[00:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.8.0-30.32+21.04.2+1] (core, kernel)
[00:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.8.0-30.32+21.04.2+1] (core, kernel)
[00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.4.18-2ubuntu3.17 => 2.4.18-2ubuntu3.18] (ubuntu-server)
[00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.4.29-1ubuntu4.14 => 2.4.29-1ubuntu4.15] (ubuntu-server)
[00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.4.46-1ubuntu1 => 2.4.46-1ubuntu1.1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.4.41-4ubuntu3.1 => 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[01:36] <xnox> cascardo:  apw: sforshee: copying up linux-riscv linux-meta-riscv from groovy-proposed to hirsute-proposed, as hirsute is stuck on groovy-release.
[01:37] <xnox> also not sure, but I am wondering if linux-riscv is no longer compatible with recent opensbi, or maybe i am booting it wrong
[01:37] <xnox> will file a bugreport
[06:34] <ginggs> pandas should migrate in the next run
[06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libclc (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.0+git20190827-4ubuntu0.1 => 0.2.0+git20190827-7~ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)
[07:09] <vorlon> reverting python3-defaults 3.9.0-3 from -proposed temporarily; it makes gobject-introspection uninstallable and breaks the ongoing ghc rebuilds
[07:10] <vorlon> (looks like gobject-introspection itself just needs a no-change rebuild; still, things are in-flight)
=== ebarretto_ is now known as ebarretto
[08:15] <apw> xnox, we don't copy kernels forward now ... we build forward ports
[08:15] <apw> (admittedly that isn't moving as fast as it should)
[08:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1030.32~18.04.1]
[08:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1030.32~18.04.1]
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32+21.04.2+1]
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32+21.04.2+1]
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32+21.04.2+1]
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32+21.04.2+1]
[08:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1030.32~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[09:10] <mwhudson> numpy migrated ohhhh emmm geeee
[09:12] <mwhudson> why hasn't excuses updates for nearly three hours?
[09:17] <Laney> it's requesting millions of tests to verify python3-defaults that got removed :(
[09:17] <Laney> ima kill this run and let it start again without that available
[09:20] <doko> vorlon: you restored libguestfs, but kept perl4caml
[09:24] <mwhudson> Laney: ah hah
[09:27] <doko> it's not that excuse updates were fast before, also took ~3h
[09:28] <Laney> no
[09:29] <Laney> more like 2 :-)
[09:30] <doko> so how do I restore  perl4caml 0.9.5-5build6 in -proposed?
[09:31] <doko> remove  0.9.5-5build7, copy  0.9.5-5build6 to the same series?
[09:32] <Laney> yes
[09:32] <tjaalton> sil2100: yo, libclc uploaded for hwe stack, after that it's mesa
[09:32] <doko> and after that,  0.9.5-5build7 is restorable?
[09:35] <Laney> should be
[09:39] <doko> let's wait for the next two britney runs, 5h...
[09:41] <doko> Laney: did you try to run britney using pypy3?
[09:48] <doko> hmm, python-apt as a C extension. but nothing else
[09:51] <sil2100> tjaalton: sweet!
[10:04] <Laney> doko: no, but that's probably not the problem, if you read any of the logs it's spending almost all the time hitting a remote https server to look for new test results
[10:04] <Laney> we should get those in bulk in advance somehow
[10:08] <doko> rbalint: do you want to look at vim/armhf or should I ?
[10:09] <doko> ahh, apparently somebody retried, and it built
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libclc [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.0+git20190827-7~ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vtk6 (xenial-proposed/universe) [6.2.0+dfsg1-10build1 => 6.2.0+dfsg1-10ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[10:22] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks doko for caring about perl4caml, not sure why it wasn't shown as blocker before
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-instance-connect [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3.20.10.0]
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-instance-connect [source] (focal-proposed) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3.20.04.0]
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-instance-connect [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~18.04.1]
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-instance-connect [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1030.32~18.04.1]
[10:53] <doko> cpaelzer: https://patches.ubuntu.com/o/openjade/openjade_1.4devel1-21.3ubuntu1.patch that seems to segfault everywhere now ...
