[00:18] <ItzSwirlz> There. Got the build for UCR ISO to work
[00:18] <ItzSwirlz> (locally). GH Actions artifact wasnt working and locally chroot and umount was having mental breakdowns
[00:18] <ItzSwirlz> lb couldn't umount the dirs because according to the chroot it didn't exist when it did, did it manually, refreshed, reran. /shrug
[10:06] <seb128> bdmurray, hey, would it be easy to add extra queries to the rls incoming reports or is that designed to be built from one launchpad query? we have non Ubuntu packages we care about, e.g subiquity, snap-store, ubuntu-cdimage, it would be useful to be able to flag rls issues on those components
[11:58] <aecalaz> Hi! I need to recompile the BOOTx64.EFI file. Where can I find the source code?
[11:59] <tarzeau> aecalaz: dpkg -S /path/to/BOOTx64.EFI ?
[12:01] <juliank> aecalaz: That's a long and complicated story.
[12:01] <juliank> aecalaz: Is it the same as shimx64.efi? Then it's the signed shim in shim-signed which was built from shim, and signed by Microsoft
[12:02] <aecalaz> Ugh. That sound painful.
[12:03] <juliank> You don't need a signed shim if you disable secure boot of course
[12:03] <juliank> or you can add your own key to your secure boot config and sign your shim with it
[12:04] <aecalaz> I'm trying to run a tiny core based OS on a new computer; I tried some time ago with a pre compilerd Slackware EFI file. That works fine; but in another computer it fails. The Ubuntu 19.04 EFI file works really fine.
[12:04] <aecalaz> But it need a grub.cfg file; and I need some hard-coded values. So, I want to recompile the Ubuntu 20.04 efi file.
[12:05] <aecalaz> Secure boot is not a problem.
[12:13] <aecalaz> @tar
[12:13] <udevbot_> Error: "tar" is not a valid command.
[12:13] <ahasenack> hello, does anybody know why dpkg -V flags files as missing when they were purposedly excluded via exclusion configuration in, say, /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg.d/excludes?
[12:13] <ahasenack> bug?
[12:13] <ahasenack> this was on bionic
[12:13] <aecalaz> tarzeau, I'l check is. Thanks!
[12:14] <aecalaz> *it
[21:37] <ItzSwirlz> Having good ol' Python GTK shenanigans, Bug #1905089
[21:38] <ItzSwirlz> A fix is either the number can be changed or use a float
[21:41] <ItzSwirlz> but supposedly there *Was* no number
[23:40] <Unit193> So libtorrent-rasterbar is uninstallable in unstable, I need it for deluge so I packaged the new one.  H doesn't have it either, it's not a minimal update at all but it builds sooo.  Something I can push?
[23:48] <ItzSwirlz> I would say a Yes but despite how Canonical has changed (with opening/welcoming new devs like me), you can't trust my answer.
[23:53] <Unit193> ItzSwirlz: lt-raster is in universe, it's more of a free for all.