| mup | PR snapd#9556 closed: tests: testing new fedora 33 image <Created by sergiocazzolato> <Merged by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9556> | 02:30 |
|---|---|---|
| zyga-x240 | good morning mvo | 07:09 |
| zyga-x240 | mvo: I had a look at the changes to the export manager but ended up just going to sleep yesterday; I think today may be better as lately we are sleep deprived by Lucy who is going through the 2-yo hyperactivity phase | 07:10 |
| mup | PR snapd#9664 closed: spread: disable unattended-upgrades on ubuntu <Simple 😃> <Created by bboozzoo> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9664> | 07:11 |
| mvo | good morning zyga-x240 | 07:14 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: no worries! thanks for letting me know | 07:14 |
| mup | PR snapd#9652 closed: o/servicestate: unlock state before calling wrappers in doServiceControl <Bug> <Created by stolowski> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9652> | 07:22 |
| zyga-x240 | mvo: I saw that the uboot bug was addressed | 07:23 |
| zyga-x240 | mvo: I understand this unblocks gadget updates across the pi lineup | 07:24 |
| zyga-x240 | mvo: and that this was an additional blocker for uc20 | 07:24 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: yeah, it's pretty good | 07:24 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: I need to check if we have updated pi/edge already | 07:24 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: but the debs got udpated, once that is in we will look into fixing it on a broader scope | 07:25 |
| zyga-x240 | mvo: the debs got updated yes | 07:25 |
| zyga-x240 | please note that while great, this makes the pi break on the dbt skew | 07:26 |
| zyga-x240 | only fresh installs are okay | 07:26 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: yes, we are working on this too | 07:26 |
| zyga-x240 | but it's inevitable | 07:26 |
| zyga-x240 | I know, that's really cool | 07:26 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: and there is work to use piboot so that we have proper a/b boot with dtbs, so it's advancing on all fronts | 07:26 |
| mvo | (also not as fast as I wish we would go) | 07:26 |
| zyga-x240 | mvo: I heard about that as well, but I was not sure if that has already started to approach snapd side | 07:27 |
| zyga-x240 | will it be another bootloader variant in our code or will there be some middleware-like abstraction via hooks | 07:27 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: I think it will be bootloader like | 07:28 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: maybe a variant of uboot, i.e. if uboot finds config.txt then it will behave slightly differently | 07:28 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: but the details are not clear yet, we are still in the prototype phase for this | 07:28 |
| zyga-x240 | mvo: I recall that there was some resitence from the pi foundation to help us in any way that would require code changes | 07:30 |
| zyga-x240 | mvo: do you know how A/B or try mode boot will work? | 07:31 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: dave told me he tested it from pi3 onward | 07:31 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: but *maybe* we loose the pi2 :( | 07:31 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: not sure yet, also this seems to be super recent firmware changes | 07:31 |
| zyga-x240 | ah, that's reassuring then | 07:31 |
| zyga-x240 | perhaps it is an improvement to the boot process | 07:32 |
| zyga-x240 | any kind of conditionality or writable state accessible from the native bootloader is sufficient | 07:32 |
| zyga-x240 | but you know that :) | 07:32 |
| zyga-x240 | I hope they changed their minds on it | 07:32 |
| mborzecki | morning | 07:33 |
| zyga-x240 | hey mborzecki | 07:33 |