[10:59] <doko> cpaelzer: samba would need merging, will block python3.9
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (focal-proposed/main) [20.0.8-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 20.2.1-1~ubuntu0.20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg)
[11:01] <tjaalton> sil2100: and there's mesa ^ :)
[11:03] <doko> ahh, you uploaded openjade an hour ago
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openzwave [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [1.6+ds-2] (no packageset)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.5.1-4 => 1.5.1-5] (core)
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openzwave [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [1.6+ds-2] (no packageset)
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceres-solver (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.11.0~dfsg0-2 => 1.11.0~dfsg0-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.5.1-5 => 1.5.1-5] (core)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openzwave [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [1.6+ds-2] (no packageset)
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.5.1-5 => 1.5.1-5] (core)
[11:42] <cpaelzer> doko: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pgpool2/+bug/1869734
[11:42] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1869734 in openjade (Ubuntu) "openjade segfaults on arm (due to gcc optimization)" [Undecided,Triaged]
[11:43] <cpaelzer> doko: I have seen it just an hour before you and started on this case again
[11:43] <cpaelzer> samba is sergiodj now *ping*
[11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openzwave [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [1.6+ds-2] (no packageset)
[11:44] <cpaelzer> doko: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjade/1.4devel1-21.3ubuntu2 is already complete and formerly FTFBS (due to openjade) https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pgpool2/4.1.4-2 built fine now on all architectures
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openzwave [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [1.6+ds-2] (no packageset)
[11:45] <cpaelzer> doko: do you happen to know if there are more packages breaking on openjade that need to have their build restarted?
[11:45] <xnox> sil2100:  could you please promote microcode-initrd to main, in focal-updates? it is in main in later releases, but as NEW-SRU it went into universe by default.
[11:46] <cpaelzer> I was looking at that for postgresql* which needs the new pgpool2 to pass autopkgtest, therefore I've not looked for "other openjade impacts" yet
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pbbam [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[11:46] <doko> cpaelzer: Reverse-Build-Depends
[11:46] <doko> * gtkextra                      (for openjade)
[11:46] <doko> * kannel-sqlbox                 (for openjade)
[11:46] <doko> * libdbi-drivers                (for openjade)
[11:46] <doko> * opensp                        (for openjade)
[11:46] <doko> * pgpool2                       (for openjade)
[11:46] <doko> * slony1-2                      (for openjade)
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1100.111~16.04.1] (kernel)
[11:48] <cpaelzer> yeah but of those pgpool2 was the only one broken atm
[11:48] <doko> then it looks good
[11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openzwave [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6+ds-2]
[11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openzwave [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6+ds-2]
[11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openzwave [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6+ds-2]
[11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1013.14+21.04.1] (core, kernel)
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openzwave [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6+ds-2]
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.10 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.10.0-1004.5] (no packageset)
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openzwave [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6+ds-2]
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1012.12+21.04.1] (core, kernel)
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1059.65~16.04.1] (kernel)
[11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pbbam [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[11:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbbam [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6.0+dfsg-2]
[11:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbbam [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.6.0+dfsg-2]
[11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1100.111~16.04.1]
[11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1059.65~16.04.1]
[11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.10 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.10.0-1004.5]
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [2.3.0-0ubuntu3.5 => 2.3.0-0ubuntu3.6] (core)
=== msalvatore_ is now known as msalvatore
[12:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (focal-proposed) [20.2.1-1~ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[12:50] <sil2100> xnox: sure, will look into that
[13:02] <slyon> Hey! Could a release-team member please merge this hint for me? https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/394173 I did lots of test yesterday, trying to improve the situation. But etcd behaves arbitrarily, so I decided to add a hint.
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:20.10.14]
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pbseqlib [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.3.4+dfsg-3] (no packageset)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pbseqlib [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.3.4+dfsg-3] (no packageset)
[13:12] <sil2100> slyon: looking o/
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.29]
[13:15] <sil2100> Done
[13:15] <doko> now, hivex is entangled. removing hivex and supermin, will restore later
[13:16] <slyon> thanks!
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbseqlib [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.3.4+dfsg-3]
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbseqlib [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [5.3.4+dfsg-3]
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pbseqlib [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.3.4+dfsg-3] (no packageset)
[13:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04.41]
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbseqlib [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.3.4+dfsg-3]
[13:51] <rbalint> plusone what's being work on and what to look at?
