[01:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: munipack [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.5.12-1] (no packageset)
=== pieq_ is now known as pieq
[02:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-dev-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.175~18.04.2]
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipqalc [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.5.3+git20200816.523b207-1] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qcalcfilehash [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.0.7+git20200816.1eb8770-1] (no packageset)
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipqalc [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.5.3+git20200816.523b207-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipqalc [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.5.3+git20200816.523b207-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipqalc [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.5.3+git20200816.523b207-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qcalcfilehash [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.0.7+git20200816.1eb8770-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipqalc [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.5.3+git20200816.523b207-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qcalcfilehash [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.0.7+git20200816.1eb8770-1] (no packageset)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qcalcfilehash [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.0.7+git20200816.1eb8770-1] (no packageset)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qcalcfilehash [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.0.7+git20200816.1eb8770-1] (no packageset)
[05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-process-viewer [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.2.6-2] (no packageset)
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-process-viewer [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.2.6-2] (no packageset)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-process-viewer [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.2.6-2] (no packageset)
[05:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qcalcfilehash [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.7+git20200816.1eb8770-1] (no packageset)
[05:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-process-viewer [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.2.6-2] (no packageset)
[05:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipqalc [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.3+git20200816.523b207-1] (no packageset)
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-process-viewer [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.2.6-2] (no packageset)
[06:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected boinc [source] (groovy-proposed) [7.16.15+dfsg.is.7.16.11+dfsg-3~ubuntu1.20.10.1]
[06:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-process-viewer [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.2.6-2] (no packageset)
=== Ukikie is now known as OldManWinter
[07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: deja-dup (groovy-proposed/main) [42.2-1ubuntu1 => 42.6-0ubuntu0.20.10] (ubuntu-desktop)
[07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: diffoscope [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [162] (no packageset)
[07:54] <icey> hey, could an archive admin reject the Nova upload that's in focal-proposed (2:21.1.0-0ubuntu2), it's going to be superceded by a point release that I'm going to upload shortly
[07:54] <icey> thanks!
=== pieq_ is now known as pieq
[08:43] <apw> icey, you can just upload over it
[08:44] <icey> apw: great, will do then; thanks!
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted diffoscope [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [162]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipqalc [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.3+git20200816.523b207-1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipqalc [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.3+git20200816.523b207-1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipqalc [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.3+git20200816.523b207-1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted munipack [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.12-1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted munipack [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.12-1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted munipack [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.12-1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qcalcfilehash [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.7+git20200816.1eb8770-1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qcalcfilehash [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.7+git20200816.1eb8770-1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qcalcfilehash [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.7+git20200816.1eb8770-1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipqalc [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.3+git20200816.523b207-1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipqalc [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.3+git20200816.523b207-1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted munipack [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.12-1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qcalcfilehash [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.7+git20200816.1eb8770-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qcalcfilehash [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.7+git20200816.1eb8770-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-process-viewer [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.2.6-2]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-process-viewer [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.2.6-2]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-process-viewer [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.2.6-2]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted speech-dispatcher-contrib [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.10.2-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipqalc [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.3+git20200816.523b207-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted munipack [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.12-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [3.10.12+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-process-viewer [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.2.6-2]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted speech-dispatcher-contrib [i386] (hirsute-proposed) [0.10.2-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted munipack [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.5.12-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-process-viewer [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.2.6-2]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qcalcfilehash [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.7+git20200816.1eb8770-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-process-viewer [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.2.6-2]
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.8 => 2.664.10] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.10]
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.8 => 2.664.10] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[09:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.9]
[09:16] <jibel> is anyone looking at the build failure of amd64 images?
[09:17] <jibel> desktop images
[09:18] <seb128> jibel, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu/hirsute/daily-live-20201201.log seems successful and  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/is current?
[09:19] <seb128> oh, only arm images there?
[09:19] <jibel> no they've been failing since the 26th
[09:19] <jibel> the build ends with
[09:19] <seb128> where is the log?
[09:19] <jibel> Making the binary CDs bootable ...