| mborzecki | finally got my tires swapped to the winter set | 07:33 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: I think they did but we helped them with that AIUI | 07:33 |
| mvo | good morning mborzecki | 07:34 |
| zyga-x240 | mborzecki: just in time for global warming ;-) | 07:34 |
| mborzecki | zyga-x240: haha right | 07:34 |
| mborzecki | mvo: hey | 07:34 |
| zyga-x240 | mborzecki: I really wish we have a month of -5 to -10 and lots of snow | 07:34 |
| zyga-x240 | I miss that from my childhood | 07:34 |
| mvo | mborzecki: when you have a few cycles, could you please look at 9497 ? hopefully straightforward | 07:34 |
| mborzecki | zyga-x240: no thanks ;) you're free to enjoy winter in canada though | 07:34 |
| mborzecki | mvo: sure | 07:35 |
| zyga-x240 | mborzecki: could as well be a screen saver unless I'm there :) | 07:35 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: or move to minessota | 07:35 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: the cold there is quite impressive | 07:35 |
| zyga-x240 | mvo: my new boss tries to move me to Italy instead ;-) | 07:35 |
| zyga-x240 | I wish we had that magic house with a handle that can open in four different ways, to go to four different places | 07:36 |
| mborzecki | zyga-x240: tbh this sounds quite nice | 07:36 |
| zyga-x240 | a house by the sea, a house in the mountains, in big city and that big black void IIRC | 07:36 |
| mborzecki | zyga-x240: move to the south and enjoy the all year round cycling season | 07:36 |
| zyga-x240 | (I love that movie) | 07:36 |
| zyga-x240 | mborzecki: well, now I'd be happy if lucy stopped running around at 1AM every day :) | 07:37 |
| zyga-x240 | I guess that will pass | 07:37 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: it will pass and in 10y happen again ;) | 07:38 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: or maybe 15y | 07:38 |
| zyga-x240 | mvo: yeah but when she has her own room that's okay :D | 07:38 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: heh … good point! | 07:39 |
| zyga-x240 | mvo: I will look at patching spread soon | 07:39 |
| zyga-x240 | I'm split between a fork and proper upstream cooperation | 07:39 |
| zyga-x240 | I'm going to add new backends to it | 07:40 |
| zyga-x240 | mainly to use a muxpi-exposed ad-hoc new API as "cloud" | 07:40 |
| zyga-x240 | initially a 1-1 but later 1-n model (one host talking to a number of configured muxpi's over lan, each exposing some real hardware and features) | 07:40 |
| zyga-x240 | I guess time will tell, I haven't touched this yet | 07:40 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: nice, looking forward to that | 07:45 |
| mvo | zyga-x240: more spread development is most welcome | 07:45 |
| mborzecki | fun thing i noticed in the serial log of a failed test: ` Error syncing keystore file /usr/share/secureboot/updates/dbx/dbxupdate_x64.bin` | 08:03 |
| zyga-x240 | interesting :) | 08:04 |
| pstolowski | morning | 08:07 |
| zyga-x240 | hey pawel :) | 08:07 |
| pstolowski | heya | 08:07 |
| mvo | hey pstolowski ! | 08:20 |
| pstolowski | o/ | 08:21 |
| mborzecki | pstolowski: hey | 08:27 |
| mborzecki | somehow debug logs in #9640 make no sense | 08:27 |
| mup | PR #9640: tests/nested/manual/core20-save: verify handling of ubuntu-save with different system variants <Run nested> <UC20> <⛔ Blocked> <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9640> | 08:27 |
| pstolowski | mborzecki: hey; merge master, this will fix lxd-services-smoke failure | 08:31 |
| mborzecki | pstolowski: it's the test changed by the PR, the debug output makes no sense, things which should have been there given the environment variables are not present | 08:33 |
| mborzecki | it's as if the env variables are not set, or something overwrites them | 08:33 |
| pedronis | mborzecki: nested.sh might overwrite some stuff? | 08:36 |
| mborzecki | pedronis: it sets some things but it should not overwrite NESTED_{ENABLE_TPM,ENABLE_SECURE_BOOT,BUILD_SNAPD_FROM_CURRENT} | 08:37 |