[13:54] <cpaelzer> rbalint: since it is tied with perl FYI I'm looking for postgresql which now is down to just multicorn (and another britney run to pick up those being fixed)
[13:55] <rbalint> cpaelzer, as i see ghc also needs to go in before perl, but now it built on all arches and many rdep's build succeeded
[13:56] <cpaelzer> oh ghc was postponed for quite some time, mwhudson was the last I remember looking at it
[13:58] <doko> we need to wait for ghc. packages are all built, and I gave back failed tests
[13:58] <cpaelzer> I barely touched ghc, but I unblocked a bunch of haskell* things with cyrus-imapd this morning https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/c/cyrus-imapd/hirsute/ppc64el
[13:59] <cpaelzer> so of the many this is one fail you don't have to look into (just wait to be reflected on excuses)
[14:00] <cpaelzer> Note: the sync has rpc.h issues which is due to glibc2.32 (vs libtirpc)
[14:00] <cpaelzer> but it now considers this skippable, so it is no blocking problem anymore
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
[14:02] <rbalint> plusone i've created LP: #1904880 , is it a duplicate?
[14:02] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1904880 in britney "Update_excuses is permanently outdated" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1904880
[14:05] <rbalint> plusone anyone looking at perl's regressions?
[14:05] <doko> rbalint: read the backlog
[14:05] <doko> <Laney> doko: no, but that's probably not the problem, if you read any of the logs it's spending almost all the time hitting a remote https server to look for new test results
[14:05] <doko> <Laney> we should get those in bulk in advance somehow
[14:06] <doko> Laney: a closing message on update_excuses.html how long the run took would be nice
[14:09] <rbalint> doko, thanks, i've added the idea to the bug
[14:11] <cpaelzer> In the context of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-13/+bug/1902059/comments/9 I'd ask to either merge https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/394179 OR remove postgresql-multicorn.
[14:11] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1902059 in postgresql-13 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] postgresql-13" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[14:12] <cpaelzer> I'm hereby asking the currently active AAs doko & Laney what of these options would be preferred (and why if you have the time to explain).
[14:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: v4l2loopback (focal-proposed/universe) [0.12.3-1ubuntu0.2 => 0.12.3-1ubuntu0.3] (no packageset)
[14:13] <doko> I'm on +1 ;p
[14:14] <rbalint> plusone i'm looking at the perl regressions
[14:14] <doko> cpaelzer: removing
[14:14] <cpaelzer> thank you
[14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iptables-netflow (focal-proposed/universe) [2.4-2ubuntu0.1 => 2.4-2ubuntu0.2] (no packageset)
[14:21] <xnox> sil2100: for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~18.04.1 can you process the binary NEW please? I.e. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=u-boot ? ditto https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=u-boot ?
[14:21] <xnox> otherwise it doesn't publish.
[14:22] <rbalint> plusone retried many tests with "Failed to fetch http://ftpmaster"
[14:32] <sil2100> o/
[14:34] <sil2100> xnox: thanks for the heads up! I again forgot about the binNEW queue, eh
[14:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted u-boot [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~18.04.1]
[14:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted u-boot [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.04.1]
[14:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted u-boot [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~18.04.1]
[14:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted u-boot [riscv64] (focal-proposed) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.04.1]
[14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adcli (focal-proposed/main) [0.9.0-1 => 0.9.0-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adcli (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.2-1 => 0.8.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:50] <rbalint> plusone there are a few dozen failures in perl tests missing recommends which are only installable in -proposed, i'm retrying those with all-proposed
[15:03] <rbalint> plusone perl seems to be ok by the time all tests finish
[15:04] <rbalint> plusone it needs this hint https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/394180 but i may add a few more packages
[15:04] <sergiodj> cpaelzer: doko: pong about samba
[15:05] <doko> sergiodj: merge please
[15:06] <sergiodj> doko: I'll add a card to our board, will get to it soon
[15:11] <rbalint> plusone i'm retrying all s390x regressions to see what got fixed and worth retrying on other slower arches
[15:11] <rbalint> plusone that's ~300 tests
[15:13] <rbalint> plusone any objection?
