=== ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson
rbasakbdmurray: sorry, I was called away on something urgent earlier. I am back this week and next week. Rick had asked me to look at helping with the SRU queue, so I was doing some very early on Wednesday that I figured wouldn't clash with anyone.01:14
rbasakI need to pick up gnome-control-center again still. Nothing else outstanding.01:15
rbasak(ie. nothing else I've looked at at not yet finished)01:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-azure-storage-common [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-4] (no packageset)03:04
kyrofacjwatson, the only change between this build and the last is a dep specific to armhf and armel, so nothing should have changed for ppc04:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: re2 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [20201101+dfsg-2] (core, i386-whitelist)05:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: re2 [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/main) [20201101+dfsg-2] (core, i386-whitelist)05:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: re2 [i386] (hirsute-proposed/main) [20201101+dfsg-2] (core, i386-whitelist)05:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: re2 [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/main) [20201101+dfsg-2] (core, i386-whitelist)05:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: re2 [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [20201101+dfsg-2] (core, i386-whitelist)05:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: re2 [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [20201101+dfsg-2] (core, i386-whitelist)05:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: re2 [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/main) [20201101+dfsg-2] (core, i386-whitelist)05:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-198.230]06:06
=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-127.130] (core, kernel)09:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-32.34] (core, kernel)09:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-127.130] (core, kernel)09:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-32.34] (core, kernel)09:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-32.34] (core, kernel)09:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-32.34] (core, kernel)09:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qiime [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2020.11.0-1]10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted re2 [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [20201101+dfsg-2]10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted re2 [i386] (hirsute-proposed) [20201101+dfsg-2]10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted re2 [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [20201101+dfsg-2]10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-azure-storage-common [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.0.1-4]10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted re2 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [20201101+dfsg-2]10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted re2 [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [20201101+dfsg-2]10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted re2 [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [20201101+dfsg-2]10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted re2 [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [20201101+dfsg-2]10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-32.34]10:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-32.34]10:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-32.34]10:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-32.34]10:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-127.130]10:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-127.130]10:13
cjwatsonkyrofa: I'd recommend diffing build logs as a starting point for looking for changes10:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adduser (groovy-proposed/main) [3.118ubuntu2 => 3.118ubuntu3] (core)10:19
Laneylooks like vorlon dropped some i386 hints that were still needed, restoring11:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.4.0-1031.33] (no packageset)11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1031.33~18.04.1] (no packageset)11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1033.34] (core, kernel)11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysdig (focal-proposed/universe) [0.26.4-1 => 0.26.4-1ubuntu0.2] (no packageset)12:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1033.34]12:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1031.33]12:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1031.33~18.04.1]12:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: signon (focal-proposed/universe) [8.59+17.10.20170606-0ubuntu2 => 8.59+17.10.20170606-0ubuntu2.20.04.1] (kubuntu)13:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: signon (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.59+17.10.20170606-0ubuntu2 => 8.59+17.10.20170606-0ubuntu2.20.10.1] (kubuntu)13:14