| mborzecki | pedronis: otoh, the debug output suggest that NESTED_BUILD_SNAPD_FROM_CURRENT was not set, because the gadget snap was most likely not repacked | 08:38 |
| pedronis | mborzecki: remember that there is some form of image caching | 08:39 |
| pedronis | maybe it's bugggy in terms of reusing things even if they were built with different params ? | 08:40 |
| mborzecki | pedronis: this is a manual test and supposedly nothing ran before it | 08:40 |
| mvo | pedronis: I re-read your comments on 9667 again this morning - is https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9667/files#diff-3dedbc3a1986cf905aca293ca6d16560d297253859ecaa8bcea2b7dab7143b3cR1360 what you suggested? | 08:40 |
| mup | PR #9667: devicestate: implement boot.HasFDESetupHook <Skip spread> <Squash-merge> <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9667> | 08:40 |
| pedronis | mvo: yes, that looks like what I had in mind | 08:41 |
| mvo | pedronis: nice, let me add tests then | 08:41 |
| pstolowski | mborzecki: fwtw we do set NESTED_IMAGE_ID in some manual/ tests | 08:41 |
| pedronis | mborzecki: spread bug? I suppose you should sprinkle "env" calls around | 08:42 |
| pedronis | mvo: ask my review again in it when you think it's ready | 08:51 |
| mvo | pedronis: I just added tests, so a quick look would be good | 08:56 |
| mborzecki | mvo: what shall we do with #9633? | 08:56 |
| mup | PR #9633: github: run nested suite when commit is pushed to release branch <Run nested> <Simple 😃> <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9633> | 08:56 |
| pedronis | mvo: I put it back into my queue | 08:57 |
| mvo | pstolowski: could you please have a look at 8943 when you have some spare cycles? | 09:17 |
| pstolowski | mvo: yes | 09:17 |
| mvo | \o/ | 09:17 |
| pstolowski | it has conflict though | 09:21 |
| pstolowski | jamesh: hey, can you merge master ^ if still around? | 09:22 |
| jamesh | pstolowski: doing it now. | 09:23 |
| pstolowski | ty | 09:24 |
| jamesh | pstolowski: I've pushed up a fix for the merge conflict. Thanks for looking into this. | 09:34 |
| pstolowski | jamesh: thanks, i'll get to it shortly | 09:45 |
| mup | PR snapd#9497 closed: usersession/agent: have session agent connect to the D-Bus session bus <Created by jhenstridge> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9497> | 09:52 |
| mup | PR snapd#9641 closed: o/servicestate: preserve order of services on snap restart <Bug> <Services ⚙️> <Created by stolowski> <Merged by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9641> | 09:52 |
| mborzecki | funny how that core20-save test works just fine when running on google from local spread :/ | 09:56 |
| pedronis | mborzecki: I see some issues with #9659 | 10:19 |
| mup | PR #9659: osutil: add KernelCommandLineKeyValue; boot: refactor ModeAnd...FromKernelCommandLine <Squash-merge> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9659> | 10:19 |
| mborzecki | pedronis: hm good catch label != "" and empty mode, looks like it would hit an internal error in cmd_initramfs_mounts in that case, and other call sites ignore the label and just look at the mode | 10:23 |
| mborzecki | heh, gorename just paniced on me when trying to rename KernelCommandLineKeyValue | 10:31 |
| mborzecki | backtrace --> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/zcywxYtfB6/ | 10:34 |
| vidal72[m] | jamesh: is this still needed for snap? https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/pull/443 | 10:45 |
| mup | PR flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal#443: Don't use AppArmor to detect snap confined clients <Created by jhenstridge> <https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/pull/443> | 10:45 |
| jamesh | vidal72[m]: yeah. We'd like to get that in. | 10:46 |
| jamesh | vidal72[m]: I can look at rebasing if that'd help | 10:46 |