[09:19] <jibel> Running tools/boot/hirsute/boot-amd64 1 /srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/scratch/ubuntu/hirsute/daily-live/tmp/hirsute-amd64/CD1
[09:19] <jibel> Get:1 file:/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/ftp hirsute/main amd64 cd-boot-images-amd64 all 9 [2584 kB]
[09:19] <jibel> W: Unable to read /srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/scratch/ubuntu/hirsute/daily-live/apt/hirsute-amd64/apt/preferences.d/ - DirectoryExists (2: No such file or directory)
[09:19] <jibel> Get:1 file:/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/ftp hirsute/main amd64 memtest86+ amd64 5.01-3.1ubuntu4 [71.1 kB]
[09:19] <jibel> W: Unable to read /srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/scratch/ubuntu/hirsute/daily-live/apt/hirsute-amd64/apt/preferences.d/ - DirectoryExists (2: No such file or directory)
[09:19] <jibel> make: *** [Makefile:903: /srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/scratch/ubuntu/hirsute/daily-live/tmp/hirsute-amd64/bootable-stamp] Error 1
[09:20] <jibel> ERROR WHILE BUILDING OFFICIAL IMAGES !!
[09:20] <jibel> eg https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu/hirsute/daily-live-20201201.log
[09:20] <jibel> the livefs is produced but the iso is not
[09:23] <Laney> yeah I noticed that yesterday
[09:31] <seb128> there doesn't seem to be anything in the log
[09:31] <seb128> diffing the last successful one and the first failing
[09:31] <seb128> I'm happy to poke a bit if nobody else is, just don't want to dup work
[10:28] <Laney> seb128: go for it, if you have your image building setup you can probably make it be more noisy easily enough
[10:36] <seb128> Laney, ack
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (groovy-proposed/main) [2:22.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:22.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (focal-proposed/main) [2:21.1.0-0ubuntu2 => 2:21.1.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[11:06] <seb128> sil2100, you broke the desktop cd build with the recent debian-cd change
[11:06] <seb128> when you merged https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/debian-cd/layerfs-canary-option/+merge/394137 but rewritten as xnox  suggested
[11:06] <seb128> [ "$SUBPROJECT" = "canary" ] && KERNEL_PARAMS="layerfs-path=minimal.standard.live.squashfs ${KERNEL_PARAMS}"
[11:07] <seb128> that doesn't like $SUBPROJECT to not be defined
[11:09] <seb128> doing a if [ "$SUBPROJECT" = "canary" ]; then...; fi instead works
[11:10] <seb128> I'm not sure to understand why the current way is making the script stop though
[11:10] <Laney> what's the output when it breaks?
[11:10] <seb128> boot-amd64 sources common.sh and call the  default_kernel_params() {
[11:10] <Laney> I could see it if we had set -u, but that's not there afaik
[11:11] <seb128> Laney,
[11:11] <seb128> + default_kernel_params
[11:11] <seb128> + case $PROJECT in
[11:11] <seb128> + KERNEL_PARAMS='file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed maybe-ubiquity quiet splash --- '
[11:11] <seb128> + '[' '' = canary ']'
[11:11] <seb128> Makefile:902: recipe for target '/home/ubuntu/ubuntu-cdimage/scratch/ubuntu/hirsute/daily-live/tmp/hirsute-amd64/bootable-stamp' failed
[11:11] <Laney> ah HEH yes
[11:12] <apw> [ ...] && do thing || true
[11:12] <apw> to stop the exit 1
[11:12] <Laney> the if form is nicer anyway
[11:12] <Laney> I'll just fix it to use that
[11:12] <apw> oh every single time
[11:12] <seb128> why does it exit?
[11:13] <seb128> if I do
[11:13] <seb128> [ "$SUBPROJECT" = "canary" ] && KERNEL_PARAMS="layerfs-path=minimal.standard.live.squashfs ${KERNEL_PARAMS}"
[11:13] <seb128> echo $KERNEL_PARAMS
[11:13] <seb128> echo "end"
[11:14] <seb128> in a local script it does display the echo
[11:14] <apw> isn't it just dropping out the bottom before
[11:14] <apw> with $? == 1
[11:14] <apw> without the echo's
[11:15] <sil2100> hm, I still don't understand why the code I merged isn't working?
[11:15] <Laney> it makes default_kernel_params() exit 1 and this fails set -e
[11:16] <Laney> seb128: put the first line of that paste in a function and call that
[11:16] <sil2100> Ah, when undefined, ok
[11:16] <sil2100> Duh
[11:17] <seb128> Laney, ah, I didn't think that would make a different it being in a function or not, apparently does :-)
[11:17] <seb128> and right boot-amd64 is set -e
[11:19] <sil2100> Well, we could use a parameter expansion of a default value
[11:20] <sil2100> Like, just change to ${SUBPROJECT:-}
[11:21] <doko> sil2100, Laney: how do you want to handle autodep8-perl-recommends tests failing, e.g. https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/ppc64el/libn/libnet-server-mail-perl/20201129_131435_4ac26@/log.gz
[11:21] <doko> <ntyni> doko: I assume this is in connection with the 5.30 -> 5.32 transition? it's an issue with autopkgtest, Restrictions: needs-recommends doesn't work well with mixing repositories
[11:21] <doko> <ntyni> https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/sramacher has quite a few force-badtest lines around 20201114
[11:21] <doko> <ntyni> it probably only comes up once a year with the Perl transitions
[11:23] <sil2100> Laney: you working on the debian-cd change, or should I just try doing the ${SUBPROJECT:-} thing?