LocutusOfBorgcan any ubuntu-archive please NBS-cleanup? old binaries left on amd64: libqgis-3d3.10.11, libqgis-analysis3.10.11, libqgis-app3.10.11, libqgis-core3.10.11, libqgis-gui3.10.11, libqgis-native3.10.11, libqgis-server3.10.11, libqgisgrass7-3.10.11, libqgispython3.10.11 (from 3.10.11+dfsg-1ubuntu3)13:29
dokoProcessing triggers for tex-common (6.15) ...13:31
dokofmtutil failed. Output has been stored in13:31
dokoPlease include this file if you report a bug.13:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1031.33~18.04.1] (no packageset)13:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1033.34~18.04.1] (no packageset)13:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-azure-storage-blob [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-2] (no packageset)13:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1031.33] (core, kernel)13:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: q2-types [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2020.11.0-1] (no packageset)13:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1029.30] (no packageset)13:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.6.0-1036.39] (no packageset)13:44
cpaelzerdoko: since you asked for omnidb being blocked in hirsute https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/omnidb/+bug/190651714:15
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1906517 in omnidb (Ubuntu) "omnidb: please remove no more existing binaries that never left proposed" [Undecided,New]14:15
cpaelzerneeds two odd binaries removed from -proposed14:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1033.34~18.04.1]14:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1031.33~18.04.1]14:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1029.30]14:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1031.33]14:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1036.39]14:49
rbalintplusone anyone looking at postorius?14:56
dokorbalint: test is overridden now15:30
sil2100jibel: ping!15:31
bdmurraysil2100: could you review the SRU for bug 1901725?15:34
ubot5bug 1901725 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Bionic) "check-new-release-gtk tells i386 users Ubuntu 20.04.1 is available" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190172515:34
jibelsil2100, still in another meeting15:38
jibelsil2100, go ahead, I'll catch up with you later15:39
dokoxnox: please provide MIRs when seeding packages (usrmerge, u-boot-menu opensbi)15:41
dokocpaelzer: .15:41
cpaelzerI guess I did something wrong if I only get a "." but could you elaborate?15:42
Laneyit means 'done' in Debian speak :p15:43
* cpaelzer needs lanuage trainer Me<->Debian15:43
cpaelzerthanks Laney for translating15:43
cpaelzerdoko: also I just have found the fix for pgpointcloud that you asked for, likely uploaded to Debian today/tomorrow and then synced to fix the FTFBS15:43
cpaelzerleaving "just" the PG-12 test issues which I'll look into tomorrow15:43
cpaelzerand thanks doko for .ing it15:44
dokocpaelzer: let's override those please.15:48
dokosil2100: ^^^15:48
cpaelzerdoko: unfortunately I can't override like "ignore result if triggered by postgresql-12" :-/15:52
cpaelzeror is there a way to do that in the meantime that I might have missed15:52
dokothat's why I'm pointing to sil210015:55
cpaelzermaybe I can fix some of them with custom triggers and we override the rest then15:55
cpaelzeroh, sil2100 knows magic way ... interesting :-)15:55
dokowell, yes. hints are not documented ;p15:56
dokoLocutusOfBorg: you discarded the delta from libkolabxml, force-syncing. now ftbfs15:58
vorlonLaney: note that the i386 hints that were dropped were dropped from the section of the file that's autogenerated, because these are no longer auto-detectable by that bit of script; I've moved the restored hints to another section so they don't get clobbered again16:01
LaneyI see, cheers16:02
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: -proposed NBS cleanup done16:07
vorlonsil2100, Laney: do you know why bionic daily builds of ubuntu-base are disabled on ancientminister?  there's no comment given16:13
Laneyno, I plead innocent16:14
Laneynot guilty?16:14
Laneynot me guv'nor16:14