| vidal72[m] | it may help yes | 10:47 |
| jamesh | vidal72[m]: sorry for not being more active on this. I got swamped with other work, and it wasn't clear what would have been needed to get it landed back then. | 10:54 |
| mborzecki | pedronis: i've updated #9659 | 11:05 |
| mup | PR #9659: osutil: add KernelCommandLineKeyValue; boot: refactor ModeAnd...FromKernelCommandLine <Squash-merge> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9659> | 11:05 |
| mborzecki | mvo: are you updating #9667 or should i push the tweaks there? | 11:20 |
| mup | PR #9667: devicestate: implement boot.HasFDESetupHook <Skip spread> <Squash-merge> <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9667> | 11:20 |
| pedronis | mborzecki: thx, will look in a bit | 11:37 |
| mup | PR snapd#9661 closed: osutil/disks: add DiskFromName to get a disk using a udev name <Simple 😃> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <Merged by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9661> | 12:08 |
| pedronis | mborzecki: reviewed | 12:09 |
| mborzecki | pedronis: thanks, added a proposal of a name for that var in a comment | 12:20 |
| ijohnson | morning folks | 12:24 |
| ijohnson | mborzecki: are you working on addressing pedronis' feedback on 9659 | 12:24 |
| ijohnson | ? | 12:24 |
| mborzecki | ijohnson: yeah | 12:28 |
| ijohnson | k, thank you ! | 12:29 |
| pedronis | mvo: I reviewed #9656 | 12:32 |
| mup | PR #9656: devicestate: support "storage-safety" defaults during install <Run nested> <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9656> | 12:32 |
| pedronis | degville: ijohnson: ^ there's a log message there where native speaker input could be valuable | 12:33 |
| ijohnson | sure I can have a look | 12:33 |
| ijohnson | responded | 12:35 |
| === msalvatore_ is now known as msalvatore | ||
| pedronis | mborzecki: thx, better but I proposed a slight tweak on the name, sorry. mostly is unclear if "mock" is relevant there or not | 12:36 |
| pedronis | ijohnson: thanks, your message sounds good to me | 12:38 |
| ijohnson | pedronis: mvo: did y'all see my comment in the SU doc about the uc20 regression? | 12:39 |
| degville | pedronis: ijohnson: me too, although I'm trying to think of something other than 'due', as it could imply prefer-unencrypted was unintentionally set. | 12:39 |
| * ijohnson has no strong attachment to the word "due" | 12:39 | |
| pedronis | ah, language is hard | 12:40 |
| pedronis | ijohnson: yes, sounds something to discuss in the standup | 12:40 |
| degville | turtles all the way down. | 12:40 |
| ijohnson | pedronis: ok | 12:40 |
| * pstolowski lunch | 13:00 | |
| mvo | mborzecki: \o/ for updating 9667 | 13:34 |
| mvo | pedronis: thanks for the review! | 13:35 |
| pedronis | pstolowski: is #9409 ready for re-reviews? | 13:38 |
| mup | PR #9409: cmd/snap: implement 'snap validate' command <validation-sets :white_check_mark:> <⛔ Blocked> <Created by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9409> | 13:38 |
| mup | PR snapd#9667 closed: devicestate: implement boot.HasFDESetupHook <Skip spread> <Squash-merge> <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9667> | 13:38 |
| mup | PR snapd#9670 opened: devicestate: make checkEncryption fde-setup hook aware <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9670> | 13:43 |
| pstolowski | pedronis: yes | 13:46 |
| pedronis | pstolowski: ok, I put it back into my queue | 13:49 |
| mup | PR snapd#9660 closed: gadget/gadget.go: allow system-recovery-{image,select} as roles in gadget.yaml <Needs Samuele review> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9660> | 13:53 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#3381 opened: multipass build provider: check if instance exists before deleting <Created by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3381> | 14:21 |
| mborzecki | pstolowski: pushed a commit with NESTED_IMAGE_ID to #9640 | 14:30 |