[11:24] <apw> sil2100, making it :- won't fix anything ... its the construct being $?!=0
[11:25] <sil2100> oh, wow, okay
[11:25] <doko> # 20201114; done 20201118
[11:25] <doko> # perl transition
[11:25] <doko> # autopkgtest regressions caused by #896698
[11:25] <doko> force-badtest libapache-session-perl/1.94-1
[11:25] <doko> force-badtest libcpanplus-perl/0.9908-1
[11:25] <doko> force-badtest libdata-stag-perl/0.14-2
[11:25] <doko> force-badtest libhttp-tinyish-perl/0.17-1
[11:25] <doko> force-badtest libjavascript-beautifier-perl/0.25-2
[11:25] <doko> force-badtest liblog-agent-perl/1.001-2
[11:25] <doko> force-badtest liblog-log4perl-perl/1.53-1
[11:25] <doko> force-badtest libmojolicious-perl/8.64+dfsg-1
[11:25] <doko> force-badtest libnet-server-mail-perl/0.28-1
[11:25] <doko> force-badtest libpdf-builder-perl/3.019-4
[11:25] <Laney> uh
[11:25] <doko> force-badtest libpoe-test-loops-perl/1.360-1
[11:25] <doko> force-badtest libspreadsheet-wright-perl/0.107-3
[11:25] <doko> force-badtest libsyntax-highlight-engine-kate-perl/0.14+dfsg-1
[11:26] <doko> force-badtest libsys-info-base-perl/0.7807-3
[11:26] <Laney> ok that's the end, saved
[11:27] <Laney> sil2100: indeed it won't work, the function will still return 1 and make the caller fail
[11:27] <Laney> -e is ignored when executing the && list (except for the last item), but the failure gets propagated out of it
[11:27] <Laney> I'll push the if thing in a sec
[11:28] <Laney> doko: it sounds like https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896698 - yes, please prepare a hints MP
[11:28] <ubot5> Debian bug 896698 in autopkgtest "autopkgtest: silently fails when 'needs-recommends' can't be installed" [Normal,Open]
[11:28] <Laney> oho, that bug is listed there
[11:40] <Laney> seb128: apw: sil2100: pushed, will trigger a build
[11:41] <Laney> tried to explain it in the commit message, hopefully that makes sense
[11:41]  * apw gets some popcorn
[11:41] <Laney> thanks for finding!
[11:42] <Laney> would be nice if for-project printed the output as well as logging it
[11:45] <seb128> Laney, thanks the explanations in the commit, that makes more sense to me now: also I confirmed the change works
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcl (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.7.2-14build1.1 => 1.7.2-14ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
=== klebers_ is now known as klebers
[11:52] <sil2100> Laney: thanks!
[11:53] <sil2100> Sorry for breaking this, nothing like that ever happened to me so I didn't expect this to cause any trouble
[11:53] <Laney> haz iso http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/daily-live/20201201.2/
[11:53] <Laney> sil2100: shell is made to be gotten wrong, not your fault :p
[11:54] <Laney> everyone should read and bookmark https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls
[11:54] <Laney> this particular one isn't there though afaics
[12:19] <seb128> jibel, ^ in case you didn't follow the detail the iso build is fixed now
[12:23] <jibel> seb128, I followed. thank you both.
[12:23] <seb128> np!
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1031.33] (core, kernel)
[12:34] <xnox> sil2100:  we need to get current livecd-rootfs in focal-proposed out. And note that for snappy images, we can upload that new livecd-rootfs into the canonical-foundations image ppa if you want the size of the images right asap?!
[12:34] <xnox> seb128:  Laney: sorry =(
[12:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1031.33]
[14:08] <blackboxsw> rbasak: if there is time today, there is a cloud-init SRU queued for bug #1905599 targetting X, B, F and G series
[14:08] <ubot5> bug 1905599 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Groovy) "sru cloud-init (20.3-2 to 20.4-0ubuntu1) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, and Groovy" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1905599
[14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (focal-proposed/universe) [2.11.2-1ubuntu0.2 => 2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: parted (focal-proposed/main) [3.3-4 => 3.3-4ubuntu0.20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: parted (groovy-proposed/main) [3.3-4 => 3.3-4ubuntu0.20.10.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:47] <rbasak> seb128: sorry I got distracted looking at gnome-control-center. I'm not done with that yet - I'll get back to it soon.