LocutusOfBorgdoko, I'm doing it! I usually try to sync16:23
LocutusOfBorgI was waiting for something else to fail16:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openafs (focal-proposed/universe) [1.8.4~pre1-1ubuntu2 => 1.8.4~pre1-1ubuntu2.1] (no packageset)16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (focal-proposed/main) [ =>] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)16:34
bdmurrayLaney: if all these oem-* packages on the sponsoring report have been sponsored can you unsubscribe ubuntu-sponsors?16:36
Laneyoh sheesh16:37
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, is it possible to kick pyxs out from hirsute, and then promote python-pyxs to main? the source is the same, and the binaries have been taken over by the Debian package16:40
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: I'll look shortly16:40
vorlonxnox, mwhudson: what's the status of nodejs on riscv64?16:40
LocutusOfBorgthanks, I hate when an universe package provides binaries in main :)16:40
vorlon(asking in this instance because r-cran-arm -> hmisc)16:40
LocutusOfBorgnot sure if such mismatches are caught16:41
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html16:42
vorlonworking out the /solution/ to such mismatches is not automated :)16:43
Laneybdmurray: ok I did it16:46
* Laney has API skills16:46
vorlonxnox: MIR for opensbi which is added to supported-cloud?16:50
dokovorlon: see scroll back16:51
vorlonkanashiro: can we get ~ubuntu-server subscribed to rubygems?  after which I would promote it since it has a previous completed MIR16:52
dokokanashiro is away this week. delayed to next week, I assume16:53
vorlonI'll talk to Rick then, thanks16:54
rbalintdoko, vorlon plusone anyone looking at dulwich holding back python3-defaults16:57
vorlonI'm not16:57
* rbalint looking then16:57
vorlondoko: do you want a formal MIR for usrmerge?  It's a pretty trivial package16:58
vorlonmaintainer scripts + conflicts16:58
dokoI din't look at it yet. just noted the mismatch16:59
vorlondoko: are you ok with me subscribing + promoting without, then?16:59
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, looks like somebody has to subscribe foundation bugs to python-pyxs probably...16:59
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: already did16:59
LocutusOfBorgso we can now kick out pyxs, right?16:59
vorlonyes; is it removed from unstable?17:00
LocutusOfBorgit never appeared on sid17:00
LocutusOfBorgit was an ubuntu only package, that now exists in debian17:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rtl8812au (focal-proposed/universe) [ =>] (no packageset)17:01
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: aha ok17:02
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: removed17:02
LocutusOfBorgits part of my "hey lets find debian packages that superseeds ubuntu specific stuff and sync them"17:02
LocutusOfBorgthanks a ton17:03
LocutusOfBorgI'm worried about ssreflect... I can't reproduce the failure on local machine... any idea?17:03
sil2100doko, cpaelzer: let me take a look at that in a moment17:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: whoopsie (focal-proposed/main) [0.2.69ubuntu0.1 => 0.2.69ubuntu0.2] (desktop-core)17:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: whoopsie (bionic-proposed/main) [0.2.62ubuntu0.5 => 0.2.62ubuntu0.6] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)17:43
sil2100vorlon: hm hm! It might have been me but I really don't remember what it was about! I usually prefix my comments with "sil2100: " tho, but then again I might have forgotten17:48
sil2100I see the one that commented out left a comment "# bionic ubuntu-base tarball still building"17:49
sil2100Which doesn't seem to be the case, so I'll just uncomment it17:49
sil2100AH, no wait, nvm!17:50
sil2100That comment is unrelated, it's to why we're still building bionic -base even though rest of bionic not17:50
sil2100Anyway, no idea why it was disabled, I can't remember of any reason I'd disable it17:51
=== ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debmirror (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:2.27ubuntu1 => 1:2.27ubuntu2.20.10.1] (no packageset)18:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debmirror (focal-proposed/universe) [1:2.27ubuntu1 => 1:2.27ubuntu2.20.04.1] (no packageset)18:15
LocutusOfBorgand now sslreflect looks regressed in release...18:32
LocutusOfBorgtime to hint please?18:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1012.12] (core, kernel)18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1013.13] (core, kernel)18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.60 => 2.408.64] (desktop-core)19:17
