| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pveclib [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.4+dfsg-3] (no packageset) | 05:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-asttokens [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [2.0.4-1] (no packageset) | 05:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected zfs-linux [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.3-1ubuntu12.6] | 08:16 | |
| === Guest23201 is now known as _hc | ||
| Laney | juliank: now make the /running page render an X next to your own items | 09:09 |
|---|---|---|
| juliank | Laney: but what possibly for? | 09:10 |
| juliank | It already tells me the username :) | 09:11 |
| Laney | so you don't have to go manually construct the URL if you want to delete your own items | 09:13 |
| juliank | Oh | 09:13 |
| juliank | A delete X button | 09:13 |
| Laney | yeah a ❌ | 09:13 |
| juliank | Ooh unicide | 09:14 |
| juliank | Unicode | 09:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.10.12+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pveclib [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.4+dfsg-3] | 09:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-asttokens [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.0.4-1] | 09:35 | |
| juliank | I just realized the queues are empty | 09:47 |
| juliank | nice | 09:47 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.10.12+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.10.12+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:13 | |
| amurray | sil2100: hey just wondering if there is anything missing on my part for iptables/groovy SRU in LP #1904192 - this has been sitting in unapproved for a while now so just wanted to make sure I didn't miss anything for this | 10:24 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1904192 in iptables (Ubuntu Groovy) "ebtables can not rename just created chain" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1904192 | 10:24 |
| sil2100 | amurray: hey! Oh, I wonder why no one picked it up - might be that it being a 'sync' scared people off, let me review it after the meeting | 10:31 |
| amurray | sil2100: cheers :) | 10:31 |
| sil2100 | amurray: yeah, everything with the SRU, I think it was all because of it being a sync - now approved o/ | 10:42 |
| amurray | sil2100: awesome, thanks | 10:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iptables [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.8.5-3ubuntu2.20.10.2] | 10:42 | |
| seb128 | sil2100, the 'syncs just sit there and being ignored' thing need to get resolved one way or another (more a comment for the SRU team than yourself) | 10:43 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, and it's really just some strange mental thing, since there's really not that much more involved in reviewing syncs | 10:46 |
| sil2100 | Bileto syncs are especially easy to review - as for normal syncs, those just require basically running 2-3 more commands | 10:47 |
| sil2100 | hm | 10:47 |
| sil2100 | But that can be automated in sru-review actually | 10:47 |
| seb128 | sil2100, just merge https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-review-bileto-support/+merge/364193 | 10:47 |
| seb128 | apw approved it | 10:48 |
| seb128 | almost a year it's sitting there... | 10:48 |
| sil2100 | seb128: that's only for bileto support, yes, I might look into merging that but actually what we need is something that would work for all syncs, which is quite easy: making sru-review recognize syncs, create temporary directory, pull latest source, pull source from queue, diff and display | 10:49 |
| seb128 | right | 10:49 |
| sil2100 | I'll try looking into this (and the MP) today | 10:50 |
| seb128 | thanks! | 10:50 |
| seb128 | sil2100, oh, while I've you around ... https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/hirsute/ubuntu-canary I finally got a succesful build, I've been hinted that the image aren't published in a public place though? any reason why not? and is the private place one I've access to (and if not could you move the current built iso somewhere public so I can see if the result is as expected) | 10:52 |
| sil2100 | seb128: yeah, so this is all because the canary image build scenario isn't complete IIRC, there were some bits missing and right now all the stuff is basically just sitting in debian-cd internal directories - I think at one point there was talk about getting this fixed, but then again the whole SUBPROJECT architecture of canary isn't perfect | 10:55 |
| sil2100 | I think we wanted to discuss if we still want canary to use subprojects as is or maybe simply make it a different project and/or SUBARCH | 10:56 |
| seb128 | I'm not familiar enough with the topic to understand what is incomplete and why | 10:56 |
| sil2100 | And then enable it publishing properly | 10:56 |
| sil2100 | Let me get back to you in a few to discuss this a bit more | 10:57 |
| seb128 | k | 10:57 |
| xnox | doko: i think, everything will be passing with the new python 3.9.1 cause it seems to call _at_fork_reinit() less often now. see bpo-42350 | 11:23 |
| xnox | uploaded one more thing for python-oslo.service to stop patching needlessly eventlet, will check how it tests/migrates. | 11:24 |