| mup | PR #9640: tests/nested/manual/core20-save: verify handling of ubuntu-save with different system variants <Run nested> <UC20> <⛔ Blocked> <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9640> | 14:30 |
| pedronis | pstolowski: are you blocked right now? | 14:37 |
| mup | PR snapd#9659 closed: osutil: add KernelCommandLineKeyValue; boot: refactor ModeAnd...FromKernelCommandLine <Squash-merge> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9659> | 14:38 |
| ijohnson | \o/ | 14:39 |
| mvo | thanks ijohnson ! | 14:39 |
| ijohnson | thanks for merging mvo! | 14:40 |
| pstolowski | pedronis: not really; but i think i won't start new validation sets PR until existing ones are ok'ed? | 14:41 |
| pedronis | pstolowski: mostly asking if a re-review of the client one can wait tomorrow? | 14:41 |
| pstolowski | pedronis: yes that's fine. when you ack the client api bit then i'll update the second existing PR to match | 14:42 |
| mvo | 8929 needs a second review, should be relatively easy I hope | 14:51 |
| * cachio lunch | 14:54 | |
| pstolowski | looking | 16:16 |
| pstolowski | +1 | 16:28 |
| jdstrand | amurray: would you ming giving https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9263 a final review from security? (I commented on the base decl and removal of device-tree only) | 16:45 |
| mup | PR #9263: interfaces/fpga: add fpga interface <Needs Samuele review> <Needs security review> <Squash-merge> <Created by alfonsosanchezbeato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9263> | 16:45 |
| ijohnson | ......................................... | 16:54 |
| ijohnson | why does uboot.go refer to the u-boot bootloader as "uboot", but gadget.yaml requires "u-boot" | 16:55 |
| * ijohnson sighes heavily | 16:55 | |
| ijohnson | pedronis: I could use some help here if you have some time | 16:55 |
| ijohnson | not sure which we should re-name | 16:55 |
| pedronis | ijohnson: none | 16:55 |
| pedronis | I'm not quite sure why it matters | 16:56 |
| ijohnson | I suppose I could just silently alias "u-boot" as "uboot" | 16:56 |
| pedronis | ijohnson: I fear I'm missing something here | 16:56 |
| ijohnson | well firstly the names are inconsistent which is just unfortunate as a fact of matter | 16:56 |
| pedronis | kind of yes | 16:57 |
| ijohnson | secondly, I am trying to do the ForGadget thing which uses the name of the bootloader from the gadget.yaml to know which bootloader it should try | 16:57 |
| pedronis | that's the part I don't get | 16:57 |
| pedronis | why the gadget.yaml | 16:57 |
| pedronis | that was not what we discussed | 16:57 |
| ijohnson | mmm | 16:57 |
| pedronis | maybe is needed for lk | 16:57 |
| pedronis | but is not what we discussed | 16:57 |
| * zyga-mbp looks at https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9546 | 16:58 | |
| ijohnson | so if we don't use gadget.yaml how do we know what bootloader is in a given extracted gadget tree ? | 16:58 |
| mup | PR #9546: overlord: add inert export manager <Created by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9546> | 16:58 |
| pedronis | ijohnson: we look at the .conf file, as we did before | 16:58 |
| ijohnson | are we supposed to just grep for all "*.conf" files and see which one matches ? | 16:58 |
| ijohnson | I guess we could do that, it feels again like we are guessing since folks could put whatever .conf they want there in addition to uboot.conf | 16:59 |
| pedronis | ijohnson: the change I had in mind was very simple | 16:59 |
| ijohnson | for example | 16:59 |
| pedronis | ijohnson: but that's how things worked already | 16:59 |
| pedronis | we are not trying to change how that works | 16:59 |
| ijohnson | I guess I was just trying to make that nicer since it feels silly how much guessing we end up doing | 17:00 |
| pedronis | we are just changing the implementaion details | 17:00 |