[15:15] <doko> rbalint: keep in mind that I already gave back the haskell related ones
[15:17] <rbalint> doko, ok, i skip the ones having haskell in the name
[15:18] <rbalint> doko, that was only one :-)
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.16.1-1ubuntu1.6 => 1.16.1-1ubuntu1.7] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (focal-proposed/main) [2.2.3-3 => 2.2.3-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ndiswrapper (focal-proposed/universe) [1.60-8ubuntu2 => 1.60-8ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[16:16] <vorlon> python3-defaults 3.9.0-3 restored to -proposed (because ghc is ready to go \o/)
[16:17] <vorlon> doko: are you planning to manage no-change rebuilds against python3.9?  (e.g. should I hold off on rebuilding gobject-introspection, which is uninstallable and causes pain)
[16:18] <doko> vorlon: I have everything prepared here
[16:18] <vorlon> doko: ok cheers
[17:08] <vorlon> rbalint: fyi, RT#127896 re ppc64el down in bos01
[17:09] <vorlon> Laney: ^^ based on the latest updates on that RT, should we try bringing bos01/ppc64el back up?
[17:09] <vorlon> or do something else to validate whether it's working
[17:10] <Laney> vorlon: Try to start an instance at all, they were just totally not working
[17:10] <Laney> in that update the SRE looked at lxd specific stuff but if it is also affecting proposed-migration too that seems like the wrong place
[17:11] <Laney> well maybe some of the other actions were more all encompassing
[17:12]  * Laney nova boot
[17:12]  * vorlon nods
[17:13] <vorlon> Server building... 0% complete
[17:13] <vorlon> is that what you've seen before?
[17:14] <vorlon> Laney: and if that ticket is being addressed at a lxd-specific layer, should we open a separate RT?
[17:15] <Laney> we should add a comment saying be aware this is not specific to one tenant
[17:16] <vorlon> ah nova boot returned
[17:16] <Laney> yeah can take a while to get scheduled
[17:17] <vorlon> Laney: ok it's booted but unreachable
[17:18] <Laney> vorlon: ok, sounds unfixed as expected then - feel free to add another comment to this effect and clarify that it's our tenant too
[17:18] <vorlon> ack
[17:19] <Laney> dunno if you can do anything to raise the priority, seems people work on it for an hour or so, fail to fix it and then drop the task for the next person to start again on ...
[17:20] <doko> vorlon: could you waive the tests triggered by doxygen? that's the last package preventing the ocaml transition, and starting with python3 (llvm) would entangle it with ocaml again
[17:20] <vorlon> doko: looking
[17:21] <vorlon> doko: hmm so the new version is built with a new compiler, is there no concern that the behavior may break as a result?
[17:22] <doko> vorlon: the tests pass, and we had never problems updating LLVM for doxygen in the past
[17:22] <doko> doxgen's test themself
[17:23] <doko> all amd64 test already pass, arm64/armhf/ppc64el still running
[17:25] <vorlon> ok
[17:25] <vorlon> agreed, skip-test is reasonable here
[17:27] <doko> vorlon: wait, I asked for the wrong thing. not the tests by doxygen itself, these can wait. but waive the doxygen test triggered by llvm-toolchain-11
[17:27] <vorlon> doko: ah ok
[17:28] <vorlon> doko: done
=== ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch
[17:50] <doko> gobject-introspection is uploaded. I'm waiting with the other uploads until ocml migrates
[17:55] <Laney> I wonder if the python3-defaults tests will get re-triggered
[17:58] <doko> Laney: if not, that's ok. just let the no-change uploads happen, and then re-upload
[18:07] <doko> hrm, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/ghc.html  shows again 24 unknown packages ...
[18:10] <doko> ahh, all the ocaml migration messages are coming in
[18:11] <rbalint> \o/
[18:13] <kyrofa> Hey sil2100 I have a high-priority SRU for vtk in Xenial in bug #1573234, any chance you can help me get it into -proposed?
[18:13] <ubot5> bug 1573234 in vtk6 (Ubuntu Xenial) "unable to link: cannot find libvtkproj4" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1573234
[18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.47.1+18.04 => 2.48+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (groovy-proposed/main) [2.47.1+20.10.1 => 2.48+20.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (focal-proposed/main) [2.47.1+20.04 => 2.48+20.04] (core)
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.47.1 => 2.48] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[18:17] <xnox> apw:  can you please unblock linux-riscv/linux-meta-riscv in hirsute? such that 5.8.0.8.8 / 5.8.0-8.9 can migrate there, to match what's in groovy-updates already?