[15:47] <seb128> rbasak, no problem, thanks
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evdi (focal-proposed/universe) [1.6.0+dfsg-1ubuntu3 => 1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected deja-dup [source] (groovy-proposed) [42.5-0ubuntu1]
[17:18] <bdmurray> rbasak: Are you doing SRU reviews today? I thought you were out.
[17:38] <bdmurray> Trevinho: I'd like to see bug 1906296 listed in the changelog of your libfprint SRU for groovy.
[17:38] <ubot5> bug 1906296 in libfprint (Ubuntu) "All my USB devices are autosuspending now because of a too broad rule in libfprint" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1906296
[17:39] <Trevinho> bdmurray: it's not affected
[17:39] <Trevinho> bdmurray: the previous patch was not in groovy, so I dind't mention for that reason
[17:39] <Trevinho> I kept the reference in the patch, but it's actually part of the previous one
[17:42] <bdmurray> Trevinho: ah so this udev-rules-Add-unsupported-devices-from-wiki-page-to-rule.patch adds it but list-udev-rules-Remove-Wrongly-added-well-known-USB-contr.patch removes it?
[17:43] <Trevinho> bdmurray: yes, I've kept it split to match upstream commmits
[17:43] <Trevinho> but they're just one set
[17:43] <bdmurray> got it
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (xenial-security/universe) [1.2.6-0ubuntu1~16.04.5 => 1.2.6-0ubuntu1~16.04.4] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libfprint [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:1.90.3+tod1-0ubuntu2~20.10.1]
[17:59] <bdmurray> sil2100: Are you getting 400s sometimes with bug.newMessage in sru_workflow?
[18:00] <bdmurray> https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/pbtKCPr9JP/
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted containerd [sync] (xenial-security) [1.2.6-0ubuntu1~16.04.4]
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (bionic-security/universe) [1.3.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.3 => 1.2.6-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted containerd [sync] (bionic-security) [1.2.6-0ubuntu1~18.04.2]
=== ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tpm2-tools [source] (groovy-proposed) [4.3.0-1ubuntu0.20.10]
[18:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tpm2-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [4.1.1-1ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[18:51] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: bug 1900837 (referenced in the changelog for cloud-init) is missing SRU information.
[18:51] <ubot5> bug 1900837 in cloud-init "cloud-init resets permissions on log file after reboot" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1900837
[19:09] <powersj> bdmurray, cloud-init uses a single process bug for srus
[19:09] <powersj> I didn't recall updated all other bugs with the template
[19:09] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: powersj sorry was "hosting" an IRC meeting. looking now.
[19:11] <blackboxsw> bug If we got another bug in the changelog besides https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1905599, then we have a bug in that upload request/debdiff.
[19:11] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1905599 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Groovy) "sru cloud-init (20.3-2 to 20.4-0ubuntu1) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, and Groovy" [Undecided,New]
[19:14] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: +    - add integration test for LP: #1900837 (#679)
[19:14] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1900837 in cloud-init "cloud-init resets permissions on log file after reboot" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1900837
[19:15] <bdmurray> and this
[19:15] <bdmurray> +    - add integration test for LP: #1886531 (#592)
[19:15] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1886531 in cloud-init "cloud-init status broken in groovy lxd containers" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1886531
[19:15] <blackboxsw> bah... ahh our tooling didn't redact that as it didn't conform expected "(LP: #XXXX)"
[19:16] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: ok will re-submit bionic.
[19:16] <blackboxsw> with the debian/changelog fix
[19:16] <blackboxsw> looks like xenial/focal are ok.
[19:17] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: also will resubmit groovy as we pulled in two too many commits
[19:20] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: okay, I'll reject groovy and bionic
[19:20] <blackboxsw> so we need reject grooby and bionic. ... was trying to dig up the versions from the quque
[19:21] <blackboxsw> will clean those two up right now.
[19:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.4-3-g6ee01078-0ubuntu1~20.10.1]
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [20.4-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted git-review [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.27.0-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[19:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:12.1.1-0ubuntu3]
[19:50] <bdmurray> coreycb: Why is bug 1881157 Fix Committed for groovy?