| pedronis | ijohnson: well it changes the mechanics quite a bit | 17:00 |
| pedronis | probably not a good thing to do before 22 | 17:00 |
| pedronis | at this point | 17:00 |
| ijohnson | pedronis: did you mean not a good thing to do before 20 ? | 17:01 |
| pedronis | no, I mean, if we want to change the mechaninics of detecting the gadget | 17:01 |
| pedronis | bootloader | 17:01 |
| pedronis | that would be a core 22 thing | 17:01 |
| pedronis | at this point | 17:01 |
| ijohnson | ok sure I will just go do the silly grep thing | 17:02 |
| pedronis | ijohnson: is not a grep thing | 17:02 |
| pedronis | ijohnson: maybe we should have a quick chat | 17:02 |
| ijohnson | sure | 17:02 |
| ijohnson | I'm in the SU | 17:03 |
| zyga-mbp | hey King_InuYasha | 17:07 |
| === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch | ||
| mup | PR snapd#9671 opened: release: snapd 2.48 <Simple 😃> <Skip spread> <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9671> | 17:59 |
| zyga-mbp | mvo +1 | 18:00 |
| mup | PR snapd#9671 closed: release: snapd 2.48 <Simple 😃> <Skip spread> <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9671> | 18:19 |
| mvo | thanks zyga-mbp | 18:24 |
| zyga-mbp | :-) | 18:24 |
| zyga-mbp | I should really thank you instead | 18:24 |
| mvo | cachio: snapd snap in beta for everything but arm* | 18:25 |
| mvo | cachio: core as well, arm will come in ~1h or so | 18:26 |
| cachio | mvo, nice | 18:27 |
| cachio | perfect, validation already started | 18:27 |
| mvo | cachio: \o/ | 18:27 |
| mvo | thanks! | 18:27 |
| cachio | mvyaw | 18:27 |
| cachio | mvo, yaw | 18:27 |
| mup | PR snapd#9672 opened: vendor: update secboot repo to avoid including secboot.test binary <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9672> | 18:39 |
| mup | PR snapcraft#3382 opened: project loader: purge dead code in Config <Created by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3382> | 18:52 |
| mvo | cachio: arm is now also ready in beta | 19:07 |
| cachio | mvo, perfect | 19:09 |
| cachio | thanks | 19:09 |
| cachio | I'll write in the docs with the results | 19:10 |
| mvo | ta! | 19:11 |
| === ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson | ||
| ijohnson | mvo: approved 9672 | 19:13 |
| mvo | ijohnson: \o/ | 19:13 |
| mvo | ijohnson: thanks, I closed/reopened because I forgot the "run-nested" label :/ | 19:14 |
| ijohnson | ah right | 19:15 |
| pedronis | for clarity, that brings in also https://github.com/snapcore/secboot/pull/108 | 19:52 |
| mup | PR secboot#108: Make AddEFISecureBootPolicyProfile less strict <Created by chrisccoulson> <Merged by chrisccoulson> <https://github.com/snapcore/secboot/pull/108> | 19:52 |
| ijohnson | yes I looked at the diff in secboot and it looked "safe" to me | 19:53 |
| mup | PR snapd#9662 closed: bootloader/many: return error from ConfigFile and new* functions <UC20> <⛔ Blocked> <Created by anonymouse64> <Closed by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9662> | 21:35 |
| mup | PR snapd#9673 opened: bootloader/many: rm ConfigFile, add Present for indicating presence of bloader <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9673> | 21:35 |
| amurray | jdstrand: security review done on https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9263 | 23:11 |
| mup | PR #9263: interfaces/fpga: add fpga interface <Needs Samuele review> <Needs security review> <Squash-merge> <Created by alfonsosanchezbeato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9263> | 23:11 |
| jdstrand | amurray: thanks! | 23:12 |
| mup | PR snapd#9674 opened: bootloader/lkenv: mv v1 to separate file, include/lk/snappy_boot_v1.h: little fixups <Simple 😃> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9674> | 23:51 |
| mup | PR snapd#9675 opened: bootloader/lkenv: add v2 struct + support using it <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9675> | 23:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!