[18:17] <xnox> cause the one in hirsute-release doesn't even boot =)
[18:18] <xnox> or should we just copy up the -9 one? as that's in groovy-proposed now.
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: supermin (hirsute-proposed/primary) [5.2.0-2ubuntu1]
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: hivex (hirsute-proposed/primary) [1.3.19-1ubuntu2]
[18:29] <sil2100> kyrofa: looking o/
[18:32] <sil2100> kyrofa: ok, looks sane
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vtk6 [source] (xenial-proposed) [6.2.0+dfsg1-10ubuntu0.1]
[18:32] <vorlon> doko: the tracker tracks installability in -proposed, and when I re-added python3 the gi stack became uninstallable /in proposed/ but doesn't block migration
[18:34] <doko> confusing
[18:35] <doko> vorlon: I restored libguestfs
[18:38] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, I don't think libguestfs was already copied
[18:38] <doko> hmm
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hivex [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [1.3.19-1ubuntu2]
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted supermin [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [5.2.0-2ubuntu1]
[18:42] <doko> didn't get a reject message either. anyway, afk for now
[18:47] <LocutusOfBorg> ok libguestfs was not copied because of supermin and hivex
[18:47] <LocutusOfBorg> so I'm not sure how ocaml could migrate... meh
[18:49] <LocutusOfBorg> any archive-admin to process missing build on s390x: polyphone (from 2.2.0.20200612+dfsg1-1)
[18:49] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974880 please?
[18:49] <ubot5> Debian bug 974880 in ftp.debian.org "RM: polyphone [s390x hppa m68k ppc64 sparc64] -- ANAIS; package is little-endian only" [Normal,Open]
=== ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson
[19:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8.0-1013.14+21.04.1]
[19:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.8.0-1012.12+21.04.1]
[19:26] <mwhudson> has anyone retried all the scipy autopkgtest regressions now that numpy has migrated?
[19:27] <rbalint> mwhudson i've retried everything on s390x
[19:27] <rbalint> plusone retrying all tests for setuptools, they passed on s390x
[19:42] <LocutusOfBorg> rbalint, somebody should retry all ppc64el failures too
[19:43] <LocutusOfBorg> fixed binutils fixed ghc/llvm/blender and lots of other stuff on ppc64el
[19:43] <vorlon> retrying them all is just going to fill the queues immediately prior to the datacenter downtime this weekend
[19:43] <vorlon> so maybe be strategic about what you requeue right now
[19:47] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, plusone i'm going up from the bottom retrying promising ones
[19:47] <LocutusOfBorg> sure, I don't plan to do them
[19:47] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon,
[19:47] <LocutusOfBorg> missing build on armhf: doctest, libghc-doctest-dev, libghc-doctest-prof (from 0.16.3-1build4)
[19:47] <LocutusOfBorg> arch:armhf not built yet, autopkgtest delayed there
[19:47] <LocutusOfBorg> this looks meh to me
[19:47] <LocutusOfBorg> did you forget to copy back one binary?
[19:47] <LocutusOfBorg> because it is published, but britney is lacking it, and stops the migration
[19:47] <LocutusOfBorg>  libghc-doctest-dev | 0.16.3-1build3   | hirsute-proposed/universe | amd64, arm64, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
[19:48] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: no, I didn't forget anything; launchpad allowed the armhf build to be published after I deleted the build4 source
[19:48] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe slow armhf published after your rollback?
[19:48] <vorlon> I've deleted the binaries and re-copied and hopefully it works
[19:48] <LocutusOfBorg> yes, that one sure, can you please do some magic? thanks
[19:48] <vorlon> (also, when doing a binary copy you don't get to pick which binaries are copied)
[19:48] <vorlon> doko flagged this to me earlier, so it should be done soon
[19:48] <LocutusOfBorg> racy race conditions are racy...
[19:49] <LocutusOfBorg> I hope to see ghc migrate now, I don't know if it is entangled or not...