| rbalint | sil2100, it you are testing the bileto change honoring hints (thanks!) my previous excuses example went away but this one is still valid: https://bileto.ubuntu.com/excuses/3840/hirsute.html | 11:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (groovy-proposed/main) [2:1.20.9-2ubuntu1 => 2:1.20.9-2ubuntu1.1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, xorg) | 12:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xorg-server [source] (groovy-proposed) [2:1.20.9-2ubuntu1.1] | 12:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (groovy-proposed/main) [0.8.4-1ubuntu11 => 0.8.4-1ubuntu11.1] (core) | 13:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.10.12+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 14:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tpm2-tools (groovy-proposed/universe) [4.3.0-1 => 4.3.0-1ubuntu0.20.10] (no packageset) | 14:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tpm2-tools (focal-proposed/universe) [4.1.1-1 => 4.1.1-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.10.12+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 15:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [3.10.12+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 15:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [3.10.12+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 15:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [3.10.12+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 15:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.10.12+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (bionic-proposed/main) [1:0.5.2.5 => 1:0.8.6.3~0.18.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 15:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (focal-proposed/main) [1:0.8.4~0.20.04.3 => 1:0.8.6.3~0.20.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 15:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (groovy-proposed/main) [1:0.8.6.2 => 1:0.8.6.3~0.20.10.1] (desktop-core) | 15:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-prime (bionic-proposed/main) [0.8.8.2 => 0.8.15.1~0.18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 15:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-prime (focal-proposed/main) [0.8.14 => 0.8.15.1~0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 15:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-prime (groovy-proposed/main) [0.8.15 => 0.8.15.1~0.20.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 15:18 | |
| Laney | juliank: I think your XXX remove me in cleanup-instances can go now | 16:21 |
| Laney | omg OMG | 16:23 |
| Laney | I was like, why do I keep getting messages about orphaned mysql-connector-c++ instances | 16:24 |
| Laney | and the test is having trouble completing https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#pkg-mysql-connector-c++ | 16:24 |
| Laney | https://git.launchpad.net/autopkgtest-cloud/tree/tools/cleanup-instances#n69 | 16:26 |
| Laney | ... | 16:26 |
| Laney | c + + | 16:26 |
| juliank | what is that? oh | 16:27 |
| Laney | we're killing that test's instance every hour | 16:28 |
| Laney | :( | 16:29 |
| * Laney hands self a shiny re.escape() | 16:29 | |
| juliank | Laney: were the broken instances removed? I doN't recall getting any emails | 16:29 |
| Laney | dunno, but I don't see them any more | 16:29 |
| Laney | feel free to double check | 16:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected zfs-linux [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.4-1ubuntu11.1] | 16:42 | |
| Laney | juliank: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/DNPBDfcMff/ quick review? | 16:44 |
| juliank | Laney: lgtm | 16:44 |
| Laney | merci | 16:46 |
| Laney | might as well drop your thing for you | 16:46 |
| juliank | +1 | 16:47 |
| Laney | all done | 16:47 |
| juliank | 🥳 | 16:54 |
| xnox | doko: 2.4.0-0ubuntu2 oslo.service is now passing =) horay. | 16:55 |
| juliank | 🎉 | 16:55 |
| Laney | I approve, we need more emoji in this world | 17:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, but with more emoji we get also giraffes | 17:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | 🦒 | 17:20 |
| Laney | but also 😱 | 17:22 |
| juliank | don't forget 🖖 | 17:24 |
| juliank | ugh | 17:24 |
| juliank | I looked at an html document and it started with an empty line instead of doctype | 17:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librsvg (focal-proposed/main) [2.48.7-1ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 2.48.9-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 17:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 34 entries have been added or removed | 17:27 | |
| === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch | ||
| === ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (groovy-proposed/main) [0.8.4-1ubuntu11 => 0.8.4-1ubuntu11.1] (core) | 19:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libfprint [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:1.90.3+tod1-0ubuntu2~20.10.1] | 19:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.41 => 1:18.04.42] (core) | 19:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libfprint [source] (focal-proposed) [1:1.90.2+tod1-0ubuntu1~20.04.3] | 19:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (focal-proposed/main) [0.8.3-1ubuntu12.5 => 0.8.3-1ubuntu12.6] (core) | 19:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfprint (groovy-proposed/main) [1:1.90.3+tod1-0ubuntu1 => 1:1.90.3+tod1-0ubuntu2~20.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 20:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfprint (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.2+tod1-0ubuntu1~20.04.2 => 1:1.90.2+tod1-0ubuntu1~20.04.3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-desktop) | 20:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: speech-dispatcher-contrib [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [0.10.2-1] (i386-whitelist) | 20:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: speech-dispatcher-contrib [i386] (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [0.10.2-1] (i386-whitelist) | 20:25 | |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: rbasak, cpaelzer and bryce , so I just validated update-notifier Focal.... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/1881632 | 20:32 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1881632 in update-notifier (Ubuntu Focal) "esm security updates not reported by apt update-notifier" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 20:32 |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: cpaelzer rbasak bryce That said, Xenial and Bionic uploads that are queued have lint/pep8 issues that I need to reject. | 20:32 |
| bryce | ok | 20:33 |
| blackboxsw | is it better to reject X and B and proceed with Focal only on the existing stale SRU? or reject current focal upload too and just include all changes needed in a followup SRU that I can queue today for X,B and F | 20:33 |
