreamed in Debian?
[21:02] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: they aren't in the distro; so I wouldn't be inclined to remove it from -proposed before we know that's fixed?
[21:02] <LocutusOfBorg> not needed anymore IIRC
[21:02] <vorlon> python2 instead of python is absolutely still needed
[21:02] <vorlon> in Ubuntu
[21:02] <LocutusOfBorg> oh wait, its one of the two rc bugs?
[21:02] <vorlon> yeah
[21:02] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936564
[21:03] <LocutusOfBorg> ok let me commit on git the change if this is ok
[21:11] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, https://salsa.debian.org/neurodebian-team/fsl/-/commit/c1febf62b17d39a9d885aa679475dcd4292a980f
[21:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iptables (groovy-proposed/main) [1.8.5-3ubuntu2.20.10.1 => 1.8.5-3ubuntu2.20.10.2] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[21:48] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: cheers
[22:25] <mwhudson> ok i think numpy will migrate on the next run
[22:32] <bdmurray> How can I get whoopsie out of -proposed? The indicator sesion failure is unrelated to it.
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-arg [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-script [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-script [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-script [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-script [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-script [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-script [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.2-1]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-script [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.2-1]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-script [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.2-1]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-script [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.2-1]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-arg [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.0.0-1]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-process-exporter [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.7.5-1]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-process-exporter [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.7.5-1]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-process-exporter [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.7.5-1]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-process-exporter [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.7.5-1]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-process-exporter [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.7.5-1]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-process-exporter [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.7.5-1]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-script [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.2-1]
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1030.32~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.8.0-30.32+21.04.2+1] (core, kernel)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.8.0-30.32+21.04.2+1] (core, kernel)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1030.32~18.04.1] (no packageset)