[19:57] <vorlon> fyi https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hirsute/armhf/libghc-doctest-prof
[19:58] <vorlon> looks like my first copy failed silently due to racing the deletion
[19:58] <vorlon> well, actually no, the timing on that predates this conversation, so it did work but took time to publish
[19:59] <vorlon> anyway, it's not in the current britney run, so expect to wait 2+ hours for the next result :P
[20:00] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[20:01] <LocutusOfBorg> what worries me is that (this is only a feeling), looking e.g. at ocaml, I saw only libguestfs being a blocker, after removing it, another one was blocking, and then another one again
[20:01] <LocutusOfBorg> is britney stopping at the first blocker?
[20:03] <rbalint> vorlon, could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/394205 for sshuttle?
[20:08] <rbalint> vorlon, also for mercurial https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/394206
[20:20] <rbalint> vorlon, what script do you use for dropping obsolete hints? it would be better to have it in git so we could run it and maybe fix some corner cases
[20:30] <vorlon> rbalint: that's the wrong file to update for amd64 (mercurial)
[20:30] <vorlon> rbalint: you want worker.conf instead (amd64 compute is not in bos01)
[20:30] <vorlon> not sure why we have a bos01 non-arch-qualified config anyway
[20:35] <rbalint> vorlon, thanks, fixed
[20:37] <doko> vim binds perl & python :-/
[20:54] <vorlon> rbalint: both merges done, and deployed
[20:55] <LocutusOfBorg> rbalint, autopkgtest for petsc4py/3.14.0-2: amd64: Pass, arm64: Regression ♻ , armhf: Pass, i386: Ignored failure, ppc64el: Regression ♻ , s390x: Pass
[20:55] <LocutusOfBorg> do you think we can try on big packages?
[20:56] <LocutusOfBorg> because we are pretty sure the failures are related to ram...
[20:56] <vorlon> rbalint: wrt scripts for obsolete hints, they're not great, which is why I haven't pushed them anywhere and also haven't run them in a long time
[21:17] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, i  retried petsc4py tests, let's see how they go
[21:18] <LocutusOfBorg> rbalint, we tried before focal release, and I think I remember they were OOM
[21:18] <LocutusOfBorg> I even found the minimum ram requested to make them work, but I forgot
[21:21] <LocutusOfBorg> can anybody please process giac removals? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974066
[21:21] <ubot5> Debian bug 974066 in ftp.debian.org "RM: giac [ppc64el s390x] -- RoM; FTBFS ; abandoned upstream" [Normal,Open]
[21:21] <LocutusOfBorg> and https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974880 please
[21:21] <ubot5> Debian bug 974880 in ftp.debian.org "RM: polyphone [s390x hppa m68k ppc64 sparc64] -- ANAIS; package is little-endian only" [Normal,Open]
[21:25] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, indeed
[21:25] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, i'm filing an mr
[21:26] <LocutusOfBorg> <3
[21:26] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, thanks
[21:35] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, vorlon https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/394209
[21:36] <rbalint> plusone i've also retried mercurial and sshuttle
[21:58] <rbalint> mwhudson, pulsone
[21:58] <rbalint> mwhudson, pulsone i think no one retried scipy tests, i'm doing it
[22:18] <mwhudson> rbalint: ah yeah i didn't get to it yet
[22:18] <mwhudson> thanks
[22:28] <rbalint> plusone mwhudson, i retry all sphinx ons, too, and retry all s390x regressions (181) with hello to use them as baseline for filing hints
[22:52] <Laney> looks like a bunch of tests are failing with
[22:53] <Laney> Removing ubuntu-minimal (1.459) ...
[22:53] <Laney> Removing netplan.io (0.100-0ubuntu5) ...
[22:53] <Laney> etc
[22:53] <Laney> possibly 3.9-as-default rebuilds, they're not getting python3.9 as a trigger
[22:54] <Laney> no
[22:55] <Laney> The following packages have unmet dependencies: python3-yaml : Depends: python3 (< 3.9) but 3.9.0-3 is to be installed
[22:55] <Laney> it's transient-ness
[22:55] <Laney> transitive*
[22:58] <Laney> vorlon: not sure if you want to upload a rebuild of pyyaml to make ubuntu-minimal installable in proposed ...
[22:58]  * Laney is just passing through atm
[22:59] <Laney> no no, it might be missing trigger on pyyaml from proposed
[23:00] <Laney> anyway, heads up, lots of failures unless that is addressed, could kill the requests and requeue them with that trigger or all-proposed
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmatio [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.19-2] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmatio [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.19-2] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmatio [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.19-2] (no packageset)