[19:50] <ubot5> bug 1881157 in Ubuntu Cloud Archive queens "[OVS][FW] Remote SG IDs left behind when a SG is removed" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1881157
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (bionic-updates/universe) [1.2.6-0ubuntu1~18.04.2 => 1.3.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:52] <coreycb> bdmurray: that should be fix released, I'll update that
[19:52] <coreycb> bdmurray: thanks for taking a look
[19:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (xenial-updates/universe) [1.2.6-0ubuntu1~16.04.4 => 1.2.6-0ubuntu1~16.04.4] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:02] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: while in the process of rejecting things... can we also reject update-notifier X, B and F I'm marked all related bugs verification-failed? On talking with bryce/cpaelzer I also created an SRU bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/1906436 which I'm going to use to document in debian/changelog the pep8 fixes needed
[20:02] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1906436 in update-notifier (Ubuntu) "Resolve autopkgtest failures Pep8 on Xenial and Bionic" [Undecided,New]
[20:03] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: An archive admin (something I'm not) would need to remove those packags from -proposed.
[20:03] <cpaelzer__> blackboxsw: they can stay in proposed until your new upload is sponsored
[20:03] <blackboxsw> so a new upload request for update-notifier X/B/F will be pushed that will fix those autopkgtest failures we saw by bumping the pkg version beyond what is in proposed.
[20:03] <cpaelzer__> blackboxsw: we just have to take care to use -v<oldver> on buildpkg
[20:04] <cpaelzer__> that will reference both changelogs in the .-changes file
[20:04] <bdmurray> This is also true
[20:04] <cpaelzer__> and then work to trigger a new verification
[20:04] <blackboxsw> yes no need to remove from -proposed.. I just thought we needed to do something to get that off of the pending_sru radar @ https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
[20:04] <cpaelzer> get the ne wone complete and upload with proper -v build will reset this on the SRU-radar
[20:04] <blackboxsw> or do we just leave those bugs untouched until the subsequent upload is reviews and landed
[20:04] <bdmurray> If its red it gets ignored by the sru team
[20:04] <blackboxsw> s/landed/queued
[20:05] <blackboxsw> ok good to know
[20:05] <blackboxsw> thanks "nothing to see here"
[20:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted containerd [sync] (bionic-updates) [1.3.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.2]
[20:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted containerd [sync] (xenial-updates) [1.2.6-0ubuntu1~16.04.4]
[21:20] <vorlon> doko: so, your list of perl-related autopkgtest regressions don't seem to line up with things currently blocking proposed-migration; possibly our autopkgtest isn't affected by bug #896698?
[21:20] <ubot5> bug 896698 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Cannot upgrade from 11.04 to 11.10" [Undecided,Expired] https://launchpad.net/bugs/896698
[21:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted parted [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.3-4ubuntu0.20.10.1]
[21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted parted [source] (focal-proposed) [3.3-4ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libfprint [source] (focal-proposed) [1:1.90.2+tod1-0ubuntu1~20.04.3]
[21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted librsvg [source] (focal-proposed) [2.48.9-1ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-desktop3 [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.8-0ubuntu1]
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (focal-proposed) [1:3.36.5-0ubuntu1]
[22:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (groovy-proposed/main) [20.3-15-g6d332e5c-0ubuntu1 => 20.4-0ubuntu1~20.10.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinnamon [source] (focal-proposed) [4.4.8-4ubuntu0.1]
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opensbi [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8-1~ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [20.3-2-g371b392c-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 20.4-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[22:17] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: ok we managed to clean up the cloud-init:debian/changelog on bionic and corrected the groovy  upload for cloud-init to be 20.4-0 instead of 20.4-3. so I *think* cloud-init SRU upload queues should be in good shape now, without stray LP: bug references
[22:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pcl [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.7.2-14ubuntu0.1]
[22:23] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: you could look at your local *_source.changes file to confirm
[22:25] <blackboxsw> sorry, I say *think* but I validated that the changes files (and the upload) don't contain any stray "LP: #\d+" https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/wfH4PfHTtQ/
[22:25] <blackboxsw> I was discounting my upload (as I'm feeling a bit guilty about making that mistake the first time)
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-198.230] (core, kernel)
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.4-0ubuntu1~20.10.1]
[22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [20.4-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [20.4-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[22:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [20.4-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[23:25] <kyrofa> Hmm, ppc64el builder seems to have run out of RAM when building PCL: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcl/1.7.2-14ubuntu0.1/+build/20354858
[23:25] <kyrofa> It has run successfully in the past, does it just need to be poked?
[23:26] <kyrofa> (if so, can someone do that for me, please?)
[23:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qiime [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2020.11.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:49] <cjwatson> kyrofa: All builds run in a clean VM
[23:49] <cjwatson> kyrofa: So I'm not aware of any poking that might be possible
[23:50] <cjwatson> kyrofa: More likely something's changed in the package or in its build-dependencies since the last success