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, nodejs is two hints waiting for migration... any reason to not do them? they are flaky and regressed in relase on arm6419:32
LocutusOfBorgsame for ssreflect that makes ocaml migrate19:32
LocutusOfBorgregressed in release too19:33
rbalintplusone dulwich should be ok unblocking python3-defaults, looking at perl regressions (libdbd-pg-perl is presumably unblocked by all-proposed triggers which passes locally)19:53
=== ajmitch_ is now known as ajmitch
=== ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: did you raise an mp for these hints?20:09
LocutusOfBorgI can do if you want sure20:09
vorlonnah I'll take it from here20:10
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: where do you see that ssreflect regressed in release?20:10
vorlonhttps://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/s/ssreflect/20201130_211141_fe88e@/log.gz is a pass20:11
LocutusOfBorg1.11.0-2build1ssreflect/1.11.0-2 hello/2.10-2ubuntu22020-12-02 17:20:42 UTC0h 03m 11s20:11
LocutusOfBorgthis one?20:11
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: which shows the actual tested version was 1.11.0-2build120:11
LocutusOfBorgmmm how can I test that one then?20:11
LocutusOfBorgmoreover I can't really see the failure locally :/20:12
LocutusOfBorgmy suspect is that not all ocaml is coming from proposed20:12
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, I don't know if this is enough to get the commit merged https://code.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+git/hints-ubuntu20:46
mwhudsonvorlon: nfi20:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1013.13]21:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1012.12]21:01
vorlonrbalint: what's the rationale for badtesting dulwich?  I only see autopkgtest failures with the version in -proposed.  Should we instead consider rolling back the new upstream version, and doing a no-change rebuild of the release version?21:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1031.33~18.04.1] (no packageset)21:12
rbalintvorlon, hm, did i mention badtesting it?21:20
rbalintvorlon, i hoped i fixed the test21:20
vorlonrbalint: ah ok21:20
vorlonsorry, misunderstood21:20
rbalintvorlon, :-)21:20
vorlon(and update-excuses still doesn't show your upload21:21
rbalintvorlon, well, i'm waiting for it to show up, too ;-)21:21
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: nodejs hints> already landed21:22
rbalintvorlon, btw badtesting it would be correct actually because i just unset the proxy which is an Ubuntu CI specific setting, the tests are passing it is not set21:22
rbalintvorlon, and that would python3-defaults in a few hours earlier21:22
rbalintvorlon, ahh, and now entangled with re2 and perl21:24
vorlonI can roll that back21:26
rbalintvorlon, so i think forcing python3-defaults would be reasonable21:26
vorlondoko: ^^ did you check for yaramod being in -proposed already before kicking the no-change rebuild?21:26
vorlonyaramod rolled back, anywho21:27
vorlonin light of which, it doesn't look like a hint is needed for dulwich, because we can have autopkgtest results in the same run afaics21:28
rbalintdulwich tests are still not picked up, while the builds are published21:28
vorlonrbalint: but we can force that21:30
vorlon'retry-autopkgtest-regressions --all-proposed --blocks dulwich | sed -e's/8-1/8-1ubuntu1/' | xargs -rn1 -P10 wget --load-cookies ~/.cache/autopkgtest.cookie -O-' done21:31
rbalintvorlon, hm, true21:31
bryceis there an archive admin available that can remove the apache2 sru from xenial-proposed?  Specifically apache2-bin=2.4.18-2ubuntu3.18 apache2-data=2.4.18-2ubuntu3.18 apache2=2.4.18-2ubuntu3.18.  This is for a proposed update regression for lp: #183218222:09
ubot5Launchpad bug 1832182 in apache2 (Ubuntu Xenial) "systemd unable to detect running apache if invoked via "apache2ctl graceful"" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/183218222:09
bryce(if I'm asking for AA help in the wrong place, please redirect me...)22:10
mwhudsonbryce: you should ping ubuntu-archive22:12
bryceubuntu-archive: could someone remove the apache2 sru from xenial-proposed?  Specifically apache2-bin=2.4.18-2ubuntu3.18 apache2-data=2.4.18-2ubuntu3.18 apache2=2.4.18-2ubuntu3.18.  This is for a proposed update regression for lp: #183218222:21
ubot5Launchpad bug 1832182 in apache2 (Ubuntu Xenial) "systemd unable to detect running apache if invoked via "apache2ctl graceful"" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/183218222:21
RAOFbryce: Sure.22:22
brycethanks RAOF22:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: q2cli [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2020.11.0-1] (no packageset)23:31

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!