/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/11/25/#lubuntu.txt

lubot<ecsamrl> @Dan58 [<Dan58> anyone can help here?], but how do you need help?01:01
kc2bez@ecsamrl They didn't wait around for an answer.01:03
=== FrankF1 is now known as FrankF
furrykefI'm not getting any sound. alsamixer seems to detect both my HDA Intel PCH and my Radeon's HDMI, but in PulseAudio I only see "HDMI / DisplayPort".03:08
furrykefI played around with the volume levels and muting in alsamixer. The only thing I accomplished was getting my mic to play back through my headphones.03:08
furrykefHmm, I think this profile is associated with the correct device. But then why am I not getting any sound?03:24
furrykefI'ma just reboot and see if anythin' changes...03:51
furrykefRebooting fixed it. Dunno why.04:12
=== akem__ is now known as akem
akemHoi.09:22
merribobhi all10:54
merribobdoes anyone know if the http://ppa.launchpad.net/lubuntu-desktop/ppa/ubuntu/dists/xenial package repo has been decommissioned recently?10:54
merribobi couldn't see anything in the mailing list but now (as of the past couple of days) just get 403s10:54
guiverc2merribob, Lubuntu 16.04 reached EOL on April 2019 (3 years from release; only main Ubuntu desktop/server has 5 years)10:56
merribobyes, we need to upgrade :D  but we have a dependency on that ppa that's just started failing this week, wondered if i could pin down the specific reason10:57
merribobguessing this is going to speed up our migration (which is good!)10:57
guiverc2merribob, yeah the PPA has been disabled, I don't recall the specifics (recall mention of it here on irc)  but it had nothing for supported releases from what I can see11:05
=== guiverc2 is now known as guiverc
merribobok, thanks :)11:15
=== Ted is now known as Guest55088
lubot<heysoundude> Hello - I am Getting notified of updates being available, but when I click to make it happen, one of them fails.16:05
lubot<heysoundude> So I try apt update in terminal, and that hangs and gives me an error message with an IP address that fails or something. Would it help to screenshot and attach it?16:07
lubot<heysoundude> (Photo, 960x1280) https://i.imgur.com/6GNyJz5.jpg Odd that an ubuntu server would fail16:20
lubot<heysoundude> And more odd that none of the ubuntu servers are https.16:21
lubot<heysoundude> Anyone?  Bueller?16:30
lubot<kc2bez> It looks like an issue with the local mirror.16:43
lubot<Michaël Van Bogaert> so a solution could be to try an other server?16:49
lubot<Michaël Van Bogaert> the http question ...16:49
lubot<Michaël Van Bogaert> I'm curious about it … how come we use http instead of https?16:50
lubot<aptghetto> Why do you need https for the package download?16:51
lubot<heysoundude> Why wouldn’t you?16:53
apt-ghettoHTTPS is a transport encryption, but the packages are open source, well-known. There is nothing to hide.16:53
lubot<heysoundude> @kc2bez [It looks like an issue with the local mirror.], How do I try a different one?16:53
apt-ghettoAnd apt has its own integrity check, the packages are signed.16:54
lubot<heysoundude> @apt-ghetto [<apt-ghetto> HTTPS is a transport encryption, but the packages are open source, …], Security is about more than obfuscation.16:54
apt-ghettoWell, then tell me a good reason to use it16:55
lubot<heysoundude> @apt-ghetto [<apt-ghetto> And apt has its own integrity check, the packages are signed.], Signed packages seem...antiquated and inefficient.16:55
apt-ghettoGood that http is more efficient than https16:56
lubot<heysoundude> @apt-ghetto [<apt-ghetto> Well, then tell me a good reason to use it], I wasn’t meaning to get your knickers (assuming you’re wearing them) knotting16:56
lubot<N0um3n0> @heysoundude [Signed packages seem...antiquated and inefficient.], Why?16:57
lubot<heysoundude> Well, you have to deliberately check a hash. I would think that you can have some better feeling of trust over https16:59
lubot<kc2bez> @heysoundude [How do I try a different one?], If you open "software Sources" from the menu -> Preferences you can change the "Download From:" to the main server.16:59
apt-ghettoChecking a hash is a check for integrity, whereas encryption is used to guarantee confidentiality. These are two completely different things.17:00
lubot<N0um3n0> @apt-ghetto [<apt-ghetto> Checking a hash is a check for integrity, whereas encryption is use …], Correct17:00
lubot<heysoundude> @kc2bez [If you open "software Sources" from the menu -> Preferences you can change the " …], Thank you. It’s working now17:00
lubot<kc2bez> @heysoundude [Thank you. It’s working now], Happy to help.17:01
lubot<heysoundude> And it seems faster than the Canadian mirror I had been using.17:01
lubot<kc2bez> That is contrary to the idea of using a local mirror but I am glad it improved things.17:02
lubot<heysoundude> @kc2bez [That is contrary to the idea of using a local mirror but I am glad it improved t …], Right?  I’m about 7ms from one of the biggest datacenters that basically everything here live at or goes through. My own ISP included17:03
lubot<heysoundude> Lives at*17:03
apt-ghettoI can give you an example, when I needed to use https for apt: the firewall was blocking packages for Kali Linux. After using https, I was able to update my Kali without problems.17:08
apt-ghettoYou can simply change the protocol in /etc/apt/sources.list from http to https and then it will use https or you can install apt-transport-https17:10
lubot<heysoundude> Hmmm...I might just do that.17:14
lubot<heysoundude> Both of those.17:14
lubot<Michaël Van Bogaert> @aptghetto  … thanks for the explaination  … My question is answered17:17
=== mrmota is now known as brmonitor
=== l is now known as Guest92270
=== Guest92270 is now known as chili
=== FrankF1 is now known as FrankF

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!