| blackboxsw | X,B and F will still require a followup for product name changing and ESM url changing in either case whatever folks prefer for SRU | 20:34 |
| blackboxsw | so I can either reject the current SRU and replace X B and F for update-notifier with the two changesets in a new SRU that makes both changes. | 20:35 |
| bryce | blackboxsw, if you're able to respin things today, then seems it might be cleanest to just reject the set and redo them all together, IMHO. | 20:35 |
| blackboxsw | that's kindof what I was thinking/hoping. it at least would make things easier to review for all series | 20:36 |
| bryce | blackboxsw, one thing to think about with SRU's is that minimizing the quantity of updates users go through can help avoid triggering other unrelated problems (network issues, yada yada) | 20:37 |
| blackboxsw | because it would be the sameish changeset to review if we wait and do it all. | 20:37 |
| bryce | yep, that's another pro | 20:37 |
| blackboxsw | +1 I'll reject the Focal then. and put up new ones now for all 3 series. | 20:37 |
| blackboxsw | tjamls | 20:37 |
| blackboxsw | thanks rather | 20:37 |
| bryce | :-) | 20:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected zfs-linux [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.4-1ubuntu11.1] | 20:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected zfs-linux [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.3-1ubuntu12.6] | 20:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.4-1ubuntu11.1] | 20:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.3-1ubuntu12.6] | 20:43 | |
| blackboxsw | bryce: thx. bdmurray,rbasak and sil2100 I've rejected update-notifier for Xenial, Bionic and Focal per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/1881632. I'll queue a new upload into -proposed today. | 20:51 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1881632 in update-notifier (Ubuntu Focal) "esm security updates not reported by apt update-notifier" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 20:51 |
| blackboxsw | bryce: since this upload hit and published to -proposed. Do I have to increment the -proposed package versions 3.192.1.8 -> 3.192.1.9? I can't remember if and SRU fails validation if incrementing pkg version is still needed or whether we can reuse | 20:52 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: you can't reuse | 20:52 |
| blackboxsw | ok thanks bdmurray I burned it. do you want a bug against those versions then too just to document the failure | 20:53 |
| bdmurray | once its made it to the archive, if it was stuck in the queue you could | 20:53 |
| blackboxsw | as the StableUpdatesRelease says I should file a bug and mark regression-proposed | 20:54 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: I don't think a new bug just for the autopkgtest failure is needed | 20:54 |
| blackboxsw | ok thanks. will not worry about that part. | 20:54 |
| bdmurray | because its just an autopkgtest failure and not a "real" regression | 20:55 |
| vorlon | RikMills-M: I see you did a force-sync of kbibtex which is now failing its autopkgtests, is this something you're going to follow through on? | 21:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfcpdump-kernel [source] (focal-proposed) [5.4-0ubuntu1] | 21:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 66 entries have been added or removed | 21:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (bionic-proposed/main) [2:12.1.1-0ubuntu2 => 2:12.1.1-0ubuntu3] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 21:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-57.63] (core, kernel) | 22:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-57.63] (core, kernel) | 22:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-57.63] (core, kernel) | 22:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-57.63] (core, kernel) | 22:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-57.63] | 22:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-57.63] | 22:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-57.63] | 22:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-57.63] | 22:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-dev-tools (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.175~18.04.1 => 0.175~18.04.2] (no packageset) | 22:09 | |
| krytarik | bdmurray: Just poking because I've noticed - in the first occurrence of the recent ubuntu-release-upgrader commit, it says "this systems 'i386' architecture" rather than "system's" >_< | 22:44 |
| bdmurray | krytarik: ah, thanks | 22:45 |
| krytarik | Of course. :) | 22:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: munipack [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.12-1] (no packageset) | 23:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: munipack [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.12-1] (no packageset) | 23:33 | |
| bryce | bdmurray, the xenial portion of an apache2 SRU is failing verification for some reason. Can we remove the package from xenial-proposed? | 23:35 |
| bryce | bdmurray, this is for LP: #1832182 | 23:36 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1832182 in apache2 (Debian) "systemd unable to detect running apache if invoked via "apache2ctl graceful"" [Unknown,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1832182 | 23:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: munipack [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.12-1] (no packageset) | 23:42 | |
| bdmurray | bryce: You need an archive admin to remove a package additionally that wouldn't people who already installed it. | 23:46 |
| bryce | bdmurray, ok hrm | 23:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: munipack [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.12-1] (no packageset) | 23:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: munipack [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.12-1] (no packageset) | 23:51 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!